Primordial Gravitational Waves Enhancement arXiv:1006.5150 & 1108.1696 M. G. Romania & N.C. Tsamis (University of Crete) Question: What happens to gravitons in QG inflation? QG Inflation GΛ ~ 10-6 starts inflation QG back-reaction stops inflation Eff. Field Eqns: Gµν = -Λgµν+ 8πGTµν[g] Tµν[g] = (ρ+p)uµuν + pgµν p[g] = Λ2 f(-GΛ□-1R) f(x) grows w/o bound ρ[g] & uµ[g] from conservation Numerical Results for GΛ=1/300 and f(x) = ex-1 X= -∫tdt’ a-3∫t’dt’’ a3R Criticality p = Λ2f(-GΛX) = Λ/8πG Evolution of X(t) = □-1R Falls steadily to Xcr Then oscillates with constant period and decreasing amplitude Generic for any f(x) growing w/o bound Inflation Ends, H(t) goes < 0, R(t) oscillates about 0 Generic Expansion Histories with only ω = 24πfcr’(GΛ)2Λ Near End of Inflation a(t) = acr e-N H2(t) ≈ ω/9 (4N + 4/3) Brief Oscillatory phase in ∆t = t–tcr a(t) ≈ acr [6 + ω∆t + √2 sin( ω∆t)]/6 H(t) ≈ ω [1 + √2 cos(ω∆t)]/[6a(t)/acr] Radiation Domination R = 6Ḣ + 12H2 0 p = const -Λgµν + 8πGTµν[g] 0 usual evolution Tensor Perturbations Usual eqn for u(t,k) ∂t2u + 3H ∂tu + k2/a2 u = 0 But H(t) oscillates & goes negative! Hubble “friction” becomes anti-friction Increases |∂tu(t,k)| Effect on M(t,k) = |u(t,k)|2 unclear One solution surely enhanced But what is its coefficient? Better to evolve M(t,k) = |u(t,k)|2 directly M(t,k) = u(t,k) u*(t,k) Now use ∂t2u + 3H ∂tu + (k/a)2 u = 0 ∂t2M = -3H ∂tM + 2(k/a)2 M + 2 (∂tu) ∂tu* Now use u ∂tu* - (∂tu) u* = i/a3 ∂tM = (∂tu) u* + u ∂tu* ∂t2M = (∂t2u) u* + 2 (∂tu) ∂tu* + u ∂t2u* Implies (∂tu) ∂tu* = [(∂tM)2 + a-6]/4M ∂t2M + 3H ∂tM + 2(k/a)2 M = [(∂tM)2 + a-6]/2M Great analytic control of M(t,k) Before 1st crossing Bunch-Davies M(t,k) 1/2ka2(t) 4 2ka2M = 1 + (1-½ε)(Ha/k)2 + O(H4a /k4) Breaks down for large ε(t) During radiation domination Exact solution: M(t,k) = [2ka2(t)]-1 [C2 sin2(k/Ha) + C-2 cos2(k/Ha)] C large for k/a(t) « H(t) M ~ const C large for k/acr ~ ω 2ka2<M> ~ const How much energy is there? E(t,k) = ½a3ẋ2 + ½ak2x2 x(t,k) = u(t,k)α(k) + u*(t,k)α† (k) α(k)|Ω> = 0 <Ω|E(t,k)|Ω> = ½a3|∂t u|2 + ½ k2a|u|2 |u|2 = M & |∂tu|2 = [(∂tM)2 + a-6]/4M <E> = ½a3[(∂t M)2 + a-6]/4M + ½k2aM Subtract off ½ω = ½k/a(t) ∆E = [a6(∂tM)2 + (1-2ka2M)2]/8a3M Gravity wave people want dΩgw/dln(k) dρ(t,k) = 4πk2dk/[2πa(t)] ∆E(t,k) dΩgw/dln(k) = [8πG/3H2(t)] dρ(t,k) k/dk = (4/3π) Gk4/H2a4 [a6(∂tM)2+(1-2ka2M)2]/8ka2M M-terms ~ constant 2 4 H a constant during radiation domination 2 4 1/H a falls like 1/a(t) during matter dom. Gk4/H2a4 = Gω2 (k/ωa)4 (ω/H)2 Bump in the gravity wave background Conclusions Oscillations at end of inflation Little effect of cosmological perturbations Pulse of gravity waves at ωacr/a0 ~ 1010 Hz Not currently detectable, maybe in future Eqn of M(t,k) = |u(t,k)|2 Excellent analytic control Works for Q’’ + [k2–θ’’/θ]Q = 0 with ANY θ Astro-ph/0306602