IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MIDDLE DISTRICT
________________________________________________________________
No. 9
MM 2012
DENNIS J. BAYLOR,
Petitioner.
vs.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
2011 LEGISLATIVE REAPPORTIONMENT COMMISSION
Respondent.
Petition for Review from the Final Legislative Reapportionment Plan
of the 2011 Reapportionment Commission Filed with
the Secretary of the Commonwealth on December 12 , 2011
Brief of Petitioner
Dennis J. Baylor,
Petitioner
2564 Moutain Road
Hamburg, Pa. 19526
(610) 781 – 8746
dennisbaylor@gmail.com
Table of Contents
I STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION........................................................................................... 3
II STATEMENT OF SCOPE OF REVIEW AND ......................................................................... 4
STANDARD OF REVIEW .......................................................................................................... 4
III ORDER OR OTHER DETERMINATION IN QUESTION ....................................................... 5
IV STATEMENT OF THE QUESTIONS INVOLVED ................................................................. 6
1.
DOES THE CONSTANT CHANGING OF PETITIONER’S LEGISLATIVE DISTICT,
THEREBY NULLIFYING HIS LOCALE’S LEGISLATIVE CHOICES, OFFEND THE
COMMONWEALTH CONSTITUTION’S PROSCIPTION AGAINST INTERFERANCE WITH THE
FREE EXERCISE OF SUFFERAGE? ........................................................................................ 6
2. DOES THE 2011 FINAL REAPPORTIONMENT PLAN UNNECESSARILY DIVIDE
COUTIES AND IGNORE THE CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATES OF COMPACTNESS AND
CONTIGUITY? FURTHER, HAS THE EXTENT THE FINAL PLAN FRACTURES TRADITIONAL
SUBORDINATE STRUCTERS .................................................................................................. 6
3. WAS THE FINAL PLAN PROMULGATED FOLLOWING PROCEDURES, AND USING
DATA THAT VIOLATE ARTICLE 2,§17 OF PENNSYLVANIA’S CONSTITUTION, ALONG WITH
THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES
CONSITUTION? ........................................................................................................................ 6
V. STATEMENT OF THE CASE ................................................................................................ 7
VI SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ...............................................................................................10
VI ARGUMENT ........................................................................................................................11
ISSUE 1
DOES THE CONSTANT CHANGING OF PETITIONER’S LEGISLATIVE DISTICT,
THEREBY NULLIFYING HIS LOCALE’S LEGISLATIVE CHOICES, OFFEND THE
COMMONWEALTH CONSTITUTION’S PROSCIPTION AGAINST INTERFERANCE WITH THE
FREE EXERCISE OF SUFFERAGE? .......................................................................................11
ISSUE 2.
DOES THE 2011 FINAL REAPPORTIONMENT PLAN UNNECESSARILY DIVIDE
COUTIES AND IGNORE THE CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATES OF COMPACTNESS AND
CONTIGUITY? FURTHER, HAS THE EXTENT THE FINAL PLAN FRACTURES TRADITIONAL
SUBORDINATE STRUCTERS OF GOVERNMENT MATERIALLY ALTERED THE FORM OF
OUR STATE GOVERNMENT? .................................................................................................12
ISSUE 3 WAS THE FINAL PLAN PROMULGATED FOLLOWING PROCEDURES, AND
USING DATA THAT VIOLATE ARTICLE 2,§17 OF PENNSYLVANIA’S CONSTITUTION,
ALONG WITH THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED
STATES CONSITUTION? ........................................................................................................17
VIII CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................20
I STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has jurisdiction pursuant to Article 2, §17(d)
of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which provides that:
Any aggrieved person may file an appeal from the
final plan directly to the Supreme Court within thirty
days after the filing thereof. If the appellant establishes
that the final plan is contrary to law, the Supreme Court
shall issue an order remanding the plan to the commission
to reapportion the Commonwealth in a manner not
inconsistent with such order.
II STATEMENT OF SCOPE OF REVIEW AND STANDARD OF REVIEW
This Honorable Court’s scope of review with regard to questions of law is
plenary. Annenberg v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, 562 Pa.570, 757 A.2d
333 (1998).
The standard of review is found in the Constitution of this Commonwealth
which directs this Honorable Court to entertain appeals from any aggrieved
person within thirty (30) days of the filing of the Final Plan. Article2,§17(d). If the
Petitioner establishes that the Final Plan is contrary to law, this Honorable Court
shall issue an Order remanding the Plan.to the Commission and directing the
Commission to reapportion the Commonwealth in a manner not inconsistent with
such Order. Id. To prevail in a challenge to the Final Reapportionment Plan,
Petitioner has the burden of showing not that there exists an alternative Plan
which is preferable or better, but rather that the final Plan filed by the
Commission fails to meet constitutional requirements. In Re 1991 Pennsylvania
Legislative Reapportionment Commission, 530 Pa. 335, 609 A.2d 132 (1992),
cert. denied, 506 U.S. 819 (1992).
III ORDER OR OTHER DETERMINATION IN QUESTION
The determination in question is the Final Legislative Reapportionment
Plan of the 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission filed with the
Secretary of the Commonwealth on December 12, 2011.
IV STATEMENT OF THE QUESTIONS INVOLVED
1.
DOES THE CONSTANT CHANGING OF PETITIONER’S LEGISLATIVE
DISTICT, THEREBY NULLIFYING HIS LOCALE’S LEGISLATIVE
CHOICES, OFFEND THE COMMONWEALTH CONSTITUTION’S
PROSCIPTION AGAINST INTERFERANCE WITH THE FREE EXERCISE
OF SUFFERAGE?
Suggested Answer : Yes.
2.
DOES THE 2011 FINAL REAPPORTIONMENT PLAN UNNECESSARILY
DIVIDE COUTIES AND IGNORE THE CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATES
OF COMPACTNESS AND CONTIGUITY? FURTHER, HAS THE EXTENT
THE FINAL PLAN FRACTURES TRADITIONAL SUBORDINATE
STRUCTERS OF GOVERNMENT MATERIALLY ALTERED THE FORM
OF OUR STATE GOVERNMENT?
Suggested Answer : Yes.
3.
WAS THE FINAL PLAN PROMULGATED FOLLOWING PROCEDURES,
AND USING DATA THAT VIOLATE ARTICLE 2,§17 OF
PENNSYLVANIA’S CONSTITUTION, ALONG WITH THE DUE
PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED
STATES CONSITUTION?
Suggested Answer : Yes.
V. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On December 12, 2011 ,the 2011 Pennsylvania Legislative
Reapportionment Commission filed with the Secretary of the Commonwealth its
Final Plan to reapportion the Pennsylvania General Assembly following the 2010
United States Census. On January 11, 2012 Petitioner at 9 MM 2012 filed a
Petition for Review from the Final Reapportionment Plan.
Petitioner, Dennis Baylor, is an aggrieved adult individual, a member of the
“No Party” party and presented testimony to the Legislative Reapportionment
Commission in public hearings November 18, 2011 - opposing what was at the
time - the Preliminary Plan. Since the group, “Occupy Harrisburg” disrupted the
hearings, petitioner submitted his objections in written form, Exhibit “A” page 1a9a. The Commission has failed to act on any of the material submitted.
Petitioner is lifelong resident of Berks County Pennsylvania, and has spent
the last forty years living in Tilden Township, Berks County, from 1971, the first
year he could vote. Then, as in 1981, 1991,.2001, 2011 he has had the
reapportionment process supplant his right of suffrage, and given a fresh
incumbent legislator. The petitioner has never been represented by a resident of
Berks in the General Assembly .
Although Berks county has experienced 10.1% growth since the 2000
census, and now has a population of 411,442 persons, its legislative clout has
remained stagnant for decades. While such a population would suggest there
should be over six (6.58) Representatives in the General Assembly voicing their
concerns about Berks County issues, Exhibit “C”, page 17a there are four (4)
House Members with their districts fully in the county, and five (5) fractional
members. (See Exhibit “A”, page 3a)
In the Final Plan the petitioner would be a resident of the 124th House
District, which includes a small part of Carbon County and a large part of
Schuylkill County. A situation much like that in 3 MAP 2009 probably will re-occur
because Rep. Reichly has been elected to Lehigh County’s bench, and petitioner
has been elected Tilden Township Auditor as a ‘No Party” Party candidate,
having received 20% of the vote, in a nine way race The “No Party” Party of
Pennsylvania v. Cortes et.al., -3 MAP 2009, (dismissed as moot),.
The final concerns the petitioner raised with the Legislative
Reapportionment Commission were procedural ones, questioning whether the
Final Plan was tendered promptly and in “good faith”. “The General Assembly of
Pennsylvania is entitled to an opportunity to enact reapportionment legislation
pursuant to the recent ” Reynolds” cases and to our interpretation here of
pertinent provisions of the
Pennsylvania Constitution. Since the Legislature is intimately acquainted with the
characteristics of Pennsylvania and is primarily responsible for constitutional
apportionment, action by that body, taken promptly and in good faith, is more
likely to achieve a workable, constitutionally acceptable result than an
apportionment following the suggested plan of the district court.’ BUTCHER v.
BLOOM 415 Pa. 438 (1964).
The foregoing concerns arose from looking at the Minutes and Agenda of
Legislative Reapportionment Commission gatherings, as well as the report of the
Investigative Grand Jury into Legislative Corruption which resulted in criminal
charges being filed against 2001 Legislative Commissioner John Perzel, to which
he plead guilty. In particular, the testimony of commission staffer, Steve Dull
Exhibit “A” ,page 4a-6a, raises grave doubt if the 2001 apportionment was based
on a tainted database, with that corruption of the data being perpetuated in the
2011 Final Plan.
VI SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT
The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania mandates three
(3) criteria, all of which must be adhered to in the reapportionment of legislative
districts: (l) districts must be compact and contiguous, (2) districts must be as
nearly equal in population as practicable, and (3) no political subdivision or ward
shall be divided unless absolutely necessary. In order to prevail in a challenge to
the Final Reapportionment Plan, petitioners have the burden of establishing not
that there exists an alternative plan which is preferable or better, but rather that
the Final Plan filed by the Commission fails to meet constitutional requirements.
Some deviations from the equal population principle are constitutionally
permissible with respect to the reapportionment of seats in the State Legislature.
The Pennsylvania Constitution requires contiguous and compact districts and
districts that do not divide counties, political subdivisions or wards unless
absolutely necessary. The requirements of contiguous and compact districts go
beyond geographical concern and also embrace the concepts· of homogeneity of
the district in order to facilitate the functioning of a representative form of
government. The newly configured 124th House District is not compact and
unnecessarily divides Berks, Schuykill and Carbon Counties. Similarly, 187th, and
134th Berks and Lehigh Counties. More over The 128th and 129th House
Districts needlessly divide Berks and Lancaster Counties.
The right to vote is a fundamental individual liberty entitled to judicial
protection under the Fourteenth Amendment , it can’t be usurped without ‘the due
process of law . Reapportionment cannot be the fruit of criminal activity. 2001
Reapportionment Commissioner Perzel plead guilty to a lengthy and detailed
Presentment, in particular, illegally using taxpayer funds to develop a partisan
database to reapportion, with the goal of ensuring “ win more seats in the
legislature and retain Republican majority.”
VI ARGUMENT
ISSUE 1
DOES THE CONSTANT CHANGING OF PETITIONER’S
LEGISLATIVE DISTICT, THEREBY NULLIFYING HIS LOCALE’S
LEGISLATIVE CHOICES, OFFEND THE COMMONWEALTH
CONSTITUTION’S PROSCIPTION AGAINST INTERFERANCE WITH
THE FREE EXERCISE OF SUFFERAGE?
According the National Conference of State Legislatures, (see http://www
.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=16506 ) an incumbent in the Pennsylvania General
Assembly will be reelected 95% to 98% of the time. By consistently being
reapportioned into a new district, with a new incumbent, every reapportionment
cycle , there is very little incentive to seek public office or to vote. We went from
residents of the 187th, to being residents of the 124th, to the 125th, and now
back to the 124th. When someone by decree tells you who your “elected” official
will be, your vote has been debased. I understand it must happen occasionally to
make the reapportionment process work, but to have it happen every
reapportionment cheapens our votes.
There is no rhyme or reason that Tilden Township has been singled out
thusly. Plainly put, it is invidious discrimination.
To the extent that a citizen's right to vote is debased, he is that much less
a citizen. The fact that an individual lives here or there is not a legitimate
reason for overweighting or diluting the efficacy of his vote.
Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964)
ISSUE 2.
DOES THE 2011 FINAL REAPPORTIONMENT PLAN
UNNECESSARILY DIVIDE COUTIES AND IGNORE THE
CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATES OF COMPACTNESS AND
CONTIGUITY? FURTHER, HAS THE EXTENT THE FINAL PLAN
FRACTURES TRADITIONAL SUBORDINATE STRUCTERS OF
GOVERNMENT MATERIALLY ALTERED THE FORM OF OUR
STATE GOVERNMENT?
Counties are the oldest known sub-divisions of government. William
Blackstone in his Commentaries on the Laws of England, Volume 1, page 113
credits King Alfred with formalizing their introduction into England, but goes on to
say that they were known to exist centuries earlier, probably coming from ancient
Germany. Owing to William Penn’s English origins, Pennsylvania has used the
County, as a fundamental organizational building block from the
Commonwealth’s founding to present. In fact, County Government is the only
sub-division specifically detailed in Pennsylvania’s Constitution Article IX § 4.
Clearly the framers of the Commonwealth’s Constitution intended that this
essential organ of government not be fractured, even in the era following Baker
et al v. Carr et al 369 U.S. 186 (1962) , because at the Constitutional Convention
were the language of Article 2, § 17 was inserted, they also inserted the
requirements for districts created thereunder, Article 2, § 16, which states;
Legislative Districts
The Commonwealth shall be divided into fifty senatorial and two
hundred three representative districts, which shall be composed of
compact and contiguous territory as nearly equal in population as
practicable. Each senatorial district shall elect one Senator, and
each representative district one Representative. Unless absolutely
necessary no county, city, incorporated town, borough, township or
ward shall be divided in forming either a senatorial or representative
district.
“Unless absolutely necessary” is free from all ambiguity. Similarly when a
reapportionment plan violates the boundary of adjacent county once, there is
faint hope of making an argument for an exception but twice is just absurd. Berks
county’s boundaries are violated five (5) times. Four of those five times are with
two counties, Lehigh county shares two districts with Berks, the 187th and 134th .
And Lancaster county shares two districts with Berks, the 128th and the 129th
Exhibit “A” page 3a.
In order to prevail in a challenge to the Final Reapportionment Plan,
Petitioners have the burden of establishing that the Final Plan filed by the
Commission fails to meet constitutional requirements, and not that there exists
an alternative plan which is better. In Re 1991 Pennsylvania Legislative
Reapportionment Commission, 530 Pa. 335, 609 A.2d 132 (1992), cert. den'd,
506 U.S. 819 (1992). Here, the Commission failed to take into account the State
Constitutional requirement of compact and contiguous senatorial districts and
failed to take into account the prohibition against dividing counties, unless
absolutely necessary. The proposed House and Senate Districts lack
compactness and unnecessarily divides Counties.
In Reynolds, the United States Supreme Court held that as a basic
constitutional requirement, the equal protection clause of the United States
Constitution requires that seats in both houses of a bi-cameral state legislature
be apportioned on a population basis. The Court further held that some
deviations from the equal population principle are constitutionally permissible
with respect to either or both houses of a state legislature so long as such
deviations are based on legitimate considerations incident to the effectuation of
a rational state policy. Id
Subsequent to the United States Supreme Court decision in Reynolds v.
Sims, this Honorable Court held that the 1964 Pennsylvania Reapportionment
Plan was unconstitutional. Butcher v. Bloom, 415 Pa. 438, 203 A.2d 556 (1964)
(Butcher I). In Butcher I, this Court held that Article 2, § 16 of the Pennsylvania
Constitution, when construed as a whole, demands that senate reapportionment
respect county lines and other lines of political subdivisions, insofar as possible,
without doing violence to the population principle enunciated in both the
Pennsylvania and United States Constitutions. However, this Court recognized
that the Commonwealth may legitimately desire to maintain the integrity of
various political subdivisions insofar as possible and provide for compact districts
of contiguous territory in designing a legislative apportionment scheme. Jd. This
Court further adopted the holding of Reynolds v. Sims, supra, where the
Reynolds Court held that valid policy considerations may underline the aims of
providing for compact districts of contiguous territory. Jd. This Court recognized
that indiscriminate districting without any regard for political subdivision or natural
or historical boundary lines may be little more than an open invitation to partisan
gerrymandering. Jd. Whatever the means of accomplishment, the overriding
objective must be substantial similarity of population among the various districts
so that the vote of any citizen is approximately equal in weight to that of any
other citizen in the state. Id.
Subsequently, in Butcher v. Bloom, 420 Pa. 305, 216 A.2d 457 (1966)
(Butcher II), this Court in undertaking the task of reapportioning the State
Legislature, held that the Court's primary concern was to provide for substantially
equal population among legislative districts, but at the same time the Court
sought to maintain the integrity of political subdivisions and to create compact
districts of contiguous territory, insofar as those goals could be realized under the
circumstances of the population distribution of this Commonwealth.
This Court, in Commonwealth ex reI. Specter v. Levin, 448 Pa. 293 A.2d
15 (1972), appeal denied, 409 U.S. 810 (1972), held that a determination that a
reapportionment plan must fail for lack of compactness cannot be made merely
by a glance at an electoral map and a determination that the shape of a
particular district is not aesthetically pleasing. This Court held that compactness
must be evaluated objectively and with allowance for the elements of
unavoidable non-compactness. Id. This Court rejected conclusionary dictionary
definitions for compactness. Id. The Commission's Final Plan, here, by any
objective measure violates the constitutional requirement of compactness.
Since the current Constitutional Amendment was adopted in 1968, this
Court has, on four occasions, reviewed the decision of the Legislative
Reapportionment Commission. Seven Justices of this Court have written
dissenting opinions cautioning the Commission about creating non-compact
legislative districts.
Justice Saylor, in 2001 wrote that the Pennsylvania Constitution demands
not only population equality but also compactness, contiguity and the
preservation of existing lines of political subdivisions or parts thereof, except in
cases of absolute necessity. Exhibit “A”page 9a.
Petitioner has the burden of establishing that Final Plan filed by the
Commission fails to meet constitutional requirements, and not that there exists
an alternative plan which is better. In Re 1991 Pennsylvania Reapportionment
Commission, 530 Pa. 335,609 A.2d 132 (1992) cert. den’d, 506 U.S. 819 (1992).
But petitioner has included a framework for reapportionment based on
Intermediate Units and School Districts in his Exhibits “D” and “E” starting at
page 18a, the concept has been advanced in two House State Government
Committee meetings on the subject of reapportionment. It main weakness is that
it is highly logical. School Districts, since their inception by the School Jointure
act, have avoided splitting counties and other political sub-divisions as a practical
matter , because of complicating the levying and collection of taxes. At the same
time, school districts are compact and contiguous, because of the practical
matter of transporting students. As a public policy issue, the suggestion has
much to recommend it, here, as well, schools receive more taxes than any
function of government, save the federal government, and having cognizable
representation would go a long way to fitting this increasingly important creature
of state government, into the scheme of modern government.
The lack of objective standards for the compactness of Legislative Districts
is a complete mystery to the petitioner. In geometry, (which comes from ‘to
measure the earth’) the isoperimetric quotient is the method used to quantify
compactness, it in turn is the area bound, divided by the perimeter of the shape.
A circle is generally accepted as the most compact shape, since a radius from its
center fully circumscribes the shape.
ISSUE 3
WAS THE FINAL PLAN PROMULGATED FOLLOWING
PROCEDURES, AND USING DATA THAT VIOLATE
ARTICLE 2,§17 OF PENNSYLVANIA’S CONSTITUTION,
ALONG WITH THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE 14TH
AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSITUTION?
The proposed plan is advanced in bad faith, see the attached Transcript of
the 28th Statewide Investigating Grand Jury Presentment No. 2, part 2 pages 69
through 71, Exhibit “B” http://www.attorneygeneral.gov/uploadedFiles/Press/GJPresentment_ No2_page64-119.pdf R.R.4a-R.R.6a. The findings of fact
concerning Steve Dull regarding the meeting between Rep. Perzel , his staff and
GCR & Associates show the 2001 plan was ready to go as soon as the U.S.
Census data was officially released, probably in March or April 2001. Although
there is clearly stalling on the part of the Commission (LRC), in the instance of
the 2001 LRC they had their Public meeting on the Preliminary Reapportionment
Plan October 25, 2001 , and Nominating Petitions circulated the end of February
2002. This reapportionment the Commission is a month behind that in 2001 and
Nominating Petitions circulate January 24, 2012. We don’t have ambush
elections in America.
Also, the proposed plan creates two open House seats in Berks.
The proposed plan is founded on a tainted database, which, in turn, is the
fruit of
criminal activity in direct contravention of Art. II, Sec. 17 of the Commonwealth
Constitution which requires that non-partisan U.S. Decennial Census data be
used to apportion the commonwealth. See Exhibit “A” page 4a-6a “Dull testified
that before the meeting with GCR, Perzel, Preski and Tomaselli explained to him
that they identified GCR as an entity to help them win more seats in the
legislature and retain Republican majority.” Since Rep. Prezel narrowly won
reelection in 2000 (By about 100 votes once absentee ballots were counted) he
didn’t hesitate to interject partisan profiling in the 2001 plan, as evidenced by his
post-2001 district . See Exhibit “D” R.R. 8a. According to Exhibit “B” Rep.
Prezel’s staff interacted extensively with GCR and other vendors to make
partisan voter data a web based database, thereby making it perpetual.
In Pennsylvania, there are, at present, 8,168,734 persons registered to
vote, of which there are 4,130,537 Democrats, 3,030,925 Republicans , and
1,007,272 non- House, and the Governor is a Republican.
VIII CONCLUSION
The 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission has failed to meet the
overriding requirement of providing all qualified electors with an equally effective
vote under the Final Plan. The Final Plan contrary to Commonwealth’s
Constitution and the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution,
and should be remanded to the Commission for corrective action, with an Order
tailored to start with a blank map to ensure that the excesses past Commissions
are removed .
Respectfully Submitted
By:
__________________________
Dated: January 13, 2012
Dennis Baylor
Petitioner
2654 Mountain Road
Hamburg, Pa. 19526
(610) 781 – 8746
Table of Contents
EXIHIBT A - STATEMENT OF EXCEPTIONS .......................................................................................... 22
EXHIBIT B – 2011 FINAL PLAN vs. A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ........................................................ 31
POPULATION CHANGE ............................................................................................................................ 34
EXHIBIT C – POPULATION OF COUNTIES AND PRO RATA REPRESENTATION IN THE
GENERAL ASSEMBLY .............................................................................................................................. 36
EXIHIBT D - School District Pop. ............................................................................................................... 39
EXIHIBT E – SCHOOL INTERMEDIATE UNITS TUNCATED TO COUNTIES........................................... 54
EXIHIBT A - STATEMENT OF EXCEPTIONS
DENNIS BAYLOR
2654 MOUNTAIN ROAD
HAMBURG, PA.19526
(610) 781-8746 dennisbaylor@gmail.com
Good afternoon, I am Dennis Baylor and appear before you today as an individual
resident of Tilden Township, aggrieved of the proposed 2011 Preliminary
Reapportionment Plan, on the grounds that follow:
1) I have lived in Tilden Township since 1971 and every subsequent reapportionment
has foist a new House incumbent on us. We went from residents of the 187th, to being
residents of the 124th, to the 125th, and now back to the 124th. When someone by
decree tells you who your “elected” official will be, your vote has been debased. I
understand it must happen occasionally to make the process work, but to have it
happen every reapportionment cheapens our votes.
2) The proposed plan reflects a lack of standards regarding compactness. The
isoperimetric quotient is used in geometry to quantify the compactness of a given
shape and should be used by the commission to score proposed plans.
3) The proposed plan creates non-contiguous House districts see the attached
Exhibit “A” for an example of the 134th, (which is a soon-to-be declared vacant district,
Rep. Richely won a Judgeship the most recent election. A Special Election coincident to
reapportionment can raise unresolved due process and unequally weighted votes under
the Pa. Election Code.)
4) The proposed plan needlessly divides Counties, and Communities of Interest in
pursuit of the goal of equal district population, to split Berk County with Lehigh County
twice, and with Lancaster County twice are examples so clear, as to require no further
explanation. School Districts are an obvious Community-of-Interest and the proposed
plan fractures every School District in Berks (18) save 1.
5) The proposed plan is advanced in bad faith, see the attached Transcript of the
28th Statewide Investigating Grand Jury Presentment No. 2, part 2 pages 69 through
71, Exhibit “B” http://www.attorneygeneral.gov/uploadedFiles/Press/GJPresentment_No2_page64-119.pdf
The findings of fact concerning Steve Dull regarding the meeting between Rep. Perzel ,
his staff and GCR & Associates show the 2001 plan was ready to go as soon as the
U.S. Census data was officially released, probably in March or April 2001. Although
there is clearly stalling on the part of the Commission (LRC), in the instance of the 2001
LRC they had their Public meeting on the Preliminary Rapportionment Plan October 25,
2001 , and Nominating Petitions circulated the end of February 2002. This
reapportionment the Commission is a month behind that in 2001 and Nominating
Petitions circulate January 24, 2012, we don’t have ambush elections in America. Once
again the proposed plan creates two open House seats in Berks.
6) The proposed plan is founded on a tainted database, which, in turn, is the fruit of
criminal activity in direct contravention of Art. II, Sec. 17 of the Commonwealth
Constitution which requires that non-partisan U.S. Decennial Census data be used to
apportion the commonwealth. See Exhibit “B” page 69, “Dull testified that before the
meeting with GCR, Perzel, Preski and Tomaselli explained to him that they identified
GCR as an entity to help them win more seats in the legislature and retain Republican
majority.” Since Rep. Prezel narrowly won reelection in 2000 (By about 100 votes once
absentee ballots were counted) he didn’t hesitate to interject partisan profiling in the
2001 plan, as evidenced by his post-2001 district . See Exhibit “D”. According to Exhibit
“B” Rep. Prezel’s staff interacted extensively with GCR and other vendors to make
partisan voter data a web based database, thereby making it perpetual. See Exhibit “C”
, an attempt was made to ascertain the architects of the proposed plan; however, the
Commission has not responded.
7) In closing, attached as Exhibit “E” is the CONCURRING OPINION on the 2001
Legislative Reapportionment Plan, authored by Mr. Justice Saylor, and joined by Mr.
Justice Eakin and Mr. Justice Castille . Under the foregoing premises I believe the
Supreme Court can be persuaded to relinquish the passive role in reviewing the instant
plan.
Thank You
Dennis Baylor
EXHIBIT B – 2011 FINAL PLAN vs. A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
POPULATION CHANGE
State and Counties
1900 – 2010
COUNTY
Senate
Members
based on
Population
Total
%
Population Change
1901
from
1901
NAME
Total
Population
House
Members
based on
Population
Pennsylvania
12,702,379
203.00
50.00
6,302,115
101,407
1.62
0.40
34,496
001
Adams County
003
Allegheny County
1,223,348
19.55
4.82
775,058
005
Armstrong County
68,941
1.10
0.27
52,551
007
Beaver County
170,539
2.73
0.67
56,432
009
Bedford County
49,762
0.80
0.20
39,468
011
Berks County
411,442
6.58
1.62
159,615
013
Blair County
127,089
2.03
0.50
85,099
015
Bradford County
62,622
1.00
0.25
59,403
017
Bucks County
625,249
9.99
2.46
71,190
019
Butler County
183,862
2.94
0.72
56,962
021
Cambria County
143,679
2.30
0.57
104,837
023
Cameron County
5,085
0.08
0.02
7,048
025
Carbon County
65,249
1.04
0.26
44,510
027
Centre County
153,990
2.46
0.61
42,894
029
Chester County
498,886
7.97
1.96
95,695
031
Clarion County
39,988
0.64
0.16
34,283
033
Clearfield County
81,642
1.30
0.32
80,614
035
Clinton County
39,238
0.63
0.15
29,197
037
Columbia County
67,295
1.08
0.26
39,896
039
Crawford County
88,765
1.42
0.35
63,643
041
Cumberland County
235,406
3.76
0.93
50,344
043
Dauphin County
268,100
4.28
1.06
114,443
045
Delaware County
558,979
8.93
2.20
94,762
047
Elk County
31,946
0.51
0.13
32,903
049
Erie County
280,566
4.48
1.10
98,473
051
Fayette County
136,606
2.18
0.54
110,412
053
Forest County
7,716
0.12
0.03
11,039
055
Franklin County
149,618
2.39
0.59
54,902
057
Fulton County
14,845
0.24
0.06
9,924
059
Greene County
38,686
0.62
0.15
28,281
061
Huntingdon County
45,913
0.73
0.18
34,650
063
Indiana County
88,880
1.42
0.35
42,556
202%
294%
158%
131%
302%
126%
258%
149%
105%
878%
323%
137%
72%
147%
359%
521%
117%
101%
134%
169%
139%
468%
234%
590%
97%
285%
124%
70%
273%
150%
137%
133%
209%
065
Jefferson County
45,200
0.72
0.18
59,113
067
Juniata County
24,636
0.39
0.10
16,054
069
Lackawanna County
214,437
3.43
0.84
193,831
071
Lancaster County
519,445
8.30
2.04
159,241
073
Lawrence County
91,108
1.46
0.36
57,042
075
Lebanon County
133,568
2.13
0.53
53,827
077
Lehigh County
349,497
5.59
1.38
93,893
079
Luzerne County
320,918
5.13
1.26
257,121
081
Lycoming County
116,111
1.86
0.46
75,663
083
McKean County
43,450
0.69
0.17
51,343
085
Mercer County
116,638
1.86
0.46
57,387
087
Mifflin County
46,682
0.75
0.18
23,160
089
Monroe County
169,842
2.71
0.67
21,161
091
Montgomery County
799,874
12.78
3.15
138,995
093
Montour County
18,267
0.29
0.07
15,526
095
Northampton County
297,735
4.76
1.17
99,687
097
Northumberland County
94,528
1.51
0.37
90,911
099
Perry County
45,969
0.73
0.18
26,263
101
Philadelphia County
1,526,006
24.39
6.01
1,293,697
103
Pike County
57,369
0.92
0.23
8,766
105
Potter County
17,457
0.28
0.07
30,621
107
Schuylkill County
148,289
2.37
0.58
172,927
109
Snyder County
39,702
0.63
0.16
17,304
111
Somerset County
77,742
1.24
0.31
49,461
113
Sullivan County
6,428
0.10
0.03
12,134
115
Susquehanna County
43,356
0.69
0.17
40,043
117
Tioga County
41,981
0.67
0.17
49,086
119
Union County
44,947
0.72
0.18
17,592
121
Venango County
54,984
0.88
0.22
49,648
123
Warren County
41,815
0.67
0.16
38,946
125
Washington County
207,820
3.32
0.82
92,181
127
Wayne County
52,822
0.84
0.21
30,171
129
Westmoreland County
365,169
5.84
1.44
160,175
131
Wyoming County
28,276
0.45
0.11
17,152
133
York County
434,972
6.95
1.71
116,413
76%
153%
111%
326%
160%
248%
372%
125%
153%
85%
203%
202%
803%
575%
118%
299%
104%
175%
118%
654%
57%
86%
229%
157%
53%
108%
86%
255%
111%
107%
225%
175%
228%
165%
374%
EXHIBIT C – POPULATION OF COUNTIES AND PRO RATA
REPRESENTATION IN THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Demographic Profile
State and Counties 2010
NAME
Total
Population
House Members
based on
Population
Senate Members
based on
Population
Pennsylvania
12702379
203.00
50.00
001
Adams County
101407
1.62
0.40
003
Allegheny County
1223348
19.55
4.82
005
Armstrong County
68941
1.10
0.27
007
Beaver County
170539
2.73
0.67
009
Bedford County
49762
0.80
0.20
011
Berks County
411442
6.58
1.62
013
Blair County
127089
2.03
0.50
015
Bradford County
62622
1.00
0.25
017
Bucks County
625249
9.99
2.46
019
Butler County
183862
2.94
0.72
021
Cambria County
143679
2.30
0.57
023
Cameron County
5085
0.08
0.02
025
Carbon County
65249
1.04
0.26
027
Centre County
153990
2.46
0.61
029
Chester County
498886
7.97
1.96
031
Clarion County
39988
0.64
0.16
033
Clearfield County
81642
1.30
0.32
035
Clinton County
39238
0.63
0.15
037
Columbia County
67295
1.08
0.26
039
Crawford County
88765
1.42
0.35
041
Cumberland County
235406
3.76
0.93
043
Dauphin County
268100
4.28
1.06
045
Delaware County
558979
8.93
2.20
047
Elk County
31946
0.51
0.13
049
Erie County
280566
4.48
1.10
051
Fayette County
136606
2.18
0.54
053
Forest County
7716
0.12
0.03
055
Franklin County
149618
2.39
0.59
057
Fulton County
14845
0.24
0.06
059
Greene County
38686
0.62
0.15
COUNTY
061
Huntingdon County
45913
0.73
0.18
063
Indiana County
88880
1.42
0.35
065
Jefferson County
45200
0.72
0.18
067
Juniata County
24636
0.39
0.10
069
Lackawanna County
214437
3.43
0.84
071
Lancaster County
519445
8.30
2.04
073
Lawrence County
91108
1.46
0.36
075
Lebanon County
133568
2.13
0.53
077
Lehigh County
349497
5.59
1.38
079
Luzerne County
320918
5.13
1.26
081
Lycoming County
116111
1.86
0.46
083
McKean County
43450
0.69
0.17
085
Mercer County
116638
1.86
0.46
087
Mifflin County
46682
0.75
0.18
089
Monroe County
169842
2.71
0.67
091
Montgomery County
799874
12.78
3.15
093
Montour County
18267
0.29
0.07
095
Northampton County
297735
4.76
1.17
097
Northumberland County
94528
1.51
0.37
099
Perry County
45969
0.73
0.18
101
Philadelphia County
1526006
24.39
6.01
103
Pike County
57369
0.92
0.23
105
Potter County
17457
0.28
0.07
107
Schuylkill County
148289
2.37
0.58
109
Snyder County
39702
0.63
0.16
111
Somerset County
77742
1.24
0.31
113
Sullivan County
6428
0.10
0.03
115
Susquehanna County
43356
0.69
0.17
117
Tioga County
41981
0.67
0.17
119
Union County
44947
0.72
0.18
121
Venango County
54984
0.88
0.22
123
Warren County
41815
0.67
0.16
125
Washington County
207820
3.32
0.82
127
Wayne County
52822
0.84
0.21
129
Westmoreland County
365169
5.84
1.44
131
Wyoming County
28276
0.45
0.11
133
York County
434972
6.95
1.71
EXIHIBT D School District Pop.
Name
Albert Gallatin Area SD
Avella Area SD
Bentworth SD
Bethlehem-Center SD
Brownsville Area SD
Burgettstown Area SD
California Area SD
Canon-McMillan SD
Carmichaels Area SD
Central Greene SD
Charleroi SD
Chartiers-Houston SD
Connellsville Area SD
Fort Cherry SD
Frazier SD
Jefferson-Morgan SD
Laurel Highlands SD
McGuffey SD
Ringgold SD
Southeastern Greene
SD
Trinity Area SD
Uniontown Area SD
Washington SD
West Greene SD
Pittsburgh SD
City
AUN
Uniontown
101260303
Avella
101630504
Bentleyville
101630903
Fredericktown
101631003
Brownsville
101260803
Burgettstown
101631203
Coal Center
101631503
Canonsburg
101631703
Carmichaels
101301303
Waynesburg
101301403
Charleroi
101631803
Houston
101631903
Connellsville
101261302
Mc Donald
101632403
Perryopolis
101262903
Jefferson
101303503
Uniontown
101264003
Claysville
101633903
IU #
DISTRICT
HOUSE
POPULATION
DIST.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
23,880
4,209
8,553
8,759
14,976
9,699
11,182
33,671
7,106
6,392
12,043
9,114
34,494
8,508
8,015
5,902
23,409
12,757
21,213
26,102
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.4
SENATE
SEATS
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
10,395
26,065
23,820
15,897
5,108
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.1
5.9
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
1.5
4.9
4.9
1.2
1.2
McMurray
101636503
New Eagle
101637002
Greensboro
101306503
Washington
101638003
Uniontown
101268003
Washington
101638803
Waynesburg
101308503
1
1
1
1
1
IU TOTAL
POP.
371,269
102027451
2
309,086
IU TOTAL
POP.
309,086
Pittsburgh
Allegheny Valley SD
Avonworth SD
Baldwin-Whitehall SD
Bethel Park SD
Brentwood Borough SD
Carlynton SD
Chartiers Valley SD
Clairton City SD
Cornell SD
Deer Lakes SD
Duquesne City SD
East Allegheny SD
Elizabeth Forward SD
Fox Chapel Area SD
Gateway SD
Hampton Township SD
Highlands SD
Keystone Oaks SD
McKeesport Area SD
Montour SD
Moon Area SD
Mt Lebanon SD
North Allegheny SD
North Hills SD
Northgate SD
Penn Hills SD
Pine-Richland SD
Plum Borough SD
Quaker Valley SD
Riverview SD
Shaler Area SD
South Allegheny SD
South Fayette
Township SD
South Park SD
Steel Valley SD
Sto-Rox SD
Upper Saint Clair SD
West Allegheny SD
West Jefferson Hills SD
West Mifflin Area SD
Cheswick
103020603
Pittsburgh
103020753
Pittsburgh
103021102
Bethel Park
103021252
Pittsburgh
103021453
Carnegie
103021603
Pittsburgh
103021752
Clairton
103021903
Coraopolis
103022103
Cheswick
103022253
Duquesne
103022503
North Versailles
103022803
Elizabeth
103023153
Pittsburgh
103023912
Monroeville
103024102
Allison Park
103024603
Natrona Heights
103024753
Pittsburgh
103025002
Mc Keesport
103026002
McKees Rocks
103026303
Moon Township
103026343
Pittsburgh
103026402
Pittsburgh
103026852
Pittsburgh
103026902
Pittsburgh
103026873
Pittsburgh
103027352
Gibsonia
103021003
Plum
103027503
Leetsdale
103027753
Oakmont
103028203
Glenshaw
103028302
Mc Keesport
103028653
McDonald
103028703
South Park
103028753
Munhall
103028833
McKees Rocks
103028853
Pittsburgh
103029203
Oakdale
103029403
Jefferson Hills
103029553
West Mifflin
103029603
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
9,708
10,055
35,724
32,691
9,643
14,350
30,496
6,796
6,761
14,428
5,565
15,125
18,140
28,727
31,680
18,363
20,627
7,615
31,150
25,472
26,825
33,137
50,013
37,876
13,075
42,423
22,597
27,126
13,934
8,777
20,912
18,499
0.2
0.2
0.6
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.8
0.6
0.2
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
14,667
6,711
16,500
12,466
19,229
20,453
19,405
21,584
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
Wilkinsburg Borough
SD
Woodland Hills SD
Butler Area SD
Commodore Perry SD
Ellwood City Area SD
Farrell Area SD
Greenville Area SD
Grove City Area SD
Hermitage SD
Jamestown Area SD
Karns City Area SD
Lakeview SD
Laurel SD
Mars Area SD
Mercer Area SD
Mohawk Area SD
Moniteau SD
Neshannock Township
SD
New Castle Area SD
Reynolds SD
Seneca Valley SD
Sharon City SD
Sharpsville Area SD
Shenango Area SD
Slippery Rock Area SD
South Butler County SD
Union Area SD
West Middlesex Area
SD
Wilmington Area SD
Conneaut SD
Corry Area SD
Crawford Central SD
Erie City SD
Fairview SD
Fort LeBoeuf SD
Wilkinsburg
103029803
Pittsburgh
103029902
3
3
15,930
46,882
IU TOTAL
POP.
Butler
104101252
Hadley
104431304
Ellwood City
104372003
Farrell
104432503
Greenville
104432803
Grove City
104432903
Hermitage
104433303
Jamestown
104433604
Karns City
104103603
Stoneboro
104433903
New Castle
104374003
Mars
104105003
Mercer
104435003
Bessemer
104375003
West Sunbury
104105353
New Castle
104375203
New Castle
104375302
Greenville
104435303
Harmony
104107903
Sharon
104435603
882,137
0.3
0.7
14.1
0.1
0.2
3.5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
54,849
4,235
14,362
5,743
10,634
17,699
16,220
4,249
10,423
8,610
8,107
18,960
10,752
10,867
9,295
0.9
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
9,609
24,323
9,618
3,898
7,741
7,943
22,592
6,134
19,544
5,572
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
7,454
11,828
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.0
0.1
Sharpsville
104435703
New Castle
104376203
Slippery Rock
104107503
Saxonburg
104107803
New Castle
104377003
West Middlesex
104437503
New Wilmington
104378003
4
4
IU TOTAL
POP.
341,261
0.1
0.2
5.5
Linesville
105201033
Corry
105251453
Meadville
105201352
Erie
105252602
Fairview
105253303
Waterford
105253553
5
5
5
5
5
5
18,617
14,849
30,672
101,798
10,102
14,150
0.3
0.2
0.5
1.6
0.2
0.2
General McLane SD
Girard SD
Harbor Creek SD
Iroquois SD
Millcreek Township SD
North East SD
Northwestern SD
Penncrest SD
Union City Area SD
Warren County SD
Wattsburg Area SD
Allegheny-Clarion
Valley SD
Brockway Area SD
Brookville Area SD
Clarion Area SD
Clarion-Limestone Area
SD
Cranberry Area SD
Dubois Area SD
Forest Area SD
Franklin Area SD
Keystone SD
North Clarion County
SD
Oil City Area SD
Punxsutawney Area SD
Redbank Valley SD
Titusville Area SD
Union SD
Valley Grove SD
Belle Vernon Area SD
Burrell SD
Derry Area SD
Franklin Regional SD
Greater Latrobe SD
Greensburg Salem SD
Hempfield Area SD
Edinboro
105253903
Girard
105254053
Harborcreek
105254353
Erie
105256553
Erie
105257602
North East
105258303
Albion
105258503
Saegertown
105204703
Union City
105259103
North Warren
105628302
Erie
105259703
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
17,300
11,237
17,234
7,323
53,503
10,609
14,741
24,644
6,894
38,402
10,412
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.9
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.6
0.2
6.4
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
1.6
0.0
IU TOTAL
POP.
402,487
6
6
6
6
5,755
7,534
12,075
8,997
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6
6
6
6
6
6
8,132
9,495
30,976
8,287
16,283
37,799
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.1
0.3
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
4,857
15,053
21,024
8,038
14,151
4,322
6,901
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
Foxburg
106160303
Brockway
106330703
Brookville
106330803
Clarion
106161203
Strattanville
106161703
Seneca
106611303
DuBois
106172003
Tionesta
106272003
Franklin
106612203
Knox
106166503
Tionesta
106167504
Oil City
106616203
Punxsutawney
106338003
New Bethlehem
106168003
Titusville
106617203
Rimersburg
106169003
Franklin
106618603
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
IU TOTAL
POP.
219,679
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
3.5
Belle Vernon
107650603
Lower Burrell
107650703
Derry
107651603
Murrysville
107652603
Latrobe
107653102
Greensburg
107653203
Greensburg
107653802
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
18,925
14,087
17,750
22,947
31,271
26,086
46,983
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.8
Jeannette
107654103
Leechburg
107654403
Ligonier
107654903
Monessen
107655803
Mount Pleasant
107655903
New Kensington
107656303
Norwin SD
North Huntingdon
107656502
Penn-Trafford SD
Southmoreland SD
Yough SD
Harrison City
107657103
Scottdale
107657503
Herminie
Jeannette City SD
Kiski Area SD
Ligonier Valley SD
Monessen City SD
Mount Pleasant Area
SD
New Kensington-Arnold
SD
7
7
7
7
9,579
28,857
16,184
7,720
0.2
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
7
17,888
0.3
0.1
7
18,273
0.3
0.1
107658903
7
7
7
7
35,529
26,083
14,446
16,196
IU TOTAL
POP.
368,804
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.3
5.9
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
59,612
16,838
8,327
5,851
5,161
9,990
114,377
10,688
5,789
8,178
6,607
9,710
5,100
12,657
27,676
27,019
7,026
9,119
1.0
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
1.8
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
8
6,958
0.1
0.0
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
7,898
17,381
6,417
14,921
5,615
16,670
39,285
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.6
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
Altoona
108070502
Bedford
108051003
Bellwood
108071003
Berlin
108561003
Nanty Glo
108110603
Patton
108111203
Ebensburg
108111303
Fishertown
108051503
Claysburg
108071504
Davidsville
108561803
Johnstown
108111403
Everett
108053003
Johnstown
108112003
Sidman
108112203
Johnstown
108112502
Hollidaysburg
108073503
Meyersdale
108565203
Boswell
108565503
Loysburg
108056004
Northern Cambria SD
Northern Cambria
108114503
Penn Cambria SD
Portage Area SD
Richland SD
Rockwood Area SD
Salisbury-Elk Lick SD
Shade-Central City SD
Cresson
108116003
Altoona Area SD
Bedford Area SD
Bellwood-Antis SD
Berlin Brothersvalley SD
Blacklick Valley SD
Cambria Heights SD
Central Cambria SD
Chestnut Ridge SD
Claysburg-Kimmel SD
Conemaugh Twp. SD
Conemaugh Valley SD
Everett Area SD
Ferndale Area SD
Forest Hills SD
Greater Johnstown SD
Hollidaysburg Area SD
Meyersdale Area SD
North Star SD
Northern Bedford
County SD
Portage
108116303
Johnstown
108116503
Rockwood
108566303
Salisbury
108567004
Cairnbrook
108567204
Shanksville-Stonycreek
SD
Somerset Area SD
Spring Cove SD
Turkeyfoot Valley Area
SD
Tussey Mountain SD
Tyrone Area SD
Westmont Hilltop SD
Williamsburg
Community SD
Windber Area SD
Shanksville
108567404
Somerset
108567703
Roaring Spring
108077503
Confluence
108568404
Saxton
108058003
Tyrone
108078003
Johnstown
108118503
Williamsburg
108079004
Windber
108569103
IU TOTAL
Austin Area SD
Bradford Area SD
Cameron County SD
Coudersport Area SD
Galeton Area SD
Johnsonburg Area SD
Kane Area SD
Northern Potter SD
Oswayo Valley SD
Otto-Eldred SD
Port Allegany SD
Ridgway Area SD
Saint Marys Area SD
Smethport Area SD
Bald Eagle Area SD
Bellefonte Area SD
Clearfield Area SD
Curwensville Area SD
Glendale SD
Harmony Area SD
Keystone Central SD
Moshannon Valley SD
Penns Valley Area SD
Philipsburg-Osceola
Area SD
State College Area SD
Austin
109530304
Bradford
109420803
Emporium
109122703
Coudersport
109531304
Galeton
109532804
Johnsonburg
109243503
Kane
109422303
Ulysses
109535504
Shinglehouse
109537504
Duke Center
109426003
Port Allegany
109426303
8
8
8
14,038
45,316
27,384
0.2
0.7
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.1
8
8
8
8
2,789
7,329
12,928
12,914
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
8
8
POP.
3,671
8,881
600,120
0.1
0.1
9.6
0.0
0.0
2.4
1,278
21,133
5,085
5,691
2,929
4,537
7,436
4,184
3,306
4,181
5,746
7,030
13,501
31,827
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.5
Ridgway
109246003
Saint Marys
109248003
Smethport
109427503
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
IU TOTAL
POP.
117,864
0.0
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.5
1.9
Wingate
110141003
Bellefonte
110141103
Clearfield
110171003
Curwensville
110171803
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
13,206
25,328
19,134
7,365
5,407
2,345
20,963
8,778
12,819
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
10
10
15,412
92,270
0.2
1.5
0.1
0.4
Flinton
110173003
Westover
110173504
Lock Haven
110183602
Houtzdale
110175003
Spring Mills
110147003
Philipsburg
110177003
State College
110148002
West Branch Area SD
Central Fulton SD
Forbes Road SD
Huntingdon Area SD
Juniata County SD
Juniata Valley SD
Mifflin County SD
Mount Union Area SD
Southern Fulton SD
Southern Huntingdon
County SD
Bermudian Springs SD
Central York SD
Chambersburg Area SD
Conewago Valley SD
Dallastown Area SD
Dover Area SD
Eastern York SD
Fairfield Area SD
Fannett-Metal SD
Gettysburg Area SD
Greencastle-Antrim SD
Hanover Public SD
Littlestown Area SD
Northeastern York SD
Red Lion Area SD
South Eastern SD
South Western SD
Southern York County
SD
Spring Grove Area SD
Tuscarora SD
Upper Adams SD
Waynesboro Area SD
West York Area SD
York City SD
York Suburban SD
Morrisdale
110179003
10
7,865
IU TOTAL
POP.
McConnellsburg
111291304
Waterfall
111292304
Huntingdon
111312503
Mifflintown
111343603
Alexandria
111312804
230,892
0.1
3.7
0.0
0.9
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
90,401
2,859
20,447
24,019
5,162
43,607
9,666
7,984
1.4
0.0
0.3
0.4
0.1
0.7
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
11
20,969
IU TOTAL
POP.
225,114
0.3
3.6
0.1
0.9
York Springs
112011103
York
112671303
Chambersburg
112281302
New Oxford
112011603
Dallastown
112671603
Dover
112671803
Wrightsville
112672203
Fairfield
112013054
Willow Hill
112282004
Gettysburg
112013753
Greencastle
112283003
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
13,105
37,538
66,240
27,315
41,093
25,748
19,542
7,992
4,521
27,592
18,889
15,289
14,575
23,371
38,264
14,416
9,265
0.2
0.6
1.1
0.4
0.7
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.0
15,199
47,368
18,407
10,828
32,339
23,636
43,718
21,658
617,908
0.2
0.8
0.3
0.2
0.5
0.4
0.7
0.3
9.9
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
2.4
Lewistown
111444602
Mount Union
111316003
Warfordsburg
111297504
Three Springs
111317503
Hanover
112672803
Littlestown
112015203
Manchester
112674403
Red Lion
112675503
Fawn Grove
112676203
Hanover
112676403
Glen Rock
112676503
Spring Grove
112676703
Mercersburg
112286003
Biglerville
112018523
Waynesboro
112289003
York
112678503
York
112679002
York
112679403
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
IU TOTAL
POP.
Annville-Cleona SD
Cocalico SD
Columbia Borough SD
Conestoga Valley SD
Cornwall-Lebanon SD
Donegal SD
Eastern Lancaster
County SD
Eastern Lebanon
County SD
Elizabethtown Area SD
Ephrata Area SD
Hempfield SD
Lampeter-Strasburg SD
Lancaster SD
Lebanon SD
Manheim Central SD
Manheim Township SD
Northern Lebanon SD
Palmyra Area SD
Penn Manor SD
Pequea Valley SD
Solanco SD
Warwick SD
Antietam SD
Boyertown Area SD
Brandywine Heights
Area SD
Conrad Weiser Area SD
Daniel Boone Area SD
Exeter Township SD
Fleetwood Area SD
Governor Mifflin SD
Hamburg Area SD
Kutztown Area SD
Muhlenberg SD
Oley Valley SD
Reading SD
Schuylkill Valley SD
Annville
113380303
Denver
113361303
Columbia
113361503
Lancaster
113361703
Lebanon
113381303
Mount Joy
113362203
New Holland
113362303
Myerstown
113382303
Elizabethtown
113362403
Ephrata
113362603
Landisville
113363103
Lancaster
113363603
Lancaster
113364002
13
13
13
13
13
13
12,078
23,201
10,400
33,000
34,729
20,557
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.5
0.6
0.3
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
13
32,151
0.5
0.1
20,705
30,068
32,978
50,268
22,789
74,885
26,258
24,089
38,162
17,419
22,379
41,319
21,413
21,327
31,038
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
2.5
Lebanon
113384603
Manheim
113364403
Lancaster
113364503
Fredericksburg
113385003
Palmyra
113385303
Lancaster
113365203
Kinzers
113365303
Quarryville
113367003
Lititz
113369003
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
IU TOTAL
POP.
641,213
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.4
1.2
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.3
0.4
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.5
10.2
Reading
114060503
Boyertown
114060753
14
14
7,581
46,133
0.1
0.7
0.0
0.2
Topton
114060853
Robesonia
114061103
Birdsboro
114061503
Reading
114062003
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
12,863
19,284
21,249
27,359
16,608
30,925
17,611
19,010
23,539
13,206
88,082
76,089
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.2
1.4
1.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.3
Fleetwood
114062503
Shillington
114063003
Hamburg
114063503
Kutztown
114064003
Laureldale
114065503
Oley
114066503
Reading
114067002
Leesport
114067503
Tulpehocken Area SD
Twin Valley SD
Wilson SD
Wyomissing Area SD
Big Spring SD
Camp Hill SD
Carlisle Area SD
Central Dauphin SD
Cumberland Valley SD
Derry Township SD
East Pennsboro Area SD
Greenwood SD
Halifax Area SD
Harrisburg City SD
Lower Dauphin SD
Mechanicsburg Area SD
Middletown Area SD
Millersburg Area SD
Newport SD
Northern York County
SD
Shippensburg Area SD
South Middleton SD
Steelton-Highspire SD
Susquehanna Township
SD
Susquenita SD
Upper Dauphin Area SD
West Perry SD
West Shore SD
Benton Area SD
Berwick Area SD
Bloomsburg Area SD
Central Columbia SD
Danville Area SD
Lewisburg Area SD
Line Mountain SD
Midd-West SD
Bethel
114068003
Elverson
114068103
West Lawn
114069103
Wyomissing
114069353
14
14
14
14
12,267
24,048
15,477
12,347
IU TOTAL
POP.
Newville
115210503
Camp Hill
115211003
Carlisle
115211103
Harrisburg
115221402
Mechanicsburg
115211603
Hershey
115221753
Enola
115212503
Millerstown
115503004
Halifax
115222504
Harrisburg
115222752
483,678
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.2
7.7
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
1.9
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
20,627
7,888
37,074
14,839
54,564
24,679
20,228
5,489
7,603
49,528
24,736
28,609
18,076
6,718
7,627
0.3
0.1
0.6
0.2
0.9
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.8
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
15
15
15
15
21,083
20,583
13,416
8,389
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
24,036
14,612
9,755
18,994
62,415
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
2.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
Hummelstown
115224003
Mechanicsburg
115216503
Middletown
115226003
Millersburg
115226103
Newport
115504003
Dillsburg
115674603
Shippensburg
115218003
Boiling Springs
115218303
Steelton
115228003
Harrisburg
115228303
Duncannon
115506003
Lykens
115229003
Elliottsburg
115508003
Lewisberry
115219002
15
15
15
15
15
IU TOTAL
POP.
521,568
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.3
1.0
8.3
Benton
116191004
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
5,233
22,341
20,663
13,842
18,754
19,166
9,200
17,458
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.3
Berwick
116191103
Bloomsburg
116191203
Bloomsburg
116191503
Danville
116471803
Lewisburg
116604003
Herndon
116493503
Middleburg
116555003
Mifflinburg Area SD
Millville Area SD
Milton Area SD
Mount Carmel Area SD
Selinsgrove Area SD
Shamokin Area SD
Shikellamy SD
Southern Columbia
Area SD
Warrior Run SD
Athens Area SD
Canton Area SD
East Lycoming SD
Jersey Shore Area SD
Loyalsock Township SD
Montgomery Area SD
Montoursville Area SD
Muncy SD
Northeast Bradford SD
Northern Tioga SD
Sayre Area SD
South Williamsport
Area SD
Southern Tioga SD
Sullivan County SD
Towanda Area SD
Troy Area SD
Wellsboro Area SD
Williamsport Area SD
Wyalusing Area SD
Mifflinburg
116605003
Millville
116195004
Milton
116495003
Mount Carmel
116495103
Selinsgrove
116557103
Coal Township
116496503
Sunbury
116496603
Catawissa
116197503
Turbotville
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16,360
5,565
16,580
12,577
46,966
2,868
28,194
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.8
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.1
116498003
16
16
5,594
17,290
IU TOTAL
POP.
278,651
0.1
0.3
4.5
0.0
0.1
1.1
Athens
117080503
Canton
117081003
Hughesville
117412003
Jersey Shore
117414003
Montoursville
117414203
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
14,779
6,531
10,425
17,858
11,026
7,427
13,205
7,040
5,644
14,523
8,415
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
30,353
20,833
6,428
11,148
10,410
11,793
41,746
9,202
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.7
0.1
4.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
1.0
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.1
Montgomery
117415004
Montoursville
117415103
Muncy
117415303
Rome
117083004
Elkland
117596003
Sayre
117086003
South
Williamsport
117416103
Blossburg
117597003
Dushore
117576303
Towanda
117086503
Troy
117086653
Wellsboro
117598503
Williamsport
117417202
Wyalusing
117089003
IU
258,786
TOTAL
POPULATION
118401403
18
20,018
118401603
18
20,566
Crestwood SD
Dallas SD
Greater Nanticoke Area
SD
Mountain Top
Nanticoke
118402603
Hanover Area SD
Hanover Township
118403003
Hazleton Area SD
Lake-Lehman SD
Hazleton
118403302
Dallas
118403903
Dallas
18
19,104
0.3
0.1
18
18
18
15,439
72,891
16,821
0.2
1.2
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.1
Northwest Area SD
Pittston Area SD
Tunkhannock Area SD
Wilkes-Barre Area SD
Wyoming Area SD
Wyoming Valley West SD
Abington Heights SD
Blue Ridge SD
Carbondale Area SD
Dunmore SD
Elk Lake SD
Forest City Regional SD
Lackawanna Trail SD
Lakeland SD
Mid Valley SD
Montrose Area SD
Mountain View SD
North Pocono SD
Old Forge SD
Riverside SD
Scranton SD
Susquehanna
Community SD
Valley View SD
Wallenpaupack Area SD
Wayne Highlands SD
Western Wayne SD
Bangor Area SD
Bethlehem Area SD
Delaware Valley SD
East Stroudsburg Area
SD
Easton Area SD
Nazareth Area SD
Northampton Area SD
Pen Argyl Area SD
Pleasant Valley SD
Pocono Mountain SD
Shickshinny
118406003
Pittston
118406602
Tunkhannock
118667503
Wilkes Barre
118408852
Exeter
118409203
Kingston
118409302
18
18
18
18
18
18
9,070
27,837
19,039
59,879
19,386
42,261
342,311
0.1
0.4
0.3
1.0
0.3
0.7
5.5
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
1.3
IU TOTAL
POP.
Clarks Summit
119350303
New Milford
119581003
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
23,623
7,744
11,069
14,057
8,362
5,819
8,671
12,101
15,309
11,732
9,134
20,809
8,313
11,982
22,244
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
Carbondale
119351303
Dunmore
119352203
Springville
119582503
Forest City
119583003
Factoryville
119665003
Jermyn
119354603
5,302
18,224
25,535
20,842
19,292
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.1
Throop
119355503
Montrose
119584503
Kingsley
119584603
Moscow
119356503
Old Forge
119356603
Taylor
119357003
Scranton
119357402
Susquehanna
119586503
Archbald
119358403
Hawley
119648303
Honesdale
119648703
Lake Ariel
119648903
19
19
19
19
19
IU TOTAL
POP.
280,164
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
4.5
Bangor
120480803
Bethlehem
120481002
Milford
120522003
20
20
20
22,655
116,811
29,140
0.4
1.9
0.5
0.1
0.5
0.1
East Stroudsburg
120452003
Easton
120483302
Nazareth
120484803
Northampton
120484903
Pen Argyl
120485603
Brodheadsville
120455203
Swiftwater
120455403
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
47,915
63,870
27,963
41,714
12,453
33,880
64,586
0.8
1.0
0.4
0.7
0.2
0.5
1.0
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.3
Saucon Valley SD
Stroudsburg Area SD
Wilson Area SD
Allentown City SD
Catasauqua Area SD
East Penn SD
Jim Thorpe Area SD
Lehighton Area SD
Northern Lehigh SD
Northwestern Lehigh
SD
Palmerton Area SD
Panther Valley SD
Parkland SD
Salisbury Township SD
Southern Lehigh SD
Weatherly Area SD
Whitehall-Coplay SD
Bensalem Township SD
Bristol Borough SD
Bristol Township SD
Centennial SD
Central Bucks SD
Council Rock SD
Morrisville Borough SD
Neshaminy SD
New Hope-Solebury SD
Palisades SD
Pennridge SD
Pennsbury SD
Quakertown
Community SD
Abington SD
Bryn Athyn SD
Cheltenham Township
SD
Hellertown
120486003
Stroudsburg
120456003
Easton
120488603
20
20
20
7,934
34,609
38,983
542,513
0.1
0.6
0.6
8.7
0.0
0.1
0.2
2.1
IU TOTAL
POP.
Allentown
121390302
21
21
21
21
21
21
118,036
10,856
54,571
15,798
17,885
12,926
1.9
0.2
0.9
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.5
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
Catasauqua
121391303
Emmaus
121392303
Jim Thorpe
121135003
Lehighton
121135503
Slatington
121394503
New Tripoli
121394603
121397803
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
12,097
14,056
12,605
54,946
2,968
15,719
5,055
29,930
IU TOTAL
POP.
377,448
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.9
0.0
0.3
0.1
0.5
6.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
1.5
Palmerton
121136503
Lansford
121136603
Allentown
121395103
Allentown
121395603
Center Valley
121395703
Weatherly
121139004
Whitehall
Bensalem
122091002
Bristol
122091303
Levittown
122091352
Warminster
122092002
Doylestown
122092102
Newtown
122092353
Morrisville
122097203
Langhorne
122097502
New Hope
122097604
Kintnersville
122098003
Perkasie
122098103
Fallsington
122098202
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
60,416
9,726
54,582
48,875
18,095
72,458
8,728
70,751
11,220
14,936
48,307
71,165
1.0
0.2
0.9
0.8
0.3
1.2
0.1
1.1
0.2
0.2
0.8
1.1
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Quakertown
122098403
22
36,426
IU TOTAL
POP.
525,685
0.6
8.4
0.1
2.1
Abington
123460302
Bryn Athyn
123460504
23
23
57,853
1,375
0.9
0.0
0.2
0.0
Elkins Park
123461302
23
36,793
0.6
0.1
Colonial SD
Plymouth Meeting
123461602
Hatboro-Horsham SD
Jenkintown SD
Lower Merion SD
Lower Moreland
Township SD
Methacton SD
Norristown Area SD
North Penn SD
Perkiomen Valley SD
Pottsgrove SD
Pottstown SD
Souderton Area SD
Spring-Ford Area SD
Springfield Township
SD
Upper Dublin SD
Upper Merion Area SD
Upper Moreland
Township SD
Upper Perkiomen SD
Wissahickon SD
Horsham
123463603
Jenkintown
123463803
Ardmore
123464502
Huntingdon Valley
123464603
Eagleville
123465303
Norristown
123465602
Lansdale
123465702
Collegeville
123466103
Pottstown
123466303
Pottstown
123466403
Avon Grove SD
Coatesville Area SD
Downingtown Area SD
Great Valley SD
Kennett Consolidated
SD
Octorara Area SD
Owen J Roberts SD
Oxford Area SD
Phoenixville Area SD
Tredyffrin-Easttown SD
Unionville-Chadds Ford
SD
West Chester Area SD
Chester-Upland SD
Chichester SD
23
23
23
23
41,707
33,507
4,422
62,107
0.7
0.5
0.1
1.0
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.2
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
12,982
35,186
63,577
98,175
37,677
21,248
22,377
11,904
26,880
0.2
0.6
1.0
1.6
0.6
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
23
23
23
18,979
25,569
34,269
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
24,015
22,324
36,697
0.1
0.1
0.1
2.9
Souderton
123467103
Royersford
123467303
Oreland
123467203
Maple Glen
123468303
King of Prussia
123468402
Willow Grove
123468503
Pennsburg
123468603
Ambler
123469303
23
23
23
IU TOTAL
POP.
729,623
0.4
0.4
0.6
11.7
West Grove
124150503
Coatesville
124151902
Downingtown
124152003
Malvern
124153503
24
24
24
24
30,080
62,979
68,499
29,816
0.5
1.0
1.1
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1
Kennett Square
124154003
Atglen
124156503
Pottstown
124156603
24
24
24
24
24
24
27,089
17,990
32,804
25,814
32,035
39,809
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
23,691
108,433
0.1
0.4
2.0
0.2
0.1
Oxford
124156703
Phoenixville
124157203
Wayne
124157802
Kennett Square
124158503
West Chester
124159002
24
24
IU TOTAL
POP.
499,039
0.4
1.7
8.0
Chester
125231232
Aston
125231303
25
25
41,151
24,432
0.7
0.4
Garnet Valley SD
Haverford Township SD
Interboro SD
Marple Newtown SD
Penn-Delco SD
Radnor Township SD
Ridley SD
Rose Tree Media SD
Southeast Delco SD
Springfield SD
Upper Darby SD
WallingfordSwarthmore SD
William Penn SD
Philadelphia City SD
Aliquippa SD
Ambridge Area SD
Beaver Area SD
Big Beaver Falls Area SD
Blackhawk SD
Central Valley SD
Freedom Area SD
Hopewell Area SD
Midland Borough SD
New Brighton Area SD
Riverside Beaver
County SD
Rochester Area SD
South Side Area SD
Western Beaver County
SD
Apollo-Ridge SD
Armstrong SD
Blairsville-Saltsburg SD
Freeport Area SD
Glen Mills
125234103
Havertown
125234502
Prospect Park
125235103
Newtown Square
125235502
25
25
25
28,553
48,491
23,588
0.5
0.8
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.1
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
35,644
26,926
31,531
40,180
35,263
4,649
19,418
90,606
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.1
0.3
1.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.7
8.2
0.1
0.2
2.0
6.0
6.0
Aston
125236903
Wayne
125237603
Folsom
125237702
Media
125237903
Folcroft
125238402
Springfield
125238502
Drexel Hill
125239452
Wallingford
125239603
Lansdowne
125239652
25
25
21,597
42,116
IU TOTAL
POP.
514,145
126515001
26
1,526,006
IU TOTAL
POP.
1,526,006
24.4
24.4
Aliquippa
127040503
Ambridge
127040703
Beaver
127041203
Beaver Falls
127041503
Beaver Falls
127041603
Monaca
127042003
Freedom
127042853
Aliquippa
127044103
Midland
127045303
New Brighton
127045653
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
9,438
23,827
14,783
13,827
17,762
15,921
11,105
18,145
2,635
10,958
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
Ellwood City
127045853
Rochester
127046903
Hookstown
127047404
27
27
27
10,453
7,046
26,736
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.1
Midland
127049303
27
5,428
IU TOTAL
POP.
188,064
0.1
3.0
0.0
0.7
Spring Church
128030603
Ford City
128030852
Blairsville
128321103
Sarver
128033053
28
28
28
28
9,519
43,364
14,591
11,756
0.2
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.0
Philadelphia
Homer-Center SD
Indiana Area SD
Leechburg Area SD
Marion Center Area SD
Penns Manor Area SD
Purchase Line SD
United SD
Blue Mountain SD
Mahanoy Area SD
Minersville Area SD
North Schuylkill SD
Pine Grove Area SD
Pottsville Area SD
Saint Clair Area SD
Schuylkill Haven Area
SD
Shenandoah Valley SD
Tamaqua Area SD
Tri-Valley SD
Williams Valley SD
Homer City
128323303
Indiana
128323703
Leechburg
128034503
Marion Center
128325203
Clymer
128326303
Commodore
128327303
Armagh
128328003
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
6,471
32,924
5,946
10,491
6,155
7,165
7,988
156,370
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
2.5
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
IU TOTAL
POP.
Orwigsburg
129540803
Mahanoy City
129544503
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
20,471
11,477
9,172
16,977
11,803
20,103
6,695
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
Minersville
129544703
Ashland
129545003
Pine Grove
129546003
Pottsville
129546103
Saint Clair
129546803
Schuylkill Haven
129547303
Shenandoah
129547203
129548803
29
29
29
29
29
14,784
8,181
16,654
6,715
7,462
IU TOTAL
POP.
150,494
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
2.4
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.6
Tamaqua
129547603
Valley View
129547803
Tower City
EXIHIBT E – SCHOOL INTERMEDIATE UNITS TUNCATED TO
COUNTIES
Intermediate Units and
Counties 2010
Demographic Profile
NAME
Total
Population
House
Members
based on
Population
Pennsylvania
12,702,379
203.00
50.00
Fayette County
136,606
2.18
0.54
1
Greene County
38,686
0.62
0.15
1
Washington County
207,820
3.32
0.82
1
Allegheny County
1,223,348
19.55
Senate
Members
based on
Population
4.82
IU#
183,862
2.94
0.72
4
Lawrence County
91,108
1.46
0.36
4
Mercer County
116,638
1.86
0.46
4
Crawford County
88,765
1.42
0.35
5
Erie County
280,566
4.48
1.10
5
Warren County
41,815
0.67
0.16
5
Clarion County
39,988
0.64
0.16
6
Forest County
7,716
0.12
0.03
6
Jefferson County
45,200
0.72
0.18
6
Venango County
54,984
0.88
0.22
6
365,169
5.84
1.44
49,762
0.80
0.20
8
Blair County
127,089
2.03
0.50
8
Cambria County
143,679
2.30
0.57
8
Somerset County
77,742
1.24
0.31
8
5,085
0.08
0.02
Senator
based
on IU
pop.
383,112
6.12
1.51
1,223,348
19.55
4.82
391,608
6.26
1.54
411,146
6.57
1.62
147,888
2.36
0.58
365,169
5.84
1.44
398,272
6.36
1.57
7
Bedford County
Cameron County
House
Members
based on
IU pop.
3
Butler County
Westmoreland County
Population
for the IU
Truncated
to County
9
Elk County
31,946
0.51
0.13
9
McKean County
43,450
0.69
0.17
9
Potter County
17,457
0.28
0.07
9
Centre County
153,990
2.46
0.61
10
Clearfield County
81,642
1.30
0.32
10
Clinton County
39,238
0.63
0.15
10
Fulton County
14,845
0.24
0.06
11
Huntingdon County
45,913
0.73
0.18
11
Juniata County
24,636
0.39
0.10
11
Mifflin County
46,682
0.75
0.18
11
Adams County
101,407
1.62
0.40
12
Franklin County
149,618
2.39
0.59
12
York County
434,972
6.95
1.71
12
Lancaster County
519,445
8.30
2.04
13
Lebanon County
133,568
2.13
0.53
13
Berks County
411,442
6.58
1.62
235,406
3.76
0.93
15
Dauphin County
268,100
4.28
1.06
15
Perry County
45,969
0.73
0.18
15
Columbia County
67,295
1.08
0.26
16
Montour County
18,267
0.29
0.07
16
Northumberland County
94,528
1.51
0.37
16
Snyder County
39,702
0.63
0.16
16
Union County
44,947
0.72
0.18
16
Bradford County
62,622
1.00
0.25
17
Lycoming County
116,111
1.86
0.46
17
Sullivan County
6,428
0.10
0.03
17
Tioga County
41,981
0.67
0.17
17
Luzerne County
320,918
5.13
1.26
18
Wyoming County
28,276
0.45
0.11
18
214,437
3.43
0.84
1.57
0.39
274,870
4.39
1.08
132,076
2.11
0.52
685,997
10.96
2.70
653,013
10.44
2.57
411,442
6.58
1.62
549,475
8.78
2.16
264,739
4.23
1.04
227,142
3.63
0.89
349,194
5.58
1.37
14
Cumberland County
Lackawanna County
97,938
19
Susquehanna County
43,356
0.69
0.17
19
Wayne County
52,822
0.84
0.21
19
Monroe County
169,842
2.71
0.67
20
Northampton County
297,735
4.76
1.17
20
Pike County
57,369
0.92
0.23
20
Carbon County
65,249
1.04
0.26
21
Lehigh County
349,497
5.59
1.38
21
Bucks County
Montgomery County
Chester County
Delaware County
Philadelphia County
Beaver County
625,249
799,874
498,886
558,979
1,526,006
170,539
9.99
12.78
7.97
8.93
24.39
2.73
2.46
3.15
1.96
2.20
6.01
0.67
88,880
1.42
0.35
28
203.00
MEDIAN COUNTY
189,588
88,880
MINIMUM COUNTY
MAXIMUM COUNTY
5,085
1,526,006
3.03
6.63
1.63
625,249
9.99
2.46
799,874
12.78
3.15
498,886
7.97
1.96
558,979
8.93
2.20
1,526,006
24.39
6.01
170,539
2.73
0.67
157,821
2.52
0.62
148,289
12,702,379
2.37
203.00
0.58
50.00
453,656
7.25
1.79
29
50.00
AVG.
IU
AVERAGE COUNTY
414,746
27
Indiana County
12,702,379
2.07
26
28
TOTAL FOR STATE
8.39
25
0.27
0.58
524,946
24
1.10
2.37
1.22
23
68,941
148,289
4.96
22
Armstrong County
Schuylkill County
310,615
0.7462704