Jefferson Lab Status
Hugh Montgomery
August 23, 2010
1
Outline
• Jefferson Lab Nuclear Physics Strategic
Plan/Vision
• Laboratory Organization and Personnel
• Other Laboratory Activities and Issues
• Longer Term Future
• Summary
2
Jefferson Lab At-A-Glance
•
Created to build and Operate the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF), worldunique user facility for Nuclear Physics
–
Mission is to gain a deeper understanding of the structure of matter
•
Through advances in fundamental research in nuclear physics
•
–
–
–
–
Through advances in photon science and related research
In operation since 1995
1,258 Active Users (World’s largest Nuclear Physics User Community)
159 Completed Experiments to date; ~21 remaining in 6 GeV program
Produces ~1/3 of US PhDs in Nuclear Physics (334 PhDs granted, 226 more in progress)
•
Managed for DOE by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC (JSA)
•
Human Capital:
–
–
–
–
720 FTEs (at 3/15/10)
22 Joint faculty, 19 Post docs, 30 Undergraduate; 47 Graduate students
1,258 Users (end of FY09)
1,110 Visiting Scientists
•
K-12 Science Education program serves as national model
•
Site is 169 Acres, and includes:
–
–
63 Buildings; 685K SF in DOE Buildings
Replacement Plant Value: $318M
FY2010
Total Lab Operating Budget: $124.1M
Non-DOE Budget: $5.0M
3
Vision, Mission, Strategy
Vision
Mission
Strategy
To be the provider of choice for world-class science and facilities in support of the DOE Office
of Science’s mission. To enable breakthroughs that ensure our nation’s future
Advance fundamental research in nuclear physics to gain a deeper understanding of the structure of matter
Advance photon science and related research into the nature of materials.
Develop the key technology and position Jefferson Lab’s user facilities for continued leadership roles
SRF
Technology
JLAMP and
4th GLS
Major Laboratory Initiatives
Core Capability Groupings
12 GeV Upgrade
Project
Nuclear Physics
Accelerator Science
Applied Nuclear Science & Tech
Large Scale User Fac./Adv. Instr.
Photon Science
4
Exp. Nuclear
Physics Program
ELectron Ion
Collider
Science Strategy for the Future
Science in the 21st Century
•
Physics, Chemistry, Biology – major progress based on:
– Advanced accelerator facilities
– Operation as international user facilities
•
Nuclear Physics:
– Execute the 12 GeV Upgrade Project
•
Highly recommended by NSAC
– Experimental Nuclear Physics Program, 6 GeV, 12 GeV
•
Nuclear physics into 2020s
– Develop Electron Ion Collider, extend beyond CEBAF scope
•
Photon Science:
– 4th Generation Light Sources: JLAMP facility
– User driven photon science, accelerator R&D Program
– Development and participation in future light sources
5
Strategy for the Future – Major Initiative
Experimental Nuclear Physics Program
Scientific exploitation of CEBAF at 6 GeV and 12 GeV
Outstanding physics remains that is best done utilizing the capabilities of the present CEBAF
accelerator and its experimental equipment during the 2 years remaining before the final Upgrade
shutdown. Once the 12 GeV Upgrade Project is completed, we envisage a program of
experimental measurements for in excess of ten years.
•
The Vision for the program:
–
Enables the national scientific strategy of understanding the structure of matter
–
Enables completion of 8 of 13 Office of Science milestones for hadronic physics
–
Aims for excellence and pre-eminence in a number of key areas of nuclear physics:
•
Confinement and its manifestation in hadronic states with exotic quantum numbers;
•
the structure of hadrons;
•
the structure of nuclei;
•
Standard Model tests via high precision at low energy.
6
Jefferson Lab Organization
JSA Board of Directors Chair
Director
H. Montgomery
Accelerator Science
Advisory Comm.
Deputy Director
Science & Tech
R. McKeown
Nuclear Physics
Program Adv. Comm.
M. Dallas
Human Resources
Photon Science
Program Adv. Comm.
Internal Audit
Accelerator
L. Cardman
A. Hutton
Legal Counsel
Project Management and
Integrated Planning
Community Outreach,
Science Education and
Public Affairs
University
Relations
Experimental
Physics
Deputy Director
Operations and Chief
Operating Officer
Theoretical &
Computational
Physics
D. Richards
(acting)
Free Electron
Laser
12 GeV
Project
Office
Chief Financial
Officer &
Business Srvs.
Environmental
Safety, Health
& Quality
Chief Information
Officer/Chief
Technical Officer
Engineering
Facilities &
Logistics
G. Neil
C. Rode
J. Scarcello
M. Logue
R. Whitney
W. Oren
J. Sprouse
7
Personnel Changes
•
Deputy Laboratory Director – Science
Bob McKeown
•
AD for Theoretical and Comp. Physics
Mike Pennington
•
Deputy AD for Accelerators
Fulvia Pilat
•
12 GeV Project APM Physics
Glenn Young
•
Hall D Leader
Eugene Chudakov (ex Hall A)
Very Pleased with these appointments
•
Experimental Nuclear Physics
Dennis Skopik -- Partial Retirement last July
Kees de Jager -- has asked to step down as Hall A leader
Larry Cardman -- has asked to step down as AD for Exp. Nucl. Phys.
Search Committee is active
8
12 GeV - $310M Total Project Cost
(as of May 2009)
12 GeV - $310M TPC - May-2009
90,000
ARRA “Stimulus” Funds = early
receipt of ~half of planned FY10
& FY11 funds
Lengthy Federal budget
Continuing Resolution in FY11
is a concern.
80,000
70,000
60,000
Pre-Ops
ARRA
50,000
Construction
$K
PED
40,000
R&D
CDR/ACD
30,000
CD-4A
Dec 2014
20,000
10,000
CD-4B
Jun 2015
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
9
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
12 GeV UPGRADE SCHEDULE
Physics schedule
unchanged.
Use FY10 downs;
shift accelerator
installation work
into 6-month down.
Cryomodule install/
testing moved
into 6-month down.
MANDATE:
Do not put follow-on
beam delivery at risk !!!
Start of Commissioning:
Hall A October 2013
Hall D April 2014
10
Halls B and C October 2014
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION - Hall D Complex
Hall D
June-July
2010
Counting House
Basement Walls/Stairwell
Hall D – NW Corner
Last wall lift
11
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION – Central Helium Liquefier (CHL) #2
Erected Steel
CHL Building Addition
Interior
Ready for Equipment – May 5th
five months ahead of Level 2 Milestone
Date
Cryogenics equipment installation
underway
12
Accelerator Construction Highlights
•
•
•
•
•
•
cryomodule cavities
beam transport magnets
cryogenics coldbox
vacuum valves
cold tuner
etc. etc. etc.
First 4 meter Dipole Magnet at JLab
Power
Systems – parts arriving
Power Systems – Parts arriving (October 2009)
Beam Transport Quadrupole Magnets
(~60 of 114) at JLab
13
Hall B Detectors
SVT sensor bonding and probe
testing (UNH and Moscow State)
HTCC prototype molds
and mirrors (JLab)
FTOF PMTs and timing test
results (US Carolina, JLab)
Panel 1a
Drift Chamber R2
wire stringing
(ODU, and Idaho
State)
BC-404
14
BC-408
Hall C - SHMS Infrastructure
Support Structure and Shield
House Manufacturing Design
progressing
HB and Q1 Contracts Awarded
Dipole vendor proposed
Q2/Q3 - 5 bids received
SHMS and HMS in Hall C
1st Cryogenic Control Reservoir
Magnet Control Racks
15
Central Drift Chamber Endplates
Hall D Detectors
Barrel Calorimeter Sixteenth Production Module
The Mighty BCAL Press
Preparing Solenoid Test
First BCAL Modules Arrive!
16
Upgrade Project Status
• Overall Project (End of June 2010)
– Funding $145M
– Cost Performance Index
– Schedule Performance Index
0.94
0.97
• On average less than a month behind schedule
• Contingencies maintained
– Contingency ~$60M,
• ~50% of Est. To Complete.
• FY11 is very constrained
• Availability projected for FY12 and FY13
– Effort on Project exceeds 120FTE
• Lehman Review (April 2010)
– Very Satisfactory Review
• Manpower management , appeared satisfactory
• Schedule holding, civil schedule recovering
– Concerns
• Hall D Solenoid
17
Funding FY09, FY10, FY11
Funding
FY09
Approp
FY10
Approp
FY11
Pres.
Budg.
ME Research
6,150
6,200
6,265
Theory Research
3,400
3,599
4,150
47,120
47,140
49,328
130
200
200
SRF R&D
1,635
1,365
1,400
Accel AIP
950
1,050
1,050
24,559
25,567
24,800
Exp Support Capital Equipment
4,500
5,200
4,700
GPP
1,800
2,000
2,000
90,244
92,321
93,893
28,623
20,000
36,000
118,867
112,321
129,893
National LQCD Ops & CE
380
223
231
SciDAC
371
299
309
119,618
112,843
130,433
Accel Ops
Accel Capital Equipment
Exp Sup Ops
Subtotal NP Base
12 GeV
Subtotal NP Base & 12 GeV
Total NP
18
Summary Comments
• Favorable President’s
Budget Request
• $1.8M up from FY10,
but less than cost of
living
Receiving supplemental
funding to enable g2p/gep
• $2M pressure
FY11 Budget and Consequences
• As yet there is no FY11 Budget
– Senate Markup is -$100M wrt SC Pres. Request
• Specifics are not good for nuclear physics
• Upgrade is not impacted
– House Markup is -$200M wrt SC Pres. Request
• Details not available, but rumored to be bad.
• Continuing Resolution expected
– “6 month” CR
• Will start running as planned, no advantage in delay
• 12 GeV Project can ride 3 months OK
– “12 month” CR
• Will need to curtail running
• Major reduction in 12 GeV Project work, major delay
19
Strategy To Modernize JLab
•
•
Facilities: Resolve critical shortage and poor quality of space by constructing 278,000 sq
ft and refurbishing 280,000 sq ft of work space; addressing safety and building code
issues by updating outdated building systems; reducing deferred maintenance; and
increasing energy efficiency.
–
Technology Engineering Development Facility (TEDF) (SLI) provides 38% of new and
31% of refurbished space (CD-3A approved 3/26/10)
–
CEBAF Center Expansion and Rehab (SLI 2016) ~ 34% of new space
–
Lab’s $32M GPP investment provides ~28% of new space.
Utilities: Replace/upgrade 20-40 year old site utilities to meet SC mission requirements by
increasing cryogenics capability; increasing capacity and adding redundancy to the power
distribution system; increasing cooling water capacity to meet mission requirements and
replacing site cooling towers.
–
•
Utility Infrastructure Modernization Project (SLI 2011)
Communications: Upgrade 1960s subsurface communications systems with 627 miles of
fiber optic cable and 42 miles of building computer cable (SLI 2011).
20
Technology and Engineering Development Facility
• Addition to Test Lab for SRF
• TED Bldg for Engineering & Shops
• Rehab Test Lab
• Eliminate Unsuitable Space
Test Lab Rehab
TED Building
SRF Addition
21
TEDF+ Project Status
• Status
– Project Construction Phase is underway
• Schedule
– CD-1 Sep 08 (complete)
– CD-2 Jul 09
– CD-3 A
• 2nd Qtr FY 2010
– CD-3 B
• 4th Qtr FY 2010
– CD-4
• New construction 4th Qtr FY 2012
• Rehab 4th Qtr FY 2014
• General Plant Project ARRA Funding from Office of Nuclear Physics
– Important ancillary work on buildings such as End Station Refrig. Buiilding
22
Strategy for the Future – Major Initiative
ELectron Ion Collider (ELIC)
Further extension of electron – nucleus scattering physics
Developing the concept and the physics case and initial design of a future ELectron Ion Collider is essential to
understand the future evolution of experimental nuclear physics in the U.S.A. and in the world. According to the
2007 NSAC Long Range Plan, “The ELIC would explore the new QCD frontier of strong color fields in nuclei and
precisely image the gluons in the proton.” Goal is to develop the PHYSICS CASE for the next long range plan.
•
The Vision for the program:
–
The next generation of electroweak nuclear physics beyond CEBAF at 12 GeV would demand an
Electron Ion Collider
•
TJNAF will participate in the development of the physics case for the EIC
•
TJNAF will engage in R&D to develop accelerator and detector technology enabling a very high
luminosity, polarized Electron Ion Collider. An initial stage, a medium-energy electron-ion-collider,
MEIC, would accommodate subsequent energy upgrade.
•
MEIC would be a high-luminosity, polarized electron-ion collider which would use CEBAF as
injector into an electron storage ring.
•
MEIC would have a center-of-mass energy of 10-50 GeV and extremely high luminosity
approaching 1x1035 cm-2s-1 . The high luminosity is crucial to probe unknown essential features of
the proton landscape, such as the impact of spin-orbit correlations.
•
The booster rings, electron collider ring, and ion collider ring are designed as a “figure 8”, a design
directly aimed at spin physics opportunities.
•
The range of nuclei considered includes polarized light ions (1H, 2H, and 3He) and medium to heavy
nuclei (such as 12C, 40Ca, and 197Au).
23
Strategy for the Future - Major Initiative
JLAMP and 4th Generation Light Sources
A Next Generation Photon Science Facility at Jefferson Lab
TJNAF has existing platforms with which it could demonstrate accelerator physics and technologies that
address the needs of light source facilities as outlined in BESAC’s report “Directing Matter and Energy:
Five Challenges for Science and the Imagination”. BESAC also delivered a position paper “Next Generation
Photon Sources for Grand Challenges in Science and Energy” to SC. Two approaches to producing the
required photons are identified: Free Electron Lasers and Energy Recovering Linacs. TJNAF has world class
expertise in both technologies.
TJNAF received funding from BES to participate in R&D, focusing on cavity and cryomodule development
ultimately to permit the demonstration of well controlled, pulse-to pulse repeatable, high duty factor X-ray bursts
of femtoseconds duration and unprecedented brightness.
•
The Vision for the program:
Jefferson Lab has proposed to build a continuous wave, high average brightness, short pulse free electron
laser operating in the VUV/soft X-ray regime named JLAMP (Jefferson Lab AMPlifier). JLAMP would
produce photons at an average brightness exceeding that of the FLASH facility in Germany. JLAMP would
provide a platform for:
–
Ultrafast studies of emergent/correlated behavior in complex and nanomaterials related to energy and
the environment, and with a strong user base of support as defined in recent BES reports.
–
Research in accelerator concepts which have the potential for substantial reduction of costs and better
performance for future large-scale light sources.
–
Eventual participation in construction of a large scale next generation light source wherever it is built.
–
Accelerator research and training relevant to DoD ONR.
24
Summary
PAC role is to provide advice with respect to the experimental nuclear
physics program which is the core activity of the laboratory.
We are concurrently constructing the 12 GeV Upgrade Project.
We are also taking opportunities to upgrade the laboratory facilities and
infrastructure.
Consequently there are challenges to balance the different activities
within constrained resources.
(But we are getting support from Office of Nuclear Physics.)
We are also looking to the long term future of Jefferson Laboratory
25