Two-Gyro All-sky Scheduling Study TIPS April 15, 2004 http://www.stsci.edu/org/ess/projects/two_gyro_science Personnel at Large Special Projects Branch (SPB) Operations Planning Branch (OPB) Alison Vick Ian Jordan Planning Systems Development Branch (PSDB) 4/15/2004 Merle Reinhart George Chapman Mark Giuliano Bob Boyer 2 Outline 4/15/2004 Two Gyro background Two Gyro Modes Why they impact scheduling All-sky scheduling study Plots galore Targets-by-week The Movie 3 TGS Modes 4/15/2004 Three operational modes MSS and two gyros (M2G): Compares MSS output to magnetic field model to control attitude and rates with errors required to be less than 10 degrees; supports vehicle maneuvers FHST and two gyros (T2G): Requires one tracker to be visible to use FHST data and gyros to control rates; onboard attitude determination (OAD) using FHST map data from two FHST units will bring attitude error within FGS search radius FGS and two gyros (F2G): Requires FGS visibility to use FGS data and gyros to control rates and attitude to allow for science What does it mean? Elaborate process to get on guide stars after a slew Less schedulability (big surprise) 4 3 gyro vs. 2 gyro Getting to guided science 3-gyro (current ops) Type 2 Slew FHST full update FGS guide star acquisition 2-gyro 4/15/2004 Type 2 Slew FHST rate control First FHST map First attitude correction Second FHST map Second attitude correction FHST GOB (overlaps with guide star acq) FGS Guide star acquisition 5 TGS Scheduling Scenario 4/15/2004 6 Scheduling Impacts & Constraints Largest impact is the requirement to have overlapping visibility between the FHSTs and FGSs Additionally, several constraints / restrictions are generically affected by the large pointing uncertainty (LAU) in M2G mode Thermal off-nominal roll angles Avoidance angles (Sun, Moon, Earth) Solar array incidence angles Solar array shadowing table Anti-Sun avoidance / roll angles 10 degree LAU means 4/15/2004 Limits the portion of sky available at any one time Targets <60 degrees from sun will not be observable An anti-sun avoidance zone of ~8 degrees radius develops 7 The TGS All-sky Study Assess the availability of targets across the entire sky under the FHST driven scheduling restrictions imposed by two gyro mode Examine how that schedulability is affected by FHST duration requirements and initial error estimates 4/15/2004 8 All-Sky Study Approach 5-degree-by-5-degree grid of targets covering 360 degrees in RA and +85 degrees to -85 degrees in DEC Very schedulable Visit (one 30-minute exposure) Used updated (reduced) FGS earth avoidance angles Guide star availability not considered Used Prototype Long Rang Planning tool (SPIKE) to determine constraint windows Summed the window durations by target Vary parameters and rerun 4/15/2004 9 All-Sky Schedulability: Three-Gyro 50°-180° Usable Sun Angle 4/15/2004 10 All-Sky Schedulability: Two-Gyro 60°-172° Usable Sun Angle 4/15/2004 11 All-Sky Schedulability: Two-Gyro 100°-172° Usable Sun Angle 4/15/2004 12 All-Sky Schedulability: Sky Availability 4/15/2004 13 All-Sky Schedulability: 3-gyro vs. 2-gyro 4/15/2004 14 All-Sky Schedulability: Sensitivity to LAU 4/15/2004 15 All-Sky Schedulability: LAU difference distribution 4/15/2004 16 All-Sky Schedulability: Visit duration sensitivity 4/15/2004 17 All-Sky Schedulability: Visit difference distribution 4/15/2004 18 All-Sky Schedulability: Activity duration sensitivity 4/15/2004 19 All-Sky Schedulability: Onboard Attitude Determination difference 4/15/2004 20 Target Availability QuickTime™ and a Animation decompressor are needed to see this picture. 4/15/2004 21 Scheduling under Two Gyro FHST / FGS overlapping visibility requirement creates the most notable impact 60 – 172 degrees usable sun angle Maximum off-nominal roll is 22 degrees Visit duration will likely be ~30 minutes On average an individual target is only observable ~120 days per year Low-dec targets become observable after the sun passes them Hi-dec targets have periodic availability tied to orbital precession Can absorb small changes to the two gyro activities without drastically affecting schedulability 4/15/2004 22