Mem. Differential Equations Math. Phys. 46 (2009), 157–160 J. Kapanadze

advertisement
Mem. Differential Equations Math. Phys. 46 (2009), 157–160
J. Kapanadze
ON SOLVABILITY OF THE PROBLEM WITH A
DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE FOR THE EQUATION ∆3 v = 0
Abstract. We consider the problem of directional derivative for the equation ∆3 v = 0 when the direction of the derivative belongs to the tangent
plane. It is proved that if the boundary functions belong to a certain class,
then the problem has a solution.
!
"
∆3 v = 0
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 35J40.
Key words and phrases: Problem with a directional derivative, volume
and single-layer potentials, Dirichlet problem.
The investigation of the problem with a directional derivative in an ndimensional domain for n ≥ 3 has been initiated in [1], [2] and continued in
[3]–[8]. In this note we treat the problem for the equation ∆3 v = 0.
Let us introduce the necessary notation. Let Ω be a bounded smooth
domain belonging to the class C (5,α) , `x be a smooth direction at x ∈ ∂Ω,
`x ∈ C (4,α) , |`x | = 1. For simplicity of presentation, we will consider the
three-dimensional case.
The volume potential and the single-layer potential will be denoted as
follows (see [9]):
Z
Z
1
1
ψ(y)
µ(y)
V µ (x) =
dy; U ψ (x) =
dSy,
4π
|x − y|
4π
|x − y|
Ω
∂Ω
where ∂Ω is the boundary of Ω, µ ∈ L1 (Ω), ψ ∈ L1 (∂Ω). If G is the Green
function for the Dirichlet problem for Ω, then the solution to the Dirichlet
problem has the form
Z
∂G(x, y)
ϕ(y) dSy, x ∈ Ω, ϕ ∈ C(∂Ω),
v(x) = −
∂νy
∂Ω
where νx is the outer normal at x ∈ ∂Ω, |νx | = 1.
The Green potential is denoted by
Z
VGf (x) = G(x, y)f (y) dy, f ∈ L1 (Ω).
Ω
158
The density of a balayaged measure µ ∈ C(Ω) (see [9]) in the volume potential case is defined as the linear operator
Z
∂G(x, y)
µ(y) dy, y ∈ ∂Ω.
T µ(y) = µ0 (y) = −
∂νy
Ω
It is well-known ([9], p. 260) that
0
V µ (x) = U µ (x), x ∈ R3 \ Ω.
Denote
n
o
E = x : (νx , `x ) = cos(νxb`x ) = 0, x ∈ ∂Ω .
We always assume that E consists of a finite number of closed curves. Denote by Γ(x, y) the Newton kernel (4π|x − y|)−1 .
In the sequel we use the following auxiliary equality [10]
∂G(x, y)
∂G(x, y)
= cos(νxb`x )
, x ∈ ∂Ω \ E, y ∈ Ω.
∂`x
∂νx
In the proof of the main assertion the following lemma will be used.
(1)
Lemma. Let µ ∈ C α (Ω), Ω ∈ C (2,α) . Then the following equality holds
∂ 2 Viµ (x) ∂ 2 Veµ
−
= −µ(x) cos2 (νxb`x ), x ∈ ∂Ω \ E.
∂`2x
∂`2x
The outwards and inwards limits for V µ are considered.
(2)
Proof. Let x0 ∈ ∂Ω − E. Obviously
3
∂V µ (x) X ∂V µ (x) 0
αk , `x0 = `0 = (α01 , α02 , α03 ).
=
∂`x0
∂xk
k=1
It is easy to see that
∂ 2 V µ (x) X ∂ 2 V µ (x) 0 0
=
α α .
∂`20
∂xj ∂xk j k
Consider the difference
3 2 µ
µ
X
∂ 2 Viµ (x) ∂ 2 Veµ (x)
∂ Vi (x) ∂ 2 V` (x) 0 0
αj αk .
−
=
−
∂`20
∂`20
∂xj ∂xk
∂xj ∂xk
(3)
j,k=1
Let us now use the following relation ([11], p. 115)
∂ 2 Viµ (x) ∂ 2 Veµ (x)
−
= −µ(x)νj νk , ν = (ν1 , ν2 , ν3 ).
∂xj ∂xk
∂xj ∂xk
(4)
(4) along with (3) gives (ν0 = νx0 )
3
X
∂ 2 Viµ (x0 ) ∂ 2 Veµ (x0 )
−
=
−µ(x
)
αj αk νj νk = −µ(x) cos2 (ν0b`0 ).
0
∂`20
∂`20
j,k=1
The lemma is proved.
Let us proceed to the main assertion of this note.
159
Theorem. There exists a solution to the equation ∆3 v = 0 in the domain Ω belonging to the space C (4,α) (Ω) and satisfying the following boundary conditions
v = ϕ0 , ϕ0 ∈ C (5,α) (∂Ω), H0 = ϕ0 , ∆H0 = 0,
∂Ω
∂Ω
∂H0 (x)
∂v(x)
=
+ ϕ1 (x)(νx , `x ), ϕ1 ∈ C (4,α) , x ∈ ∂Ω \ E,
∂`x
∂`x
∂ 2 v(x)
∂ 2 H0 (x)
=
+ ϕ2 (x)(νx , `x )2 +
2
∂`x
∂`2x
∂ 2 Uiϕ1 (x) ∂ 2 Ueϕ1 (x)
+
−
, ϕ2 ∈ C (3,α) , x ∈ ∂Ω \ E.
∂`2x
∂`2x
(5)
Proof. The solution v ∈ C (4,α) has the form
Z
Z
Z
v(x) = H0 (x) − G(x, y)H1 (y) dy + G(x, y) G(y, z)H2 (z) dz dy,
Ω
Ω
Ω
where H0 , H1 and H2 are harmonic functions such that ∆v(x) = H1 (x),
∆2 v(x) = H2 (x), x ∈ ∂Ω. In order to find H1 , let us rewrite the solution as
follows
Z
Z
v(x) = H0 (x)− G(x, y)Φ1 (y) dy, Φ1 (y) = H1 (y)− G(x, y)H2 (z) dz.
Ω
Ω
Due to the second boundary condition, we get
∂H0 (x)
∂H0 (x)
+ cos(νxb`x )Φ0 (x) =
+ ϕ1 (x) cos(νxb`x ).
∂`x
∂`x
Therefore, Φ01 (x) = ϕ1 (x) x ∈ ∂Ω (Φ1 (x) = H1 (x) x ∈ ∂Ω).
The third boundary condition also gives
∂ 2 Uiϕ1 (x) ∂ 2 Ueϕ1 (x)
∂ 2 H0
2
+
Φ(x)
cos
(ν
b`
)
+
−
=
x
x
∂`2x
∂`2x
∂`2x
∂ 2 H0 (x)
∂ 2 Uiϕ1 (x) ∂ 2 Ueϕ1 (x)
2
=
+
ϕ
(x)
cos
(ν
b`
)
+
−
.
2
x
x
∂`2x
∂`2x
∂`2x
Hence, Φ(x) = H1 (x) = ϕ2 (x), x ∈ ∂Ω.
In order to define H2 , we apply again the second boundary condition
∂H0 (x)
∂v(x)
=
+ ϕ1 cos(νxb`x ) =
∂`x
∂`x
∂H0 (x)
=
+ H10 (x) cos(νxb`x ) + (VGh2 )0 cos(νxb`x ).
∂`x
Hence, ϕ1 (x) − H10 (x) = (VGH2 (x))0 x ∈ ∂Ω.
Therefore,
Z
Z
ϕ(x)dSx
VGH2 (x)
dx =
, ϕ = ϕ1 − H10 ∈ C (4,α) , x ∈ R3 − Ω.
|x − y|
|x − y|
Ω
∂Ω
160
Due to the equality
Z
Z
VGH2 (y)dy
V H2 (y)dy ϕ(y)dSy
,
=
, x ∈ R3 \ Ω v1 (x) = G
|x − y|
|x − y|
|x − y|
Ω
∂Ω
we get the Dirichlet problem in the domain Ω for the equation ∆3 v1 = 0
v1 (x) = U ϕ (x), x ∈ ∂Ω,
∂U`ϕ (x)
∂v1 (x)
=
, x ∈ ∂Ω,
∂νx
∂νx
∂ 2 U`ϕ (x)
∂ 2 v1 (x)
=
, x ∈ ∂Ω.
∂νx2
∂νx2
Now H2 can easily be found by solving the Dirichet problem (∆2 v1 =
H2 ).
References
1. A. V. Bitsadze, The homogeneous problem for the directional derivative for harmonic functions in three-dimensional regions. (Russian) Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 148
(1963), 749–752.
2. A. V. Bitsadze, Boundary value problems for elliptic equations of second order.
(Russian) Nauka, Moscow, 1966.
3. M. B. Maljutov, Oblique derivative problem in three-dimensional space. (Russian)
Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 172 (1967), 283–286.
4. A. Janušauskas, On the oblique derivative problem for harmonic functions of three
independent variables. (Russian) Sibirsk. Mat. Ž. 8 (1967), 447–462.
5. Ju. V. Egorov and V. A. Kondrat’ev, The oblique derivative problem. (Russian)
Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 78 (120) (1969), 148–176.
6. V. G. Maz’ja, The degenerate problem with an oblique derivative. (Russian) Mat.
Sb. (N.S.) 87 (129) (1972), 417–454.
7. Sh. A. Alimov, On a problem with an oblique derivative. (Russian) Differentsial’nye
Uravneniya 17 (1981), No. 10, 1738–1751.
8. S. Rempel and B.-V. Schulze, Index theory of elliptic boundary problems.
Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1982; Russian transl.: Mir, Moscow, 1986.
9. N. S. Landkof, Fundamentals of modern potential theory. (Russian) Nauka,
Moscow, 1966.
10. D. V. Kapanadze, On the uniqueness of a solution of the oblique derivative problem
for the equation ∆n v = 0. (Russian) Ukrain. Mat. Zh. 58 (2006), No. 6, 835–841;
English transl.: Ukrainian Math. J. 58 (2006), No. 6, 945–953
11. N. M. Gyunter, Theory of the potential and its application to the basic problems of
mathematical physics. (Russian) Gosudarstv. Izdat. Tehn.-Teor. Lit., Moscow, 1953.
(Received 18.05.2006)
Author’s address:
M. Nodia Institute of Geophysics
1, Aleksidze St., 0193 Tbilisi
Georgia
Download