BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
PROGRAM ASSESSMENT
Prof. Sonia I. Mojica, MBA
Director of Business Administration
Department
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
1
 Enrolled
2
 First Time Freshmen
3
 Graduates
4-5
 First Time Freshmen vs. Enrolled
6
 Graduates vs. Enrolled
7
 Graduates by Grade Point Average (GPA)
8-10
 Graduates by Sex and Grade Point Average(GPA)
11-12
 Graduates by Grade Point Average(GPA)and by Major 2007 13
 Graduates by Grade Point Average(GPA) and by Major 2008 14

i
CONT. TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Graduates by Grade Point Average(GPA) and by Major 2009
15
 Graduate by Grade Point Average(GPA) and by Major 2010
16
 Graduates 2007 by Major Grade Point Average(GPA)
17
 Graduates 2008 by Major Grade Point Average(GPA)
18
 Graduates 2009 by Major Grade Point Average(GPA)
19
 Graduates 2010 by Major Grade Point Average(GPA)
20
 Grades Distribution
21-51
 Retention
52-53

ii
INTRODUCTION

This report presents information and analysis about
the effectiveness of the Business Administration
Department for the academic years: 2006-2007, 20072008, 2008-2009, and 2009-2010. The Business
Administration Department is committed to
establishing assessment procedures for reliable results
to help determine the effectiveness of the department
in accordance with the teaching-learning process. In
addition, it has the responsibility to strengthen the
assessment of students and faculty to continually
improve the program and classroom learning.
4
ENROLLED
(FALL 2006-2009)
300
250
283
252
260
256
221
200
150
100
50
0
2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011
Enrolled
2
FIRST TIME FRESHMEN
(FALL 2006-2009)
60
50
50
40
30
37
33
34
29
20
10
0
2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011
First Time…
3
GRADUATES 2006 - 2010
52
51
50
49
48
46
44
46
45
44
42
40
2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011
Graduates
4
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS

In the past five years, the August 2008
trimester (FA-2008) accounted for the
greatest quantity of enrolled and firsttime freshmen in Business Administration
Department. In 2010-2011 was the year
with the greatest quantity of graduates in
Business Administration.
5
FIRST TIME FRESHMEN VS. ENROLLED
20%
18%
18%
16%
14%
15%
13%
13%
13%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011
% First time…
6
GRADUATES VS. ENROLLED
(FALL)
20.00%
18.00%
16.00%
14.00%
12.00%
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
18%
18%
2006-2007
2007-2008
17%
17%
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
% Graduates
7
GRADUATES BY GRADE POINT
AVERAGE (GPA) AND
BY ACADEMIC YEAR
2007-2010
30
25
24
20
16
15
13 13
10
11
10
7
5
5
0
0
1
0
1
2
4
5
6
14
2007 (45 EST)
2008 (44 EST)
2009 (49 EST)
2010 (46 EST)
14
12
9
7
4
3
1
0
1
0
1
11
% OF GRADUATES BY GPA
2007 - 2010
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
36%
27%
16%
10%
1%
% of Graduates
9%
1%
9
GRADUATES

From 184 graduates between 2007 and
2010, 165 graduated with a grade point
average (GPA) of 2.60 to 4.00, this
represent 90%. Only 10% graduated with
a grade point average (GPA) of 2.59 to
2.00.
10
GRADUATES BY GPA AND SEX
2007 – 2010
50
47
45
40
36
35
30
25
20
FEMALE
19
18
16
15
MALE
14
13
11
10
5
5
2
1
2
0
4.00-3.90
3.89-3.50
3.49-3.25
3.24-3.00
2.99-2.60
2.59-2.25
2.24-2.00
11
GRADUATES BY SEX



From 184 graduates between 2007 and 2010,
132 are male; they represent a 72%, while 52
are female, representing 28%.
62% of males graduated with a grade point
average (GPA) of 3.89 a 2.60, while 9%
graduated with a grade point average (GPA)
of 2.59 y 2.00.
28% of female graduated with a grade point
average (GPA) of 4.00 a 2.60, while only 1%
graduates with a grade point average (GPA)
of 2.59 a 2.25.
12
GRADUATES BY GPA AND BY MAJOR
YEAR-2007
ACCOUNTING (ACCO)
7
GENERAL MGMT (GM)
6
6
5
5
5
MARKETING (MARK)
4
3
CONSTRUCTION MGMT
(CM)
3
3 3
INDUSTRIAL MGMT (IM)
2 2
2
1
1 1 1 1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
(ISYS)
0
4.00-3.90 3.89-3.50 3.49-3.25 3.24-3.00 2.99-2.60 2.59-2.25 2.24-2.00
13
GRADUATES BY GPA AND BY
MAJOR
YEAR-2008
6
5
5
4
4
4
ACCO
GM
3
3
3
MARK
3
CM
IM
2 2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2 2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
0
0
4.00-3.90
3.89-3.50
ISYS
1
0
3.49-3.25
3.24-3.00
2.99-2.60
2.59-2.25
2.24-2.00
14
GRADUATES BY GPA AND BY
MAJOR
YEAR-2009
8
7
7
6
6
ACCO
5
5
GM
5
MARK
4
CM
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
3
2
3
IM
2 2
1
ISYS
2
1
1 1
0
0
4.00-3.90
3.89-3.50
3.49-3.25
3.24-3.00
2.99-2.60
2.59-2.25
2.24-2.00
15
GRADUATES BY GPA AND BY
MAJOR
YEAR-2010
9
8
8
ACCO
GM
MARK
CM
IM
ISYS
7
7
6
5
4
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
0
1
2
11
4.00-3.90
1
3.89-3.50
1
2
2
2
2
1
3.49-3.25
3.24-3.00
1
2.99-2.60
1
2.59-2.25
2.24-2.00
16
GRADUATES - 2007 BY MAJOR GPA
4.5
4
4
4 4 4
ACCO
3.5
3
3
3
3
3 3
3
GM
MARK
2.5
2
2
2
CM
IM
1.5
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1 1
ISYS
0.5
0
4.00-3.90
3.89-3.50
3.49-3.25
3.24-3.00
2.99-2.60
2.59-2.25
2.24-2.00
17
GRADUATES 2008 BY MAJOR GPA
4.5
4
4
4
ACCO
3.5
3
3
3
3
GM
MARK
2.5
2 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
CM
IM
1.5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
1 1
1
1
ISYS
0.5
0
4.00-3.90
3.89-3.50
3.49-3.25
3.24-3.00
2.99-2.60
2.59-2.25
2.24-2.00
18
GRADUATES 2009 BY MAJOR GPA
8
7
7
ACCO
6
MARK
4
4
CM
3
3
2 2
2
1
GM
5
5
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
3
2
1
3
3
2
IM
ISYS
2
1
1
0
4.00-3.90
3.89-3.50
3.49-3.25
3.24-3.00
2.99-2.60
2.59-2.25
2.24-2.00
19
GRADUATE 2010 BY MAJOR GPA
7
6
6
6
ACCO
5
5
GM
4
4
3
3
3
MARK
CM
3
IM
2
2
1
4 4
ISYS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
0
4.00-3.90
3.89-3.50
3.49-3.25
3.24-3.00
2.99-2.60
2.59-2.25
2.24-2.00
20
GRADES DISTRIBUTION FALL-2007
709 STUDENTS
250
200
150
185
199
Students
121
100
50
71
42
21
35
28
7
0
21
% OF GRADES DISTRIBUTION
FALL-2007
30
28%
26%
25
20
17%
% Of Grade
Distribution
15
10%
10
6%
5
5%
3%
4%
1%
0
A
B
C
D
F
W
WF
NR
OTHER
22
GRADE DISTRIBUTION FALL-2008
702 STUDENTS
300
250
257
223
200
150
Students
121
100
50
0
63
50
17
17
20
6
23
% OF GRADES DISTRIBUTION
FALL-2008
40
35
32%
34%
30
25
20
14%
15
% Of Grade Distribution
10
6%
6%
3%
5
2%
3%
W
WF
1%
0
A
B
C
D
F
NR
OTHER
24
GRADES DISTRIBUTION FALL-2009
774 STUDENTS
300
250
257
223
200
Students
150
121
100
63
50
50
17
17
20
W
WF
0
A
B
C
D
F
6
NR Others
25
% OF GRADE DISTRIBUTION
FALL-2009
35
30
33%
29%
25
20
16%
% Of Grade
Distribution
15
8%
10
6%
5
2%
2%
3%
W
WF
1%
0
A
B
C
D
F
NR
OTHER
26
GRADES DISTRIBUTION
WINTER-2007
709 STUDENTS
250
200
230
206
150
100
50
0
106
Students
21
42
28
48
25
7
27
% OF GRADES DISTRIBUTION
WINTER-2007
35
33%
29%
30
25
20
% Of Grade
Distribution
15%
15
10
6%
5
3%
7%
4%
3%
1%
0
A
B
C
D
F
W
WF
NR
OTHER
28
GRADES DISTRIBUTION
WINTER-2008
708 STUDENTS
250
220
228
200
150
100
50
0
Students
78
50
14
22
44
44
7
29
% OF GRADE DISTRIBUTION
WINTER-2008
35
31%
32%
30
25
20
% Of Grade
Distribution
15
11%
10
7%
5
6%
3%
2%
6%
1%
0
A
B
C
D
F
W
WF
NR OTHER
30
GRADES DISTRIBUTION
WINTER-2009
729 STUDENTS
250
212
200
150
190
129
100
50
80
18
40
31
19
Students
10
0
31
% OF GRADE DISTRIBUTION
WINTER-2009
35
30
30%
26%
25
20
18%
% Of Grade
Distribution
15
11%
10
5%
5
2%
4%
3%
1%
0
A
B
C
D
F
W
WF
NR OTHER
32
GRADES DISTRIBUTION SPRING-2008
820 STUDENTS
350
300
250
288
223
200
150
Students
125
100
50
17
42
58
25
25
17
0
33
% OF GRADE DISTRIBUTION
SPRING-2008
40
35%
35
30
27%
25
20
% Of Grade
Distribution
15%
15
10
7%
5%
5
2%
3%
3%
2%
W
WF
NR
0
A
B
C
D
F
OTHER
34
GRADES DISTRIBUTION SPRING-2009
703 STUDENTS
300
250
246
234
200
150
100
50
0
Students
77
21
35
14
28
41
7
35
% OF GRADE DISTRIBUTION
SPRING-2009
40
36%
34%
35
30
25
20
% Of Grade
Distribution
15
11%
10
5
3%
5%
6%
4%
2%
1%
0
A
B
C
D
F
W
WF
NR
OTHER
36
GRADES DISTRIBUTION SPRING-2010
805 STUDENTS
350
300
250
292
223
200
150
100
50
0
Students
103
70
14
18
26
53
6
37
% OF GRADE DISTRIBUTION
SPRING-2010
40
36%
35
30
28%
25
20
15
% Of Grade
Distribution
13%
10
9%
6%
5
2%
2%
3%
1%
W
WF
NR
0
A
B
C
D
F
OTHER
38
GRADES DISTRIBUTION SUMMER-2008
47 STUDENTS
18
16
16
15
14
12
10
8
8
Students
6
4
3
2
0
0
A
B
C
D
F
1
W
2
2
WF
NR
39
% OF GRADE DISTRIBUTION
SUMMER-2008
35
33%
30%
30
25
19%
20
15
% Of Grade
Distribution
10
7%
5
3%
4%
W
WF
4%
0%
0
A
B
C
D
F
NR
OTHER
40
GRADES DISTRIBUTION - SUMMER-2009
40 STUDENTS
25
23
20
15
13
10
Students
5
0
A
B
0
0
0
0
C
D
F
W
1
WF
3
NR
41
% OF GRADE DISTRIBUTION
SUMMER-2009
60
57%
50
40
33%
30
% Of Grade
Distribution
20
10
7%
3%
0
A
B
C
D
F
W
WF
NR
OTRER
42
GRADE DISTRIBUTION SUMMER-2010
37 STUDENTS
25
22
20
15
9
10
5
Students
3
0
A
B
C
3
0
0
0
0
D
F
W
WF
NR
43
% OF GRADES DISTRIBUTION
ACADEMIC YEAR SUMMER-2010
70
60%
60
50
40
30
24%
% Of Grade
Distribution
20
8%
10
0
A
B
C
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
D
F
W
WF
NR
44
GRADES DISTRIBUTION
ACADEMIC YEAR 2007-2008
2274 STUDENTS
800
700
719
643
600
500
Students
359
400
300
200
62
100
126
179
89
76
21
0
A
B
C
D
F
W
WF
NR OTHER
45
% OF GRADES DISTRIBUTION
ACADEMIC YEAR
2007-2008
35
32%
30
29%
25
20
15%
% Of Grade
Distribution
15
10
8%
5
2%
7%
3%
3%
1%
0
A
B
C
D
F
W
WF
NR
OTHER
46
GRADE DISTRIBUTION
ACADEMIC YEAR 2008-2009
2153 STUDENTS
800
700
712
712
600
500
Students
400
300
253
200
126
56
100
50
129
94
21
0
A
B
C
D
F
W
WF
NR
OTHER
47
% OF GRADES DISTRIBUTION
ACADEMIC YEAR
2008-2009
35
33%
33%
30
25
20
15
% Of Grade
Distribution
13%
10
6%
5
2%
2%
6%
4%
1%
0
A
B
C
D
F
W
WF
NR
OTHER
48
GRADES DISTRIBUTION
ACADEMIC YEAR 2009-2010
2345 STUDENTS
800
749
679
700
600
500
Students
356
400
300
199
160
200
100
49
66
65
W
WF
22
0
A
B
C
D
F
NR OTHER
49
% OF GRADES DISTRIBUTION
ACADEMIC YEAR
2009-2010
35
32%
29%
30
25
20
% Of Grade
Distribution
15%
15
10
8%
7%
5
2%
3%
3%
W
WF
1%
0
A
B
C
D
F
NR
OTHER
50
GRADES DISTRIBUTION
For the academic year 2007-08, 78% of
students passed their courses, 7% failed,
and 3% withdrew (W).
 During 2008-09, 80% of the students
passed their courses, 6% failed, and 2%
withdrew (W).
 For the academic year 2009-10, 78% of
students passed their courses, 7% failed,
and 3% withdrew (W).

51
RETENTION
ACADEMIC
YEAR
FIRST TIME
FRESHMEN
(FALL
TRIMESTER)
RETAINED
STUDENTS
(NEXT FALL)
% OF
RETENTION
2006-2007
78
56
78%
2007-2008
56
38
68%
2008-2009
57
34
60%
52
RETENTION
Of 78 first time freshman in August 2006,
78% was retained in 2007.
 Of 56 first time freshman in August 2007
68% was retained in 2008.
 Of 57 first time freshman in August 2008,
60% was retained in 2009.

53