Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics AROUND APÉRY’S CONSTANT WALTHER JANOUS Ursulinengymnasium Fürstenweg 86 A-6020 Innsbruck Austria. volume 7, issue 1, article 35, 2006. Received 04 January, 2006; accepted 18 January, 2006. Communicated by: A. LupasĖ§ EMail: walther.janous@tirol.com Abstract Contents JJ J II I Home Page Go Back Close c 2000 Victoria University ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756 020-06 Quit Abstract In this note we deal with some aspects of Apéry’s constant ζ(3). 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 49J40, 90C33, 47H10. Key words: Apéry’s constant, Harmonic numbers, Infinite sums, Integrals. This research is partially supported by grant 04-39-3265-2/03 (11.XII.2003) of the Federal Ministry of Education and Sciences, Bosnia and Herzegowina. Dedicated to Professor Gerd Baron on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Contents 1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2 Two Multisums . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 A New Formula for Apéry’s Constant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4 Further Observations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5 Two Questions for Further Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 References Around Apéry’s Constant Walther Janous Title Page Contents JJ J II I Go Back Close Quit Page 2 of 16 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 35, 2006 http://jipam.vu.edu.au 1. Introduction Since Apéry’s miraculous proof (1979) that the value ζ(3) of Rieman’s ζ-function is irrational, Apéry’s constant ζ(3) has been the focus of attention for many mathematicians. (An extensive list of results and references are found in Section 1.6 of the highly recommended encyclopedic book [2].) It is the purpose of this note to extend some of these results. Thereby we will also obtain a new infinite sum rapidly converging to ζ(3). At the end of this note we raise two questions for further investigation. Around Apéry’s Constant Walther Janous Title Page Contents JJ J II I Go Back Close Quit Page 3 of 16 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 35, 2006 http://jipam.vu.edu.au 2. Two Multisums Recently in [1] the proof of ∞ X ∞ X (2.1) 1 = 2ζ(3), ij(i + j) i=1 j=1 where ζ(3) = 1.202056903..., was posed as a problem. Although this result was published earlier (see [2, p. 43]) it is worthwhile reconsidering in the following more general way. Around Apéry’s Constant Walther Janous Theorem 2.1. For r ≥ 1 the multisum Sr = ∞ X ∞ X ··· k1 =1 kr 1 k1 · · · kr (k1 + · · · + kr ) =1 attains the value r!ζ(r + 1). Proof. Firstly we rewrite the multisum as an integral as follows Title Page Contents JJ J II I Go Back Sr = ∞ X ··· k1 =1 ∞ X kr 1 k1 · · · k r =1 Z 1 xk1 +···+kr −1 dx 0 Quit that is (upon interchanging of summation and integration), Z Sr = 0 1 ∞ ∞ X x kr 1 X x k1 ··· dx. x k =1 k1 k r k =1 1 Close r Page 4 of 16 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 35, 2006 http://jipam.vu.edu.au Due to ∞ X xj j=1 = − ln(1 − x), j we get r Z 1 ln(1 − x)r dx. x Sr = (−1) 0 Substituting x = 1 − t yields r Z Sr = (−1) 0 1 ln(t)r dt. 1−t This and the known result ([2, p. 47]) Z 1 ln(t)r dt = (−1)r r!ζ(r + 1) 1 − t 0 readily yield the claim. Subsequently we will deal with a ‘relative’ of Sr , namely the multisum Tr = ∞ X k1 =1 ··· ∞ X kr (−1)k1 +···+kr . k 1 · · · kr (k1 + · · · + kr ) =1 Around Apéry’s Constant Walther Janous Title Page Contents JJ J II I Go Back Close Quit Page 5 of 16 As it will turn out, matters are here more involved. Indeed, we will prove now J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 35, 2006 http://jipam.vu.edu.au Theorem 2.2. For r ≥ 1, (2.2) Tr = (−1)r r!ζ(r + 1) − r (ln 2)r+1 r+1 ∞ X r X r(r − 1)...(r − m + 1) − (ln 2)r−m k m+1 2 k k=1 m=1 holds. ! Around Apéry’s Constant Proof. Proceeding as in the previous proof we get Z 1 ln(1 + x)r r Tr = (−1) dx. x 0 Substitution of x = e−t − 1 yields Z ln(1/2) (−t)r r Tr = (−1) (−e−t )dt, −t − 1 e 0 Walther Janous Title Page Contents JJ J II I Go Back that is, Z 0 Tr = ln(1/2) Upon expanding 1 1−et tr dt. 1 − et as a geometric series we arrive at Tr = ∞ Z X k=0 0 − ln 2 tr ekt dt. Close Quit Page 6 of 16 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 35, 2006 http://jipam.vu.edu.au Integration by parts leads to the identity (we suppress integration constants) ! Z r r X t r(r − 1)...(r − m + 1) tr ekt dt = ekt + (−1)m tr−m , k m=1 k m+1 where k > 0. Therefore a straightforward simplification yields ∞ r Tr = (−1) (ln 2)r+1 X r! + r+1 k r+1 k=1 ∞ X 1 − 2k k=1 r (ln 2)r X r(r − 1)...(r − m + 1) + (ln 2)r−m m+1 k k m=1 Around Apéry’s Constant Walther Janous !! . Title Page Contents Since ∞ X 1 = ln 2, k k2 k=1 we finally get the claimed identity (2.2). JJ J II I Go Back Close Quit Page 7 of 16 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 35, 2006 http://jipam.vu.edu.au 3. A New Formula for Apéry’s Constant Theorem 2.2 enables us to obtain a new way to express ζ(3) by a fast converging series. Indeed, letting r = 2 we get ! ∞ 3 X 1 ln 2 1 (ln 2) . T2 = 2 ζ(3) − − + 3 k 2 3 2 k k k=1 Around Apéry’s Constant Furthermore [2, p. 43], reports Walther Janous 1 T2 = ζ(3). 4 Title Page Contents Therefore the following holds. JJ J Theorem 3.1. (3.1) 8 ζ(3) = 7 ∞ (ln 2)3 X 1 + 3 2k k=1 ln 2 1 + 3 2 k k ! . This formula should be compared with the following one (see [5]) ∞ X (−1)k+1 2 3 . ζ(3) = (ln 2) + 4 3 k 3 2k 2k k k=1 II I Go Back Close Quit Page 8 of 16 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 35, 2006 http://jipam.vu.edu.au 4. • Further Observations From S2 + T2 = 94 ζ(3) we infer X 1 9 2 = ζ(3) ij(i + j) 4 i,j≥1 i+j even that is (we put i + j = 2k), ∞ 2k−1 X X k=1 j=1 i.e. 1 9 = ζ(3), 2(2k − j)jk 8 Around Apéry’s Constant Walther Janous ∞ 2k−1 X 1 X 1 1 1 9 + = ζ(3). 2k j=1 2k j 2k − j 8 k=1 This can be summarized as ∞ X 1 9 H2k−1 = ζ(3), 2 k 4 k=1 Title Page Contents JJ J II I Go Back where Hn = n X 1 j=1 j denotes the n-th harmonic number. In a similar way S2 − T2 = 74 ζ(3) implies the formula ∞ X k=1 7 1 H2k = ζ(3). 2 (2k + 1) 16 Close Quit Page 9 of 16 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 35, 2006 http://jipam.vu.edu.au From these two formulae we get easily Theorem 4.1. (4.1) ∞ X k=1 1 21 H2k−1 = ζ(3) 2 (2k − 1) 16 and ∞ X (4.2) k=1 1 11 H2k = ζ(3). 2 (2k) 16 Walther Janous Adding these two identities yields ∞ X 1 Hk = 2ζ(3), k2 k=1 (4.3) a result already known to L. Euler. • [4, p. 499, item 2.6.9.14] reads Z 1 ∞ X ln(1 + x)2 (−1)k ψ(k) π 2 γ T2 = dx = 2 − , x k2 6 0 k=1 where ψ(z) = (ln Γ(z))0 and γ denote the digamma function and the EulerMascheroni constant, resp. Therefore there holds the curious identity ∞ X (−1)k ψ(k) k=1 k2 Around Apéry’s Constant 1 π2γ = ζ(3) + . 8 12 Title Page Contents JJ J II I Go Back Close Quit Page 10 of 16 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 35, 2006 http://jipam.vu.edu.au Because of ψ(k) = −γ + Hk−1 it reads in equivalent form ∞ X (−1)k (4.4) k=1 • k2 5 Hk = ζ(3) 8 Recently [3] posed the problem of proving the identity Z π/4 ∞ X ln(cos x) ln(sin x) 1 =7 dx. 3 (2n + 1) cos x sin x 0 n=0 We show that it implies a remarkable result for two doublesums. Indeed, we firstly note ∞ X n=0 that is ∞ ∞ X 1 X 1 1 = − , (2n + 1)3 k 3 k=1 (2k)3 k=1 ∞ X n=0 1 7 = ζ(3). 3 (2n + 1) 8 Therefore, the identity under consideration in fact means Z π/4 ln(cos x) ln(sin x) · dx. ζ(3) = 8 cos x sin x 0 x) Letting f (x) = ln(cos and setting z = π/2 − x we obtain cos x Z π/4 Z π/2 π π f (x)f − x dx = − z f (z)dz f 2 2 0 π/4 Around Apéry’s Constant Walther Janous Title Page Contents JJ J II I Go Back Close Quit Page 11 of 16 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 35, 2006 http://jipam.vu.edu.au whence π/2 Z ζ(3) = 4 √ 0 ln(cos x) ln(sin x) · dx. cos x sin x Next, we substitute sin x = w. √ From cos xdx = 2√1 w dw and cos x = 1 − w we get dx = 2√w√1 1−w dw. This in turn yields √ √ Z 1 1 ln( 1 − w) ln( w) √ · √ √ dw, · √ ζ(3) = 4 w 2 w 1−w 1−w 0 Walther Janous that is ζ(3) = 1 2 1 Z 0 ln(1 − w) ln w · dw. 1−w w Upon rewriting this as Title Page Contents 1 ζ(3) = 2 Z 0 1 ln(1 − w) ln w · dw w 1−w and developing the two factors of the integrand we get ! ! Z ∞ ∞ X X wi−1 (1 − w)j−1 1 1 ζ(3) = − − dw, 2 0 i j i=1 j=1 that is Around Apéry’s Constant ∞ ∞ 1 XX 1 ζ(3) = 2 i=1 j=1 ij Z 0 1 wi−1 (1 − w)j−1 dw. JJ J II I Go Back Close Quit Page 12 of 16 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 35, 2006 http://jipam.vu.edu.au Keeping in mind that Z 1 wi−1 (1 − w)j−1 dw = 0 (i − 1)!(j − 1)! , (i + j − 1)! we arrive at the formula ∞ ∞ 1 1 XX ζ(3) = i+j−1 . 2 2 i=1 j=1 ij j (4.5) Equation (4.5) and ζ(3) = 12 S2 give the two noteworthy identities ∞ X ∞ X (4.6) 1 ij 2 i+j−1 j i=1 j=1 ∞ X ∞ X = i=1 j=1 1 ij(i + j) and Z (4.7) 0 1 ln(1 − z) ln z · dz = z 1−z Z 0 1 ln(1 − z) ln(1 − z)dz. z Around Apéry’s Constant Walther Janous Title Page Contents JJ J II I Go Back Close • Finally, Theorem 4.1 enables us to prove the following finite analogon of the initial formula (2.1) of the present note, namely (4.8) ∞ X i X i=1 j=1 1 5 = ζ(3). ij(i + j) 4 Quit Page 13 of 16 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 35, 2006 http://jipam.vu.edu.au Indeed, (4.2) and (4.3) imply ∞ X 1 1 1 3 + ··· + = ζ(3). 2 k k+1 2k 4 k=1 However, 1 k2 1 1 + ··· + k+1 2k k 1 1X = k j=1 k(k + j) Around Apéry’s Constant and Walther Janous 1 k k X j=1 1 1 = k(k + j) k k X j=1 1 j 1 1 − k k+j = 1 Hk − k2 j=1 1 kj(k + j) Title Page Contents readily lead to 2ζ(3) − k ∞ X X k=1 j=1 as claimed. k X 3 1 = ζ(3) kj(k + j) 4 JJ J II I Go Back Close Quit Page 14 of 16 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 35, 2006 http://jipam.vu.edu.au 5. Two Questions for Further Research • The results of Theorem 4.1 may be regarded as special cases of the more general sums ∞ X 1 H , Sa,b = 2 ak−b (ak − b) k=1 where 0 ≤ b < a are entire numbers. Problem 1. Determine Sa,b for a ≥ 3 in terms of ’familiar’ expressions. • Let, in analogy to Sr and Tr , Ur,s denote the multisum Ur,s = ∞ X k1 =1 ··· Around Apéry’s Constant Walther Janous ∞ X kr (−1)k1 +···+ks , k1 · · · kr (k1 + · · · + kr ) =1 Title Page Contents where r ≥ 1 and 0 ≤ s ≤ r. Problem 2. Determine Ur,s in the spirit of Theorem 2.2. In other words evaluate the integrals Z 1 ln(1 − x)s ln(1 + x)r−s Ir,s = dx x 0 JJ J II I Go Back Close Quit for r ≥ 1 and 0 ≤ s ≤ r. Page 15 of 16 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 35, 2006 http://jipam.vu.edu.au References [1] M. BENCZE, Problem 2984, Crux Math., 29 (2004), 431. [2] S.R. FINCH, Mathematical Constants, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2003. [3] N. LORD, Problem 89.D, part (b), Math. Gaz., 89 (2005), 115. [4] A.P. PRUDNIKOV et al., Integrals and Series (Elementary Functions) (in Russian), Nauka, Moscow 1981. [5] E.W. WEISSTEIN, Apéry’s Constant, MathWorld–A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/AperysConstant. html Around Apéry’s Constant Walther Janous Title Page Contents JJ J II I Go Back Close Quit Page 16 of 16 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 35, 2006 http://jipam.vu.edu.au