At the core of performance – PART 2
1
May 2009
SPECIAL SOLUTIONS
 HYPRON,
 Fire
Lead Free Technology
PerformanceTechnologies
2
May 2009
Nexans Oil&Gas expertise towards
Hypron® Lead Free Technology
Total
presentation
May 2009
3
Onshore Hypron®
Cables
HYPRON®
Aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons resistant
 Current practices
 Petrochemical & Refinery soils environments : Risk of insulation damages &
penetration of chemical products (acids, bases, aliphatic and aromatic
hydrocarbons) towards the conductors.
== Cables are protected against external chemical products by a
conventional lead sheath.
 However , Lead is not recyclable and risk of groundwater contamination
Need to develop a new chemical barrier,
environmentally friendly.
Total
presentation
May 2009
4
Onshore Hypron®
Cables
HYPRON®
Aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons resistant
 As an alternative to lead sheath, Nexans has developed a new barrier made of
three construction elements:
 AluPE: Aluminium coated tape “sealed barrier” applied longitudinally
 HDPE sheath: High Density Polyethylene Sheath
 PA sheath: Polyamide Sheath
 Co-extrusion process allowing a powerful adhesion of these 3 sheaths.
Aluminium
+
Watertight
HDPE
+
Polyamide
Resistant to
Resistant to
inorganic chemicals
organic chemicals
HYPRON®
Total
presentation
May 2009
5
Onshore Hypron®
Cables
Design
Lead sheathing
Total
presentation
May 2009
AluPE tape
HDPE sheath
PA sheath
6
Onshore Hypron®
Cables
Design
Lead sheathing
Total
presentation
May 2009
AluPE tape
HDPE sheath
PA sheath
7
Onshore Hypron®
Cables
 Polyamides are known for their resistance to a wide range of chemicals,
different
Properties
types of oil and greases.
2 Hypron® technologies are available depending on Polyamide:
 Standard Hypron® version
 Improved Hypron® version with fire performances, based on HFFR Polyamide
Physical properties
Density (g/cm3)
Moisture absorption
- Humidity absorption (23°C / 50% RH)
- Water absorption (23°C)
Mechanical properties
- Tensile modulus (@ 1 mm/min)
- Yield stress (@ 50 mm/min)
- Nominal strain at break (@ 50
mm/min)
Flammability
- at thickness @ 1,6 mm
- at thickness @ 0,38 mm
Total
presentation
May 2009
Standard
Standard
polyamide
HFFR
Polyamide
ISO 1183
1,13
1,17
ISO 62
2,5%
9,5%
2,5%
9,0%
3150 MPa
85 MPa
45%
3800 MPa
80 MPa
50%
-
Pass (V-0)
Pass (V-0)
ISO 527-1
UL94
8
Hypron®
Electrical properties of insulation
Insula tion resista nce
(IRM 903 oil)
32000
EI 2046 (Lead)
160°C
EI 2048 (Hypron)
140°C
28000
24000
120°C
20000
100°C
16000
80°C
12000
60°C
8000
40°C
4000
20°C
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Time (hours)
Total
presentation
May 2009
9
Te mpe ra ture (°C)
Ri
Temperature
Onshore Hypron®
Cables
 Objectives:
Ageing tests
 Remain mechanical properties of insulation materials above 50% vs. initial values
 Mechanical properties evolution:
 Tensile strength (MPa)
 Elongation at break (%)
 Duration of ageing tests: 74 weeks.
 Standard references:
 EN 60811-1-1: mechanical properties measurement
 No sign of gases or liquid inside the cable after tests ….
 Construction:
 Core / insulation 4 x 2,5mm² XLPE with or without mica tape
 Bedding
 Hypron technology: Alu/PE tape + HDPE+ PA6
 Outer sheath: PVC
Total
presentation
May 2009
10
Onshore Hypron®
Cables
 Comparison:
Ageing
 Ageing test in Oil IRM 903 @ 90°C
 Evolution of Tensile strength (MPa) and Elongation at break (%) on insulation
materials
tests
 Compositions:
 4 x 2,5mm² XLPE – Bedding – AluPE – HDPE - PA6 - PVC
 4 x 2,5mm²
mica/XLPE
Bedding - AluPE - HDPE - PA6 - Tensile
PVC strength (MPa)
Elongation
at break -(%)
500
20.0
450
18.0
400
16.0
350
14.0
300
12.0
250
10.0
50% initial properties
50% initial properties
200
8.0
150
6.0
100
50
XLPE in IRM 903
4.0
Mica/XLPE in IRM 903
2.0
0
0
May 2009
XLPE in IRM 903
Mica/XLPE in IRM 903
0.0
10
20
30
40
Weeks
50
60
70
80
0
20
40
Weeks
60
8011
Onshore Hypron®
Cables
HYPRON®
Technical data sheet
Aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons resistant
 Technology is applicable in:
 Instrumentation cables
 Low voltage cables
 Medium voltage cables
 Armoured and non armoured versions
 Specific fire performances
…
Total
presentation
May 2009
12
Onshore Hypron® Cables
LV cable according to IEC 60502-1
Low Voltage cable
(3 x 150 mm²)
Lead sheath
Hypron®
Variation (%)
Diameter (mm)
55
50
-9.1%
Weight (kg)
11306
8761
-22.5%
Price (€)
-
-
-13.0%
Low Voltage cable
(12 x 2.5 mm²)
Lead sheath
Hypron®
Variation (%)
Diameter (mm)
26
23
-11.5%
Weight (kg)
2249
1279
-43.1%
Price (€)
-
-
-26.0%
 Advantages
 Easier installation
 Longer length per drum
 Less splicing vs. cable length
 Manpower cost reduction
 Lower transportation cost
Total
presentation
May 2009
Fire resistant (IEC 60331)
Halogen free (IEC 60754-1)
Fire retardant (IEC 60332-3-22(A))
Low toxicity
Low Smoke (IEC 61034-2)
Aliphatics and aromatics
Hydrocarbon resistant
-20°C / +60°C
13
Onshore Hypron® Cables
Instrumentation cable according to BS 5308
Instrumentation cable
(1 pair 1mm²)
Lead sheath
Hypron®
Variation (%)
Diameter (mm)
15,4
15,2
-1,3%
Weight (kg)
806
602
-25,3%
Price (€)
-
-
-10,0%
Instrumentation cable
(20 pairs 1mm²)
Lead sheath
Hypron®
Variation (%)
Diameter (mm)
45,6
44,7
-2,0%
Weight (kg)
5349
3026
-43,4%
Price (€)
-
-
-25,0%
 Advantages
 Easier installation
 Longer length per drum
 Less splicing vs. cable length
 Manpower cost reduction
 Lower transportation cost
Total
presentation
May 2009
Fire resistant (IEC 60331)
Halogen free (IEC 60754-1)
Fire retardant (IEC 60332-3-22(A))
Low toxicity
Low Smoke (IEC 61034-2)
Aliphatics and aromatics
Hydrocarbon resistant
-20°C / +60°C
14
Cable terminations and glands for Hypron
cables

MV terminations : same as standard cables (without lead sheath). Drain
wire in contact with Aluminium foil to be connected to earth.

MV splicing :


long length available should permit single length laying

contact us for tailor made proposal
Glands : no change as Hypron cable design to be considered for gland
selection as equivalent to a standard cable (see our leaflet Cable Gland /
Cable System )
15
May 2009
Qualification
Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of
certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment
Official Journal L 037 , 13/02/2003 P. 0019 - 0023
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
Article 1
Objectives
The purpose of this Directive is to approximate the laws of the Member States on the restrictions of the use of hazardous
substances in electrical and electronic equipment and to contribute to the protection of human health and the
environmentally sound recovery and disposal of waste electrical and electronic equipment.
Article 3
Definitions
For the purposes of this Directive, the following definitions shall apply:
(a) "electrical and electronic equipment" or "EEE" means equipment which is dependent on electric currents or electromagnetic
fields in order to work properly and equipment for the generation, transfer and measurement of such currents and
fields falling under the categories set out in Annex IA to Directive 2002/96/EC (WEEE) and designed for use with a
voltage rating not exceeding 1000 volts for alternating current and 1500 volts for direct current;
Article 4
Prevention
Member States shall ensure that, from 1 July 2006, new electrical and electronic equipment put on the market does not contain
lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent……
On the basis of a proposal from the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council shall decide, as soon as scientific
evidence is available, and in accordance with the principles on chemicals policy as laid down in the Sixth Community
Environment Action Programme, on the prohibition of other hazardous substances and the substitution thereof by
more environment-friendly alternatives which ensure at least the same level of protection for consumers.
16
May 2009
Qualification
MANUAL
INSTRUMENT SIGNAL LINES
DEP 32.37.20.10-Gen.
July 1999
(DEP Circulars 02/01 and 83/03 have been incorporated)
Type-3, Type-4 and , Type-5 cables (PEI-MS-AL/HDPE/NC-SWA-HDPE or MICA/AL/HDPE/NC/GSWA/TH.OH)
Flame retardant cable (PEI-MS-AL/HDPE/NC-SWA-HDPE)
An extruded bedding of high density polyethylene compound meeting the requirement of ASTM D1248, type 3, class C, category 5, grade J5 shall be applied
over the collective screen.
The bedding shall be bounded to the plastic coated aluminium foil. A single layer of round galvanized steel wire armored shall be applied spirally over the
polyamide protective sheath. A high density polyethylene compound meeting the requirements of ASTM D 1248, Type 3, Class C, Category 5, Grade J5 shall be
applied over the galvanized steel wire armor (see clause 13.3.3) to the dimensions specified in Table 2.
Fire resistant cable
An extruded bedding of high density polyethylene compound meeting the requirement of ASTM D1248, type 3, class C, category 5, grade J5 shall be applied
over the collective screen.
The bedding shall be bounded to the plastic coated aluminium foil. A single layer of round galvanized steel wire armored shall be applied spirally over the
polyamide protective sheath. A thermoplastic low smoke halogen free (LSZH) shall be applied over the galvanized steel wire armor.
Shell Project No.: HP-3000-QAT
Contractor name:
Unit:0-0000
Sheet: 15 of 18
PCWBS:
Contractor Project No.: 5887
Contractor Contract No.: Pl-099
PEARL GTL PROJECT
Orig. Org.:
QATAR – C8 ETP
VSA
Contractor Doc No:
F15032-SSA-0-0000-INS-SPC-0006
Project Doc No: T-4.118.228
Rev.: A
T-4.118.228RevA – SPECIFICATION FOR CABLES
Presentation to Technip Italy – May 2008
17
Onshore Hypron®
Cables
Oil & Gas projects requiring
Hypron®
technology
References
 SHELL :Nigeria NLNG & QATAR PEARL GTL
 BASF Antwerp
 CEPSA Cartagena
 STATOIL Norway
 ADNOC ( Gasco) ABICS
GASCO - IGD
18
May 2009
Nexans Oil&Gas expertise towards
Fire
Performances
Technologies
19
May 2009
Why Fire Safety?
Fire Casualties and Damages
 3% of homes experience a fire incident annually
 Over 4000 fire deaths in the USA
 Over 4400 in Europe
 Total cost of fire ~1% GDP
 70 large industrial fires alone (in UK) cost over US$ 200
million
 Property damage alone from fires in the US 2001 cost
over US$10 billion
20
May 2009
Introduction
Fire safety & cables
What is fire ?
Air
Energy source, spark
OXYGEN
HEAT
Polymer degradation
Radical formation
FUEL
21
May 2009
Introduction
Fire safety & cables
Fire extinction
and escape
possible
Start of fire &
Ignition propagation
Flash over
Temperature
Fire fully developed
Time
Role of the
Role of the
fire reaction
(no propagation)
fire resistance
( circuit intregrity )
22
May 2009
Introduction
Fire safety & cables
Fire behaviour of cables
Fire Reaction
Fire propagation
Flammability
Heat release
Smoke emission
Smoke acidity & toxicity
Fire Resistance
Usage continuity
The cable is an ACTIVE element
against fire
The cable is a PASSIVE element
during fire
23
May 2009
Nexans expertise in
Fire safety
Product development
Materials & Designs
Fire phenomenon
understanding
Standards
mastering
Bringing Solutions for the end user
24
May 2009
Mastering
Fire Reaction
25
May 2009
Fire reaction
What is fire and fire reaction ?
26
May 2009
Fire reaction
Oxygen
Heat
Polymer particles
in vapor phase
(fuel)
Thermal degradation
of the polymer
27
May 2009
Fire reaction
Dilution of the
gaz vapor phase
from sheath
combustion
28
May 2009
Fire reaction
Particle trap
Particle stabilization
29
May 2009
Fire reaction
Particle trap
Vapor phase
absorption
30
May 2009
Fire reaction
Barrier effect
31
May 2009
Fire reaction
Thermal insulation
32
May 2009
Fire reaction
Reaction to fire can be achieved by different mechanisms :
- dilution of the vapor phase
- particles /fuel traps
- barrier effect
- thermal insulation, heat decrease…etc
33
May 2009
Fire reaction
Reaction to fire can be achieved by different mechanisms :
- dilution of the vapor phase
- particles / fuel traps
- barrier effect
- thermal insulation, heat decrease…etc
34
May 2009
Fire reaction
Reaction to fire can be achieved by different mechanisms :
- dilution of the vapor phase
- particles / fuel traps
- barrier effect
- thermal insulation , heat decrease…etc
35
May 2009
Fire reaction
Reaction to fire can be achieved by different mechanisms :
- dilution of the vapor phase
- particles / fuel traps
- barrier effect
- thermal insulation, heat decrease…etc
More than one mechanism may occur during fire reaction…
36
May 2009
Fire reaction
Mastering the standards
37
May 2009
International standards
Flame
Retardant
(cable)
Fire retardant
(cable)
Fire Retardant
(bunched
cables)
International
IEC/ISO
European
EN
Spain
UNE
IEC 60332-1-1
IEC 60332-1-2
IEC 60332-1-3
EN 50265
UNE EN 50265
France
UTE
NF C 32 070 Cat.
VDE 472- 804B
C2
NF C 32 070 Cat.
C1
EN 50266-2-1
IEC 60332-3-22 (A)
EN 50266-2-2
IEC 60332-3-23(B)
EN 50266-2-3 UNE EN 50266
IEC 60332-3-24(C)
EN 50266-2-4
IEC 60332-3-25(D)
EN 50266-2-5
NF C 32 072
Fire Resistant
(cable system)
Italy
CEI
CEI 20-35
UK
BS/LUL
China
GB/T
BS EN 50265
GB/T 18380-1
(BS 4066/1)
USA
BELGIUM
UL/IEEE/ASTM
NBN EN
UL 44
NBN EN 50265
NBN EN 50266
CEI 20-22 III
VDE 472-804C CEI 20-22/3
BS EN 50266
GB/T 18380-3
(BS 4066/3)
IEEE 383
IEC 60331-11
(750°C)
IEC 60331-12
( 830°C)
Smoke density
chamber
(static method)
IEC 60695-6-30
ISO 5659-2
EN 50200
EN 50362
UNE EN 50200
UNE EN 50362 NF C 32 070 Cat.
VDE 472- 814
UNE 20-431
CR1
(IEC 60331)
NF C 20902-1
NF C 20902-2
IEC 61034
EN 50268
UNE EN 50268
NF X 10702
NF C 20452
NF C 32073
IEC 60754-1
EN 50267
UNE EN 50267
NF X 70100
NF X 70101
NF C 20454
IEC 60754-2
EN 50267
UNE EN 50267
NF C 20454
ISO 4589
IEC 60216
CEI 20-36
BS 6387
BS 8434-1 & 2
GB/T 19216
ASTM E 662
NFPA 258
ASTM D 2843
(XP2 chamber)
BS 6401
VDE 472- 816
CEI 20-38
BS EN 50268
(BS 7622-1&2)
CEI 20-37
VDE 472-813
NF T 51071
CEI 20-37
GB/T 17651
ASTM D 2843
GB/T 17650
NBN EN 50268
NBN EN 50267
GB/T 17650
BS EN 50267
(BS 6425 - 1)
NBN C30-004 F2
FR 2
NBN 713 020
FR 1
C1 NBN EN 50200
C2 NBN EN 50362
C3
DIN 4102-12
Fire Resistant
(cable)
Smoke opacity
(materialcables)
Gases and
smoke Toxicity
(material cables)
Gases and
smoke
Corrosivity
(material cables)
Oxygen Index
Temperature
Index
May 2009
Germany
VDE
NES 713
NBN EN 50267
BS 2782
VDE 304-21
38
Reaction to fire
 Standard: IEC 60332-1, NF C 32070 test n°1 (Cat. C2), BS 4066-1, VDE 472/804 B,
EN 50265-1
 Test: Resistance to vertical flame propagation
 Objective:
 Limited flame propagation on wire or cable
 No flaming droplets
 Products concerned: Insulated wires or cables
 Test conditions:
 Insulated wire or cable sample: 600 mm
 Test sample fixed vertically in a metallic screen
 Source of heat: 1 kW propane burner inclined at 45°
 Time for the flame application: 1 to 8 min
 Depending on sample diameter
 Recommended values:
 The minimum length of uncharred surface: 50 mm under top support
 Fire test on video
39
May 2009
Reaction to fire
 Standard: IEC 60332-3, EN 50266, BS 4066-3, VDE 472/804C, NBN 30-004 F2
 Test: Resistance to vertical fire propagation
 Objective: Limited fire propagation on vertically mounted bunched wires or cables
 Products concerned: Wires or cables, electrical or optical
 Test conditions:
 Test chamber: 4m x 2m x 1m
 Controlled air flow: 5000 l/min
 Heat source: Propane gas burner (20.5 kW)
 Oven temperature: 800°C approx.
 Bunched cables (3.5 m long) mounted spaced or not on
a steel ladder (with 500 or 800 mm)
 Maximum burnt height:
 Damaged length: 2.5 m
 Video of fire test
May 2009
Ca tegory
A
B
C
D
Fla me
Volume of non
a pplica tion meta llic ma teria l
7.0l
40min
3,5l
1,5l
20min
0,5l
40
NO IDEAL
TESTING
METHOD
TEST METHOD
≠ SIMULATION
OF REAL FIRE
Air 5000l/min
41
May 2009
Mastering
Fire Resistance
42
May 2009
Mastering the
standards
Flame tests
43
May 2009
Mastering the
standards
Oven tests
44
May 2009
Fire resistant test
 Standard: IEC 60331-11 & 21, BS 6387
 Test: Resistance to fire alone
 Objective: Maintain circuit integrity
 Products concerned: Fire resisting cables
 Test conditions:
 Cable mounted horizontally and supported by 2 to 5 metal rings
Standard
Temperature (°C)
Minimal survival time
IEC 60331-11
750
90 min (+15 min without fire)
BS 6387 Cat. A
650
180 min
BS 6387 Cat. B
750
180 min
BS 6387 Cat. C
950
180 min
BS 6387 Cat. S
950
20 min
 Rated voltage: Up to 0.6 / 1 kV (electrical cables)
 Fire test on video
45
May 2009
Fire resistant test
 Standard: BS 6387 – Cat. X, Y, Z
 Test: Resistance to fire with mechanical shocks (categories X, Y, Z)
 Objective: Maintain circuit integrity
 Products concerned: Fire resisting cables
 Test conditions:
 Cable mounted on a non combustible wall
 Flame temperature:
 Category X: 650°C
 Category Y: 750°C
 Category Z: 950°C
 Mechanical shocks: 1 shock / 30 sec
 Rated voltage: Up to 0.6 / 1 kV (electrical cables)
 Minimal survival time:
 15 min
46
May 2009
Fire resistant test
 Standard: EN 50200
 Test: Resistance to fire with mechanical shocks
 Objective: Maintain circuit integrity
 Products concerned: Electrical power, control, data or communication
cables and optical fibre cables (Ø  20 mm)
 Test conditions:
 Cable mounted in a U form on a non combustible wall
 Flame temperature: 830°C
 Mechanical shocks: 1 shock / 5 min
 Rated voltage: Up to 0.6 / 1 kV (electrical cables)
 Minimal survival time:
 15, 30, 60, 90 or 120 min
 Categories: PH15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min
47
May 2009
Fire resistant test
 Standard: BS 6387 Cat. W
 Test: Resistance to fire with water spray
 Objective: Maintain circuit integrity
 Products concerned: Fire resisting cables
 Test conditions:
 Cable mounted on a metal support
 Flame temperature: 650°C
 Water spray with a sprinkler
 Rated voltage: Up to 0.6 / 1 kV (electrical cables)
 Minimal survival time:
 15 min (fire) + 15 min (fire + water)
 Fire test on video
48
May 2009
Mastering the
standards
Summary of the qualitative description of each fire resistant test
Standard
Fire type
Temperature
(°C)
Duration
(min)
Shock
Water
Cable
length
NF C 32070 – CR1
Oven
 900
 90
Yes
No
Short
BS 8434-1
Flame
< 900
 30
Yes
Yes
Short
BS 8434-2
Flame
 900
 120
Yes
Yes
Short
BS 6387-C
Flame
 900
 120
No
No
Short
BS 6387-Z
Flame
 900
 30
Yes
No
Short
BS 6387-W
Flame
< 900
 30
No
Yes
Short
IEC 60331
Flame
< 900
 90
No
No
Short
IEC 60331 (1000°C)
Flame
 900
 90
No
No
Short
NF EN 50200 (ph90)
Flame
< 900
 90
Yes
No
Short
NF EN 50200 (ph120)
Flame
< 900
 120
Yes
No
Short
DIN E30
Oven
< 900
 30
No
No
Long
DIN E90
Oven
 900
 90
No
No
Long
AS/NZS 3013
Oven
 900
 120
No
Yes
Long
TEST METHOD ≠ SIMULATION OF REAL FIRE
49
May 2009
Mastering
Fire
Consequences
Smoke ,Toxicity, Corrosivity
50
May 2009
Fire safety
Smoke & Toxicity
Ambient air
modification
98% of victims are died by asphyxia
High risks of corrosion damage
on metallic material
51
May 2009
Phenomenon
understanding
Smoke
Smoke due to partially burned particles :
 Too low temperature to burn
 Partial oxidation
 Too stable radicals
Will strongly impact the evacuation time
52
May 2009
Smoke emission
Mastering the standards
Low smoke = easier evacuation and easier fire fighting
Measurement of smoke opacity
(NFC 20-902 – ASTM E662)
Dm and VOF4 values
53
May 2009
Smoke emission
Mastering the standards
Smoke opacity measurement in
a 27m3 room, during the burning
of a cable sample (25 min),
and 40 min after burning is
completed.
The light transmittance is
measured and thanks to PVC
LSLH compounds, it remains
above 40%
Low smoke = easier evacuation and easier fire fighting
54
May 2009
Toxicity
Toxicity ponderation IEC 60684-2 and NES 713
(scaled for CO = 1)

Comparison of 30 min. lethal
doses for man in ppm

Inverse of dose = pondera-tion
factor for toxicity index
Phosgene
160,00
Hydrogen fluoride
40,00
Hydrogen bromide
26,67
HCl gas is 8 times as toxic as CO.
Hydrogen cyanide
26,67
HF gas is 40 times as toxic as CO.
Phenol
16,00
Nitrogen oxides
16,00
We see:

For clean fire conditions,
halogens, sulfur and
nitrogen containing material
should be limited.
 Nexans LSLH material
has a lower toxicity
index
Sulphur dioxide
10,00
Acrylonitrile
10,00
Hydrogen chloride
8,00
Formaldehyde
8,00
Ammonia
5,33
Hydrogen sulphide
5,33
Carbon monoxide
Carbon dioxide
0,01
1,00
0,04
0,1
1
10
100
1000
55
May 2009
Toxicity

Quantitative analysis of different
toxic combustion gases produced
by the material

Ponderated addition (according to
toxicity) of these quantities
 Toxicity index
Standards: NFX 70100, NES 713, IEC 60684-2
 CO : the most dangerous - Lethal at 0.3% in the air
 CO2 : not toxic but do not maintain life
 HCl : Highly corrosive and irritant , soluble in water
 HCN : very toxic and soluble in water
May 2009
 + NOx, Dioxins, aldehydes, ….
56
Corrosivity
IEC 60754 -1 & IEC 60754 -2

Material combustion in oven

Combustion gases trapped in water

Measurement of acid quantity,
determination of degree of acidity
 LSLH cables : HCl content < 10%
Low Halogen cable in fire means:

Low HCl gas production

Minimize hydrochloric acid formation

Minimize corrosion on metallic
equipment
(metallic structures, conducts and pipes,
engines, electronics, … )
(Reminder : 1 kG of PVC burnt produces about 2 liter of Hydrochloric Acid of “Xi” concentration)
57
May 2009
Bringing
Solutions
for
the end user
58
May 2009
Fire safety
Smoke & toxicity
Nexans special PVC LSLH sheaths limit the
level of smoke and halogens in case of fire
less dense black smoke to allow
easier fire fighting
less toxicity (hydrochloric acid)
less corrosion damage on
metallic material in the vicinity
of the fire.
59
May 2009
At the core of performance
60
May 2009
References
61
May 2009
Africa
• Algeria
 Sonatrach : Arzew LNG
 Sonatrach : Skikda Refinery
 Sonatrach Hassi Messaoud OilField
• Ivory Coast
 SIR refinery- Abidjan
• Libya
 Great man made river –Marubeni
 SOC-Tripoli-Mehlita Gas Pipeline.
• Angola
 Total Dalia Gas treatment
Equatorial
Bechtel
Guinea
- LNG
Tunisia
 Hasdrubal LNG-Petrofac

El Borma Field - SITEP
Nigeria
Daewoo/Mobil
- Refinery
Exxon/Mobil - Refinery
NLNG Projects-Shell /KBR
OML 58 - Saipem
62
May 2009
Americas
• Peru
 Camisea gas development I & II
 Talara Refinery – PlusPetrol/Tecnicas.
• Venezuela
 Contrina-PDVSA
 Sincor Petrochem- Total
• Colombia




Cerro Matoso Mining Refinery- Bechtel
Cartagena Refinery-CB&I
Pacific Rubiales Energy – Quifa field
Ecopetrol-Chichimene
• Ecuador
 Repsol YPF Pipeline upgrade
• USA
Calpine
Shell Martinas (California)
Shell (Gulf of Mexico)
• Brasil
Petrobras P 36,38,42,52,54,58,61,62
 Comperj Petrochem
Pernambuco Refinery
•Mexico
•Pemex - Danjos Refinery
•Bajio Gas treatment - Bechtel
63
May 2009
CIS
• Azerbaijan
 ACG Terminal: KBR/ AIOC
 BTC pipelines : Botas
 SCP pipelines: Petrofac
• Kazakhstan
 Kashagan O&G treatment - Agip KCO
 TCO :Parson-FluorDaniel
 Caspian pipeline - Tefken
• Uzbekistan
 Fergana refinery - Tefken
• Georgia
 Tbilissi metering: AES
• Russia
 Kharyga 1 field: Petrofac
 Sakhaline 1 & 2 gas treatment
 Prirazlomnoe Platform
 Gazprom : Aztrakan – Linegaz
 Tuapse Refinery - Rosneft
• Turkmenistan
 Turkmenbashi refinery :
FosterWheeler
 South Yoloten refinery - Petrofac
64
May 2009
Central Asia

Iran








Petrofac/Elf : Dorood
Technip/Olefin 9th,
Amir Kabir, NPCC-Soroosh
Pidec:Abadan Refinery
Hyundai /Elf Balal
South Pars 4&5: ENI
NIGC/OIEC : 6 Compressor Stations
Turkey



Tupras: refinery
LNG: Botas
BTC (Botas) – Tefken
65
May 2009
Middle East
• Bahrein
•
 Alstom/Bapco
• Iraq
 Suleimaniyah: ABB
 South Gaz Co :repairs
 Basra Export Terminal : Foster Wheeler
• Qatar
 QatarChemical:LG Benzene
 Technip/KBR: Q.Chem 1
 Shell Pearl GTL- KBR/Saipem
•
• Saudi Arabia
 Aramco-Maintenance & Repairs
Operations
•
U.A.E.

Dolphin: McDermott

ADCO/Technip : NEB

GASCO- ABICS : Cegelec

ADMAOPCO – Umm Shaif Gas Injection plant
Yemen

Atuf field facilities upgrade: Total

YemGas –LNG Terminal – Technip

Asharq Masood:Nexen Petroleum
Kuwait

NPC : MAA refinery & OLK2
66
May 2009
Asia / Pacific
•
Vietnam
 Dong Quat refinery – technip
•
• Indonesia
 West Natuna refinery – Conoco
 Texaco Refinery.
 Balikpapan Expensions - TOTAL
•
Thailand.

PTTAR – EXXON Refineries upgrades

PPTEP – ARTHIT blocks development
Australia

DARWIN LNG - Bechtel
67
May 2009
Europe
• Holland
•
 Shell Refinery ( Pernis )
• Spain
 CEPSA – Cartagena refinery
• Germany
 TOTAL Refinery ( Leuna )
•

TOTAL Refinery & Petrochem ( Gonfreville)

TOTAL Refinery ( Lyon )

TOTAL Refinery ( Nantes )

ARKEMA INEOS ( Fos / Mer )
Norway

• UK
 Milford Haven Terminal
France.
•
Statoil Refinery ( Oslo)
Belgium


FINA Refinery & Petrochem ( Antwerp )
BASF Petrochem ( Antwerp )
68
May 2009
69
May 2009
Thank you for your attention
www.nexans.com
70
May 2009