Agenda for 1st Class
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Administrative Stuff
Newspapers & Public Radio
Introduction to Civil Procedure
Introduction to Service of Process
Greene v. Lindsey
Introduction to FRCP
Introduction to pleading
1
Assignment for Next Class
• Review any questions or materials we didn’t cover in class
• Service of Process and the Constitution (continued)
– Questions for next class and Writing Assignment for Group 1
• Questions 10 and 11 on Greene v Lindsey handout p. 12
• Service of Process
• FRCP 1, 4,12(b)(4) & (5), Forms 1-3, 5-6
– 3 Blackboard question on Service of Process
– Questions for next class and Writing Assignment for Group 1
• Questions on Service of Process Under FRCP (next 2 slides)
– Optional. Glannon 345-48, 352-53, Problems 1-8, 10, 11a, 12a, 13a, 14
• Pleading
– FRCP 2,3 , 8(a),(d) & (e), 12(b)(6), 84
– Yeazell, pp. 365-83
– 3 Blackboard questions on Complaints
– Questions for next class and Writing Assignment for Group 2
• Questions on Complaint and 12(b)(6) (3rd slide after this one)
– Optional. Glannon 615-46
2
Questions on Service of Process Under FRCP I
• Prof. Gross sues Prof. Garet for giving her a hairy hand. She attempts to
serve process but the process server she hired is unable to find Prof. Garet
and his house is abandoned. So Prof. Gross publishes the summons in the
Los Angeles Times. Is service of process valid?
– Assume that the case was commenced in the federal district court for the
Central District of California and that Prof. Garet resides in that district
– Note that California statutes include the following provision:
• Cal. Code Civ. Pro. 415.50. Service by publication
• (a) A summons may be served by publication if upon affidavit it
appears to the satisfaction of the court in which the action is pending
that the party to be served cannot with reasonable diligence be
served in another manner specified in this article…
• (b) The court shall order the summons to be published in a named
newspaper, published in this state, that is most likely to give actual
notice to the party to be served….
3
Questions on Service of Process Under FRCP II
• It has been proposed that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure should be
amended to add a new FRCP (4)(e)(2)(D) that would read:
• (D) delivering a copy of each by electronic means at a location
previously accessed by the individual within 60 days of delivery.
– a) Is this proposed amendment constitutional? What factors are relevant
to this question?
– b) Is this amendment a good idea? If you were on the Rules Advisory
Committee, would you recommend its adoption?
– c) If it were your responsibility to draft a new rule relating to electronic
service of process, would you propose different language? If so, draft
the rule you would propose.
• How could one argue that service of process by electronic means is already
allowed under the FRCP in some circumstances? If you need more
information to answer this question, what information do you need? I do not
encourage you to do research to find the information you would need.
Rather, I hope you will read FRCP 4 carefully to see what provision or
provisions of it could be construed under some circumstances to allow 4
electronic service of process.
Questions on Complaint & 12(b)(6)
• Briefly summarize Haddle v. Garrison.
– Your summary should include the parties, the key
allegations of the complaint, the way each court which heard
the case ruled, and why.
– Try to keep your summary brief. The summary I drafted is 4
sentences and 92 words. Concision is a virtue!
• As stated in Haddle v. Garrison, a "court must assume that all
of the factual allegations of the complaint are true." Paragraph
21 of the complaint asserts that "Plaintiff has been injured in his
person and property." Why wasn't this allegation sufficient to
defeat the defendant's motion to dismiss?
• The plaintiff in Haddle v. Garrison, won a great victory in the
U.S. Supreme Court. Does that mean that the case is over and
that the defendant must pay the plaintiff the compensatory and
punitive damages requested in the complaint's Prayer for
5
Relief? If not, what happens next?
Questions on Complaint & 12(b)(6)
• Read 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) carefully (Yeazell p. 373). What are
the elements of a cause of action under that statute? That is,
list all the things that the plaintiff will have to prove to prevail if
the case goes to trial.
• For each element you listed, find the corresponding allegations
in the complaint (pp. 370-72).
6
Administrative Stuff
• Everyone receive at least one email from me?
• Everyone receive writing group and web # from Chris Emerson?
• Everyone successfully access the website?
– See www.klerman.com. Click on “Civil Procedure”
– You are responsible for the policies posted there
• Everyone get books for class?
• Nameplates
– Bring to class every day
– First & Last name: Write first name you want me to use
• Seating Chart -- Put name you want me to use on chart
• Office Hours
– Thursdays 2-3PM
• May not consult materials from last year’s class
• Audio recording posted to Portal
• Attendance and participation are mandatory
– May be included in grading
– Email dklerman@law.usc.edu if absent or unprepared
• Not advisable to read ahead or do writing assignments in advance
• Exam will be open book; MC in class + 8-hour take-home
7
Socractic Method
• Starting next class I will call on you, even if you don’t raise your
hand
• Much of what you do in the law practice will be oral
–
–
–
–
Arguing your case to a judge or jury
Responding to a client's legal questions
Negotiating with opposing counsel
Discussing a case with a supervising attorney or partner in a law firm
• Many of those situations will be ones in which others will be
asking you questions and you will be expected to answer
– Judges, partners, and clients set the agenda, and they will expect you to
answer their questions
– You can't say "I pass" to a judge
– If you say it to a partner you may not be at the firm much longer
– If you say it to a client, you are not likely to have many clients
• I will sometimes try to argue you out of your position
– Even if I think you are right
– Good lawyer knows when and how to defend position, when to give in
– Can be frustrating, but important
8
Newspapers
• I strongly advise you to keep up with the news
– Major Newspaper: New York Times, Wall Street
Journal, or Financial Times
• Online or hard copy
• Hardcopy available in library
– Public Radio: 89.3 KPCC, 89.9 KCRW
• Law is in the news nearly every day
• More generally, you will be a much better
lawyer if you are up on current events
– Also you will interview much better
– Not to mention, you will be a better citizen
9
Clerking
• I also strongly advise everyone to apply for a
clerkship
– Clerking for a judge is the very best job you can
take after the law school
• Learn more about practice of law, more quickly, than at
any other job
• Best way to make good first impressions at next job
– So can acquire good mentors and supporters
– Apply in summer between 2L and 3L year
• Judicial externships and internships also good
– But not a substitute
10
Introduction to Civil Procedure
• Arguably most important course this semester
– Very few of you will litigate torts or contracts
– But about half of you will become litigators
• And even transactional lawyers need to know a little about litigation
• Course is mixture
– Part constitutional, part application of court rules, part statutory, part
caselaw
– Part theory, part very practical (court visit, mock mediation)
• Civil, not criminal
• Mostly pretrial and post-trial
– Trial Advocacy is separate course
– Pretrial is very important because most cases settle
• Mostly federal
– California and other states are similar
– Separate course for California Civil Procedure
11
Structure of Course
• Stages of a simple lawsuit
– Service of process, pleading, discovery, trial, appeal
• ADR
– Settlement, mediation
• Complex litigation
– Multiple parties, multiple claims, multiple suits
– Joinder, class actions, res judicata
• Which court, what law
– Jurisdiction, venue, choice of law, Erie doctrine
12
Introduction to Service of Process
• How notify someone that sued?
• Ideally personally deliver relevant papers to
them
– Relevant papers are summons and complaint
• But personal delivery is sometimes too difficult
or costly, so other methods sometimes allowed
– Valid method must be authorized by relevant rules
or statute AND must be constitutional
• Important, because if defendant doesn’t
respond to summons, subject to default
judgment
13
Greene v. Lindsey Questions I
•
•
•
•
1) Who were the parties to this litigation?
2) How many courts were involved in this litigation?
3) Was there a trial?
4) How did each court rule? How did their reasoning differ? What authorities
(statutes, cases, constitutional provisions) did they rely upon? How
persuasive were their arguments?
• 5) Did the Supreme Court reach the right decision? Why?
• 6) Do you think tenants (including those not parties to Greene v. Lindsey)
generally benefited from this decision? How might the decision help them?
How might it hurt them?
• 7) What is the rule of law ("the holding") established by this case? Try to
state it in a single sentence.
14
Greene v. Lindsey Questions II
• 8) Suppose you rent a posh apartment in Beverly Hills. The building has a
doorman, 24-hour security, and other amenities. The landlord wants to evict
you and attempts to notify you by posting the summons on the door to your
apartment. You don't see the summons, and the landlord evicts you. You
bring suit in federal court arguing that service of process was
unconstitutional. Are you likely to win? Be sure to think of arguments both for
why you might win and for why you might lose. Which are more persuasive?
• 9) Suppose you park your car in unapproved spot on the USC campus. A
USC Transportation Services employee tacks a notice on your car stating
that you must move it within 24 hours or it will be towed. You don't see the
notice in time, and USC tows your car. You file suit in federal court arguing
that USC violated your Due Process rights. Are you likely to win? Be sure to
think of arguments both for why you might win and for why you might lose.
Which is more persuasive?
15
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
• FRCP
• Rules that govern civil cases in federal court
• Written by Advisory Committee of judges,
academics, and practicing lawyers, approved
by Supreme Court. Congress can veto.
– Interpreted like statutes
• States have their own rules
– Some states enact rules as statutes (e.g. California)
– Approx. 35 states have modeled their procedures
on FRCP
• Unfortunately not California
16
Service of Process under FRCP
• 4(c)(1). Summons and complaint served together
– 4(c)(2). Service by anyone 18 or older not a party
• 4(e). Service on individuals by
– (1) method allowed by state law, or
– (2) delivering copy personally or leaving copy at home with person of
suitable age living there
• 4(h)(1) Service on corporations by
• (A) method allowed by state law, or
• (B) delivery to officer, managing or general agent, agent authorized to
receive service
– Officer = very high ranking person, e.g. CEO, Secretary, Treasurer
– State law usually requires designation of someone to receive service
» Names and addresses on website: http://kepler.sos.ca.gov/
• All methods must be constitutional
• Waiver procedure in 4(d) seldom used, because defendant gets 60 days to
answer complaint, rather than ordinary 21
17
Introduction to Pleading
• First major phase of lawsuit
– Complaint, answer
• Functions
– Notice
– Identify issues for discovery and trial
– Weed out bad claims
• Very hard for 1L students
– because closely related to discovery and trial
– because closely related to substantive law
• Good complaint alleges facts relating to every element of cause of
action
– because law recently changed
• Iqbal (2009)
18
Complaint in FRCP I
• 3. Complaint filed with court
• 4(c)(1). Complaint served on defendant with summons
• 8(a). Complaint has 3 parts
– Jurisdictional statement. See Haddle, p. 370 ¶ 5
– Short and plain statement of claim. See Haddle, pp. 370-72 ¶¶ 7-23
• Plaintiff usually must plead facts related to every element of a valid
cause of action
• Need not cite legal authority
– Demand for relief. See Haddle, p. 372 last paragraph
• How much money; what kind of injunction
• 8(d). Can plead in alternative, even if both can’t be true
• 8(e). Complaint interpreted “so as to do justice”
– See also Rule 1. Rules construed “to secure just, speedy, and
inexpensive determination” of cases
• 10, Form 1. Formalities, captions, etc.
19
Complaint in FRCP II
• 11. Complaint must be truthful, e.g. supported by legal and factual research
(more detail next week)
20
12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss
• Defendant challenges complaint by making motion to dismiss for failure to
state a claim upon which relief can be granted
– Judge assumes all facts in complaint (but not legal conclusions) are true
– Case dismissed, if law would not allow plaintiff to prevail
• Motion granted if law does not support plaintiff’s claim
• E.g. Prof. Klerman called on John in class, wherefore John prays
$1,000,000 in damages.
– If motion granted, plaintiff almost always has chance to amend
– Core purpose – dismiss claims not supported by law
• May require resolution of difficult, close, and/or new legal issues
• Subject of next class
– Newer purpose – dismiss claims with insufficient factual support
• See Iqbal. very controversial, because plaintiff may need discovery to
get factual support, but not discovery if case dismissed
• Subject of class after next
21
• Called “demurrer” in common law and in many state law systems