General Mathematics Vol. 14, No. 2 (2006), 109–119 Optimal Quadrature Formulas in the Sense of Nikolski 1 Ana Maria Acu Abstract In this paper we will perform a method to obtain a quadrature formulas and we will study the optimality in sense of Nikolski for this quadrature formulas. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 26D15, 65D30 Key words and phrases: quadrature rule, numerical integration, error bounds, optimal quadrature 1 Introduction Let H be a linear space of real valued functions , defined and integrable on a finite interval [a, b] ⊂ R and S : H → R be the integration operator defined by Z b S[f ] = f (x)dx . a 1 Received June 4, 2006 Accepted for publication (in revised form) July 7, 2006 109 110 Ana Maria Acu Let © ª Λ = λi | λi : H → R, i = 1, n be a set of linear functionals. For f ∈ H, one considers the quadrature formula (1) S[f ] = Qn [f ] + Rn [f ] where Qn [f ] = n X Ai λi (f ) i=1 and Rn [f ] denotes the remainder term. Remark 1.1. Usually , λi (f ), i = 1, n are the values of the function f or of certain of its derivatives on the quadrature nodes from [a, b]. Definition 1.1. The quadrature formula (1) is called optimal in the sense of Nikolski in the space H , if Fn (H, A, X) = sup |Rn [f ]| , f ∈H attains the minimum value with regard to A and X , where A = (A1 , . . . , An ) are the coefficients and X = (x1 , . . . , xn ) are the quadrature nodes. 2 Main Results Let (∆m )m∈N be a division of [a, b] , ∆m : a = x0 < x1 < x2 < · · · < xm−1 < xm = b and (ξi )i=1,m a system of intermediate points , ξ1 < ξ2 < · · · < ξm , ξi ∈ [xi−1 , xi ] for i = 1, m . Optimal Quadrature Formulas in the Sense of Nikolski 111 Theorem 2.1. If f ∈ C n−1 [a, b] , f (n−1) is absolutely continous , then Z b (2) f (t)dt = a n−1 X m X Ak,i f (k) (xi ) + Rn [f ] k=0 i=0 where Z b n (3) Rn [f ] = (−1) Kn (t)f (n) (t)dt a n (t − ξi ) , t ∈ [xi−1 , xi ) , i = 1, m − 1 n! n Kn (t) = (4) (t − ξm ) , t ∈ [xm−1 , b] n! and for k = 0, n − 1 (xi − ξi )k+1 − (xi − ξi+1 )k+1 , i = 1, m − 1 (k + 1)! (a − ξ1 )k+1 Ak,0 = (−1)k+1 (k + 1)! (b − ξm )k+1 Ak,m = (−1)k (k + 1)! Ak,i = (−1)k Proof. We prove (2) by induction. For n = 1 we have "m−1 Z # Z b Z b X xi K1 (t)f 0 (t)dt = − (t − ξi )f 0 (t)dt + (t − ξm )f 0 (t)dt = − a xi−1 i=1 =− "m−1 X i=1 ¯xi ¯ (t − ξi )f (t)¯ xi−1 xm−1 ¯b ¯ + (t − ξm )f (t)¯ xm−1 Z b − # f (t)dt = a "m−1 X =− (xi − ξi )f (xi )− i=1 − # Z b (xi−1 − ξi )f (xi−1 ) + (b − ξm )f (b) − (xm−1 − ξm )f (xm−1 ) + f (t)dt = m−1 X i=1 =− a "m−1 X i=1 # ((xi − ξi ) − (xi − ξi+1 )) f (xi ) − (a − ξ1 )f (a) + (b − ξm )f (b) 112 Ana Maria Acu Z b + f (t)dt = − a Therefore Z b a a i=1 i=1 m X xi xi−1 b A0,i f (xi ) + f (t)dt . a Z b A0,i f (xi ) − K1 (t)f 0 (t)dt a i=0 For n = 2 we have Z b m−1 XZ 00 K2 (t)f (t)dt = = Z i=0 f (t)dt = m−1 X m X (t − ξi )2 00 f (t)dt + 2! Z b xm−1 (t − ξm )2 00 f (t)dt 2! Z b (t − ξm )2 0 ¯¯b (t − ξi )2 0 ¯¯xi + − K1 (t)f 0 (t)dt f (t)¯ f (t)¯ 2! 2! xi−1 xm−1 a = m−1 X i=1 m−1 X (xi−1 − ξi )2 (xi − ξi )2 0 f (xi ) − f 0 (xi−1 )+ 2! 2! i=1 (b − ξm )2 0 (xm−1 − ξm )2 0 f (b) − f (xm−1 )− 2! 2! Z b m−1 X (xi − ξi )2 − (xi − ξi+1 )2 0 f 0 (xi )− − K1 (t)f (t)dt = 2! a i=1 + (a − ξ1 )2 0 (b − ξm )2 0 f (a) + f (b)− 2! 2! Z b Z b m m X X 0 0 f (t)dt . K1 (t)f (t)dt = − A1,i f (xi ) − A0,i f (xi ) + − − a i=0 a i=0 Therefore Z b f (t)dt = a 1 X m X Z Ak,i f (k) b (xi ) + K2 (t)f 00 (t)dt . a k=0 i=0 Now suppose that (2) holds for an arbitrary n. We have to prove that (3) holds for n → n + 1. We have "m−1 Z Z b X Kn+1 (t)f (n+1) (t)dt = (−1)n+1 (−1)n+1 a i=1 xi xi−1 (t − ξi )n+1 (n+1) f (t)dt + (n + 1)! Optimal Quadrature Formulas in the Sense of Nikolski 113 ¸ (t − ξm )n+1 (n+1) + f (t)dt = (n + 1)! xm−1 "m−1 ¯xi X (t − ξi )n+1 ¯ = (−1)n+1 f (n) (t)¯ + (n + 1)! xi−1 i=1 Z b ¸ Z b (t − ξm )n+1 (n) ¯¯b (n) f (t)¯ + − Kn (t)f (t)dt = (n + 1)! xm−1 a "m−1 m−1 X (xi − ξi )n+1 X (xi−1 − ξi )n+1 n+1 (n) = (−1) f (xi ) − f (n) (xi−1 ) + (n + 1)! (n + 1)! i=1 i=1 (b − ξm )n+1 (n) f (b) − (n + 1)! ¸ Z b (xm−1 − ξm )n+1 (n) n f (xm−1 ) + (−1) Kn (t)f (n) (t)dt = − (n + 1)! a + n+1 = (−1) m−1 X i=1 (xi − ξi )n+1 − (xi − ξi+1 )n+1 (n) (a − ξ1 )n+1 (n) f (xi )+(−1)n f (a)+ (n + 1)! (n + 1)! − ξm )n+1 (n) f (b) + (−1)n (n + 1)! n+1 (b +(−1) =− m X An,i f (n) i=0 (xi ) − m n−1 X X Z b Kn (t)f (n) (t)dt = a Z Ak,i f (k) b (xi ) + f (t)dt . a k=0 i=0 Therefore Z b Z b n X m X (k) n+1 f (t)dt = Ak,i f (xi ) + (−1) Kn+1 (t)f (n+1) (t)dt . a k=0 i=0 a Remark 2.1. The quadrature formulas of type (2) with equidistant knots had obtain from this method in [1], [2], [3], [5], [6], [7], [9], [10]. Remark 2.2. If ξ1 = a and ξm = b then quadrature formula (2) is open type. 114 Ana Maria Acu Next, we will study the optimality in sense of Nikolski for this quadrature ¯ n o ¯ n,p n−1 (n) p formulas. Let H [a, b] = f : [a, b] → R¯f ∈ C [a, b] , f ∈ L [a, b] . If f ∈ H n,p [a, b] for rest term we have the evaluation £ ¤1 |Rn [f ]| ≤ Mn[p] [f ] p (5) where Z Mn[p] [f ] b = a ·Z b |Kn (t)|q dt ¸ 1q a ¯ (n) ¯p ¯f (t)¯ dt , 1 + 1 = 1 p q with remark that in cases p = 1 and p = ∞ this evaluation is |Rn [f ]| ≤ Mn[1] [f ] sup |Kn (t)| (6) t∈[a,b] Z (7) |Rn [f ]| ≤ where Mn∞ [f ] b |Kn (t)| dt a R b ¯ (n) ¯ ¯f (t)¯ dt a ¯ ¯ Mn∞ [f ] = sup ¯f (n) (t)¯ . [1] Mn [f ] = t∈[a,b] The quadrature formula (2) is optimal in the sense of Nikolski in H n,p [a, b], if Z b |Kn (t)|q dt , a 1 1 + =1 p q attains the minimum value. Theorem 2.2. If f ∈ H n,p [a, b] , p > 1 ,then quadrature formula of the form (2), optimal with regard to the error, is Z b f (x)dx = a n−1 X m X k=0 i=0 A∗k,i f (k) (x∗i ) + R∗n [f ] Optimal Quadrature Formulas in the Sense of Nikolski where , for k = 0, n − 1 (b − a)k+1 2k+1 mk+1 (k + 1)! (b − a)k+1 A∗k,i = [1 + (−1)k ] k+1 k+1 , i = 1, m − 1 2 m (k + 1)! (b − a)k+1 A∗k,m = (−1)k k+1 k+1 2 m (k + 1)! b−a ∗ xi = a + i , i = 1, m − 1 m A∗k,0 = with |R∗n [f ]| (b − a)n ≤ · (2m)n n! µ b−a qn + 1 ¶ 1q £ ¤1 · Mn[p] [f ] p . Proof. We will determine the parameters A and X for which Z b F (A, X) = |Kn (t)|q dt a attains the minimum value . We have ¯ Z b ¯ m−1 X Z xi ¯¯ (t − ξi )n ¯¯q ¯ (t − ξm )n ¯q ¯ ¯ ¯ dt ¯ F (A, X) = ¯ n! ¯ dt + ¯ ¯ n! x x m−1 i−1 i=1 " m # m X X 1 = (xi − ξi )qn+1 + (ξi − xi−1 )qn+1 . (qn + 1)(n!)q i=1 i=1 The optimal nodes constitute the solution of the system ∂F (A, X) 1 = [(xk − ξk )qn − (ξk+1 − xk )qn ] = 0 , k = 1, m − 1 q ∂x (n!) k (8) 1 ∂F (A, X) = [−(xk − ξk )qn + (ξk − xk−1 )qn ] = 0 , k = 1, m ∂ξk (n!)q From (8) we obtain (9) (10) ξk = xk−1 + xk , k = 1, m 2 xk+1 − 2xk + xk−1 = 0 , k = 1, m − 1 . 115 116 Ana Maria Acu From recurrent relation (10) we obtain (11) xk = a + b−a k , k = 1, m − 1 m From (9) and(11) follows that (b − a)k+1 2k+1 mk+1 (k + 1)! (b − a)k+1 Ak,i = [1 + (−1)k ] k+1 k+1 , i = 1, m − 1 2 m (k + 1)! (b − a)k+1 Ak,m = (−1)k k+1 k+1 . 2 m (k + 1)! Ak,0 = Because the quadratic form φ= m−1 m XX i=1 j=1 + m−1 X m−1 X i=1 j=1 m m−1 X X ∂ 2 F (A, X) ∂ 2 F (A, X) ai bj + bj ai ∂xi ∂ξj ∂ξj ∂xi j=1 i=1 m m X X ∂ 2 F (A, X) ∂ 2 F (A, X) ai aj + bi bj ∂xi xj ∂ξi ∂ξj i=1 j=1 in cross point (A, X) is positive, namely ) µ ¶qn−1 (m−1 X£ ¤ b−a qn φ= · · (ai − bi )2 + (ai − bi+1 )2 + b21 + b2m (n!)q 2m i=1 then F (A, X) attains the minimum value for the knots X ∗ = (x∗i )i=1,m−1 m and coefficients A∗ = (A∗k,i )n−1 k=0 i=0 , where b−a i , i = 1, m − 1 m (b − a)k+1 A∗k,0 = k+1 k+1 2 m (k + 1)! (b − a)k+1 A∗k,i = [1 + (−1)k ] k+1 k+1 , i = 1, m − 1 2 m (k + 1)! (b − a)k+1 A∗k,m = (−1)k k+1 k+1 2 m (k + 1)! x∗i = a + Optimal Quadrature Formulas in the Sense of Nikolski 117 Finally, we have F (A∗ , X ∗ ) = min F (A, X) = A,X (b − a)qn+1 , (qn + 1)(n!)q (2m)qn and ¶ 1q µ n £ [p] ¤ p1 (b − a) b − a |R∗n [f ]| ≤ · · Mn [f ] . (2m)n n! qn + 1 In this way we prove follow result: Theorem 2.3. The quadrature formula of the form (2) is optimal in the sense of Nikolski for p = ∞ if it has the coefficients and knots (b − a)k+1 = k+1 k+1 2 m (k + 1)! (b − a)k+1 A∗k,i = [1 + (−1)k ] k+1 k+1 , i = 1, m − 1 2 m (k + 1)! (b − a)k+1 A∗k,m = (−1)k k+1 k+1 2 m (k + 1)! b − a x∗i = a + i , i = 1, m − 1 m A∗k,0 and there is for rest term evaluation |R∗n [f ]| ≤ (b − a)n+1 · Mn∞ [f ] . (n + 1)!(2m)n The optimal quadrature formulas had obtain by S.M. Nikolski (see [8]).In [4] T. Cătinaş and G. Coman obtain the optimal quadrature formulas using ϕ- function method. For example if f ∈ H 1,2 [0, 1] then quadrature formula of the form (2), optimal with regard to the error, is " # Z 1 m−1 X µi¶ 1 · f (0) + 2 f f (x)dx = + f (1) + R∗1 [f ] , 2m m 0 i=1 where |R∗1 [f ]| ≤ 1 √ kf 0 k2 . 2m 3 118 Ana Maria Acu For f ∈ H 2,2 [0, 1] we have " # Z 1 m−1 X µi¶ 1 1 1 f (x)dx = · f (0) + 2 f + f (1) + 2 f 0 (0)− 2 f 0 (1)+R∗2 [f ] , 2m m 8m 8m 0 i=1 where |R∗2 [f ]| ≤ 1 √ kf 00 k2 . 8m2 5 References [1] A. M. Acu, A Generalized Quadrature rule, JATA (to appear). [2] A. M. Acu, Some News Quadrature Rules of Close Type , AAMA (to appear). [3] G. A. Anastassiou, Ostrowski Type Inequalities, Proc. Amer. Math.Soc.,Vol 123,No 12,(1995),3775-3781. [4] T. Cătinaş, G. Coman, Optimal Quadrature Formulas Based on the ϕfunction Method, Studia Univ. ”Babes-Bolyai”, Mathematica, Volume LII, Number 6,January 2005. [5] P. Cerone, S. S. Dragomir, Midpoint-type Rules from an Inequalities Point of View,Handbook of Analytic-Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics, Editor: G. Anastassiou, CRC Press, New York, (2000),135-200. [6] P. Cerone, S. S. Dragomir, Trapezoidal-type Rules from an Inequalities Point of View,Handbook of Analytic-Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics, Editor: G. Anastassiou, CRC Press, New York, (2000),65-134. Optimal Quadrature Formulas in the Sense of Nikolski 119 [7] Lj. Dedić, M. Matić, J. Pečarić, On Euler trapezoid formulae,Appl. Math. Comput.,123(2001),37-62. [8] S. M. Nikolski, Formule de cuadratura,Editura tehnica, Bucuresti , 1964. [9] C. E. M. Pearce, J. Pečarić, N. Ujević, S. Varošanec, Generalizations of some inequalities of Ostrowski-Grüss type, Math. Inequal. Appl., 3(1), (2000), 25-34. [10] N. Ujević, Error Inequalities for a Generalized Quadrature Rule , General Mathematics, Vol. 13, No. 4(2005), 51-64. University ”Lucian Blaga” of Sibiu Department of Mathematics Str. Dr. I. Rat.iu, No. 5-7 550012 - Sibiu, Romania E-mail address: acuana77@yahoo.com