leadership

advertisement

LEADERSHIP

Presented by: Jehanwash kareem

Noman Saleem

leadership

“leadership is the process whereby one individual influences, other group members toward the attainment of defined group or organizational goals”

Jerald Greenberg

“leadership is the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of goals”

Stephen p. robins.

“leadership is both a process and a property; as a process leadership involves the use of non coercive influence: as a property, leadership is the set of characteristics attributed to someone who is perceived to use influence successfully” griffin

“an interaction between members of a group. leaders are agents of change, person whose acts affect other people more than other people’s acts affect them. leadership occurs when one group member modifies the motivation or competencies of others in the group” bernard.m.bass

Presented by: Jehanwash kareem

Noman Saleem

LEADERSHIP

“LEADERSHIP IS THE PROCESS WHEREBY ONE INDIVIDUAL INFLUENCES

OTHER GROUP MEMBERS TOWARD THE ATTAINMENT OF DEFINED GROUP

OR ORGANIZATIONAL GOALS”

JERALD GREENBERG

A

LEADERSHIP IS PRIMARILY A PROCESS INVOLVING INFLUENCE-

ONE IN WHICH A LEADER CHANGES THE ACTIONS OR ATTITUDES

OF SEVERAL GROUP MEMBERS OR SUBORDINATES

B

LEADERSHIP INVOLVES THE EXERCISE OF INFLUENCE FOR A

PURPOSE-TO ATTAIN DEFINED GROUP OR ORGANIZATIONAL GOALS

C CENTRAL ROLE OF INFLUENCE, IMPLIES THAT LEADERSHIPIS REALLY

SOMETHING OF A TWO-WAY STREET

Presented by: Jehanwash kareem

Noman Saleem

MANAGERS

WHO ARE NOT

LEADERS

LEADERS

WHO ARE NOT

MANAGERS

MANAGERS

LEADERS

MANAGERS

WHO ARE ALOS

LEADERS

MANAGERS AND LEADERS:NOT NECESSARILY IDENTICAL

ALTHOUGH SOME MANAGERS ACT AS LEADERS, OTHERS DO NOT.

FURTHER; NOT ALL LEADERS ARE MANAGERS.FOR THESE IS IS

USEFUL TO DISTINGUISH CLEARLY BETWEEN THE TWO TERMS

Presented by: Jehanwash kareem

Noman Saleem

MANAGERS VERSUS LEADERS

MANAGEMENT

IS ABOUT COPING WITH COMPLEXITY.

GOOD MANAGEMENT BRINGS ABOUT ORDER AND

CONSISTENCY BY DRAWING UP FORMAL PLANS,

DESIGINING RIGID ORGANIZATION STRUCTURES, AND

MONITORING RESULTS AGAINST THE PLANS.

LEADERSHIP

, IN CONTRAST IS ABOUT COPING WITH THE

CHANGE. LEADERS ESTABLISH DIRECTION BY

DEVELOPING A VISION OF THE FUTURE; THEN

THEY ALIGN PEOPLE BY COMMUNICATING THIS VISION

AND INSPIRING THEM TO OVERCOME HURDLES

JOHN KOTTER OF HARWARD BUSINESS SCHOOL

Presented by: Jehanwash kareem

Noman Saleem

MANAGERS VERSUS LEADERS

MANAGERS

USE THE AUTHORITY INHERENT IN THEIR

DESIGNATED FORMAL RANK TO OBTAIN COMPLIANCE

FROM ORGANIZATION MEMBERS.

MANAGEMENT CONSISTS OF IMPLEMENTING THE VISION

AND STRATEGY PROVIDED BY LEADERS, COORDINATING

AND STAFFING THE ORGANIZATION, AND HANDLING DAY

TO DAY PROBLEMS

ROBERT HOOSE OF THE WHARTON SCHOOL

Presented by: Jehanwash kareem

Noman Saleem

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LEADERS AND MANAGERS

MANAGER

ADMINISTER

A COPY

MAINTAINS

FOCUS ON SYSTEM

RELIES ON CONTROL

SHORT RANGE VIEW

ASKS HOW AND WHEN

EYE ON THE BOTTOM LINE

IMITATES

ACCEPTS THE STATUS QUO

CLASSIC GOOD SOLDIER

DOES THINGS RIGHT

LEADER

INNOVATES

AN ORIGINAL

DEVELOPS

FOCUS ON PEOPLE

INSPIRES TRUST

LONG RANGE PERSPECTIVE

ASKS WHAT AND WHY

EYE ON THE HORIZON

ORIGINATES

CHANLLENGES THE STATUS QUO

OWN PERSON

Noman Saleem

RALPH STOGDILL’S TRAIT FACTORS

1.

INTELLIGENCE AND SCHOLARSHIP

2.

PHYSICAL TRAITS

3.

PERSONALITY

4.

SOCIAL STATUS AND EXPERIENCE

5.

TASK OREINTATION

EDWIN GHISELLI’S PERSONAL TRAITS

VERY IMPORTANT

DECISIVENESS

INTELLECTUAL CAPACITY

JOB ACHIEVEMENT ORIENTATION

SELF-ACTUALIZATION FEELINGS

SELF-CONFIDENCE

MANAGEMENT ABILITY ----TEAM BUILDER

MODERATELY IMPORTANT

• AFFINITY FOR WORKING CLASS

• DRIVE AND INITIATIVE

• NEED FOR A LOT OF MONEY

• NEED FOR JOB SECURITY

• PERSONAL MATURITY

ALMOST NO IMPORTANCE

MASCULINITY VERSUS FEMININITY

Presented by: Jehanwash kareem

Noman Saleem

CRITICISM OF TRAIT APPROACH

PEOPLE WHO FAIL AS LEADERS AND PEOPLE WHO NEVER ACHIEVE

POSITIONS OF LEADERSHIP OFTEN POSSESS SOME OF THE SAME TRAITS

AS SUCCESSFUL LEADERS.

BOTH PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES(HEIGHT, WEIGHT, APPEARANCE ETC) AND

PSYCHOLOGICAL ATTRIBUTES (PERSERVERANCE, INTELLIGENCE,

INITIATIVE ETC) HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED “TRAITS”

THE TRAITS POSSESSED BY SUCCESSFUL LEADERS ARE INVARIABLY

VALUE-JUDGED AS POSITIVE.

THERE IS LITTLE CONSENSUS ON WHAT WORDS MEAN THAT ARE USED

TO LABEL TRAITS.

IT IS OFTEN DIFFICULT TO MEASURE TRAITS.

EVEN IF A TRAIT CAN BE CLEARLY DEFINED AND ACCURATELY

MEASURED (TILL ORDER), IT IS MUST ACHIEVE ON A GIVEN TRAIT TO

MAKE IT EFFECTIVE.

Presented by: Jehanwash kareem

Noman Saleem

LOWA UNIVERSITY LEADERSHIP STUDIES

( RONALD LIPPIT, RALPH K WHITE & LEWIN)

AUTOCRATIC PARTICIPATIVE FREE REIN

EMPLOYEES

LEADER

LEADER

EMPLOYEES

EMPLOYEES

EMPLOYEES

LEADER

WHOLE GROUP

EMPHASIS

EMPLOYEES

Presented by: Jehanwash kareem

Noman Saleem

MUCZYK AND REIMAN LEADERSHIP STYLES

LEADERSHIP STYLE

DIRECTIVE AUTOCRAT

PERMISSIVE AUTOCRAT

DIRECTIVE DEMOCRAT

PERMISSIVE AUTOCRAT

DESCRIPTION

MAKES DECISIONS UNILATERILLY;

CLOSELY SUPERVISES ACTIVITIES OF

SUBORDINATES

MAKES DECISIONS UNILATERILLY;

ALLOWS SUBORDINATES CONSIDERABLE

LATITUDE IN CARRYING OUT ASSIGNED

TASKS

MAKES DECISIONS PARTICIPATIVELY;

CLOSELY SUPERVISES ACTIVITIES OF

SUBORDINATES

MAKES DECISIONS PARTICIPATIVELY;

ALLOWS SUBORDINATES CONSIDERABLE

LATITUDE IN CARRYING OUT ASSIGNED

TASKS

Presented by: Jehanwash kareem

Noman Saleem

“MY EFFECTIVE BOSSES HELPED ME TO GET THE JOB DONE.

THEY GIVE ME ADVICE, ANSWERED MY QUESTIONS, AND LET

ME KNOW EXACTLY WHAT WAS EXPECTED OF ME. MY

INEFFECTIVE BOSSES DIDN’T DO THIS”

“MY EFFECTIVE BOSSES SEEMED TO CARE ABOUT ME AS

PERSON.

THEY WERE FRIENDLY, LISTENED TO ME WHEN I HAD

PROBLEMS OR QUESTIONS, AND SEEMED TO HELP ME TOWARD

MY PERSONAL GOALS.

MY INEFFECTIVE BOSSES DID’T DO THIS”

Presented by: Jehanwash kareem

Noman Saleem

OHIO STATE STUDIES

LOW STRUCTURE

HIGH CONSIDERATION

HIGH

LESS EMPHASIS IS PLACED ON

STRUCTURING EMPLOYEE TASK

WHILE THE LEADER CONCENTRATE

ON SATISFYING EMPLOYEE NEEDS

AND WANTS

HIGH STRUCTURE

HIGH CONSIDERATION

THE LEADER PROVIDES A LOT OF

GUIDANCE ABOUT HOW TAKS CAN

BE COMPLETED WHILE BEING

HIGHLY CONSIDERATE OF

EMPLOYEE NEEDS & WANTS

LOW STRUCTURE

LOW CONSIDERATION

HIGH STRUCTURE

LOW CONSIDERATION

LOW

THE LEADER FAILS TO PROVIDE

NECESSARY STRUCTURE AND

DEMONSTRATES LITTLE

CONSIDERATION FOR EMPLOYEE

NEEDS AND WANTS

LOW

PRIMARY EMPHASIS IS PLACED ON

STRUCTURING EMPLOYEE TASKS

WHILE THE LEADER DEMONSTRATE

LITTLE FOR EMPLOYEE NEEDS &

WANTS

INITIATING STRUCTURE

HIGH

Presented by: Jehanwash kareem

Noman Saleem

BLAKE & MOUTON’S LEADERSHIP GRID

2

1

6

5

8

7

4

3

9

(1,9) COUNTRY CLUB

THOUGHTFUL ATTENTION TO

NEEDS OF PEOPLE FOR SATISFYING

RELATIONSHIPS LEADS TO A

COMFORTABLE FRIENDLY

ORGANIZATION ATMOSPHERE &

WORK TEMPO.

(9,9) TEAM

WORK ACCOMPLISHMENT IS FROM

COMMITTED PEOPLE;

INTERDEPENDENCE THROUGH A

COMMON STAKE IN ORGANIZATION

PURPOSE LEADS TO RELATIONSHIP OF

TRUST AND RESPECT

(5,5) MIDDLE OF THE ROAD

ADEQUATE ORGANIZATION

PERFORMANCE

IS POSSIBLE THROUGH BALANCING

THE NECESSITY OF GET OUT WORK

WITH MAINTAINING MORALE OF

PEOPLE AT A SATISFACTORY LEVEL

(1,1) IMPOVERISHED (9,1) AUTHORITY COMPLIANCE

EXERTION OF MINIMUM EFFORT

TO GET REQIRED WORK DONE IS

APPROPRIATE TO SUSTAIN

ORGANIZATION MEMBERSHIIP

1 2 3 4 5 6

EFFICIENCY IN OPERATIONS RESULTS

FROM ARRANGING CONDITIONS OF

WORK IN SUCH A WAY THAT HUMAN

ELEMENTS INTERFERE TO A

MINIMUM DEGREE

7

CONCERN FOR PRODUCTION

8 9

Presented by: Jehanwash kareem

Noman Saleem

BLAKE AND MOUTON 5 LEADERSHIP STYLES

GRID

POSITION

1,1

1,9

9,1

5,5

9,9

CHARACTERISTICS

STYLE OF

LEADER

EFFECTIVENESS

LITTLE CONCERN FOR EITHER

PEOPLE OR PRODUCTION

IMPOVERISHED

TYPE

WORST

LEADERSHIP STYLE

LOWEST CONCERN FOR

PRODUCTION AND HIGHEST FOR

PEOPLE

COUTNRY-CLUB

TYPE

HIGHEST CONCERN FOR

PRODUCTION AND LOWEST

FOR PEOPLE

COMFORTABLE CONCERN

FOR BOTH PEOPLE AND

PRODUCTION

AUTOCRAT

TYPE

MIDDLE OF ROAD

TYPE

PEOPLE-ORIENTED

STYLE

PRODUCTION-

ORIENTED STYLE

MAINTAIN PRESENT

BALANCE STYLE

HIGHEST CONCERN FOR BOTH

PRODUCTION AND PEOPLE

TEAM

TYPE

PEAK OF

LEADERSHIP STYLE

Presented by: Jehanwash kareem

Noman Saleem

THE TANNENBAUM AND SCHMIDT CONTINUM OF

LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOR

BOSS CENTERED

LEADERSHIP

SUBORDINATE CENTERED

LEADERSHIP

MANAGER

MAKES

DECISION

AND

ANNOUNCES

IT

MANAGER

SELLS

DECISION

MANAGER

PRESENTS

IDEAS

AND

INVITES

QUERRIES

MANAGER

PRESENTS

MANAGER

PRESENTS

TENTATIVE PROBLEM,

DECISION

SUBJECT

TO

CHANGE

GETS

SUGGES_

TIONS

MAKES

DECISION

MANAGER

DEFINES

LIMITS;

ASKS

GROUP

TO

MAKE

DECISION

MANAGER

PERMITS

SUBORDI-

NATES

TO

FUNCTION

WITHIN

DEFINED

LIMITS

RANGE OF BEHAVIOR

Presented by: Jehanwash kareem

Noman Saleem

LEADERSHIP STYLES DRAWN FROM THE CLASSIC STUDIES

AND THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP

BOSS CENTERED

THEORY X

AUTOCRATIC

PRODUCTION CENTERED

CLOSE

INITIATING STRUCTURE

TASK DIRECTED

DIRECTIVE

DIRECTIVE

EMPLOYEE CENTERED

THEORY Y

DEMOCRATIC

EMPLOYEE-CENTERED

GENERAL

CONSIDERATION

HUMAN RELATIONS

SUPPORTIVE

PARTICIPATIVE

Presented by: Jehanwash kareem

Noman Saleem

Download