PHY4605–Spring 2005 Problem Set 1, Solutions Due: Jan. 14, 2005 1. Inhomogeneous field B = −αxî + (B0 + αz)k̂ (a) ∂ ∂ x+0+α z ∂x ∂z = −α + α = 0 ∇ · B = −α (b) The Hamiltonian is H = µ0~σ · B = µ0 [−αxσx + (B0 + αz)σz ]. We can then write the time evolution operator as ¶ µ iHt U = exp − h̄ = exp [i(aσx + bσz )] ≡ exp (iθn̂ · ~σ ) = cos θ + in̂ · ~σ sin θ where µ0 αxt h̄ µ0 (B0 + αz)t θnz = b = − , h̄ and n̂ is a unit vector (i.e., n2x + n2z = 1). Then it follows that, θnx = a = µ20 t2 2 2 2 2 (α x + (B0 + αz) ) h̄ µ0 t p 2 2 µ0 t √ θ= α x + (B0 + αz)2 ≡ · · ·. h̄ h̄ θ2 (n2x + n2z ) = Hence, µ U = cos θ + i At time t, µ χ+ χ− ¶ αx B0 + αz √ σx − √ σz sin θ. ··· ··· ¶ |χ(t)i = U (t) ¶ ¶ ¶µ µ µ B0 + αz αx χ+ σz sin θ = cos θ + i √ σx − √ χ− ··· ··· ¶ µ ¶ ¶ µ µ iαx sin θ χ− i(B0 + αz) sin θ χ+ χ+ √ + √ = cos θ − χ− χ+ −χ− ··· ··· iαx sin θχ− i(B0 + αz) sin θχ+ √ √ − cos θχ+ + · · · ··· . = iαx sin θχ+ i(B0 + αz) sin θχ− √ √ + cos θχ− + ··· ··· This shows the full time-dependence of |χi. Note that this time-dependence is found in θ. 1 (c) Assuming B0 À αx, αz, µ0 B 0 t =⇒ θ ≈ h̄ √ · · · ≈ B0 (These become independent of position.) Hence, for χ+ = χ− = 1, iαx sin θ iαz sin θ cos θ + − i sin θ − B0 B0 |χ(t)i ≈ iαx sin θ iαz sin θ . cos θ + + i sin θ + B0 B0 µ ¶ 1 At t = 0, or θ = 0, we have |χi = . 1 Now we compute the momenta of the spin-up and spin-down components. For spin-up: µ ¶ iαx sin θ iαz sin θ p̂χ+ (t) = (−ih̄∇) − B0 B0 h̄α sin θ = (x̂ − ẑ). B0 For spin-down: µ p̂χ− (t) = (−ih̄∇) = iαx sin θ iαz sin θ + B0 B0 ¶ h̄α sin θ (x̂ + ẑ) B0 So the spin-up and spin-down parts of the initial state are diverging in the ±ẑ directions. The “extra” αx component of the gradient required to have ∇ · B = 0 does not separate the beams, as it gives the same deflection to both. 2. Stern-Gerlach Effect. (a) To find the the probability amplitudes parallel and anti-parallel to ŷ, we project the initial state onto eigenstates of Ŝy : µ ¶ µ ¶ 1 1 1 i |χ1 i = √ , |χ2 i = √ 2 i 2 1 with eigenvalues + h̄2 and − h̄2 respectively. (To check this recall that µ ¶ 0 −i ˆ Sy ∝ ≡ σy .) So the probability of a particle ending up with a i 0 spin antiparallel to ŷ is r µ ¶ ¢ 1 ¡ 1 4 −i 1 · P−y = | √ |2 i 17 2 1 9 = | − 4i + i|2 = 34 34 2 Now these spins are passed through a second SG apparatus ⊥ to the first. The probability of getting a spin parallel to ẑ from a spin-down state in ŷ is just 12 . Thus, the total fraction of particles which make it through is 1 9 9 · = . 2 34 68 (b) For S = 1, Sz = 1, 0, or −1. With the eigenstates of Ŝz as basis, Ŝz has the matrix form: 1 0 0 Sz = h̄ 0 0 0 0 0 −1 since h1, m|Sˆz |1, m0 i = mh̄δm,m0 . We also need the eigenstates of Ŝy . Construct first the matrix: 1 Sˆy |1, m0 i = (Sˆ+ − Sˆ− )|1, m0 i 2i p h̄ p = ( 1 · 2 − m0 (m0 + 1)|1, m0 + 1i − 1 · 2 − m0 (m0 − 1)|1, m0 − 1i). 2i With this the matrix elements are given by p h̄ p h1, m|Sˆy |1, m0 i = [ 2 − m0 (m0 + 1)δm,m0 +1 − 2 − m0 (m0 − 1)δm,m0 −1 ]. 2i Explicitly, we have: √ 0 2 0 0 1 0 √ √ h̄ h̄ = √ −1 0 1 . Sy = − 2 0 2 √ 2i i 2 0 −1 0 0 − 2 0 The eigenvectors (which you can get with Maple or by hand) are then: −1 −1 1 √ √ 1 1 1 |χ1 i = √ 0 ; |χ2 i = i 2 ; |χ3 i = −i 2 , 2 2 2 1 1 1 corresponding to λ1 = 0, λ2 = −h̄, and λ3 = +h̄. need to express this state in terms Case 1 (initial state is |1, 1i, m = 1). WeP of the eigenstates of Sˆy . Recall |1, mi = n hχn |1, mi|χn i by completeness. The projection hχn |1, mi onto the n-th Sˆy eigenstate gives the probability amplitude that the spin will emerge in the n-th beam: 1 1 √2 , n = 1 hχn |1, 1i = hχn | 0 = −1, n = 2 21 0 −2, n = 3 The intensity is proportional to |hχn |1, 1i|2 , and so the ratios of the intensities are 14 : 12 : 41 for Sy = 1 : 0 : −1. 3 Case 2 (initial state is |1, 0i, m = 0). n=1 0 0, i √ , n=2 hχn |1, 0i = hχn | 1 = √2i 0 − 2, n = 3 The intensities are related according to 1 2 :0: Case 3 (initial state is |1, −1i, m = −1). 0 hχn |1, −1i = hχn | 0 = 1 The intensities are related according to 1 4 : 1 2 : 1 2 for Sy = 1 : 0 : −1. √1 , 2 1 , 2 1 , 2 1 4 n=1 n=2 n=3 for Sy = 1 : 0 : −1. 3. Oscillating B-field. (a) γB0 h̄ H = −γB · S = −γB0 cos ωt Sz = − cos ωt 2 µ 1 0 0 −1 ¶ (b) µ χ(t) = α(t) β(t) ¶ 1 , with α(0) = β(0) = √ 2 µ ¶ µ ¶µ ¶ ∂χ γB0 h̄ α̇(t) 1 0 α(t) ih̄ = ih̄ = Hχ = − cos ωt 0 −1 β(t) β̇(t) ∂t 2 µ ¶ γB0 h̄ α(t) = − cos ωt −β(t) 2 µ α̇ = ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ µ ¶ γB0 dα i cos ωt α ⇒ =i cos ωt α 2 iγB0 sin ωt + const. log α = 2ω √ α = Aei(γB0 /2ω) sin ωt ; α(0) = A = 1/ 2 1 α(t) = √ ei(γB0 /2ω) sin ωt 2 γB0 2 ¶ Similarly 1 β(t) = √ e−i(γB0 /2ω) sin ωt 2 4 (c) Call the probability amplitude of getting −h̄/2 with a measurement of Sx cx− . Then we have cx− ! à √1 ei(γB0 /2ω) sin ωt 1 2 = χx− · χ = √ (1 − 1) · 1 −i(γB0 /2ω) sin ωt √ e 2 2 µ ¶ µ ¶ 1 1 i(γB0 /2ω) sin ωt 1 −i(γB0 /2ω) sin ωt γB0 √ e = √ −√ e = i sin sin ωt 2ω 2 2 2 Probability is |cx− |2 = sin2 ¡ γB0 2ω ¢ sin ωt . 2 (d) Argument of sin must reach π/2, so we need γB0 /2ω = π/2, or B0 = πω/γ. 5