Math 617 Theory of Functions of a Complex Variable Fall 2015 Examination 1 1. State some theorem (from this course) to which the name of Augustin-Louis Cauchy is attached. Solution. Some results covered so far are Cauchy’s integral theorem for rectangles, Cauchy’s residue theorem for rectangles, and Cauchy’s formula for the radius of convergence of a power series. (There are others.) 2. Give a geometric description of the set of points π§ in β for which π§2 + 4π§π§ + ( π§ )2 = 6. Solution. The equation is quadratic, so the set must be some conic section. To identify the set more precisely, you could set π§ equal to π₯ + ππ¦ and rewrite the left-hand side in terms of the real coordinates π₯ and π¦: π§2 + 4π§π§ + ( π§ )2 = 2 Re(π§2 ) + 4|π§|2 = 2(π₯2 − π¦2 ) + 4(π₯2 + π¦2 ) = 6π₯2 + 2π¦2 . Accordingly, the original equation says that π₯2 + 13 π¦2 = 1. This equation √ represents an ellipse centered at the origin. (The foci are ± 2 π.) sin(π§) . Show that cos(π§) there is no complex number π§ for which tan(π§) is equal to π. 3. The complex function tan(π§) is defined to be the quotient Solution. Seeking a contradiction, suppose that there is a complex number π§ for which tan(π§) = π, or, equivalently, sin(π§) = π cos(π§). Multiplying by −π shows that −π sin(π§) = cos(π§), or 0 = cos(π§)+π sin(π§) = πππ§ . But the complex exponential function is never equal to 0: if π§ = π₯ + ππ¦, then |πππ§ | = π−π¦ > 0. The contradiction shows that tan(π§) is never equal to π. An alternative method is to start from the supposition that sin(π§) = π cos(π§) and square both sides to deduce that sin2 (π§) = − cos2 (π§), whence sin2 (π§) + cos2 (π§) = 0. But sin2 (π§) + cos2 (π§) = 1 for every complex number π§ by the persistence of functional relationships, since sin2 (π₯)+cos2 (π₯) = 1 when π₯ is a real number. The contradiction again shows that the point π cannot be in the range of the complex tangent function. October 1, 2015 Page 1 of 5 Dr. Boas Math 617 Theory of Functions of a Complex Variable Fall 2015 Examination 1 Remark. Since the tangent function is odd (antisymmetric), the tangent function cannot take the value −π either. The two values ±π turn out to be the only values omitted by the complex tangent function. You can verify this claim by an explicit calculation; alternatively, the claim can be deduced from a deep theorem of Picard, to be proved in Math 618, concerning omitted values of meromorphic functions. ∑∞ 4. Suppose the power series π=1 ππ π§π has radius of convergence equal to 6, ∑∞ and the power series π=1 ππ π§π has radius of convergence equal to 7. What, if anything, can be said about the radius of convergence of the power series ∑∞ π π π§π ? π=1 π π Solution. The hypothesis implies that lim supπ→∞ |ππ |1βπ = 1β6, and similarly lim supπ→∞ |ππ |1βπ = 1β7. The lemma stated and proved below implies that lim supπ→∞ |ππ ππ |1βπ ≤ 1β42. Therefore the radius of convergence of ∑∞ the power series π=1 ππ ππ π§π is at least 42 but could be larger. Indeed, if π is an arbitrary number greater than or equal to 42, then there ∑∞ is an example in which the radius of convergence of π=1 ππ ππ π§π is equal to π. Namely, set ππ equal to 1β6π when π is a power of 2 and 0 otherwise; set ππ equal to (6βπ)π when π is a power of 2 and 1β7π when π is a power of 3 and 0 otherwise. Evidently, lim supπ→∞ |ππ |1βπ = 1β6; and 6βπ ≤ 1β7 when π ≥ 42, so lim supπ→∞ |ππ |1βπ = 1β7. The value of ππ ππ equals 1βππ when π is a power of 2 and 0 otherwise, so lim supπ→∞ |ππ ππ |1βπ = 1βπ, as desired. The special case when π = ∞ can be handled by the same argument by interpreting 6βπ as 0 in that case. Lemma. Suppose for every natural number π that π΄π ≥ 0 and π΅π ≥ 0. Let πΌ denote lim supπ→∞ π΄π , and let π½ denote lim supπ→∞ π΅π . If πΌ and π½ are finite (not +∞), then lim sup π΄π π΅π ≤ πΌπ½. π→∞ Remark. The reason for excluding an infinite lim sup is that if πΌ = ∞ and π½ = 0, then the right-hand side of the inequality is the undefined expression ∞ ⋅ 0. Proof. Fix an arbitrary positive number π. The definitions of πΌ and π½ imply the existence of a number π such that π΄π ≤ πΌ + π and π΅π ≤ π½ + π whenever π ≥ π. The indicated quantities are nonnegative, so π΄π π΅π ≤ (πΌ + π)(π½ + π) October 1, 2015 Page 2 of 5 Dr. Boas Math 617 Theory of Functions of a Complex Variable Fall 2015 Examination 1 when π ≥ π. Therefore lim sup π΄π π΅π ≤ (πΌ + π)(π½ + π). π→∞ Now let π tend to 0. 5. Suppose π is an analytic function (on some open subset of β) with real part π’ and imaginary part ( π£. Show ) that ∇π’ and ∇π£ are orthogonal vectors. ππ’ ππ’ The notation ∇π’ means , , the gradient vector of π’. ππ₯ ππ¦ Solution. The dot product (scalar product) of the two gradients equals ππ’ ππ£ ππ’ ππ£ + . ππ₯ ππ₯ ππ¦ ππ¦ By the Cauchy–Riemann equations, this expression equals ππ£ ππ£ ππ£ ππ£ − , ππ¦ ππ₯ ππ₯ ππ¦ or 0. Accordingly, the two vectors are orthogonal. Remark. The geometric interpretation is that the level sets of π’ (the curves where π’ has a constant value) and the level sets of π£ are families of mutually perpendicular curves (which you might have called “orthogonal trajectories” in calculus class). 6. Show that ∞ ∫−∞ π π₯2 ππ₯ = . 3 (π₯2 + 1)(π₯2 + 4) Solution. The integrand is a rational function with the degree of the denominator two greater than the degree of the numerator. By the corollary of Cauchy’s residue theorem for rectangles discussed in class, the value of the integral is 2ππ times the sum of the residues of the rational function π§2 at the two singularities in the upper half-plane: namely, the (π§2 + 1)(π§2 + 4) point where π§ = π and the point where π§ = 2π. October 1, 2015 Page 3 of 5 Dr. Boas Math 617 Theory of Functions of a Complex Variable Fall 2015 Examination 1 Since 2 π§2 (π§+π)(π§2 +4) π§ , = π§−π (π§2 + 1)(π§2 + 4) the residue at the point where π§ = π is equal to | π§2 | , (π§ + π)(π§2 + 4) ||π§=π or −1 . 6π Similarly, the residue at the point where π§ = 2π is equal to | π§2 | , (π§2 + 1)(π§ + 2π) ||π§=2π or −4 . −12π The sum of these residues equals 1β(6π), so the value of the integral equals 2ππβ(6π), or πβ3. Remark. This integral can be computed instead by techniques of real calculus using the method of partial fractions: namely, −1β3 4β3 π₯2 = + . (π₯2 + 1)(π₯2 + 4) π₯2 + 1 π₯2 + 4 The two fractions on the right-hand side have elementary antiderivatives in terms of the real arctangent function. Cauchy’s residue calculus can be viewed in this instance as a shortcut that eliminates some of the algebra involved in computing the partial-fractions decomposition. Bonus Who is the French mathematician shown in the picture below? (1789–1857) October 1, 2015 Page 4 of 5 Dr. Boas Math 617 Theory of Functions of a Complex Variable Fall 2015 Examination 1 Solution. This mathematician is Augustin-Louis Cauchy, the person who created most of the mathematics under discussion in this course. October 1, 2015 Page 5 of 5 Dr. Boas