Understanding Osteoporosis Learning Objectives

advertisement
Understanding
Osteoporosis
Jeri W. Nieves, PhD
Associate Professor of Clinical Epidemiology
Columbia University
Director, Bone Density Testing
Helen Hayes Hospital
Everyone has a Role to Play in
Improving Bone Health
This report is a starting point for national action
Learning Objectives
• Understand the public health impact of
osteoporosis
• Describe methods to identify the risk
and the importance of fracture reduction
• Describe the treatments for fracture
reduction currently available.
NYSOPEP
The New York State
Osteoporosis Prevention
and Education Program
Œ
Œ
Œ
Œ
Definition of Osteoporosis
A skeletal disorder characterized by
compromised bone strength predisposing a
person to an increased risk of fracture. Bone
strength primarily reflects the integration of
bone quality and bone density.
Established in 1997
Evidence-based
education
6 regional centers
Visit the website
www.NYSOPEP.org
Bone is alive!
National Institutes of Health (USA)
Consensus Statement on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, 2000
There is a cycle of breaking down
and rebuilding bone called
Normal Bone
Osteoporosis
bone remodeling
1
Osteoporosis: A Growing
Concern for Health Plans
Osteoporosis
• 44 million people have osteopenia or
osteoporosis1
− 34 million people have osteopenia or
low bone density
− 10 million people have osteoporosis
• Osteoporotic fractures are more
common than heart attack, stroke, and
breast cancer combined2-4
1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon
General, 2004.
2 Riggs BL, et al. Bone. 1995;17(5)(Suppl.):505S-511S. .
3 American Heart Association. Heart and Stroke Facts:1996 Statistical Supplement.
4 Cancer Facts & Figure: 1996. American Cancer Society.
• Baby boomers and now at risk
• Osteoporosis is under-diagnosed
• Osteoporosis is under-treated
“…Fractures…are
“…Fractures…are by far the most important
consequence of poor bone health since they can
result in disability, diminished function, loss of
independence, and premature death.”*
*U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Surgeon General; 2004.
Available at: http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library.
Fragility Fracture Rates in a
Managed Care Population
60%
$60
Fracture
Cost
$50
40%
$40
30%
$30
20%
$20
10%
$10
0%
Wrist
Leg
Arm
Hip
Pelvis
Clavicle
Millions of Dollars
Percent of Fractures
50%
Vertebral
Adachi J, et al. Online publication of abstract presented at: Annual Meeting of the European Calcified Tissue Society.
The Osteoporosis Continuum
Spine Fractures May
Cause:
ΠPain
ΠLoss of height
ΠStooped posture
ΠDifficulty breathing
Healthy
spine
Kyphotic
spine
50 Menopausal
55+ Postmenopausal
75+ Kyphotic
Experiencing
vasomotor
symptoms
At greater risk for vertebral
fracture than any other
type of fracture
At risk for
hip fracture and
vertebral
fracture
ΠStomach pains/digestive discomfort
ΠLoss of selfself-esteem
ΠIncreased risk for spine and other nonnonspine fractures (including hip fracture)
2
Hip Fractures have Serious
Consequences
ΠOnly 1 in 10 return to full activity
Π1 in 5 need a skilled nursing facility within
a year
Π1 in 4 become disabled
ΠMany become isolated and depressed
Π1 in 5 die within a year of the fracture
Promoting Bone Health
ΠFollow a bonebone-healthy diet
ΠWellWell-balanced, adequate calcium & vitamin D
ΠEngage in regular physical activity
ΠAvoid harmful behaviors
ΠSmoking and excessive alcohol consumption
ΠAssessing for and treating secondary
causes
Certain Diseases/Conditions
ΠDiseases that cause poor intestinal
absorption (Crohn’s
(Crohn’s disease, celiac
disease, liver disease)
ΠDiseases associated with immobility or
bed rest for more than 6 months (stroke,
Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis)
It is important to identify people at
risk in order to prevent fracture
• Risk factor identification
• Bone density testing
• Prior fracture
It is never too early or too late to
prevent fractures
Risk Factors That Individuals
Cannot Change
Œ
Œ
Œ
Œ
Œ
Œ
Family history of osteoporosis and/or fracture
Older age
Being female
Ethnicity (esp. Caucasian, Asian or Hispanic)
Menopause at an early age
Certain medications and/or medical
conditions that may lead to bone loss or
increase the risk for osteoporosis
Certain Medications
ΠSteroid medications used for more than
3 months (Cortisone, Prednisone)
ΠExcess thyroid hormone replacement
ΠAntiseizure medications (Dilantin
(Dilantin or
phenytonin,
phenytonin, Depakote)
Depakote)
ΠSome cancer treatments
3
Risk Factors That
Individuals Can Change
ΠLow lifetime calcium and/or vitamin D
intake
ΠLifetime lack of exercise
ΠTobacco use
ΠExcessive alcohol use
ΠBeing underweight
ΠHormonal imbalance
Vitamin D and Falls
Based on a review of 5 studies, if we treat
15 people over the age of 65 with Vitamin
D supplementation (~800 IU) we will
prevent one fall.
Secondary Prevention
ΠActivities that block the progression of
osteoporosis to a fracture
ΠEarly detection of those at risk
ΠPrevent the disability from the
disease by treatment of those at
sufficient risk
Vitamin D, Calcium and
Fractures
• Four studies in elderly patients have found
that supplementation with both calcium and
vitamin D, resulted in fracture reductions (2443% in hip and 22-54% in all non-spine
fracture). In WHI, compliant women had a
29% reduction in hip fracture.
• One study of vitamin D alone found that there
was no effect on fracture, although less than
half the people took the vitamin D
• There was a 22% reductions in fracture after
100,000 IU vitamin D were given every 4
months for two years.
Exercise has the potential to:
ΠIncrease bone density in youth and
young adulthood
ΠMaintain and may modestly increase
bone density in adulthood
ΠPrevent and minimize kyphosis
ΠIncrease muscle mass
ΠImprove balance and agility
ΠReduce the risk for fallfall-related fractures
Bone Mineral
Density Tests
ΠRequires a prescription
with a diagnosis
ΠDual X-ray Absorptiometry
ΠGold standard: hip and spine
ΠPainless, noninvasive
ΠSafe: low dose xx-ray
ΠCan determine mineral content of bone
4
Who Should get a BMD test?
Using T-scores to Define
Bone Health
ΠAll women by the age of 65
ΠAll men by the age of 70
ΠPostmenopausal women or men who have clinical
risk factors
Adulthood fractures, kyphosis,
kyphosis, family history
Chronic diseases that increase risk of osteoporosis
Medications that increase risk
Active or recent smoking
Being very thin
The Future of BMD Testing
Osteoporosis
Low Bone Mass
(- 2.5 and lower)
Normal Bone Mass
(Between -1.0 and - 2.5)
( -1.0 and above)
......- 3.5 … - 3.0 … - 2.5 … -2.4 … -2.0 … -1.5 ……-1.1... -1.0…0.0 …+1.5 …+2.0...
Ten-Year Risk of Hip Fracture by BMD
and the Number of Risk Factors
•The move to absolute risk
35.0
•Absolute risk: Defines the risk of an
event specifically for that person over a
reasonable time.
17.9
23.4
30
5.6
10.5
20
10.6
10
>2
2.7
5.8
2
1-
1.4
0
0
≤ -2.5
-2.5-<-1.0
≥ -1.0
Total hip BMD t score
be
r
fa
ct of r
or
is
k
s
•4 times what and over what time?
40
N
um
•Relative Risk: Ms Smith had a bone
density evaluation. Her T-score is -2
which increases her risk of fracture by
4 times.
10-year risk of hip
fracture (%)
Œ
Œ
Œ
Œ
Œ
Diagnosis Based on Bone Density Test
Taylor et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:1479.
Clinical Risk Factors1
Identifying High-Risk Patients
Combination of BMD and risk factors leads to
improved risk identification
BMD: Identifies
patients with bone loss
Input of additional quantifiable
risk factors
identifies patients at risk for
fracture in conjunction with BMD
LowerLower-efficiency
detection of
fracture risk
HigherHigher-efficiency
detection
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Age
Weight or BMI
Femoral neck T-score*
Previous low trauma fracture after age
50
Current cigarette smoking
Secondary osteoporosis (e.g. RA)
High alcohol intake (> 2 units/day)**
Family history of hip fracture (M or F)
Prior or current glucocorticoid use
1. WHO Report. 2007. In production. Subject to change upon release of finalized WHO Report.
5
When is Medication Needed?
SHOULD TREAT people with:
Πprior clinical vertebral or hip fracture
Πprevalent vertebral deformity
ΠBMD in the osteoporosis range (T(T- score < -2.5)
ΠAntiresorptive medicationsmedications- reduce bone loss
ΠBisphosphonates:
Bisphosphonates:
MAY TREAT people with BMD TT-scores
between –1.5 and –2.5 depending on number
and severity of risk factors:
Œ
Œ
Œ
Œ
Œ
Œ
Œ
U.S. FDA-Approved
Medications for Osteoporosis
prior adulthood fracture (non(non-spine, nonnon-hip)
older age
family history of fracture
low body weight
high bone turnover
medications/diseases
smokers
Πalendronate sodium (Fosamax
(Fosamax)) or (Fosamax
(Fosamax Plus D)
Πibandronate sodium (Boniva
(Boniva))
Πrisedronate sodium (Actonel
(Actonel)) or Actonel and Calcium
Œ
Œ
Œ
Œ
Œ
1
0.8
34%
0.6
•
0.4
There was a 34%
reduction in clinical
vertebral fracture
and
0.2
0
n=62
Placebo
(N=8102)
n=44
HRT
(N=8506)
WHI: Risk-Benefit Assessment
60
RH=0.66 (95% CI=0.450.98)
•
No. of cases per year
in 10,000 women
% of Women With Hip Fracture
Over 5.2 Years
WHI HRT Study: Incidence of Fractures
estrogen therapy (ET) or hormone therapy (HT)
raloxifene hydrochloride (Evista
(Evista))
salmon calcitonin (Miacalcin)
Miacalcin)
Anabolic agentsagents- build bone
teriparatide or parathyroid hormone (Forteo
(Forteo))
Risks
Neutral
Benefits
Endometrial Deaths
cancer
Colorectal
Hip
cancer
fractures
50
40
30
20
10
0
24% overall
reduction in fracture
occurrence
Heart
attacks
Strokes
Breast
cancer
Blood
clots
Placebo
Estrogen + progestin
DSMB = data and safety monitoring board.
Adapted from: Writing Group for the Women’s
Health Initiative. JAMA. 2002;288:321-333.
Women’s Health Initiative. At: http://www.whi.org/updates/update_hrt2002.php. Accessed January 2006.
WHI: Risk-Benefit Assessment
No. of cases per year
in 10,000 women
90
80
Risks
Neutral
Uncertain*
Benefits
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Strokes
Deaths
Colorectal
cancer
Placebo
Heart
attacks
Blood clots
Breast
cancer
Hip
fractures
Estrogen
Women’s Health Initiative. At: http://www.whi.org/updates/update_hrt2004.php. Jan
2006.
6
Percent of Patients with
Incident Nonvertebral Fractures
Effect of Raloxifene on
Nonvertebral and Hip Fracture
Nonvertebral Fractures
A hormone usually administered by nasal spray approved
for osteoporosis treatment in women five or more years after
menopause
Hip Fractures
15
Benefits
3
Placebo
10
2
Raloxifene
Pooled
5
Raloxifene
Pooled
1
Placebo
0
0
0
6
12 18 24 30 36
Months
Calcitonin (Miacalcin)
Miacalcin)
0
6
12 18 24 30 36
Months
9 Prevents bone loss in the spine but least potent of all the
medicines
9 Reduces risk of spine fracture in the older woman (less
than other medications)
9 No proof that it reduces fractures anywhere else
9 May have pain relief properties following spine fracture
Possible Side Effects
9 Runny nose, nose bleeds, nose pain
Ettinger B. JAMA. 1999;282:637-645.
Fracture Risk Reduction
in Ibandronate Trials
Bisphosphonates Approved for Treating
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
FOSAMAX PLUS D™
Actonel
Boniva
(alendronate sodium/
(risedronate sodium tablets)
(ibandronate sodium) tablets or
injection
cholecalciferol) Tablets
and
INDICATION
INDICATION
• Increases BMD
• Increases BMD
INDICATION
• Reduces incidence of vertebral
fracture and a composite end
point of nonvertebral fracture
• Increases BMD
• Reduces incidence of hip and spine
fractures
New and
worsening
vertebral
fractures
–52%
–52%
Clinical
(symptomatic)
vertebral
fractures
–20
–40
DOSING
DOSING
DOSING
FOSAMAX PLUS D
5 mg/day or
35 mg once weekly
Actonel with calcium
2.5 mg/day or
70 mg/2800 IU once weekly
FOSAMAX
–60
Injection 3 mg every 3 months
administered over 15-30 seconds
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
Take at least 30 min before first food of
the day. Do not lie down for at least 30
min after dosing.
Take at least 30 min before first
food of the day. Do not lie down
for at least 30 min after dosing.
Take at least 60 min before first
food of the day. Do not lie down
for at least 60 min after dosing.
Clinical Osteoporotic Nonvertebral Fractures
vs Placebo in Ibandronate Trials
P = 0.0003
Absolute Risk
Reduction
–49%
Year 3
P value
unreported
Year 3
150 mg once monthly
35 mg and 500 mg calcium
70 mg once weekly or 10 mg/day
4.9%
5.3%
Year 3
P value
unreported
2.5%
Boniva (ibandronate sodium) Tablets, Full Prescribing Information (NDA21-455).
http://www.rocheusa.com/products/Boniva/PI.pdf. Accessed on March 31, 2005
Risedronate: Cumulative New Vertebral
Fracture Incidence
With Prior VFx
10
9.1%
8.2%
8.9%
Control
Risedronate 5.0 mg
20
8
6
15
Patients (%)
Rate of Nonvertebral Fractures,
%
0
• Reduces incidence of vertebral
fracture
New
vertebral
fractures
% Relative
Risk
FOSAMAX®(alendronate sodium) Tablets
With Prior VFx
4
2
0
Placebo
(n = 975)
Daily
Ibandronate
(n = 977)
Intermittent
Ibandronate
(n = 977)
10
#
5
#
#
0
0
Chesnut CH III et al. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:1241─1249.
Risedronate reduced
vertebral fracture risk
by 41% at 3 years,
p = 0.003
12
24
36
Month
#p < 0.05 vs. control
Harris, et al. JAMA. 1999
7
Alendronate: Vertebral Fracture Arm of FIT
Risedronate: Hip Fracture Data
4
3
No Effect
Observed
2
1
0
PBO
5
4
3
2
1
0
RIS 5 mg
40% Reduction
at Year 3
P=0.009
PBO
RIS
5
4
1050
47% Reduction
(P=0.001)
15%
Placebo Alendronate 10mg
n=981
n=965
Any New Vertebral Fractures
3
2
PBO
Hip
Fractures
FIT VFA1
FIT VFA1
2.3%
1.2%
–47%
Year 3
P<0.001
7.1%
–51%
Year 3
P = 0.047
Risk Reduction
Relative: 53%
Absolute: 2.9%
1
Relative: 65%
Absolute: 9.3%
50
40
30
20
10
0
64
22
Placebo
FORTEO
(n=448)
(n=444)
15
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
14
Placebo
FORTEO
(n=544)
(n=541)
defined as occurring with minimal trauma
MicroCT Images of Transiliac Crest Biopsy
Before and After Teriparatide
6
4
3
30
Risk Reduction
60
5
2
0
(RR 0.35, 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.55)
(AR: Placebo 14.3%; FORTEO 5.0%, P <0.001)
1
0
% of Women
Number of Women with Nonvertebral
Fragility Fractures
(RR 0.47, 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.88)
(AR: Placebo 5.5%; FORTEO 2.6%, P <0.05)
20
15
10
5
2.3%
Placebo Alendronate 10mg
n=1002
n=1005
Neer RM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1434-1441
FORTEO Reduces the Risk of Nonvertebral
Fragility Fractures1
25
70
1.1%
1. Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB et al. Lancet. 1996;348:1535–1541.
2. Data available on request from Merck & Co., Inc. Please specify DA-FOS73(4).
35
30
Number of Women with 1 or More
New Vertebral Fractures
% Relative Risk
Absolute Risk
Reduction
–56%
Year 4
P = 0.044
5.0%
D.M., et al, Randomized trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women
with existing vertebral fractures, The Lancet, Dec 7,1997; Vol#348: 1535-1541
With Prior VFx
Vertebral
Fractures
–40
–48%
2-
FORTEO Reduces the Risk of
≥1 New Vertebral Fractures
0
Year 4
P<0.001
55%Reduction
(P=0.047)
4-
0
1Black
–20
–60
0
% of Women
FIT CFA2
(T-score <–2.0) (T-score <–2.5)
60.5%
(n=1,313) Pooled Doses
(n=2,573)
Fracture Intervention Trials (FIT)
FIT CFA2
4.9%
RIS
Fracture Risk Reduction
in Alendronate Trials
Hip
Fractures
Painful Vertrebral Fractures
2-
Placebo Alendronate 10mg
n=1002
n=1005
0
1. Actonel® [package insert]. Cincinnati, Ohio: Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals and Kansas City, Mo: Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc.; 2001.
2. McClung MR et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(5):333–340.
Without Prior VFx
90% Reduction
(P=0.047)
4-
1
(n=1,821) Pooled Doses
(n=1,222)
(n=1,220)
(n=3,624)
*The percentages are based on the number of women for whom vertebral-fracture status was known.
Vertebral
Fractures
Multiple New Vertebral Fractures
8.0%
Percent of Patients
5
20% Reduction
Not Significant
15-
Percent of Patients
% of Patients With Hip Fracture
% of Patients With Hip Fracture
note: hip fracture (alone)
was not a primary end point
HIP (80+)2
With Prior VFx=45%*
Age Range=80+
Percent of Patients
HIP (70–79)2
With Prior VFx=39%*
Hip T-score ≤–3.0 w/ risk factors
or Hip T-score ≤–4.0
Age Range=70–79
With Prior VFx=87%
Spine T-score ≤–2.0
Age Range=up to 80
% of Patients With Hip Fracture
VERT (Combined)1
Reduction in Incidence of Vertebral Fracture1
Baseline
After 21 months
MicroCT images of iliac crest bone biopsies were obtained from a 65 year-old
woman
Jiang et al, J Bone Miner Res
Neer RM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1434-1441
8
Tertiary Prevention:
Following a Fracture
ΠBlock or slow the progression of disability
ΠIt is important to prevent falls
ΠPhysicians fail to diagnose and treat
osteoporosis
Œ
Œ
Œ
Œ
Bone density testing not performed
Calcium and vitamin D supplements not given
Effective medications not prescribed
Therapy prescribed often does not conform
Following a Fracture
ΠCalcium supplements reduce bone loss
and fracture
ΠVitamin D supplements reduce fractures
and falls
ΠPhysical activity preserves bone mass,
builds muscle mass, reduces falls, delays
loss of independence
ΠBed rest reduces bone mass
ΠMedications reduce risk of future fractures
Risk for Falls
Fall Prevention
ΠOne third people over age 65 fall each
year; half fall more than once
Π1 in 10 falls results in serious injury
Π90% of hip fractures are the result of a
fall
ΠActivities often decrease after a fall even
if not hurt
ΠThere are identifiable risk factors for
falls
ΠChanges with aging
ΠBalance, coordination, strength, sensory,
vision, blood pressure, circulation,
cognition
ΠUse of medications
ΠEnvironmental factors
ΠMore deconditioned and more likely to fall
again
Osteoporosis Treatment Rate After Fracture
Decreases with Age as Fracture Incidence
Rises
Fall Prevention
ΠTargeted interventions: multiple risk
factors
ΠMuscle strengthening/balance retraining
ΠProfessional home hazard assessment
and modification
ΠStopping or reducing psychotropic
medications
40
30
%
Percent treated
Women’s vertebral fracture
incidence per 100,000
personperson-years
1,400
1,200
1,000
20
800
600
10
400
200
0
55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 ≥90
Age
0
Melton LJ III et al. Osteoporos Int;10:214, 1999.
Freedman KG et al. J Bone Joint Surg;82A:1063, 2000.
9
Steps to Healthy Bones
ΠOptimal nutrition
ΠHealthy body weight
ΠYearly height checks
ΠRegular exercise
ΠTobacco cessation
ΠModeration of alcohol intake
ΠFall prevention
ΠMedication when indicated
Surgeon General’s Report
“Federal, State, and local governments
(including State and local health
departments) to join forces with the
private sector and community
organizations in a coordinated,
collaborative effort to promote bone
health.”
10
Download