On the π-residue of disjoint unions of graphs with applications to π-independence David Amos, Randy Davila, and Dr. Ryan Pepper Abstract The π-residue of a graph, introduced by Jelen in a 1999 paper, is a lower bound on the π-independence number for every positive integer π. This generalized earlier work by Favaron, Mahéo and Saclé, by Griggs and Kleitman, and also by Triesch, who all showed that the independence number of a graph is at least as large as its Havel-Hakimi residue, defined by Fajtlowicz. We show here that, for every positive integer π, the π-residue of disjoint unions is at most the sum of the π-residues of the connected components considered separately, and give applications of this lemma. Our main application is an improvement on Jelen’s bound for connected graphs which have a maximum degree cut-vertex. Preliminaries Main Results Applications of the Disjoint Union Lemma Let πΊ = π, πΈ be a simple, finite and undirected graph of order π with vertex set π and edge set πΈ. The independence number of πΊ, denoted πΌ πΊ , is the cardinality of a largest set of pairwise non-adjacent vertices. The degree sequence of πΊ, denoted π·(πΊ), is the sequence of degrees of each vertex of π, where the degree of a vertex is the number of vertices that it is adjacent to. We use Δ to denote the largest degree, and assume that π· is ordered in non-increasing order. Lemma (Pepper [8]). Let πΊ be a graph πππ π ∈ β€+ . If π ≥ Δ, then Theorem ([1]). Let πΊ be a disconnected graph with components πΊ1 , πΊ2 , … , πΊπ and let π ∈ β€+ . Then π π π πΊ = π − , π The elimination sequence of π· is the sequence of terms deleted, in order, during the HHP, together with the zeros obtained at the end of the HHP. π π πΊ ≤ π π π πΊπ ≤ π=1 where π is the number of edges in πΊ. Lemma ([1]). Let πΎπ be the complete graph on n vertices and let π ∈ β€+ . Then π π πΎπ = π π+1 , 2 π π−1 − 2π πΌπ πΊπ = πΌπ πΊ . π=1 p ′ The Havel-Hakimi derivative of π· is the sequence π· obtained by removing a largest term Δ from D and reducing by one the next Δ highest terms. A well known theorem of Havel and Hakimi states that π· is graphic if and only if π·′ is graphic [5, 6]. As a consequence of this, repeatedly taking Havel-Hakimi derivatives of the degree sequence of a graph will eventually terminate in a sequence of zeros. This process is called the Havel-Hakimi Process (HHP) and the number of remaining zeros is called the residue. The residue was conjectured to be a lower bound for the independence number in [2] and this conjecture was later proven in [3,4,7,9] π ππ π ≤ π The difference between π π (πΊ) and i=1 R k Gi can be arbitrarily large (see Figure 1 for a small example where the difference is 3 for π 1 ). Theorem ([1]). Let πΊ be a graph with a maximum degree cut vertex π and let πΊ1 , πΊ2 , … , πΊπ be the components of πΊ − π . Then, for π ∈ β€+ , π ≤ Δ, . , πππ ≥ π + 1 Theorem (The Disjoint Union Lemma [1]). Let πΊ and π» be any two graphs and let πΊ ∪ π» be their disjoint union. Then π π πΊ ∪ π» ≤ π π πΊ + π π π» . π π π πΊ ≤ π π π πΊπ ≤ π=1 πΌπ πΊπ ≤ πΌπ πΊ . π=1 π Again, the difference between π π (πΊ) and π=1 π π πΊπ can be arbitrarily large (see Figure 2 for a small example where the difference is 5 for π 1 ). Let π be a positive integer. The π-residue of a graph πΊ, first introduced by Jelen [7], is defined as 1 π π πΊ = π π−1 π − π ππ π=0 where ππ is the frequency with which π occurs in the elimination sequence of π·. Note that π 1 is equivalent to the residue. The π-residue is a lower bound for the πindependence number πΌπ of a graph [7] – that is, the cardinality of a largest subset of vertices that induces a subgraph of maximum degree at most π − 1 (observe that πΌ1 = πΌ). Figure 2 Open Problems Problem 1: Characterize the case of equality for the Disjoint Union Lemma. Problem 2: Find more applications of the Disjoint Union Lemma. Problem 3: Find a formula for the π-Residue of regular graphs. Theorem (Jelen [6]). Let πΊ be a graph. Then for every positive integer π, π π πΊ ≤ πΌπ πΊ . Figure 1 Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences www.uhd.edu/cms References [1] D. Amos, R. Davila, R. Pepper. On the π-residue of disjoint unions of graph with applications to π-independence (submitted for publication). [2] S. Fajtlowicz, On the conjectures of Graffiti, III, Congressus Numerantum 66 (1988), 23-32. [3] O. Favaron, M. Mahéo, and J.F. Saclé, On the residue of a graph, J. Graph Theory 15 (1991), 39-64. [4] J. R. Griggs and D. J. Kleitman, Independence and the Havel-Hakimi residue, Discrete Math 127 (1994), 241-249. [5] S. L. Hakimi, On the realizability of a set of integers as degrees of the vertices of a linear graph, I., SIAM J. Appl. Math 10 (1962), 496-506. [6] V. Havel, A remark on the existence of finite graphs, Casopis Pest Mat 80 (1955), 477-480 (Czech). [7] F. Jelen, k-independence and the k-residue of a graph, J. Graph Theory 127 (1999), 209-212. [8] R. Pepper, Binding independence, Ph.D. thesis, University of Houston, 2004. [9] E. Triesch, Degree sequences of graphs and dominance order, J. Graph Theory 22 (1996), 89-93.