pdf

advertisement
On the π‘˜-residue of disjoint unions of graphs with
applications to π‘˜-independence
David Amos, Randy Davila, and Dr. Ryan Pepper
Abstract
The π‘˜-residue of a graph, introduced by Jelen in a 1999 paper, is a lower bound on the π‘˜-independence number for every positive integer π‘˜. This generalized earlier work by Favaron, Mahéo and
Saclé, by Griggs and Kleitman, and also by Triesch, who all showed that the independence number of a graph is at least as large as its Havel-Hakimi residue, defined by Fajtlowicz. We show here
that, for every positive integer π‘˜, the π‘˜-residue of disjoint unions is at most the sum of the π‘˜-residues of the connected components considered separately, and give applications of this lemma. Our
main application is an improvement on Jelen’s bound for connected graphs which have a maximum degree cut-vertex.
Preliminaries
Main Results
Applications of the
Disjoint Union Lemma
Let 𝐺 = 𝑉, 𝐸 be a simple, finite and undirected graph of order 𝑛 with vertex set 𝑉
and edge set 𝐸. The independence number of 𝐺, denoted 𝛼 𝐺 , is the cardinality of a
largest set of pairwise non-adjacent vertices. The degree sequence of 𝐺, denoted 𝐷(𝐺),
is the sequence of degrees of each vertex of 𝑉, where the degree of a vertex is the
number of vertices that it is adjacent to. We use Δ to denote the largest degree, and
assume that 𝐷 is ordered in non-increasing order.
Lemma (Pepper [8]). Let 𝐺 be a graph π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘˜ ∈ β„€+ . If π‘˜ ≥ Δ,
then
Theorem ([1]). Let 𝐺 be a disconnected graph with components 𝐺1 , 𝐺2 , … , 𝐺𝑝 and let
π‘˜ ∈ β„€+ . Then
π‘š
π‘…π‘˜ 𝐺 = 𝑛 − ,
π‘˜
The elimination sequence of 𝐷 is the sequence of terms deleted, in order, during the
HHP, together with the zeros obtained at the end of the HHP.
π‘…π‘˜ 𝐺 ≤
𝑝
π‘…π‘˜ 𝐺𝑖 ≤
𝑖=1
where π‘š is the number of edges in 𝐺.
Lemma ([1]). Let 𝐾𝑛 be the complete graph on n vertices and
let π‘˜ ∈ β„€+ . Then
π‘…π‘˜ 𝐾𝑛 =
𝑛
π‘˜+1
,
2
𝑛 𝑛−1
− 2π‘˜
π›Όπ‘˜ 𝐺𝑖 = π›Όπ‘˜ 𝐺 .
𝑖=1
p
′
The Havel-Hakimi derivative of 𝐷 is the sequence 𝐷 obtained by removing a largest
term Δ from D and reducing by one the next Δ highest terms. A well known theorem of
Havel and Hakimi states that 𝐷 is graphic if and only if 𝐷′ is graphic [5, 6]. As a
consequence of this, repeatedly taking Havel-Hakimi derivatives of the degree
sequence of a graph will eventually terminate in a sequence of zeros. This process is
called the Havel-Hakimi Process (HHP) and the number of remaining zeros is called
the residue. The residue was conjectured to be a lower bound for the independence
number in [2] and this conjecture was later proven in [3,4,7,9]
𝑝
𝑖𝑓 π‘˜ ≤ 𝑛
The difference between π‘…π‘˜ (𝐺) and i=1 R k Gi can be arbitrarily large (see Figure 1
for a small example where the difference is 3 for 𝑅1 ).
Theorem ([1]). Let 𝐺 be a graph with a maximum degree cut vertex 𝑐 and let
𝐺1 , 𝐺2 , … , 𝐺𝑝 be the components of 𝐺 − 𝑐 . Then, for π‘˜ ∈ β„€+ , π‘˜ ≤ Δ,
.
, π‘–π‘“π‘˜ ≥ 𝑛 + 1
Theorem (The Disjoint Union Lemma [1]). Let 𝐺 and 𝐻 be
any two graphs and let 𝐺 ∪ 𝐻 be their disjoint union. Then
π‘…π‘˜ 𝐺 ∪ 𝐻 ≤ π‘…π‘˜ 𝐺 + π‘…π‘˜ 𝐻 .
𝑝
π‘…π‘˜ 𝐺 ≤
𝑝
π‘…π‘˜ 𝐺𝑖 ≤
𝑖=1
π›Όπ‘˜ 𝐺𝑖 ≤ π›Όπ‘˜ 𝐺 .
𝑖=1
𝑝
Again, the difference between π‘…π‘˜ (𝐺) and 𝑖=1 π‘…π‘˜ 𝐺𝑖 can be arbitrarily large (see
Figure 2 for a small example where the difference is 5 for 𝑅1 ).
Let π‘˜ be a positive integer. The π‘˜-residue of a graph 𝐺, first introduced by Jelen [7], is
defined as
1
π‘…π‘˜ 𝐺 =
π‘˜
π‘˜−1
π‘˜ − 𝑖 𝑓𝑖
𝑖=0
where 𝑓𝑖 is the frequency with which 𝑖 occurs in the elimination sequence of 𝐷. Note
that 𝑅1 is equivalent to the residue. The π‘˜-residue is a lower bound for the π‘˜independence number π›Όπ‘˜ of a graph [7] – that is, the cardinality of a largest subset of
vertices that induces a subgraph of maximum degree at most π‘˜ − 1 (observe that
𝛼1 = 𝛼).
Figure 2
Open Problems
Problem 1: Characterize the case of equality for the Disjoint Union Lemma.
Problem 2: Find more applications of the Disjoint Union Lemma.
Problem 3: Find a formula for the π‘˜-Residue of regular graphs.
Theorem (Jelen [6]). Let 𝐺 be a graph. Then for every positive integer π‘˜,
π‘…π‘˜ 𝐺 ≤ π›Όπ‘˜ 𝐺 .
Figure 1
Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences
www.uhd.edu/cms
References
[1] D. Amos, R. Davila, R. Pepper. On the π‘˜-residue of disjoint unions of graph with
applications to π‘˜-independence (submitted for publication).
[2] S. Fajtlowicz, On the conjectures of Graffiti, III, Congressus Numerantum 66
(1988), 23-32.
[3] O. Favaron, M. Mahéo, and J.F. Saclé, On the residue of a graph, J. Graph Theory 15
(1991), 39-64.
[4] J. R. Griggs and D. J. Kleitman, Independence and the Havel-Hakimi residue,
Discrete Math 127 (1994), 241-249.
[5] S. L. Hakimi, On the realizability of a set of integers as degrees of the vertices of a
linear graph, I., SIAM J. Appl. Math 10 (1962), 496-506.
[6] V. Havel, A remark on the existence of finite graphs, Casopis Pest Mat 80 (1955),
477-480 (Czech).
[7] F. Jelen, k-independence and the k-residue of a graph, J. Graph Theory 127 (1999),
209-212.
[8] R. Pepper, Binding independence, Ph.D. thesis, University of Houston, 2004.
[9] E. Triesch, Degree sequences of graphs and dominance order, J. Graph Theory 22
(1996), 89-93.
Download