Key Legal Cases Flashcards Template
The following pages of Key Legal Cases are formatted to be used to
create a set of flash cards –just print the following pages in single- sided
format, then fold them in half to create a quick and easy set of study
materials.
Note: printing on heavy or cardstock paper will add to durability.
Darling v. Charleston
Memorial Community
Hospital,
(Ill. 1965)
Key Issue: Failure to have proper supervision;
Case set aside the Charitable Immunity Doctrine.
Fact Summary:Hospital liable for negligent
treatment resulting in amputation of teenager’s leg
nurses failed to monitor; physician failed to consult;
hospital claimed that charitable immunity doctrine
limited damages to its insurance.
Johnson v.
Misericordia
Community Hospital,
(Wis. 1981)
Key Issue: Negligent credentialing; Failure
of initial credentialing process.
Fact Summary:Hospital liable to patient
injured by physician who had failed to disclose
pending malpractice cases and lied about
privileges at other hospitals; should have verified
information.
Elam v. College Park
Hospital,
(Ca. 1982)
Key Issue: Negligent Credentialing
Fact Summary:Hospital liable for
podiatrist’s negligence; failed to obtain malpractice
claims data although medical records department
aware of claims.
Patrick v. Burget,
(1988)
Key Issue: Anti-competitive peer review;
HCQIA; Violation of Federal Anti-trust Laws
Fact Summary: Physicians conducted
peer review for anti-competitive reasons liable for
violating federal anti-trust laws.
Robinson v.
Magovern,
(1982)
Key Issue: Hospitals may determine proper
limitation on competition within the hospital and
surrounding areas - careful and thorough adherence
to bylaws that contain objective criteria required.
Denial of application is not a restraint of trade.
Fact Summary:
MD brought antitrust suit
because he was denied privileges. Hospital did this
based on shortage of OR space, unfavorable
recommendation, failure to publish MD on seven
other staffs and would probably not be able to
contribute to hospital teaching program.
Miller v. Eisenhower
Medical Center,
(Ca. 1980)
Key Issue: Disruptive behavior must be
patient care related
Fact Summary:Denial of application
based on inability to work with others; no quality
of care problems.
Rao v. Auburn
General Hospital,
(Washington Court of
Appeals, 1978)
Key Issue: Disruptive behavior. Personality
may be considered if affects ability to practice or
hospital operations - personality problems must
affect the workings of the hospital.
Fact Summary:Hospital denied privileges
to MD after receiving reports from other hospitals
on termination/ restriction of privileges. Other
hospitals also reported substandard work and
emotional instability.
Boyd v. Albert
Einstein Medical
Center,
(Pa. 1988)
Key Issue: Ostensible agency; MCO liable
for practitioner’s action.
Fact Summary: IPA-type HMO advertised
as providing medical care held liable for member
MD’s negligence.
Harrell v.
Total Health Care,
Inc.,
(Mo. 1989)
Key Issue: Negligent credentialing; Failure
to credential
Fact Summary:State law granted
immunity to non-profit health plans; MCO not
liable for negligent credentialing.
McClellan v.
Health Maintenance
Organization of
Pennsylvania,
(Pa. 1992)
Key Issue: Duty to select and monitor
providers; Negligent credentialing; Ostensible
agency.
Fact Summary:MCO liable for provider’s
action.
Mathews v. Lancaster
General Hospital,
(Pa. 1996)
Key Issue: HCQIA burden on physician to
prove bad faith peer review.
Fact Summary:Committee including
competitors found substandard care; outside
consultant agreed; surgeon challenged summary
judgment applying HCQIA immunity; HCQIA
presumption of good faith upheld.
Bell v. Sharp Cabrillo
Hospital,
(Ca. 1989)
Key Issue: Negligence in reappointment;
Negligent credentialing
Fact Summary:Hospital liable for
physician’s actions due to its failure to request
data from other hospital about basis for its
summary suspension. No deficiencies had
occurred at Sharp Cabrillo.
Hongsathavij v.
Queen of the Angels
Hollywood
Presbyterian Hospital,
(Ca. 1998)
Key Issue: Governing body is ultimate authority.
Fact Summary: Physician taken off back-up
panel for failing to accept patient; Board overturned
hearing committee recommendation to reinstate call
panel membership due to lack of substantial evidence.
Mahmoodian v.
United Hospital
Center,
(W.Va. 1991)
Key Issue: Disruptive behavior
Fact Summary:Hospital can revoke
otherwise competent physician’s privileges when
physician’s disruptive behavior may adversely
affect patient care.
Oskooi v.
Fountain Valley
Regional Hospital
and Health Center,
(Ca. 1996)
Key Issue: Failure to disclose
Fact Summary:Ophthalmologist did not
disclose all prior hospital affiliations on
application; Hospital’s summary suspension
upheld.
Webman v.
Little Company of
Mary Hospital,
(Ca. 1995)
Key Issue: Duty to credential; Reasonable
application requirements; Burden of proof.
Fact Summary:Physician refused to
authorize release of information by prior hospital;
new hospital denied application; court held for
hospital.