UNCTAD SPECIAL AND DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT in the Doha Work Programme UNCTAD Commercial Diplomacy Programme October 2002 UNCTAD THE BASIC IDEAS BEHIND THE CONCEPT OF SPECIAL AND DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT (S&D): • There are structural imbalances between developing and developed countries in terms of: – share of world trade; – access to financing; – access to technology; – infrastructure weaknesses; – institutional capacity and human resources. 2 UNCTAD THE BASIC IDEAS BEHIND THE CONCEPT OF SPECIAL AND DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT (S&D) The trade liberalisation does not automatically imply development nor equitable welfare gains. Developing countries do not have the same capacity as developed countries in taking advantage of the opportunities created by trade liberalisation. 3 UNCTAD THE S&D CONCEPT IS APPLIED IN SEVERAL AREAS OF THE INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS: • Financing for development • Development aid • TRADE At the • national • bilateral • regional • multilateral levels 4 UNCTAD SOME BENCHMARKS IN THE HISTORY OF S&D IN MULTILATERAL TRADE RULES : • GATT 1947: MFN for all members, exc. art.XVIII which allows for flexibility and for tariff protection and QRs in case of balance of payments crisis • GATT PART IV (1964): the principle of “nonreciprocity” is introduced • ENABLING CLAUSE (1979): allows for GSPs, trade agreements among developing countries, S&D for LDCs • TOKYO ROUND (1978): plurilateral codes as a way to implement S&D • URUGUAY ROUND (1994): the “single undertaking” does not allow for opt-in/opt-out rules • DOHA MIN.DECL.(2001): paras. 44 on S&D, 42-43 on LDCs, and 35 on small economies (plus the Decision on Implementation Issues) 5 UNCTAD The evolution of the concept of S&D Until the Tokyo Round: The trade agenda focused on border barriers (mainly tariffs): S&D was meant to avoid these barriers through preferences. S&D was conceived as a development tool to help the exports of developing countries During and after the Uruguay Round: The trade agenda focused on « within the border » barriers (domestic measures) and traderelated obligations: S&D was mant to fulfill them. S&D conceived as an adjustment tool to fulfill the new rules 6 WAYS OF IMPLEMENTING THE UNCTAD S&D IN THE AREA OF TRADE: “NEGATIVE” measures (to support the adjustment) (binding rules, enforceable) “POSITIVE” measures (prodevelopment) (non-binding rules, not enforceable) • Transition periods to comply with the rules • Different criteria and /or thresholds in the implementation of the rules • Exceptions to the rules • Technical assistance and capacity building • Greater market access (GSPs) • “Best endeavour” clauses • Positive list approach (GATS) 7 UNCTAD TWO PARALLEL APPROACHES TO S&D: The defense of the concept per se: • Implies a strong political support • It is linked to an ideological debate • It is linked to the issue of coherence between trade and financing for development The defense of the concept topic by topic: • Implies in-depth technical inputs • Implies both legal and economic arguments 8 Opportunities and caveats of the approach UNCTAD to S&D topic by topic (sectoral): • Agriculture: – Divergences among developing countries • Services: – Make « pro-development » requests – Attach conditions to your offers • Anti-dumping: – Many AD cases among developing countries…. • Subsidies and TRIMS: – Divergences among developing countries • Art. XXIV and Enabling Clause: – S&D for South/South arrangements only ? • Singapore issues: – S&D may be envisaged in any multilateral framework • TRIPS: – Difficulties to implement S&D provisions • Market access: – The pending issue of the erosion of preferences 9 – Applied or bound rates ? UNCTAD THE WTO SECRETARIAT’S TYPOLOGY OF THE 155 EXISTING S&D MEASURES: 1. Provisions aimed at increasing the trade opportunities of developing countries (*) 2. Provisions under which WTO members should safeguard the interests of developing countries (*) 3. Flexibility of commitments, of action, and use of policy instruments 4. Transitional time periods 5. Technical assistance (*) 6. Provisions relating to LDCs (*) (*)= all or several “best endeavour” clauses 10 UNCTAD HOW TO ENSURE HOW TO ENSURE ENFORCEABLE ENFORCEABLE S&DCLAUSES: RULES: S&D The Preambles, Declarations, some Decisions and footnotes are NOT mandatory BY CREATING CLEAR RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS IN THE MANDATORY PROVISIONS OF THE AGREEMENTS, SUBJECT TO THE WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM WTO criterion: the “SHALL” language is mandatory (the “should” is not) 11 UNCTAD HOW TO STRENGTHEN THE S&D PROVISIONS IN THE CURRENT NEGOTIATIONS: Through AMENDMENTS of the existing provisions (ex.: “should” becomes “shall”) Through AUTHORITATIVE INTERPRETATIONS (“Understanding on the interpretation” of the rules) Through the negotiation of a horizontal “FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT” on S&D (para.44 Doha Min.Decl.) 12 UNCTAD THE CATEGORIES OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES WERE INTRODUCED IN 1979 Least developed countries (LDCs) UN Index (49 LDCs): category recognised by the 1979 GATT Enabling Clause The issue of Landlocked countries GRADUATION... Island countries Small economies Para.35 Doha Min.Decl. Net food importing countries Marrakech Min.Decl. Small suppliers Textiles 13 UNCTAD Other problems raised by the S&D issues: • Proliferation of trade regimes with different S&D levels • The value of the autonomous liberalisation • Quality and financing of the trade-related technical assistance • Assessment of the utilisation instead of the effectiveness of the S&D: – We need development benchmarks – The role of a monitoring mechanism 14 UNCTAD The state of play in the current negotiations • New deadline of 31 Dec.2002 to agree on « clear recommendations » to the General Council • Only 3 formal meetings scheduled between October and December 2002 • Some 90 proposals on S&D are on the table • No consensus (except on the monitoring mechanism) 15 UNCTAD WHAT IS REALLY IMPORTANT: • The S&D concept is part of the « single undertaking » • Close links between S&D issues and the implementation issues • Assess both issues at the 5th WTO Ministerial Conference in Cancun 16 UNCTAD THANK YOU ! ...QUESTIONS ? 17