Internal and Governmental Financial Auditing and Operational Auditing Chapter 26 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 1 Learning Objective 1 Explain the role of internal auditors in financial auditing. ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 2 Internal Auditing The New York Stock Exchange requires its registrants to have an internal audit function. ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 3 Internal Auditing It is an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity designed to add value and improve an organization’s operations. It helps an organization accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance processes. ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 4 Institute of Internal Auditors Ethical Principles Integrity Objectivity Confidentiality Competency ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 5 Relationship of Internal and External Auditors The external auditor is responsible to financial statement users. The internal auditor is responsible to management. ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 6 Relationship of Internal and External Auditors Competency Objectivity Methodology Audit risk model ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 7 Learning Objective 2 Describe the auditing and reporting requirements under Government Auditing Standards and the Single Audit Act ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 8 Governmental Financial Auditing The primary source of authoritative literature for performance of government audits is Government Auditing Standards, which is issued by the GAO. Because of the color of the cover, it is usually referred to as the “Yellow Book.” ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 9 Governmental Financial Auditing The Yellow Book standards are often called generally accepted government auditing standards (GAGAS). ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 10 Financial Audit and Reporting Requirements – Yellow Book Materiality and significance Quality control Compliance auditing Reporting Audit files ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 11 Audit and Reporting – Single Audit Act and OMB Circular A-133 The threshold for requiring a single audit was raised from $100,000 to $300,000 to exempt many smaller entities from single audit requirements. The OMB increased the single audit threshold to $500,000 beginning in 2004. ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 12 Audit and Reporting – Single Audit Act and OMB Circular A-133 The office of Management and Budget issued a revised Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations, to provide administrative guidance for implementing the single audit requirements. ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 13 Audit Requirements The audit should be in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards (GAGAS). The auditor must obtain an understanding of internal control over federal programs sufficient to support a low assessed level of control risk for major programs. ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 14 Audit Requirements The auditor should determine whether the client had complied with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that may have a direct and material effect on each of its major programs. ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 15 Reporting Requirements An opinion on whether the financial statements are in accordance with GAAP An opinion as to whether the schedule of federal awards is presented fairly in all material respects in relation to the financial statements as a whole ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 16 Reporting Requirements A report on internal control related to the financial statements and major programs A report on compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements A schedule of findings and questioned costs ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 17 Operational Auditing The purpose of operational auditing is to determine the effectiveness or efficiency of any part of an organization. ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 18 Learning Objective 3 Distinguish operational auditing from financial auditing. ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 19 Differences between Operational and Financial Auditing Purpose of the audit Distribution of the reports Inclusion of nonfinancial areas ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 20 Learning Objective 4 Provide an overview of operational audits. ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 21 Effectiveness Versus Efficiency Effectiveness refers to the accomplishment of objectives. Efficiency is defined as reducing costs without reducing effectiveness. ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 22 Effectiveness Versus Efficiency Types of inefficiency Example Acquisition of goods and services is too costly. Bids for purchases of materials are not required. Raw materials are not available when needed. An assembly line was shut down for lack of materials. A duplication of effort by employees exists. Production and accounting keep identical records. ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 23 Effectiveness Versus Efficiency Types of inefficiency Example Vendors’ invoices and Work is done that serves no receiving reports are filed purpose. without being used. There are too many employees Office work could be done with one less assistant. ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 24 Relationship between Operational Auditing and Internal Controls Reliability of financial reporting Efficiency and effectiveness of operations Compliance with applicable laws and regulations ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 25 Types of Operational Audits Functional Organizational Special assignments ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 26 Who Performs Operational Audits Internal auditors Government auditors CPA firms ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 27 Independence and Competence of Operational Auditors The two most important qualities for an operational auditor are: Independence Competence ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 28 Learning Objective 5 Plan and perform an operational audit. ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 29 Specific Criteria Were all plant layouts approved by home office engineering at the time of original design? Has home office engineering done a reevaluation study of plant layout in the past five years? ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 30 Specific Criteria Is each piece of equipment operating at 60 percent of capacity or more for at least three months each year? Does layout facilitate the movement of new materials to the production floor? Does layout facilitate the production of finished goods? ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 31 Specific Criteria Does layout facilitate the movement of finished goods to distribution centers? Does the plant layout effectively use existing equipment? Is the safety of employees endangered by the plant layout? ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 32 Sources of Criteria Historical performance Benchmarking Engineers standards Discussion and agreement ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 33 Phases in Operational Auditing Planning Evidence accumulation and evaluation Reporting and follow-up ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 34 Planning • Scope of engagement • Staffing • Background information • Understand internal control • Decide on appropriate evidence ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 35 Evidence Accumulation and Evaluation • Documentation • Client inquiry • Observation ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 36 Reporting Follow-up • Report usually sent to management • Tailored reports • Follow-up on recommendations with management ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 37 Examples of Operational Audit Findings • Outside janitorial firm saves $160,000 • More timely credit memo processing • Use the right tool • Computer programs save manual labor ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 38 End of Chapter 26 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 22 - 39