1 Welcome and introductions ◦ News from members 10:00-10:30 Northwest Gas Association 2011 Outlook 10:30-11:00 What has happened since last meeting 11:00-11:45 ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Comparison to actual prices Update on analytics Short-term Forecast Fuel price poll Lunch 11:45-1:00 Discussion on need for revision to Long-term forecast 1:00-1:45 ◦ Comparison to other forecasts Discussion of other issues raised by NGAC members. Next steps 2 The 6th Plan was adopted. Oil and Natural Gas prices declined from their 2008 highs. Estimates for supply of natural gas increased Shale Gas fracking concerns surfaced Technological and economic change pushed Cost of Natural gas production down $1-$2 dollars Ruby pipeline is completed (almost) Economic recovery has been slower than anticipated. Natural gas, electric generation, wind integration issues resurfacing. NW as LNG importer to LNG exporter. 3 4 Council Forecast Wellhead Price Natural Gas Refiners Acquisition Cost Low $4 $59 Med-Low $4.3 Medium $4.6 $70 Med-High $4.9 $75 High $5.4 $80 $4.05 Actual $64 $76 Actual 5 Fuel price forecast is in Council’s : ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Demand forecasting model Wholesale Price of electricity model Regional Portfolio model Other organizations/utilities Over the past few months we have updated all of our fuel models. We have also updated the delivery charge components. Note that the short-term fluctuations are handled through the Regional Portfolio Model. 6 We start with national wellhead Price forecasts. We then establish the relationship between price at each delivery point to prices at natural gas hubs. For each delivery point, monthly shaping factors are then used to convert annual forecasts to monthly forecasts. 7 Delivery Point HENRY Key market Price Driver Wellhead Relationship between the Delivery Point and Driver 1.05 R-square 98% AECO SUMAS ROCKIES SAN_JUAN PERMIAN Henry Henry Henry Henry Henry 1.03 0.89 0.79 0.87 0.92 94% 98% 91% 99% 99% Northern California Northern Nevada Alberta British Columbia Pacific Northwest _EAST AECO AECO AECO AECO AECO 0.93 1.15 1.00 1.00 1.03 99% 93% Limited Data Limited Data 87% Rockies Rockies Rockies Rockies Rockies 0.74 1.00 0.86 0.78 1.13 75% Limited Data 89% 95% 80% Permian SAN_JUAN Permian Permian 0.96 1.00 1.12 1.04 99% 97% 91% 90% Sumas 1.00 70% Utah Wyoming Southern Idaho Colorado Eastern Montana Southern California Arizona New Mexico Southern Nevada Western Pacific Northwest ** based on 1989-2010 annual data 8 When the last forecast was produced, Council’s forecast covered the short-term expectations. Nominal $/MMBtu Draft Plan FC 2011 Comparison (04/26/2010) $8.00 $7.00 $6.00 $5.00 $4.00 $3.00 $2.00 $1.00 $- •But by 2010-2011 Council’s forecast was on the high range of the short-term expectations. 6th Plan FC 2011 Comparison (04/22/2011) $4.00 $3.00 $2.00 Q:\MJ\ex\Fuel\NGW FC Comp_mj.xls Council H Council MH Council M Council ML 4 2 NGW 10 3 Council L Avg NGW 9 6 8 7 11 5 $- EIA $1.00 1 Nominal $/MMBtu $5.00 9 6th Plan forecast Comparison FC 2012 Comparison (04/22/2011) Nominal $/MMBtu $6.00 $5.00 $4.00 $3.00 $2.00 $1.00 $- Q:\MJ\ex\Fuel\NGW FC Comp_mj.xls 10 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2010-2015 2015-2020 2020-2025 2025-2030 NGAC Low NGAC Med Low NGAC MED NGAC MED High 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.8 5.4 6.3 4.3 5.1 5.8 6.8 4.7 5.5 6.3 7.4 5.0 5.9 6.7 7.9 -0.2% 1.5% 1.4% 1.3% 3.4% 1.5% 1.4% 1.3% 6.1% 1.5% 1.4% 1.3% 9.2% 1.6% 1.5% 1.4% NGAC High 4.1 8.3 8.6 8.8 9.1 15.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.5% 11 Range in Price of Gas (2006 constant dollars/mmbtu) 12 After lunch Do we need to revise forecast? Comparison of long-term forecasts Proposal for revisions 13 Do forecasted natural gas prices need to be lowered ? 14 Would Forecasted Natural Gas Wellhead prices need to be lowered ? 15 Proposed adjustments to the plan (2010$/MMBtu) 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Annual rate 2010-2015 2015-2020 2020-2025 2025-2030 6th Plan-Low NGAC Low Proposed-Low 6th Plan -Medium NGAC Medium Proposed-Medium 6th Plan - High NGAC High 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.6 4.1 4.1 5.4 4.3 4.0 4.2 6.2 5.4 5.4 8.6 4.6 4.3 4.5 6.7 5.8 5.9 9.1 4.7 4.7 4.6 7.5 6.3 6.6 9.6 4.8 5.0 4.7 8.0 6.7 7.1 10.7 1.3% 1.2% 0.5% 0.7% -0.2% 1.5% 1.4% 1.3% 0.8% 1.2% 0.5% 0.7% 6.0% 1.7% 2.3% 1.4% 6.1% 1.5% 1.4% 1.3% 6.0% 1.7% 2.3% 1.4% 9.8% 1.2% 1.1% 2.1% 4.1 8.3 8.6 8.8 9.1 Proposed-High 4.1 7.1 7.6 8.0 8.9 15.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.5% 12.0% 1.2% 1.1% 2.1% 16 17 Comparison of Medium Forecasts 120 Refiners acquisition cost 2010$/Bbl 110 100 90 80 6th Plan Medium NGAC MedAvg 70 AEO 2011 Reference case 60 50 40 18 6th Plan Forecast 140 130 Refiners acquisition cost 2010$/Bbl 6th plan Low 120 110 6th Plan Medlo 6th Plan Medhi 6th plan High 100 90 6th Plan Medium NGAC Low NGAC MedAvg 80 NGAC High 70 AEO 2011 Reference case DB 60 ICF 50 IHSGI INFORUM 40 19 Proposed Price of RAC $2010/bbl 6th Plan Low 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Annual rate 2010-2015 2015-2020 2020-2025 2025-2030 NGAC-Low P-Low 59 59 56 51 48 76 59 63 67 71 76 76 72 66 62 0.0% -1.1% -1.6% -1.3% -4.9% 1.3% 1.2% 1.2% 0.0% -1.1% -1.6% -1.3% 6th Plan Medium NGAC-Med P-Med 70 76 75 91 77 94 79 97 86 100 1.5% 0.6% 0.5% 1.6% 3.7% 0.7% 0.6% 0.6% 76 82 84 87 94 6th Plan High NGAC-High 80 91 99 118 129 P-high 76 109 111 112 114 76 86 93 111 122 1.5% 0.6% 0.5% 1.6% 2.5% 1.6% 3.6% 1.8% 7.6% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 2.5% 1.6% 3.6% 1.8% 20 150 130 110 6th Plan Low 6th Plan Medium Proposed Medium 90 6th Plan High Proposed High 70 P-Low 50 30 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 21 Powder River Basin Coal Powder River Basin coal spot prices are typically well below national prices, hovering around $10-$12 dollars per ton. 22 Coal prices seem to be in a higher trajectory in the short-term with a return to medium trajectory in the long-term. 23 Update the wellhead/RAC/Minemouth prices Update the pipeline charges Update new fuel price forecast for power plants 24 25 According to Exxon Mobil CEO Rex W. Tillerson oil should be $60-70 dollars a barrel based on supply and demand. 26 Are we entering a gas bubble? Oil fundamentals at 60-70 dollars/barrel 27 US Shale Production to about 50% of total production by early 2030s. Canadian Shale production grows to 1/3 of total output by 2040 (not pictured) Total production flat, as production from other sources decline. The Rice World Gas Trade Model, Discussion of Ref. Case, April 19, 2011 28 29 In 2000, shale formations contributed about 2% to total natural gas production in the Lower 48 By 2010, the contribution exceeded 23% 30 3-D and 4-D methods for quantitative assessment of deposits. Better success in exploratory well 30% in 1990s to about 65% in the late 2000s Better drilling success, rates reached 90% Increased production using horizontal drilling. Significantly lowering marginal cost to around $4/thousand cubic feet (extracts from CEC current Trends- staff workshop April 19, 2011) 31 Sources: California Energy Commission; Altos Management Partners; Baker Institute; National Petroleum Council 32 Source: CEC presentation based on Energy Information Administration data 33 Greenhouse emissions (methane, CO2 release from thermogenic shale deposits) Fresh Water Usage Disposal of Retrieved Water Increased Seismic Activity Groundwater Contamination ◦ Repeal or continuation of 2005 Halliburton amendment, which excluded everything used in fracking(except diesel fuel) from Safe Drinking Water Act. 34 Are oil and natural gas fundamental prices separated or divorced? Are we seeing coal and gas long-term competition? Can gas in low $4 range compete with low cost coal (including transportation, storage, environmental cost for SO2, NOX emissions)? 35 Potential Gas Agency estimates plus EIA’s latest proved dry-gas puts the total future supply at 2170 Trillion CF. Would Marcellus/Utica play increase eastern US source of gas and reduce pressure on natural gas from Canada, western US.? Would existing pipeline capacity going from west to east be stranded? Are gas processing infustructure in the right places? Is US going to be an exporter of LNG? 36 37 38 Fuel Price Parity (Ratio $/Bbl to Wellhead Price) 45.00 40.00 WH Parity HH Parity 35.00 NGW WH Parity 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 39 EIA World Oil Price Forecasts AEO 1982 AEO 1983 AEO 1984 60 AEO 1985 AEO 1986 AEO 1987 50 AEO 1989* AEO 1991 40 AEO 1992 AEO 1993 AEO 1994 30 AEO 1995 AEO 1996 AEO 1997 AEO 1998 20 AEO 1999 AEO 2000 AEO 2001 AEO 2002 AEO 2003 AEO 2004 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 AEO 2005 1987 0 source: C:\Backups\EUCI 100505 Presentation\Back up and working papers\Hist EIA oil price fc.xls; and Annual Energy Outlook, Mid-Price or Reference Case Projections, Various Editions (forecasts), Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Review 2005, DOE/EIA-0384(2005) (Washington, DC, July 2006) , Table 5.21 (historical data) 1986 10 1985 Current Year $/Barrel AEO 1990 AEO 2006 Actual 40