THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES 2010:
A New Law for the International
Commerce
UNIDROIT:
AN OVERVIEW
PURPOSE
 The International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT) is an independent
intergovernmental Organisation with its seat in the Villa Aldobrandini in Rome. Its
purpose is to modernize, harmonize and co-ordinate private and commercial law and
to formulate uniform law instruments, principles and rules to achieve those
objectives.
 Set up in 1926 as an auxiliary organ of the League of Nations (i.e. the current United
Nations- ONU), the Institute was re-established in 1940 on the basis of a multilateral
agreement, the Unidroit Statute.
 MEMBERSHIP
 Membership of UNIDROIT is restricted to States acceding to the UNIDROIT Statute. UNIDROIT's
63 member States from the five continents and represent a variety of different legal,
economic and political systems as well as different cultural backgrounds.
 STRUCTURE
 There are a Secretariat (Secretary-General and two Deputy Secretaries-General appointed
by the Governing Council), a Governing Council (appointed by the General Assembly,
consisting in twenty-five members and a President; the latter is appointed by the Italian
Government) and a General Assembly (consisting of one representative from each
Government).
2
UNIDROIT:
THE PRINCIPLES
 PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS
 The Governing Council of UNIDROIT adopted on 10 May 2011 the third edition of the Principles
of International Commercial Contracts (UNIDROIT Principles 2010).
 Previous versions were drafted in 1994 and in 2004. The UNIDROIT Principles 2010 consists of
11 Articles; they contain limited new provisions on restitution in case of failed contracts,
illegality, conditions and plurality of obligors and obligees; with respect to the 2004 edition the
only significant change relate to Article 1.4 (mandatory rules).
 PURPOSE OF THE PRINCIPLES

The Principles set forth general rules for international commercial contracts.
 They may be applied (i) when the parties have agreed that their contract is governed by
general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like; or (ii) when the parties have not chosen
any law to govern their contract.
 They may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments or domestic
law.
 They may serve as a model for national and international legislators.
3
UNIDROIT:
THE PRINCIPLES
 UNIDROIT Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract is
governed by them.
 Parties wishing to provide that their agreement (international commercial also national) be
governed by the Principles might use the following wording:
 “This contract shall be governed by the UNIDROIT Principles (2010) [except as
 to Articles …]”.
 Parties wishing to provide in addition for the application of the law of a particular jurisdiction
might use the following wording:
 “This contract shall be governed by the UNIDROIT Principles (2010) [except as
to Articles…], supplemented when necessary by the law of [jurisdiction X]”.
4
STRUCTURE AND COMPARISON OF THE PRINCIPLES
1994
 CHAPTER 1: GENERAL
PROVISIONS
 CHAPTER 2: FORMATION
 CHAPTER 3: VALIDITY
 CHAPTER 4:
INTERPRETATION
 CHAPTER 5: CONTENT
 CHAPTER 6:
PERFORMANCE
 CHAPTER 7: NONPERFORMANCE
2004
CHAPTER 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS
CHAPTER 2: FORMATION AND
AUTHORITY OF AGENTS
CHAPTER 3: VALIDITY
CHAPTER 4:
INTERPRETATION
CHAPTER 5: CONTENT AND THIRD
PARTY RIGHTS
CHAPTER 6: PERFORMANCE
CHAPTER 7: NON-PERFORMANCE
CHAPTER 8: SET-OFF
CHAPTER 9: ASSIGNMENT OF
RIGHTS, TRANSFER OF
OBLIGATIONS, ASSIGNMENT OF
CONTRACTS
CHAPTER 10: LIMITATION PERIODS
5
2010 UNIDROIT:
















GENERAL PROVISIONS
ARTICLE 1.1.
(Freedom of contract)
The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content.
ARTICLE 1.2
(No form required)
Nothing in these Principles requires a contract, statement or any other act to be made in or
evidenced by a particular form. It may be proved by any means, including witnesses.
ARTICLE 1.3
(Binding character of contract)
A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties. It can only be modified or
terminated in accordance with its terms or by agreement or as otherwise provided in these
Principles.
ARTICLE 1.4
(Mandatory rules)
Nothing in these Principles shall restrict the application of mandatory rules, whether of
national, international or supranational origin, which are applicable in accordance with the
relevant rules of private international law.
ARTICLE 1.7
(Good faith and fair dealing)
(1) Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international
trade.
(2) The parties may not exclude or limit this duty.
6
UNIDROIT:
SPECIFIC PROVISIONS
 ARTICLE 3.2.6
 (Threat)
 A party may avoid the contract when it has been led to conclude the contract by the other
party’s unjustified threat which, having regard to the circumstances, is so imminent and
serious as to leave the first party no reasonable alternative. In particular, a threat is
unjustified if the act or omission with which a party has been threatened is wrongful in itself, or
it is wrongful to use it as a means to obtain the conclusion of the contract.
 ARTICLE 7.3.3
 (Anticipatory non-performance)
 Where prior to the date for performance by one of the parties it is clear that there will be a
fundamental non-performance by that party, the other party may terminate the contract.
 ARTICLE 7.3.4
 (Adequate assurance of due performance)
 A party who reasonably believes that there will be a fundamental non-performance by the
other party may demand adequate assurance of due performance and may meanwhile
withhold its own performance. Where this assurance is not provided within a reasonable
time the party demanding it may terminate the contract.
7
UNIDROIT:
SPECIFIC PROVISIONS
ARTICLE 6.2.2
(Definition of hardship)
There is hardship where the occurrence of events fundamentally alters the equilibrium of the
contract either because the cost of a party’s performance has increased or because the
value of the performance a party receives has diminished, and
(a) the events occur or become known to the disadvantaged party after the conclusion
of the contract;
(b) the events could not reasonably have been taken into account by the disadvantaged
party at the time of the conclusion of the contract;
(c) the events are beyond the control of the disadvantaged party; and
(d) the risk of the events was not assumed by the disadvantaged party.
ARTICLE 6.2.3
(Effects of hardship)
(1) In case of hardship the disadvantaged party is entitled to request renegotiations. The request
shall be made without undue delay and shall indicate the grounds on which it is based.
(2) The request for renegotiation does not in itself entitle the disadvantaged party to withhold
performance.
(3) Upon failure to reach agreement within a reasonable time either party may resort to the
court.
(4) If the court finds hardship it may, if reasonable,
(a) terminate the contract at a date and on terms to be fixed, or
(b) adapt the contract with a view to restoring its equilibrium.
8
CONCLUSIONS
 UNIDROIT Principles 2010 can be used as a really fair and reasonable regulation for all
commercial contracts, including shipping agreements;
 This is particularly relevant when bearing in mind current importance of the “sustainability”
(where fairness with all stakeholders is a must) in the international market and environment;
9