Development of a HighSensitivity Pump-Probe Fast Scanning Delay Line Stephanie Majewski University of Illinois @ Urbana-Champaign University of Florida Faculty Mentor: Professor David Reitze Introduction • Femtosecond “LASER”s • Pump-Probe Spectroscopy • Lock-in Method • Fast-Scan System Femtosecond Lasers Conventional Laser continuous Femtosecond Laser 1 fs = 0.000 000 000 000 001 s What Happens in 100 Femtoseconds? • Light Travels 30 μm • Electrons Collide With Electrons • Solids Begin to Melt Under Laser Irradiation • Chemicals Dissociate There are about as many femtoseconds in a minute as there are minutes in the age of the universe. Shaker Pump Reference Beam Splitter Laser Beam Splitter Photo Diode M Lens Sam ple Probe Project Objectives • Characterize Motion of Shaker • Design Mirror Mount • Optimize Performance of ShakerMount System • Implement System in Pump-Probe Experiment The “Shaker” k 0 m M1 Shaker He Ne M2 M3 Diverging Lens Converging Lens Photo diode Signal Generator Oscilloscope Ch1 Ext Trig Major axis amplitude vs frequency of oscillation 6 Load 0.00g 1.85g 2.34g 3.03g 3.52g 4.21g 4.70g 5.88g 7.06g 7.63g 8.81g 9.99g 10.51g 11.69g Mirror Mount 5 Amplitude (mm) 4 3 2 1 0 20 30 40 50 60 Frequency (Hz) 70 80 90 100 Major axis amplitude and time delay vs load 4.5 30 Frequency (Hz) 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Amplitude (mm) 3.5 3.0 25 20 2.5 15 2.0 1.5 10 1.0 5 0.5 0.0 0 0 2 4 6 Load (g) 8 10 12 Time Delay (ps) 4.0 FIG. 6 Mirror Mount Mirror Mount Mirror Diameter: 6mm Obstacles ... • Elliptical Beam Shape • Unstable Mirror Mount • Wobble in Drive Arm of Shaker Solutions! • Uniform Bolt Force on Mirror Yielded Circular Beam Shape, Mirror Rattle Minimized • Extra Screw Added Stability to Mount • Beam Jitter Corrected Optically FIG. 8 Beam wobble characterization setup Signal Generator M1 HeNe Converging Lens M2 Iris m M3 Shaker Oscilloscope Optical Position Sensor Tetra-Lateral Detector Beam Jitter amplitude vs frequency Beam Jitter Amplitude (mm) 5 Before 4 3 2 1 0 40 50 60 70 Frequency (Hz) 80 90 100 Beam Jitter amplitude vs frequency Beam Jitter Amplitude (mm) 5 Before After 4 3 2 1 0 40 50 60 70 Frequency (Hz) 80 90 100 Time-Resolved Nanotube Transmission Measurement • Achieved successful fast-scan system implementation in pump-probe experiment • Measurement itself unsuccessful due to intrinsic scattering of sample • In future, can try using cross-polarization and other methods to reduce scattering. Conclusion • Developed Shaker Design for Fast Scanning System • Characterized Shaker Motion and Corrected Beam Jitter to Within Acceptable Limits • Implemented Shaker in Time-Resolved Carbon Nanotube Transmission Measurement Acknowledgements Professor David Reitze Mark Moores and Anatoly Efimov Drs. Kevin Ingersent and Alan Dorsey NSF Research Experience for Undergraduates