Recruiting Mathematics and Science Teachers Through Partnerships MODERATOR Dave Jolly – Director California Academic Partnership Program FACILITATOR Edward Landesman – Associate Director of Intersegmental Relations UC Science and Mathematics Initiative Recruiting Mathematics and Science Teachers Through Partnerships PANELISTS Dave Jolly Moderator Director California Academic Partnership Program Phil Lafontaine Manager, Math and Science Leadership Office CA Dept of Education Steve Bruckman Executive Vice Chancellor and General Counsel CA Community College Chancellor’s Office Jean Houck Dean, College of Education CA State University, Long Beach Diane Siri Superintendent of Schools Santa Cruz County Edward Landesman Associate Director of Intersegmental Relations UC Science and Mathematics Initiative Guiding Questions What are the most promising strategies and practices we currently see? What are the critical success factors for each of these? What immediate steps can be taken to grow the success of these strategies? California Department of Education Phil Lafontaine Mathematics and Science Leadership Office 916-323-6189 plafonta@cde.ca.gov Developing the Profession of Teachers Superintendent Jack O’Connell Educate our students for the future Increase the number of teachers in mathematics and science Continue to provide support and professional development to new and veteran teachers Provide support for principals Developing Highly Qualified Teachers Four Areas of Focus Recruiting highly qualified teachers Enhancing preservice education for teachers Expanding induction for beginning teachers Providing high-quality professional development for experienced teachers Mathematics and Science Teaching Workforce in California in 2004-05 Classes* FTE Teachers New Hires New Credentials** New Permits** New BA/BSs** Mathematics 98,103 19,713.72 2,057.2 1,258 823 1,505 Science 78,445 15,552.72 2,078.7 1,422 642 8,429 *Includes AP and IB courses **Issues in 2003-04 NCLB Title II, Part B California Mathematics and Science Partnership (CaMSP) Grants California’s allotment $14 million 2003-04 $20.6 million in 2004-05 $24 million in 2005-06 $26 million estimated in 2006-07 Administered by CDE’s MSLO Total of 43 CaMSPs funded Purpose Dedicated to increasing the academic achievement of students in mathematics (grades five through Algebra I) and science (grades four through eight) by enhancing the content knowledge and teaching skills of classroom teachers through professional learning activities. CaMSP Goals Increase student knowledge in science and mathematics. Provide professional development for science and mathematics teachers. Research effective instructional practices to achieve growth in student achievement. Research effective practices to accomplish teacher professional learning. CaMSP State Focus Aimed at improving student achievement in: Grades 4-8 in science New State CST testing in fifth grade Pre-high school/college courses Grades 5-9 in mathematics Further readiness of students for success in Algebra I in eighth grade High School Exit Exam Algebra I information CaMSP Partnerships High Need Local Educational Agency 40 percent free and reduced lunch Institution of Higher Education Universities, State Universities, Colleges, and Community Colleges. Disciplinary faculty in mathematics, science, and engineering. CaMSP Research Model Leadership Team Student Data Teacher Data Other Partners Need IHE Intervention CaMSP Program ? Student & Teacher Data LEA Intensive 80 hours Classroom Followup 24 hours Classroom Followup Additional Intensive Promising Practices Be sure teachers are involved Involve both the College of Natural Sciences faculty and Education faculty Clear vision of the needs of the districts Set realistic goals to address the needs Connect the intensive activities to the follow-up activities Conduct regular meetings of the leadership team California Community Colleges Steve Bruckman Executive Vice Chancellor and General Counsel CA Community College Chancellor’s Office California Community Colleges System Strategic Plan Ensure that the Community College System and its partners are maintaining and improving the transfer function to meet the needs of students and the state of California. California Community Colleges System Strategic Plan Ensure that Community College programs are aligned and coordinated with state and local economic and workforce development needs. Math, Engineering, Science Achievement Program (MESA) Participating Colleges Students Male Female 61% 39% Hispanic African American Native American Other 50% 10% 3% 37% 27 3,316 Math, Engineering, Science Achievement Program (MESA) Participating Colleges Transfer CSU UC other 585 50% 36% 14% Annual Cost $81,000 Economic Development and Career Technical Education Reform 2004-05 $20 million 2005-06 $50 million (Governor’s Proposed Budget) California Alliance of Pre K-18 Partnerships (Final Report, 2004) City Heights Education Pilot Educational Partnership Center, UC Santa Cruz Kern County Initiative for Teacher Recruitment Long Beach Education Partnership North County Professional Development Federation (San Diego County) Santa Ana Education Partnership Shasta Partnership California State University, Long Beach Jean Houck Dean, College of Education CA State University, Long Beach Essential Elements of Successful Partnerships Shared vision and goals Effective communication Respect for differences Adequate resources Continuous processes to stay relevant An appropriate organizational model Committed, responsible members Continuous evaluation Santa Cruz County Diane Siri Superintendent of Schools Santa Cruz County Teacher Workforce Initiative: What We Know About Monterey Bay Area Teachers Monterey Bay Educational Consortium and the Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Work Groups Research & Evaluation House Recruitment & Retention Hard to Staff Schools Teacher Pipeline Teacher Workforce Initiative (TWI) Goal To strengthen the teacher workforce in Monterey, San Benito, and Santa Cruz Counties through a regional, data-driven collaborative among K-18 educational institutions. TWI Primary Objective To build and maintain a regional teacher workforce decision-making system that: illuminates teacher workforce issues – supply and demand – quality maintains an ongoing capacity to address these issues; and facilitates the collection and analysis of current-year data. Question #1. What can we learn about the region’s teacher workforce with 2002-03 data? Strategy: Replicate SRI analyses to compare region with state Data – California Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS) – Collected annually from all K-12 teachers, schools, and districts in October – Available for analysis in late summer Professional Assignment Information Form (PAIF) Teacher Preparation – Full Credential: completed teacher preparation program and hold a preliminary, clear, professional clear, or life credential – Not Full Credential: university or district intern; pre-intern; or emergency permit or waiver if used in current assignment Authorized Teaching Area: all areas authorized, regardless of current assignment Summary of 2002-03 Findings Teacher certification varies across – subject area – students’ socioeconomic status Many regional teachers near retirement age These results parallel California state patterns Full-Time Teachers’ Credentials by Subject Area (MBEC, 2002-03) Comparison of California State and MBEC Credential Patterns, 2002-03 Both for the state and the region, special education, mathematics, and science had the highest levels of teachers without full credentials. Source: CBEDS Data 2002-03, SRI International Analysis Relationship Between Teacher Certification and Student Poverty Levels: MBEC 2002-03 Relationship Between Teacher Certification and Proportion of Ethnic Minority Students: MBEC 2002-03 Relationship Between Special Education Teacher Certification and Proportion of Ethnic Minority Students: MBEC 2002-03 Relationship Between Teacher Certification and Proportion of English Learners: MBEC 2002-03 Relationship Between Teacher Certification and School API Performance: MBEC 2002-03 Age Distribution of MBEC Region’s Full-Time Teachers: 2002-03 The statewide median age was 44.5 years In the Tri-County region, teachers’ median age was 48 Regionally, more teachers were nearing retirement age in special ed and social sciences (median = 51) Full-time Teachers: California Public Schools (2002-03) Full-time Teachers: Monterey, San Benito, and Santa Cruz Counties (2002-03) Question #2: What Else Can We Learn About Teacher Supply and Demand? Housing costs compared with salaries New teacher preparation in the region – Public and private teacher preparation programs – Community college and high school pipeline resources Gap Between Teachers’ Salaries and Housing Prices Ethnic Background of MBEC Region’s Students and Teachers, 2002-03 Tri-County Region Teacher Supply: Number of Credential Recommendations, 7/1/02 – 6/30/03 Tri-County Region Teacher Demand & Supply 2002-03 Key Partnership Points Select data points and collect data Use data for decisions Develop the trust and relationships to sustain efforts Listen before volunteering and make certain follow-through is done in time UC Science and Mathematics Initiative Edward Landesman Associate Director of Intersegmental Relations UC Science and Mathematics Initiative Guiding Questions What are the most promising strategies and practices we currently see? What are the critical success factors for each of these? What immediate steps can be taken to grow the success of these strategies?