Cognitive Theories of Motivation Roberts & Glick (1981) Champoux (1991) Vroom (1964) Wood & Bandura (1989) Agenda – 6/14/05 Reminders Questions, Comments, or Concerns Cognitive Theories of Motivation Job Characteristics Theory Expectancy Theory (VIE Theory) Social Cognitive Theory Break TRP 3 Discussion Thursday Reminders SAP 4 and TRP 4 Thursday No SAPs or TRPs Next Week Turn In SAP 3 Please Pass to the Isle and then Forward to the Front. Thanks Questions, Comments, or Concerns? How Can Individuals Reduce the Cognitive Dissonance Associated with Perceived Inequity? Summarize the Major Findings of Deci’s Cognitive Evaluation Theory? Cognitive Theories of Motivation Job Characteristics Theory Expectancy Theory Vroom (1964) Key Features and Outcomes Social Cognitive Theory Hackman & Oldham (1971) Key Features and Outcomes Wood & Bandura (1989) Synthesis of Theories Job Characteristics Theory Based on Job Enrichment 5 Core Job Dimensions to Measure Motivating Potential Score (MPS) Skill Variety, Task Identity, Task Significance, Autonomy, and Feedback Lead to 3 Psychological States Focus on Characteristics of Job to Motivate Increase Intrinsic Job Satisfaction Meaningfulness of Work, Responsibility for Outcomes, and Knowledge of Results Depending on Growth Need Strength JC Model of Motivation Core Job Dimensions Critical Psych States Skill Variety Task Identity Meaningful Work Exp. Task Sig, Autonomy Feedback Personal and Work Outcome Increased Intrinsic Motivation High Quality Work Responsibility for Outcomes Knowledge of Results Employee Growth Need Strength High Work Satisfaction Reduced Absenteeism and Turnover Expectancy Theory Valence, Expectancy, and Instrumentality Force = V x I x E Flexible Model Mixed Empirical Results Due to Methodological Issues Reliance on “Economic Man” On the Road to Goal Setting Theory Social Cognitive Theory Based on Social Learning Self-Esteem vs. Self-Efficacy Self-Efficacy Leads to Effort which Leads to Performance Available Role Model, Motive to Model, Reward to Model, and Feedback about Modeling Level of Self-Efficacy Determines Difficulty of Goals Interact with Environmental Factors to Predict Behavior Begins Cycle of Behavior Reinforcing Beliefs Leading to Self-Selection into Successful Environments Synthesis The Choice Is Yours Affect vs. Cognition Which Comes First? All Theories Assume that People Are Rationale Relevance of Goals Any Managerial Usefulness? Break Take a 20 Minute Break TRP 3 Discussion Can You Take These Theories to Work? Thursday SAP 4 and TRP 4 Goal Setting Theory Locke et al. (1981) Eden (1988) Eden (1984) Davidson & Eden (2000) On to Leadership