Sensitivity of Summer Stream Temperatures to Climate Variability in Pacific Northwest Forests Charles Luce , US Forest Service Brian Staab, US Forest Service Marc Kramer, U. Florida Seth Wenger, U. Georgia Dan Isaak, US Forest Service Callie McConnell, US Forest Service A Rapidly Growing Sensitivity Literature (>2012)… Kanno et al. (2014). Paired stream–air temperature measurements reveal fineβscale thermal heterogeneity within headwater brook trout stream networks. River research and applications, 30:745-755. Kelleher et al. (2012) Investigating controls on the thermal sensitivity of Pennsylvania streams. Hydrol. Process. 26:771–785. Kurylyk et al. (2015) Shallow groundwater thermal sensitivity to climate change and land cover disturbances: derivation of analytical expressions and implications for stream temperature modeling. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci 19: 2469-2489. Leach & Moore (2014) Winter stream temperature in the rain-on-snow zone of the Pacific northwest: influences of hillslope runoff and transient snow cover. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 18: 819-838. Luce et al. (2014). Sensitivity of summer stream temperatures to climate variability in the Pacific Northwest. Water Resour. Res, 50, 2. Mayer (2012). Controls of summer stream temperature in the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Hydrology, 475:323-335. Null et al. (2013). Stream temperature sensitivity to climate warming in California’s Sierra Nevada: impacts to coldwater habitat. Climatic Change, 116:149-170. Snyder et al. (2015) Accounting for groundwater in stream fish thermal habitat responses to climate change. Ecological Applications 25:1397–1419. Trumbo et al. (2014). Ranking site vulnerability to increasing temperatures in southern Appalachian Brook Trout streams in Virginia: an exposure-sensitivity approach. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 143:173-187. Sensitivity defined as: VarS*T 1) stream ΔΛC : air ΔΛC 2) stream ΔΛC : flow ΔSD(Q) “Connectivity” Theory Streams that are cold in summer months are poorly “connected” to the atmosphere via energy exchanges. Prediction: cold streams should show less variation relative to climate forcing factors (air temperature and discharge). Sensitivity Parameters from Regressions Stream Temperature C 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 ππ = π0 + πππ + πππ + π Slope = a = 0.74 ππ : Air temperature anomaly ππ : Standardized streamflow -2 -1 0 1 2 Air Temperature Anomaly C Model Timestep & Functional Form Temp (ΛC) Intra-annual vs. Inter-annual 25 Sun Δ = 0 15 5 Daily, weekly… 2/11/2012 5/21/2012 8/29/2012 12/7/2012 3/17/2013 6/25/2013 10/3/2013 -5 Predicted (°C) Linear vs. Non-linear 25 20 >20ºC 15 < 0ºC 10 5 5 15 Observed (°C) 25 Mohseni et al. 1998. Dataset (Region 6 USFS) Stream Temp Sites (n = 246; >7 summers of data) USHCN Air Temp Red (n = 25) Streamflow Blue (n = 15) Small to medium size streams Principal Component Reconstructions for: π»π : Air temperature anomaly & πΈπ : Standardized streamflow πππ = πΏππ X πππ P = Principal Component (time series) i = which principal component (just using 1 & 2) L= Loading (map) S = Station Y = Year For a particular place, the time series is given by: ππ‘ = πΏ1 X π1π‘ + πΏ2 X π2π‘ 49 0.3 0.24 48 π»π : Air temperature anomaly PC2 Loading 0.17 Air stations 46 0.05 -0.02 45 -0.08 44 -0.15 -0.21 43 -0.27 -0.34 -0.4 42 Latitude 2 PCs 1st – Regional Mean 2nd – lat & lon R2=0.81 -124 -122 -120 Longitude -118 PC2 Air Temperature Anomaly 47 0.11 PCA Reconstruction Example 0 -2 -4 Obs Pred NS R2=0.90 -6 Air Temp Anomaly TemperatureAnomaly 2 Halfway, OR 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 49 πΈπ : Standardized streamflow 0.43 48 0.36 Streamflow Stations 47 0.22 46 0.08 45 0 44 -0.07 -0.14 43 -0.21 -0.28 -0.35 42 2 PCs 1st – Regional Mean 2nd – lat & lon R2=0.90 Latitude 0.15 -124 -122 -120 Longitude -118 PC2 Standardized Streamflow Anomaly 0.29 STEAMBOAT CREEK NEAR GLIDE,OREG. 0 1 NS R2=0.95 -1 Streamflow Anomaly Standardized Departure of Annual Streamflow 2 Obs Pred 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Stream Maximum Weekly Maximum Temperature (MWMT; °C) Observed values, averaged across years X-axis > 25.75 24 - 25.75 22.25 - 24 20.5 - 22.25 18.75 - 20.5 17 - 18.75 15.25 - 17 13.5 - 15.25 11.75 - 13.5 10 - 11.75 < 10 Wide range Thermal Sensitivity (°C/°C) Observed values, averaged across years Y-axis >0.9 0.8 - 0.9 0.7 - 0.8 0.6 - 0.7 0.5 - 0.6 0.4 - 0.5 0.3 - 0.4 0.2 - 0.3 0.1 - 0.2 < 0.1 Wide range 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 mean = 0.5°C/°C -0.5 Sensitivity to Air C air tempC (ΛC:ΛC) toTemperature Sensitivity Sensitivity to Air Temperature 10 15 20 Stream MWMT (°C) Average Weekly Maximum Temperature 25 C 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 -2.0 Sensitivity to Streamflow C SD Q to flow (ΛC:ΔSD Sensitivity Q) Sensitivity to Annual Streamflow 10 15 20 Stream MWMT (°C) Average Weekly Maximum Temperature 25 C Bigger Data, Same Result… (923 sites, 10-20 year monitoring records) Sensitivity (ΛC/ΛC) 1.4 1 0.6 0.2 -0.2 5 10 15 20 August stream temperature (ΛC) 25 Isaak et al. In Preparation Why? What explains low sensitivity of cold streams Elevation BFI Watershed size Annual Precip Canopy % Reach slope °C/°C -0.07 0.02 -0.08 0.05 0.07 0.04 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 Sensitivity to Air Temperature C C Sensitivity to air temp What about sensitivity of warmer streams? 10 15 20 Average Weekly Maximum Temperature 25 C Stream MWMT (°C) Two Possibilities: Local Climate Forcing &/or Buffering Air microclimates in complex valley morphologies Groundwater influxes downstream of headwaters This information needed at high resolution across 100,000s stream kilometers Torgersen et al. 2012 Brute Force, Empirical Approach SSN models to geostatistically krige sensitivity n = 923 & growing SSN Website & Freeware • R2 = 0.91 • RMSE = 1.0ºC Summary • Streams exhibit a wide range of correlations with air temperature & discharge (sensitivity) • Colder streams are less responsive to climate forcing across years – Groundwater, late snowpack – Indirect sensitivity to climate change could be large (e.g., wildfires alter riparian vegetation & limit site regrowth) • Better understanding & prediction of sensitivities (especially in warmer streams) would enable better climate change forecasts