Deriving the Electromagnetic Field from the Li´enard–Wiechert potential February 7, 2010

advertisement

Deriving the Electromagnetic Field from the Li´enard–Wiechert potential

Robert Clancy and Howard Thom

February 7, 2010

Given the path of a particle of charge q located at space-time coordinate x µ q

( τ ) for invariant time τ , the Li´ A

ν at coordinate x

µ

,

µ ∈ { 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 } , induced by the motion of the charge can be shown to be

4 π

A

ν q

V

ν

=

R σ V

σ

(1) where the expression on the right is evaluated at the retarded time τ

0 defined by

R

σ

R

σ

= 0 (2) and where the argument of the potential relative to the location of the charge is

R

σ

= x

σ − x

σ q

( τ ) .

(3)

To find the electromagnetic field F µν at the coordinate x ρ resulting from the expression for the four potential exhibited in equation (1) consider the relative position four vector R

σ

= R

σ

( x

ρ

, τ ) as a function of x

ρ and τ . Since the path of the particle, x µ q

( τ ) , intersects the past lightcone of the event x ρ once we can regard the invariant time, τ = τ ( x ρ ) , as a function of x ρ . Equation (3) provides

µ

R

σ

=

∂R σ

∂x µ

=

∂x σ

∂x µ

− d x σ q d τ

∂ τ

∂x µ

= δ

µ

σ − V

σ

∂ τ

∂x µ

(4) involving a Kronecker delta and a four velocity of the charged particle denoted by

V

σ

= d x

σ q d τ

.

Again, taking the partial derivative of equation (2) with respect to x

µ yields

(5)

( ∂

µ

R

σ

) R

σ

+ R

σ

( ∂

µ

R

σ

) = 2 R

σ

( ∂

µ

R

σ

) = 0 (6) from which, with an abbreviated from of equation (4) , one may conclude that

R

σ

δ

σ

µ

− V

σ

µ

τ = R

µ

− R

σ

V

σ

µ

τ = 0 (7) resulting in equivalent expressions for the four gradient of the invariant time

µ

τ =

R

µ

R

σ

V σ

, that is,

∂ τ

∂x

µ

=

R µ

R σ V

σ

.

(8)

1

Taking the partial derivative of the four potential below will require the derivative

µ

R

ρ

= δ

ρ

µ

∂ τ

− V

ρ

∂x

µ

= δ

ρ

µ

R µ

− V

ρ

R σ V

σ

(9) that follows from the use of equations (4) and (8) , written with altered indices.

Also required will be a derivative of the four velocity V ν = V ν ( τ ) in equation (5) , treated as a function of τ ( x ρ ) , and again using equation (8)

µ

V

ν

=

∂V

ν

∂x

µ

= d V

ν d τ

∂τ

∂x

µ

ν

R

µ

R σ V

σ

=

R

µ

V

˙ ν

R σ V

σ

(10) where V

˙

µ refers to d V µ / d τ , the derivative with respect to the invariant time.

Evaluating the partial derivative of the four potential A

ν in equation (1) reveals

4 q

π

µ

A

ν

=

=

∂ µ V ν

R σ V

σ

V ν

( R σ V

σ

)

2

[ R

ρ

( ∂

µ

V

ρ

) + ( ∂

µ

R

ρ

) V

ρ

]

R

µ

V

˙ ν

( R σ V

σ

) 2

V

ν

( R σ V

σ

) 2

"

R

ρ

R

µ

V

˙ ρ

R λ V

λ

+ δ

µ

ρ

R

µ

− V

ρ

R λ V

λ

V

ρ

(11)

#

=

R

µ

V

˙ ν

( R σ V

σ

) 2

R

ρ

V

˙ ρ

( R σ V

σ

) 3

R

µ

V

ν −

V

µ

V

ν

( R σ V

σ

) 2

+

V

ρ

V

ρ

( R σ V

σ

) 3

R

µ

V

ν

.

The third term will not contribute to F

µν

, being symmetric in indices µ and ν .

Noting that the four velocity of the particle V σ = γ ( c, ~ ) obeys

V

ρ

V

ρ

= γ

2

( c

2 − ~

2

) = γ

2 c

2

γ

− 2

= c

2

(12) equations (11) and (12) indicate that the electromagnetic field may be written

F

µν

= ∂

µ

A

ν − ∂

ν

A

µ

= F

µν acc

µν

+ F vel

(13) where the acceleration and velocity elements of the electromagnetic tensor are

4 π F

µν acc

= q

( R σ V

σ

) 2

( R

µ

V

˙ ν − R

ν

V

˙ µ

) − q R ρ V

˙

ρ

( R σ V

σ

) 3

( R

µ

V

ν − R

ν

V

µ

) (14)

4 π F

µν vel

= q c 2

( R σ V

σ

) 3

( R

µ

V

ν − R

ν

V

µ

) (15) with all quantities here being evaluated at the retarded time given by equation (2) .

In the case where the particle is at rest with V σ = ( c, ~ the radiative part of the field is zero F

µν acc

F i 0 vel

= 0 ; the non-radiative part indicates here that the electric field gives the expected inverse square law and that the magnetic field F i j vel is zero.

References

1. Classical Electrodynamics (third edition), J. D. Jackson, John Wiley, 1998.

2. Classical Theory of Fields, E. M. Lifshitz & L. D. Landau, Pergamon, 1962.

3. Classical Field Theory, Francis E. Low, John Wiley, 1997.

2

Download