Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics http://jipam.vu.edu.au/ Volume 2, Issue 1, Article 4, 2001 SOME ASPECTS OF CONVEX FUNCTIONS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS J. ROOIN I NSTITUTE FOR A DVANCED S TUDIES IN BASIC S CIENCES , P.O. B OX 45195-159, G AVA Z ANG , Z ANJAN 45195, IRAN. AND FACULTY OF M ATHEMATICAL S CIENCES AND C OMPUTER E NGINEERING , U NIVERSITY FOR T EACHER E DUCATION , 599 TALEGHANI AVENUE , T EHRAN 15614, IRAN. Rooin@iasbs.ic.ir Received 13 April, 2000; accepted 04 October 2000 Communicated by N.S. Barnett A BSTRACT. In this paper we will study some aspects of convex functions and as applications prove some interesting inequalities. Key words and phrases: Convex Functions, Means, Lp-Spaces, Fubini’s Theorem. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 26D15, 39B62, 43A15. 1. I NTRODUCTION In [2] Sever S. Dragomir and Nicoleta M. Ionescu have studied some aspects of convex functions and obtained some interesting inequalities. In this paper we generalize the above paper to a very general case by introducing a suitable convex function of a real variable from a given convex function. Studying its properties leads to some remarkable inequalities in different abstract spaces. 2. T HE M AIN R ESULTS The aim of this section is to study the properties of the function F defined below as Theorems 2.2 and 2.6. First we mention the following simple lemma, which describes the behavior of a convex function defined on a closed interval of the real line. Lemma 2.1. Let F be a convex function on the closed interval [a, b]. Then, we have (i) F takes its maximum at a or b. (ii) F is bounded from below. (iii) F (a+) and F (b−) exist (and are finite). ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756 c 2001 Victoria University. All rights reserved. The author is supported in part by the Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences. 008-00 2 J. ROOIN (iv) If the infimum of F over [a, b] is less than F (a+) and F (b−), then F takes its minimum at a point x0 in (a, b). (v) If a ≤ x0 < b (or a < x0 ≤ b), and F (x0 +) (or (F (x0 −)) is the infimum of F over [a, b], then F is monotone decreasing on [a, x0 ] (or [a, x0 )) and monotone increasing on (x0 , b] (or [x0 , b]). Proof. See [3, 4]. Definition 2.1. Let X be a linear space, and f : C ⊆ X → R be a convex mapping on a convex subset C of X. For n given elements x1 , x2 , · · · , xn of C, we define the following mapping of real variable F : [0, 1] → R by X n n P f aij (t)xj j=1 F (t) = i=1 , n where aij : [0, 1] → R+ (i, j = 1, · · · , n) are affine mappings, i.e., aij (αt1 + βt2 ) = αaij (t1 ) + βaij (t2 ) for all α, β ≥ 0 with α + β = 1 and t1 , t2 in [0, 1], and for each i and j n X aij (t) = 1, i=1 n X aij (t) = 1 (0 ≤ t ≤ 1). j=1 The next theorem contains some remarkable properties of this mapping. Theorem 2.2. With the above assumptions, we have: x1 + · · · + xn f (x1 ) + · · · + f (xn ) (i) f ≤ F (t) ≤ (0 ≤ t ≤ 1). n n (ii) F is convex on [0, 1]. R1 x1 + · · · + xn f (x1 ) + · · · + f (xn ) ≤ 0 F (t)dt ≤ . (iii) f n n P (iv) Let pi ≥ 0 with Pn = ni=1 pi > 0, and ti are in [0, 1] for all i = 1, 2, · · · , n. Then, we have the inequality: ! n x1 + · · · + xn 1 X (2.1) f ≤ F pi ti n Pn i=1 ≤ n 1 X f (x1 ) + · · · + f (xn ) pi F (ti ) ≤ , Pn i=1 n which is a discrete version of Hadamard’s result. Proof. (i) By the convexity of f , for all 0 ≤ t ≤ 1, we have ! Pn Pn i=1 j=1 aij (t)xj F (t) ≥ f n ! Pn Pn j=1 i=1 aij (t)xj = f n ! Pn j=1 xj = f , n J. Inequal. Pure and Appl. Math., 2(1) Art. 4, 2001 http://jipam.vu.edu.au/ S OME A SPECTS OF C ONVEX F UNCTIONS AND T HEIR A PPLICATIONS 3 and Pn Pn aij (t)f (xj ) Pn Pn n j=1 i=1 aij (t)f (xj ) = n Pn j=1 f (xj ) = . n (ii) Let α, β ≥ 0 with α + β = 1 and t1 , t2 be in [0, 1]. Then, P Pn n f a (αt + βt )x ij 1 2 j i=1 j=1 F (αt1 + βt2 ) = P n Pn Pn n i=1 f α j=1 aij (t1 )xj + β j=1 aij (t2 )xj = n P P Pn Pn n n f a (t )x f a (t )x i=1 j=1 ij 1 j i=1 j=1 ij 2 j ≤ α +β n n = αF (t1 ) + βF (t2 ). F (t) ≤ i=1 j=1 Thus F is convex. (iii) F being convex on [0, 1], is integrable on [0, 1], and by (i), we get (iii). (iv) The first and last inequalities in (2.1) are obvious from (i), and the second inequality follows from Jensen’s inequality applied for the convex function F . Lemma 2.3. The general form of an affine mapping g : [0, 1] → R is g(t) = (1 − t)k0 + tk1 , where k0 and k1 are two arbitrary real numbers. The proof follows by considering t = (1 − t) · 0 + t · 1. Lemma If aij : [0, 1] →P R+ (i, j = 1, 2, · · · , n) are affine mappings such that for each t, i P2.4. and j, ni=1 aij (t) = 1 and nj=1 aij (t) = 1, then there exist nonnegative numbers bij and cij , such that (2.2) aij (t) = (1 − t)bij + tcij (0 ≤ t ≤ 1; i, j = 1, · · · , n), and for any i and j n X bij = i=1 n X cij = 1, and i=1 n X bij = j=1 n X cij = 1. j=1 Proof. The decomposition of (2.2) is immediate from Lemma 2.3, and the rest of the proof comes from below: n X 0 ≤ aij (0) = bij , 0 ≤ aij (1) = cij , n n n X X X bij = aij (0) = 1, cij = aij (1) = 1, i=1 i=1 i=1 i=1 n X n X n X n X j=1 bij = j=1 J. Inequal. Pure and Appl. Math., 2(1) Art. 4, 2001 aij (0) = 1, j=1 cij = aij (1) = 1. j=1 http://jipam.vu.edu.au/ 4 J. ROOIN Remark 2.5. A lot of simplifications occur if we take (2.3) bij = δ ij and cij = δ i,n+1−j (i, j = 1, · · · , n), in Lemma 2.4, where δ ij is the Kronecker delta. Theorem 2.6. With the above assumptions, if bij and cij are in the form (2.3), then we have: (i) For each t in 0, 21 , F 12 + t = F 12 − t . (ii) max{F (t) : 0 ≤ t ≤ 1} = F (0) = F (1) = n1 (f (x1 ) + · · · + f (xn )). P (iii) min{F (t) : 0 ≤ t ≤ 1} = F 21 = ni=1 f xi +x2n+1−i n. (iv) F is monotone decreasing on 0, 12 and monotone increasing on 12 , 1 . Proof. (2.4) (i) Since bij = δ ij and cij = δ i,n+1−j , we have n P f [(1 − t)xi + txn+1−i ] i=1 , F (t) = n and therefore, for each t in 0, 21 , n P f 12 + t xi + 12 − t xn+1−i 1 F −t = i=1 2 n n P f 12 + t xn+1−i + 12 − t xi = i=1 n 1 = F +t . 2 (ii) It is obvious from (2.4), and (i) of Lemma 2.1. (iii) If F ( 12 ) is not the minimum of F over [0, 1], then by (i), there is a 0 < t ≤ 12 , such that 1 1 1 F −t =F +t <F . 2 2 2 But, using the convexity of F over [0, 1], we have 1 1 1 1 1 1 F ≤ F −t + F +t <F , 2 2 2 2 2 2 a contradiction. (iv) It is obvious from (iii) of Theorem 2.6, and (v) of Lemma 2.1. 3. A PPLICATIONS Application 1. Let x1 , x2 , · · · , xn be n nonnegative numbers. Then, with the above notations, we have v uY n u n X √ x1 + x2 + · · · + xn n n t x1 x2 · · · xn ≤ [(1 − t)bij + tcij ]xj ≤ , (3.1) n i=1 j=1 (3.2) v u n uY √ x1 + x2 + · · · + xn n n x1 x2 · · · xn ≤ t [(1 − t)xi + txn+1−i ] ≤ , n i=1 J. Inequal. Pure and Appl. Math., 2(1) Art. 4, 2001 http://jipam.vu.edu.au/ S OME A SPECTS OF C ONVEX F UNCTIONS AND T HEIR A PPLICATIONS 5 for all t in [0, 1], and √ n (3.3) x1 x2 · · · xn v u Pj cij xj P c x −1 P b x u P ( j ij j j ij j ) uY n u j cij xj n ≤ e−1 u Pj bij xj t P i=1 j bij xj x1 + x2 + · · · + xn . n ≤ In particular √ n (3.4) v u n xn+1−i 1 u Y xn+1−i (xn+1−i −xi ) n −1 t ≤ e xxi i i=1 x1 x2 · · · xn ≤ x1 + x2 + · · · + xn , n and √ (3.5) x1 x2 ≤ e 2n + 2 2n + 1 (3.6) −1 1 1+ n xx1 1 xx2 2 1 1 −x2 x n r ≤e≤ ≤ x1 + x2 , 2 n+1 n 1 1+ n n . Proof. If we take f : (0, ∞) → R, f (x) = − ln x, then we have n n X 1X F (t) = − ln [(1 − t)bij + tcij ]xj n i=1 j=1 ! , and Z 0 1 n 1X F (t)dt = − n i=1 1 Z ln 0 n X ! [(1 − t)bij + tcij ]xj Pn 1P c x − n b x j=1 ij j j=1 ij j Pnj=1 cij xj Pn j=1 cij xj 1 Y = − ln P Pnj=1 bij xj n i=1 n j=1 bij xj n dt j=1 + 1, which proves (3.1) and (3.3). In particular, if we take bij = δ ij and cij = δ i,n+1−j (i, j = 1, · · · , n), we obtain (3.2) and (3.4) from (3.1) and (3.3) respectively. The result (3.5) is immediate from (3.4). If we take x1 = n, x2 = n + 1 in (3.5), we get (3.6). Application 2. If X is a Lebesgue measurable subset of Rk , p ≥ 1, and f1 , f2 , · · · , fn belong to Lp = Lp (X), then we have i Pn hPn Pn p f1 + · · · + fn i=1 j=1 cij |fj |; j=1 bij |fj | ≤ (3.7) n n(p + 1) p kf1 kpp + · · · + kfn kpp ≤ , n J. Inequal. Pure and Appl. Math., 2(1) Art. 4, 2001 http://jipam.vu.edu.au/ 6 J. ROOIN and (3.8) Pn f1 + · · · + fn p i=1 [|fi | ; |fn+1−i |] ≤ n n(p + 1) p kf1 kpp + · · · + kfn kpp ≤ , n where for each Lebesgue measurable function g ≥ 0 and h ≥ 0 on X, p+1 Z p+1 p+1 g g − hp+1 − h = [g; h] = dx, g − h 1 g−h X when g(x) = h(x), the integrand is understood to be (p + 1)g p (x). In particular, if p is an integer then, p n P P k p−k p fi .fn+1−i f1 + · · · + fn kf1 kpp + · · · + kfn kpp 1 ≤ i=1 k=0 ≤ , (3.9) n n(p + 1) n p and (3.10) f1 + f2 p 2 ≤ p p P k p−k f .f 1 2 1 k=0 p+1 kf1 kpp + kf2 kpp ≤ , 2 Proof. Since (f1 + · · · + fn ) ≤ (|f1 | + · · · + |fn |) n n p p and the Lp −norms of fi and |fi | are equal (i = 1, · · · , n), it is sufficient to assume fi ≥ 0 (i = 1, · · · , n). If we take ϕ → kϕkp for the convex function Lp → R, then using Fubini’s theorem we get n p Z 1 n Z 1 X 1 X F (t)dt = [(1 − t)bij + tcij ]fj dt n i=1 0 j=1 0 p !p Z Z n n X 1X 1 = [(1 − t)bij + tcij ]fj (x) dxdt n i=1 0 X j=1 !p n Z Z 1 n X 1X = [(1 − t)bij + tcij ]fj (x) dtdx n i=1 X 0 j=1 P p+1 P p+1 n n Z n − X j=1 cij fj j=1 bij fj 1 Pn Pn dx = n(p + 1) i=1 X j=1 cij fj − j=1 bij fj i Pn hPn Pn c f ; b f i=1 j=1 ij j j=1 ij j = , n(p + 1) which yields (3.7). In particular, if we set bij = δ ij and cij = δ i,n+1−j (i, j = 1, · · · , n), (3.8) follows from (3.7). Finally, (3.9) and (3.10) are immediate from (3.8). Remark 3.1. Let X be a Lebesgue measurable subset of Rk with finite measure, and M be the vector space of all Lebesgue measurable functions on X with pointwise operations [1]. The set J. Inequal. Pure and Appl. Math., 2(1) Art. 4, 2001 http://jipam.vu.edu.au/ S OME A SPECTS OF C ONVEX F UNCTIONS AND T HEIR A PPLICATIONS 7 C, consisting of all nonnegative measurable functions on X, is a convex subset of M. Since t the function t → 1+t (t ≥ 0) is concave, the mapping ϕ : C → R with Z ϕ(f ) = X f dx (f ∈ C) 1+f is concave. Application 3. With the above notations, if f1 , · · · , fn belong to M, then n (3.11) 1X n i=1 Z X |fi | dx 1 + |fi | P n Z 1 + nj=1 cij |fj | 1X 1 P P dx ≤ m(X) − ln n i=1 X nj=1 (cij − bij )|fj | 1 + nj=1 bij |fj | Pn Z 1 i=1 |fi | n P ≤ dx, n 1 X 1+ n i=1 |fi | n (3.12) 1X n i=1 Z X |fi | dx 1 + |fi | n Z 1X 1 1 + |fn+1−i | ≤ m(X) − ln dx n i=1 X |fn+1−i | − |fi | 1 + |fi | Pn Z 1 i=1 |fi | n P ≤ dx, n 1 X 1+ n i=1 |fi | 2 (3.13) 1X 2 i=1 Z X Z |fi | 1 1 + |f2 | dx ≤ m(X) − ln dx 1 + |fi | 1 + |f1 | X |f2 | − |f1 | P2 Z 1 i=1 |fi | 2 dx, ≤ P 2 1 |f | X 1+ 2 i i=1 in which, generally, when a = b > 0, the ratio (ln b − ln a)(b − a) is understood as 1a. Proof. We can suppose that fi ≥ 0 (1 ≤ i ≤ n). Since ϕ is concave, taking ϕ and φ instead of f and F in Theorem 2.2 respectively, we get Z 1 ϕ(f1 ) + · · · + ϕ(fn ) (3.14) ≤ φ(t)dt n 0 f1 + · · · + fn ≤ ϕ . n However, by Fubini’s theorem and applying the change of variables u= n X [(1 − t)bij + tcij ]fj (x), j=1 J. Inequal. Pure and Appl. Math., 2(1) Art. 4, 2001 http://jipam.vu.edu.au/ 8 J. ROOIN in the following integrals, we have, Pn Z Z 1 n Z 1X 1 j=1 [(1 − t)bij + tcij ]fj (x) P φ(t)dt = dxdt n i=1 0 X 1 + nj=1 [(1 − t)bij + tcij ]fj (x) 0 Pn n Z Z 1 1X j=1 [(1 − t)bij + tcij ]fj (x) P dtdx = n i=1 X 0 1 + nj=1 [(1 − t)bij + tcij ]fj (x) Z Pnj=1 cij fj (x) n Z 1 1X 1 P = 1− dudx n i=1 X nj=1 (cij − bij )fj (x) Pnj=1 bij fj (x) 1+u P n Z 1 + nj=1 cij fj 1 1X P P = m(X) − ln dx, n i=1 X nj=1 (cij − bij )fj 1 + nj=1 bij fj and after substituting this in (3.14), we obtain (3.11). The inequalities (3.12) and (3.13) are special cases of (3.11), taking bij = δ ij and cij = δ i,n+1−j . Acknowledgement 1. I would like to express my gratitude to Professors A. R. Medghalchi and B. Mehri for their valuable comments and suggestions. R EFERENCES [1] S. BERBERIAN, Lectures in functional analysis and operator theory, Springer, New YorkHeidelberg-Berlin, 1974. [2] S. S. DRAGOMIR AND N. M. IONESCU, Some remarks on convex functions, Revue d’analyse numérique et de théorie de l’approximation, 21 (1992), 31–36. [3] A.W. ROBERTS AND D.E. VARBERG, Convex functions, Academic Press, New York and London, 1973. [4] R. WEBSTER, Convexity, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, Tokyo, 1994. J. Inequal. Pure and Appl. Math., 2(1) Art. 4, 2001 http://jipam.vu.edu.au/