Legal Compliance

advertisement

Legal Compliance effecting the

Staffing Area

MANA 4328

Dennis C. Veit dveit@uta.edu

Sources of Laws and Regulations

Source Example

Common Law Employment at will, Workplace tort

Constitutional Law Fifth Amendment/Fourteenth Amd

Statutory law Civil Rights Act, Information Act,

Age Discrimination, ADA, Rehabilitation a.

Immigration Reform and Control act

Fair Credit Reporting Act, Polygraph

Protection act, Reemployment act

State and local laws

Civil Service laws

Executive order 11246, EEOC, DOL, OFCCP,

Department of Homeland Security

State fair employment practice agencies

Major federal EEO/AA laws affecting the Staffing area

Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts (1964, 1991)

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (1967)

Americans With Disabilities Act (1990, 2008)

General Information Nondiscrimination Act (2008)

Rehabilitation Act (1973)

Executive Order 11246 (1965)

The Employment Relationship

Employer-employee

Most prevalent form of employment relationship

Involves an agreement between employer and employee on terms and conditions of employment

Results in an employment contract

Independent contractors

Are not considered employees, in a legal sense, of employer

Temporary employees

Do not have special legal stature

2-4

Laws and Regulations

Need for laws and regulations

Balance of power

Protection of employees

Protection of employers

Sources of Laws and Regulations

Common law

Constitutional law

Statutory law

Executive order

Agencies

2-5

Staffing Laws

Classifying Employees

 FLSA and Internal Revenue Code

Equal Opportunity

Civil Rights Acts (1964 and 1991)

ADA and ADEA

Affirmative Action

 Executive Order 11246

Immigration

 Immigration Reform and Control Act

Wages and Benefits

 Equal Pay Act

Exh. 2.3: Major Federal/AA Laws:

General Provisions

2-7

Ex. 2.3: Major Federal/AA Laws

2-8

Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VII

(a) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer –

DISPARATE TREATMENT

(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or

ADVERSE IMPACT

(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

Disparate Treatment

Involves allegations of intentional discrimination where employer knowingly discriminated on basis of specific characteristics

Evidence

May be direct

May consist of a mixed motive

May be inferred from situational factors

1. Person belongs to a protected class

2. Person applied for, and was qualified for, a job employer was trying to fill

3. Person was rejected despite being qualified

4. Position remained open and employer continued to seek applicants as qualified as person rejected

2-10

Disparate / Adverse Impact

Focuses on effect of employment practices, rather than on motive or intent underlying them

As a result of a protected characteristic, people are adversely affected by an employment practice

Evidence -- Involves use of statistics

Exh. 2.5: Types of Disparate Impact Statistics

Applicant flow statistics

 Fourfifth’s rule - An employment practice has disparate impact if hiring rate for minority group is less than four-fifths (or 80%) of hiring rate for majority group

Stock statistics

Concentration statistics 2-11

Litigation Process - EEOC

Disparate treatment Disparate impact

Show intent?

Prima facie case

Employer’s rebuttal

Plaintiff’s rebuttal

Remedies

Yes No

Disparate treatment intentional practice

Nondiscriminatory reason(s) for practice or show BFOQ

Reason is a pretext for discrimination

Consent decree; compensatory and punitive damages

Disparate impact - effect of practice

Practice job-related and consistent with business necessity

Practice not job-related; employer does not adopt practice with less disparate impact

Consent decree; equitable relief, i.e. back pay

2-12

Exh. 2.5: Types of Disparate Impact Statistics

2-13

Equal Opportunity vs. Affirmative Action

Equal Opportunity

Employment practices must guarantee equal opportunity to employees and applicants based on protected class differences.

Composition of workforce depends on applicants as long as all groups have equal opportunity.

Affirmative Action

 Employment practices should encourage a workforce that reflects the gender and racial composition of the local population.

Companies should seek applicants and provide opportunities for underutilized minorities to guarantee representation in the workforce.

No business is ever required to hire someone not qualified for a job.

Equal Opportunity vs. Affirmative Action

Equal Opportunity

Applies to private employers with more than 15 employees.

Defined by a number of laws and court cases

Enforced by the EEOC

EEOC responds to complaints

Affirmative Action

 Applies to government contractors and court-ordered employers.

NO affirmative action requirements for others.

Defined by Executive Order 11246

Written document with targets for minority hiring.

Enforced by the OFCCP

OFCCP responds to complaints and conducts audits

Enforcement by EEOC:

Initial Charge and Conciliation

Charge filed

Investigation to determine “reasonable cause”

If “reasonable cause” found, conciliation is pursued

Voluntary settlement process

Preferred method of settlement

If EEOC decides not to pursue a claim, a

“right to sue” letter is issued to complaining party

Complementing conciliation is mediation

Neutral, third-party mediates dispute to obtain agreement to resolve dispute

2-16

Exh. 2.7: Basic Litigation Process -

EEOC

2-17

Protected Groups

Race

Color

Religion

Sex

National origin

Age

Disability

EEO / AA Laws:

Specific Staffing Provisions

Civil Rights Act of 1964

Unlawful employment practices

Establishment of disparate impact

Disparate treatment

Mixed motives

Bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ)

Testing

Test score adjustments

Seniority or merit systems

Employment advertising

Pregnancy

Preferential treatment and quotas

2-19

EEO / AA Laws:

Specific Staffing Provisions

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (1967)

Prohibited age discrimination

BFOQ

Factors other than age

Seniority systems

Employment advertising

2-20

EEO / AA Laws:

Specific Staffing Provisions

Americans with Disabilities Act (1990)

Prohibited discrimination

Definition of disability

Physical and mental impairments substantially limiting a major life activity

2-21

EEO / AA Laws:

Specific Staffing Provisions

Americans with Disabilities Act (1990)

EEOC clarifications

Impairment “A physiological disorder affecting one or more of a number of body systems or a mental or psychological disorder.”

Expanded major life activities include “sitting, standing, lifting, and mental and emotional processes such as thinking, concentrating, and interacting with others.”

Whether an impairment is substantially limiting depends on its nature and severity, duration or expected duration, and its permanency or long-term impact.

To be substantially limiting, impairment must prevent/significantly restrict a person from performing a class or broad range of jobs in various classes.

2-22

EEO / AA Laws:

Specific Staffing Provisions

Americans with Disabilities Act (1990)

Qualified individual with a disability

Essential job functions

Reasonable accommodation and undue hardship

Selection of employees

Medical exams for job applicants and employees

Affirmative action

2-23

EEO / AA Laws:

Specific Staffing Provisions

Rehabilitation Act (1973)

Prohibited discrimination

Affirmative action

Executive Order 11246 (1965)

Prohibited discrimination

Affirmative action

2-24

Other Staffing Laws: Immigration

Reform and Control Act (1986)

Purpose

To prohibit employment of unauthorized aliens

To provide civil and criminal penalties for violations

Prohibited discrimination

Employment verification system -- I-9 form

Employer must verify individual is not an unauthorized alien and is legally eligible for employment

Individuals must offer proof of identity

Temporary foreign workers

Enforcement

Enforced by Department of Justice

Noncompliance may result in fines up to $10,000

2-25

Other Staffing Laws: Employee

Polygraph Protection Act (1988)

Purpose

Prevent most private employers from using a polygraph on job applicants or employees

Prohibited practices

Requiring applicants or employees to take a polygraph

Using results of a polygraph for employment decisions

Discharging or disciplining individuals for refusal to take a polygraph

Examples of instances where polygraph may be used

Enforcement

Enforced by Department of Labor

Noncompliance may result in fines up to $10,000

2-26

Other Staffing Laws: Fair

Credit Reporting Act (1970)

Purpose

Regulates organization’s acquisition and use of consumer reports on job applicants

Required compliance

Before obtaining a report, organization must

Give applicant notice in writing a report may be obtained

Obtain written authorization from applicant

If an “adverse action” is taken, organization must

Notify (written, oral, electronic) applicant of adverse action

Provide information of consumer reporting agency to applicant

Provide notice of applicant’s rights to applicant

Enforcement

Enforced by Federal Trade Commission

Noncompliance may result in fines up to $1,000

2-27

Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VII

(a) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer –

(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or

(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

Court Cases

Griggs v. Duke Power (1971)

Adverse impacts must be job related

Discriminatory intent not sufficient defense

McDonnell Douglas vs. Green (1972)

To establish prima facie in disparate treatment cases

Presentation of Evidence

Plaintiff

Disparate Treatment

He or She demonstrates: a) Protected class b) Was qualified c) Was rejected d) The job remained open

“McDonnell-Douglas Test”

Defendant

Provides a clear and specific job-based explanation for actions.

Plaintiff

Must prove that rejection was discriminatory.

Adverse Impact

Statistical Tests:

4/5’ths Rule

Demonstrates Job relatedness (validity) and business necessity

Proves that an alternative practice is available that has less adverse impact

Selection Rate Tests

4/5ths RULE The selection rate for any protected group should be no less than 4/5ths or 80% of the selection rate for the group with the highest rate of selection. If SR1 *.8 > SR2, then Adverse

Impact.

Selection Rate (SR) =

Number Hired

Number of Applicants

4/5ths Rule

Assume 200 employees were selected from a pool of 500 applicants

(200 black and 300 white). Of the employees selected 60 were black and 140 were white.

Selection Rates:

White = 140 / 300 = 46.7%

Black = 60 / 200 = 30%

4/5 ths Rule: .467 X .8 = .374 = 37.4%

Since 30% (actual selection rate) is less than 37.4% (4/5ths comparison selection rate) evidence of discrimination exists.

Defense of Discrimination

Merit

Judged on an individual basis

Bona Fide Occupational Qualification

Must be present for all who hold that job

If is required for the job then it does not matter that it has adverse impact

Business necessity

Seniority

Civil Rights Act of 1991

Followed Wards Cove Packing vs. Antonio (1989)

Prohibits “race norming” of tests.

Plaintiffs can sue for punitive damages in cases of intentional discrimination.

Adverse impact prohibited for each piece of a selection system.

Burden of proof on the employer.

Prohibits quotas in selection.

Equal Opportunity Defined

Protected Classes

 Race, color, religion, sex and national origin

 Age and disability (added through ADA and ADEA)

Reverse discrimination

Disparate treatment vs. Adverse Impact

Private employers with more than 15 employees.

EEO does NOT require preferential treatment

Quotas are illegal http://www.eeoc.gov/abouteeo/overview_practices.html

EEO Applied

Organizations with more than 15 employees.

Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures

EEO does NOT require preferential treatment - Quotas are illegal

Must keep records of applicants for 6 months

Employer must show practices are “job-related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity”

Company Defenses

Merit

Bona Fide Occupational Qualification

Business Necessity

An “alternative employment practice” must be accepted if shown to meet the business necessity and have less adverse impact.

EEO vs. Affirmative Action

Equal Employment Opportunity

Collection of laws that apply to all organizations

Aimed at ending discrimination

Affirmative Action

Executive Order 11246

Applies only to (1) government and contractors (2) court orders and (3) voluntary programs.

NO affirmative action requirements for others.

Written document with targets for minority hiring.

Enforcement Agencies

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

All private employers with more than 15 employees

EEO – 1 for more than 100 employees

Office Of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP)

 Government contractors or sub-contractors.

 Covers approximately 26 million or nearly 22% of the total civilian workforce.

 OFCCP requires a contractor to engage in a self-analysis for the purpose of discovering any barriers to equal employment opportunity.

 Investigates complaints of discrimination.

Affirmative Action Program (AAP)

Develop a written program for each establishment

Identify potential problems in the participation and utilization of women and minorities.

Gives the specific procedures and the good faith efforts to provide equal employment opportunity.

 If there is underutilization, provides gives targets (not hard quotas) and timetables.

 Expanded efforts in outreach, recruitment and training.

AAP Statistics

Flow Statistics

Examines selection rates by group

4/5 th’s rule / Std. Deviation Rule

Availability and utilization analyses

Employee distribution compared with local population

“Stock Statistics”

Concentration Statistics

Examining placement of women and minorities by job category

Availability Analysis

U.T. System determines minority availability by:

The minority population in the surrounding labor market.

The minority unemployment rate in the surrounding labor market.

The percentage of the minority workforce as compared with the total workforce in the surrounding labor market and Texas.

The availability of promotable and transferable minorities within U.

T. System Administration. http://www.eeoc.gov/stats/jobpat/2000/pmsa/2800.html

http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/eeoindex.html

Utilization Analysis

Compares the % percentage of minorities and women in each Job Group with the calculated % availability of minorities and women.

Job Category:

Management Trainee

Current Trainees Availability

"Underutilized" is defined as having fewer than would reasonably be expected by their availability.

Non

Minority

90%

Minority

10%

Non

Minority

70%

Minority

30%

Concentration Statistics

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

Men Women

Executives

Managers

Supervisors

Technicians

Staff

Admin Asst.

ADEA (1967) and Age Discrimination

Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967

Protects employees 70 million workers over 40

Nearly 50% of workers

Cases most often arise from layoff or dismissal

It is legitimate to consider salary in layoffs

No standard of “reverse discrimination” for age suits

Disparate impact rules apply

Adams vs. Florida Power Corp

Dismissed by the Supreme Court 2002

Smith vs. City of Jackson

Affirmed by the Supreme Court 2005

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

 Discrimination is prohibited against individuals with disabilities who can perform essential job functions with reasonable accommodation unless it would cause undue hardship.

 Employers not required to change work rules if they are business necessity.

 OFCCP vs. Ozark Airlines (1986) – employers must prove applicant could not perform the job safely.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

 Disability is a physical or mental impairment that affects a major life activity.

 Essential vs. marginal job functions

Categories of "reasonable accommodations": changes to a job application process changes to the work environment changes to the way a job is usually done employee training

Undue Hardship

“Undue hardship” means significant difficulty or expense.

Not only financial difficulty

Those that would fundamentally alter the nature or operation of the business.

Every request for reasonable accommodation should be evaluated separately taking into account:

Nature and cost of the accommodation needed

Overall financial resources of the business

Number of persons employed by the business

Impact of the accommodation on the business

Record Keeping

EEOC requires that employers keep all personnel records for one year after termination.

Written descriptions of benefits plans (such as pensions) and any seniority or merit system.

Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the Equal Pay

Act, require employers to keep payroll records for at least three years.

All records relevant to wages including wage rates, job evaluations, and seniority and merit systems.

Employment Information Report (EEO-1)

EEO-1 survey is authorized by Title VII and the

Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972.

All employers with 15 or more employees are required to keep employment records as.

Employers are required to file an EEO-1 report on an annual basis if they:

Employ 100 or more employees

Employ 50 or more employees and have Federal contracts totaling $50,000 or more.

How to Proceed?

 What can companies do to navigate the differences between targets and preferences (which are legal) vs. quotas and reverse discrimination (which are illegal)?

This all means….

Make sure that selection criteria are fair.

Use validated selection tests.

Use the same procedure for all applicants.

Collect data and keep records.

Only ask job-related questions.

No medical exams before making job offers.

No business is ever required to hire someone not qualified for a job.

Download