Reflection and Interference from Thin Films

advertisement
Reflection and Interference from Thin Films
ÎNormal-incidence
light strikes surface covered by a thin film
‹ Some
rays reflect from film surface
‹ Some rays reflect from substrate surface (distance d further)
ÎPath
length difference = 2d causes interference
‹ From
d
full constructive to full destructive, depending on λ
(Angle shown, but actually
normally incident)
n0 = 1
n1
n2
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
14
Standard analysis of Thin Film Interference
2d = mλn1
(
2d = m +
d
Max (constructive)
1
2
) λn
1
Min (destructive)
λn1 =
λ
n1
Wavelength inside film!
(Angle shown, but actually
normally incident)
n0 = 1
n1
n2
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
15
Example of Thin Film Interference
Let λ = 500
λ1.38
n1 = 1.38 (MgF2)
n2 = 1.5 (glass)
500
=
= 362.3nm
1.38
Max intensity
d = 12 mλ1.38 = 181nm, 362 nm, 543nm, …
Min intensity
d=
1
2
( m + 12 ) λ1.38 = 90.6 nm, 272 nm, 453nm, …
Must be careful about phase shift at boundary:
Reflection for nin < nout has ½ λ phase shift, 0 if nin > nout
¾ Since n0 < n1 and n1 < n2, the phase shift has no effect here
¾ But for other cases, there can be an extra ½ λ phase shift
¾ Soap bubble (next slide)
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
¾
16
Thin Film Interference for Soap Bubble
λ
2d = mλn
Min (destructive)
λn =
(
2d = m +
1
2
) λn
n
Max (constructive)
Wavelength inside soap!
Similar analysis, but…
¾ Phase shift of ½ λ for air–soap reflection
¾ No phase shift for soap–air reflection
¾ Net ½ λ phase shift switches
max ↔ min
n
d
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
17
Example of Soap Bubble Interference
Let λ = 500
λ1.32
n = 1.32 (soap + water)
500
=
= 379 nm
1.32
Min intensity
d = 12 mλ1.32 = 189 nm, 379 nm, 568nm, …
Max intensity
d=
1
2
( m + 12 ) λ1.32 = 94.7 nm, 284 nm, 473nm, …
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
18
Quiz
ÎWhat
is the condition for destructive interference for light
reflecting from a soap bubble of thickness d?
‹ (1)
2d = mλn
‹ (2)
2d = m + 12 λn
(
)
Only 1 reflection has a phase shift,
so this switches min and max
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
19
Quiz
ÎConsider
an oil film (thickness d, n = 1.5) on top of water
(n = 1.3). Light of λ = 600 nm is normally incident. Which
value of d corresponds to destructive interference?
‹ (1)
300 nm
‹ (2) 150 nm
‹ (3) 200 nm
d
Only 1 reflection has a phase shift,
so d = m * 200 nm
n0 = 1
n1
n2
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
20
Quiz
ÎConsider
a soap bubble of thickness d and n = 1.5. Light
of λ = 600 nm is incident on the bubble. Which value of d
corresponds to destructive interference?
‹ (1)
300 nm
‹ (2) 150 nm
‹ (3) 200 nm
Only 1 reflection has a phase shift,
so d = m * 200 nm
n
d
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
21
Diffraction Grating: 1000s of Slits!
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
22
Diffraction Grating
ÎAnalysis
similar to double slit
‹ Many
slits instead of 2
‹ Slits still separated by distance d
‹ Maxima again occur only for d sin θ
‹ Maxima are much sharper
= mλ
Grating
N=4
d
d
m=1
λ
2λ
d 3λ
d
4λ
θ
L
Waves
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
23
Intensity Pattern for Diffraction Grating
ÎCalculation
of intensity vs θ
‹ Basically
a product of single slit and multiple slit formula
‹ Let a = slit width, d = slit separation, N = # of slits
2
⎛ sin α ⎞ ⎛ sin N β ⎞
I = I max ⎜
⎟ ⎜
⎟
α
β
N
sin
⎝
⎠ ⎝
⎠
2
α = π a sin θ / λ
β = π d sin θ / λ
ÎWhen
N is large, maxima are extremely sharp
‹ For central peak, angular half-width Δθ hw λ / Nd
‹ Imagine
N ≅ 10000 – 100000!
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
24
2 Slits: d = 4λ
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
25
4 Slits: d = 4λ
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
26
10 Slits: d = 4λ
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
27
20 Slits: d = 4λ
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
28
Diffraction Gratings in Astronomy
to determine wavelength (θ measured)
‹ Use d sin θ = mλ to determine wavelength (θ measured)
ÎUse
have N = 60,000 – 100,000!!
‹ Sharp peaks allow closely spaced wavelengths to be resolved
‹ Accuracy better than 0.001 nm, e.g. 589.605 ± 0.001 nm
‹ Typically
ÎImportant
‹ Find
for distinguishing element “signatures”
all the elements in a stellar spectrum
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
29
Example: Separate λ = 600, λ = 600.05 nm
ÎPoorly
‹ Too
resolved with 15,000 slit grating
few slits ⇒ lines too wide to tell apart
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
30
Example (cont.)
ÎLines
easily resolved with 60,000 slit grating
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
31
Example: Resolution of Sodium D1, D2 Lines
ÎHigh
resolution solar spectrum near sodium absorption lines
Sodium lines
λ D1 = 589.54 nm
λ D2 = 588.94 nm
Δλ = 0.60 nm
PHY 2049: Chapter 36
32
Download