Observing Complex Dispersion in a Vapor Problems related to an optics experiment PHYS 352, Optics, Spring 2013 The Mach-Zehnder Interferometer is a configuration of mirrors and beam splitters arranged in a rectangle as shown in Figure 1. A laser beam is divided into two equal intensity halves at the top left beam splitter. When light hits a 50:50 beam splitter, half of the irradiance passes straight through, and half is reflect away according to the law of reflection. Now, one half of the laser beam travels a distance, L1, and the other half travels a distance L2. The two beams are reunited at the bottom right beam splitter and then proceed to a photodiode detector, which is a semiconductor that produces a DC voltage that is proportional to the net irradiance incident upon it. The distance that each beam travels might be referred to as the optical path length, but use this term a little carefully since optical path Figure 1. A Mach-Zehnder interferometer splits a beam and then length is a combination of recombines it after the two beams travelled different path lengths. geometry and index of refraction. Problem 1. Show that the irradiance received at the photodiode is given by the expression I Io 1 coskL 2 where Io is the irradiance of the initial beam and L=L2-L1. Attach a graph of I/Io vs. kL made using your favorite CAS software. The maxima on the graph are referred to as “fringes” in the spatial distribution of the irradiance. The complex index of refraction can be generally written as n=no(1+i), where is the loss factor and no is the real part of the index of refraction. Around resonance, both and no are strongly frequency dependent. This is a very general statement, applicable to any system: solid, liquid, vapor. A vapor can be characterized first by its atomic or molecular absorption resonances that can be excited by electromagnetic waves, and second by an index of refraction that tends to real and unity away from these resonances. In class, we modeled the complex index Rev 1, January 4, 2013 of refraction using a 2nd order differential equation based on Newton’s second law. The dissipation term, which is proportional to velocity in Newton’s second law, includes the dissipation constant . Problem 2. In class, it was shown that (oscillator strength aside) around resonance Re( n) no 1 Im(n) no e2 N m o o 4 2 2 and e2 N . 2m o o 4 2 2 Show that the real and imaginary parts are related through no 1 2( )no which is a form of the Kramers-Kronig relation, which is a set of relations that relate the real and imaginary parts of physical properties. Re-write this expression in terms of Re(n) and Im(n). The Mach-Zehnder interferometer in Figure 1 is modified in an experiment by inserting a sample of length z in the path of the beam along the lower portion as shown in Figure 2. Problem 3. Show that the phase shift experienced by the beam passing through the sample with complex index of refraction is i(kz ) where =knoz and =k(no-1)z. Explain the physical meanings of , and kz. Figure 2. A Mach-Zehnder interferometer with a sample placed in one of the beams. Rev 1, January 4, 2013 Problem 4. Show that the irradiance received by the photodiode detector is given by the expression I Io 1 e 2 2e cos(kL ) . 4 For experimental convenience, it would be helpful to consider changes in kL to be insignificant. We can achieve this by keeping L small. Let’s plan on this when we do an experiment. Problem 5. Let’s suppose that the laser is swept through a range /2=5 GHz. How small must L be such that I/Io goes through one half of an interference fringe? You probably learned somewhere that resonance peaks are modeled using a Lorentzian, also called a Cauchy distribution function, f(x)=fo/(1+x2). (See Bevington and Robinson, Section 2.4 for more details.) So, a way to write the frequency dependence of the absorption is o 1 2 where for a dimensionless frequency variable, we use the ratio of frequency deviation from resonance to absorption coefficient. In an experiment, the control variable will be , adjusted by sweeping a diode laser through a very small range of frequencies. Implicitly then, it is which becomes the varied quantity. An experimenter can vary the laser frequency, thus vary , and measure the irradiance I/Io seen at the photodiode. Problem 6. Using your favorite CAS, make two graphs of I/Io versus /, one for each value of o=0.5, and o=10. Vary / from -20 to +20. Make 5 plots on each graph for different values of the phase, kL, ranging from 0 to rad. Note that through the result of Problem 2, the independent variable / is also (1-no)/2no. Rev 1, January 4, 2013 The Experiment You can vary o by varying the density of the vapor which is being used as the sample. One common experimental arrangement is to use an airtight, evacuated glass-walled cylinder for the sample. Inside the cylinder is a small piece of metal attached to a heater. As the temperature of the metal is varied, atoms will vaporize, changing the density of the gas in the cylinder. This gas will be the sample of length z. When the heater temperature is low, o is small (perhaps about 0.5). When the heater temperature is high, o is large (perhaps about 10). For our experiment we will use rubidium, which has significant vapor pressure at moderate temperatures in the range of 40oC to 80oC. Observe the photodiode on an oscilloscope as the laser is swept around one of the resonant frequencies of rubidium. A Doppler broadened resonance line is about 5 GHz wide (hence Problem 5), and that will be about the width of our sweep. When the temperature of the rubidium cell is low (around 40oC), the oscilloscope display should resemble one of the peaks that you produced in Problem 6 using o=0.5. When the temperature is high (around 80oC) the oscilloscope display should resemble one of the peaks that you produced using o=10. (This procedure is based on a lab handout made available from CalTech.) Rev 1, January 4, 2013