Design and Modeling of a Landfill Cover using Salix for Hydrologic Control, Biomass Production and Land Reclamation: Solvay Wastebeds, Syracuse, NY Douglas J. Daley, P.E. State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry Syracuse, NY American Society of Agricultural Engineers Annual International Meeting July 18, 2005 Presentation Outline Project Background and Objectives Field Demonstration Trial Results Modeling and Evaluation of Design Elements Summary Project Goal and Objectives • Evaluate the feasibility of large-scale willow biomass crop production on a former waste disposal site to improve stormwater control, reduce leachate generation, enhance recreational opportunities and produce biomass. • • • Screen willow varieties suitable for wastebed environment. Determine the effectiveness of Salix for hydrologic control in an ecologically engineered, alternative landfill cover system. Measure and model the effect of short rotation woody crop (SRWC) management strategies and three organic soil amendments on percolation/leachate generation. Project Site Location Syracuse, NY N 43o 04’ 26” W 076o 14’ 58” Solvay Process Residues Solvay process to produce soda ash 1887 -1986 Primarily a non-hazardous mixture of calcium, magnesium and sodium compounds Waste Beds 9 to 15 15 to 21 m deep 270 ha (662 acres) Elevated chloride levels in leachate and stormwater Stressful growing conditions pH (8.0 – 12.3) Electrical conductivity (0.5 – 9.2 dS/m) Organic matter (0 - 3.9%) Landfill Cover Systems: Conventional vs. Evapotranspiration Reduce percolation (leachate) Conventional systems rely on low permeability soil and geomembrane Alternative systems enhance evapotranspiration Issue: Long-term reliability, flexibility, sustainability Evapotranspiration (ET) Landfill Cover The role of willow PPT = (E + T) + RO + DS + D Evaporation is positively influenced by increasing leaf/stem area and promoting interception. Evaporation through advection is enhanced in multi-story canopies. Benefits of Salix One of the first woody species to establish naturally Tolerant of harsh site conditions on site (elevated chloride and pH) Naturally established willow and poplar on the Solvay waste beds. Design: Willow Selection High growth rates High stem density High transpiration rates Genetic diversity SUNY ESF long history of research in short rotation woody crop for biomass Select desired traits to match project design First-year growth from cuttings (Trial Field 1, May 2005) Survival Below-ground biomass (consider root : shoot ratio) High water use “efficiency” (e.g. high water use : biomass ratio) Design: Growth and Yield Field Trials Two 2-acre fields (2004) Multiple Salix varieties selected from greenhouse trials (2003) First-season’s growth of willow on biosolids-amended Solvay waste (Fall 2004) biosolids-amended (1986) unamended Solvay waste Two cutting lengths to test rooting depth and survival (25 and 50 cm) High planting density 15,000 stems/ha (6,000 stems/ac) First-year Survival of Willow on Biosolids-amended Waste 120 25 cm 50 cm Survival (%) 100 80.1% survival on unamended waste (Field 2) 80 60 40 20 0 -66 37-77 70-23 71-26 71-31 S 365 SV1SX 61SX 64 1 0 98 98 98 98 981 Salix varieties First Year Growth of Willow on Biosolids-amended Solvay Waste (Field 1) 100 80 2 Basal area (cm /plot) 25 cm 50 cm 60 40 20 0 7 3 6 1 6 65 SV1 X 61 X 64 01-69837-79870-29871-29871-3 S 3 S S 1 8 9 Salix varieties Average basal area on Field 2 (unamended waste) (1.2 cm2/plot) Using Sap Flow to Measure Transpiration Stem heat balance method Three-year old willow on mineral soil (control) Sensor sizes range from 10 - 35mm Measure: sap flow (g/hr/stem) and stem diameter frequency (stem/ha) Compute: Stand-scale sap flow (l/day) 9/1 6/ 2 9/1 004 9/ 2 00 9/2 4 2/ 2 9/2 004 5/ 2 00 9/2 4 8/ 2 10 004 /1/ 2 10 004 /4/ 20 04 10 /7/ 20 10 04 /10 /20 10 04 /13 / 10 2004 /16 /20 10 04 /19 / 10 2004 /22 / 10 2004 /25 /20 10 04 /28 / 10 2004 /31 /20 04 11 /3/ 2 11 004 /6/ 20 04 11 /9/ 20 11 04 /12 / 11 2004 /15 /20 04 Sap flow (l/day) Stem Size Differences in Late Season Sap Flow for One Variety 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 SX64, 16mm sap flow l/day SX64, 25mm sap flow l/day SX64, 35mm sap flow l/day Time (day) 5/ 6/ 2 5/ 005 8/ 2 5/ 005 9/ 5/ 2 00 10 5 / 5/ 200 11 5 / 5/ 200 12 5 / 5/ 200 14 5 / 5/ 200 15 5 / 5/ 200 16 5 / 5/ 200 17 5 / 5/ 200 18 5 / 5/ 200 20 5 / 5/ 200 21 5 / 5/ 200 22 5 / 5/ 200 23 5 / 5/ 200 24 5 / 5/ 200 26 5 / 5/ 200 27 5 / 5/ 200 28 5 / 5/ 200 29 5 / 5/ 200 30 5 /2 00 5 Sap flow (g/hour) Sap Flow: Early Season 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Time (days) SX64, 35mm, sensor 7 SX64, 35mm, sensor 16 SX64, 35mm, sensor 15 Stem Diameter Distribution to Determine Stand-level Sap Flow 20000 S25 SV1 SX64 18000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 >4 0 37 _4 0 34 _3 7 31 _3 4 28 _3 1 25 _2 8 22 _2 5 19 _2 2 16 _1 9 13 _1 6 10 _ 13 0 <1 0 Number of stems ha-1 16000 Diameter class (mm) Sensor sizes (16, 25, 35 mm) Late Season Willow Transpiration (October-November 2004) Salix Variety Sap Flow (l/d/plant) S25 Sap Flow (mm/month) 180 SV1 65 1.2 SX64 131 2.5 Equivalent transpiration 3.4 350,000 – 968,000 gal/acre/season Simultaneous Heat and Water (SHAW) Model Humid climate 30-yr Average Annual PPT = 978 mm PET:P = 1.3 Model simulates heat and water transfer through soilplant-air continuum Freeze-thaw Management Salix as short-rotation woody crop (SRWC) Even-age vs. 3-year harvesting rotation Soil modifications with organic amendments (mulch and biosolids) (Figure supplied by USDA) Preliminary Model Projections Deep percolation 1500 1400 1300 1200 1100 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Mean: 978 mm SD: 165 mm Precipitation No vegetation 19 75 19 77 19 79 19 81 19 83 19 85 19 87 19 89 19 91 19 93 19 95 19 97 19 99 20 01 Water (mm) Different management regimes Year Uniform Stand 3-YR Harvest Rotation Summary Willow (Salix) is successful when organic amendments are incorporated into Solvay waste Late season transpiration by willow is important to the water balance Preliminary model results indicate that Salix minimizes deep percolation throughout a long growing season. Evaluate other design elements to address extreme wet weather events. Acknowledgements Sponsor: Honeywell International Co-investigators: Timothy Volk, Lawrence Abrahamson Graduate Students: Andrew Johnson, Jaconette Mirck, Engineering Consultants: O’Brien & Gere