Administrative Law Fall 2013 Professor Amanda C. Leiter Leiter@wcl.american.edu OHs Wed. 3:15-5, Room 470 COURSE INFORMATION & SYLLABUS Casebook: Cass, Diver, Beermann, & Freeman (CDBF), 6th ed. Office Hours: Wednesdays 3:15 – 5 or by appointment (leiter@wcl.american.edu) Class Policies: Attendance: Class attendance is mandatory. Please let me know in advance if you need to be absent for any reason. Class Participation: I will have tent-cards with your first name in large black letters on one side of the card, and in large red letters on the other side. Bring these to class every day and set them up with the black side facing me if you’re prepared, or the red side facing me if you’re unprepared. Each day, I will call on several students to participate in our discussion. Please be prepared to discuss the facts and law of each case assigned for that day as well as any cases or issues we carry over from the previous class discussion. If you’re unprepared for class one day, make sure the red side of your card is facing me. Be forewarned, though: I will likely call on you the next day. Even if I don’t call on you, you are encouraged to volunteer in class, and/or to ask questions as necessary. PowerPoints: I frequently use PowerPoints to display questions, answers, interesting tidbits from discussion, etc. I will post these slides on the MyWCL site every few days, so please don’t bother to reproduce the slides in your notes, as that will prevent you from paying attention to our discussion. If I haven’t posted slides for a few days, feel free to email and remind me. -1- Administrative Law Fall 2013 Professor Amanda C. Leiter Leiter@wcl.american.edu OHs Wed. 3:15-5, Room 470 Laptop Policy: Some professors ban laptops in the classroom, but I would prefer not to do that. You are adults and must determine for yourselves how best to use your computers in law school and in your subsequent careers. That said, if computer use is proving to be a distraction, I will reconsider my laptop policy. Please, be courteous to me and your fellow students and save your research, tv-watching, and virtual socializing for your free time. Grading: Field Observation: As detailed below, you must choose a federal agency to “follow” over the course of the semester. SEE BELOW FOR DETAILS. Exam: There will be a 4-hour, 100-point, open-book, in-class exam. o One 20-point essay question will ask you to consider and evaluate a general administrative law topic (like the relationship between agencies and Congress) in the context of your chosen “field agency.” Grading: Your course grade will be based principally on your exam grade, with an adjustment for class participation (including satisfactory completion of the field observation exercise). -2- Administrative Law Fall 2013 Professor Amanda C. Leiter Leiter@wcl.american.edu OHs Wed. 3:15-5, Room 470 Agency Field Observation: From the start of the course, you should follow the issues we discuss as they arise in actual day-to-day practice within a functioning federal agency or sub-agency. Over the semester, you must: Prepare to discuss your agency on specified days during class discussion (I will notify you ahead of these discussions); Do ONE of the following: o Attend and write up a 1-page summary of an administrative proceeding (such as a meeting, hearing, or adjudication) at your chosen agency; OR o Research a policy issue currently pending before your chosen agency and write a 4-page discussion of (a) the issue, and (b) relevant administrative procedural questions that have arisen during the agency’s consideration of the issue (for example: has the agency had to decide how to involve interested members of the public? Has it held a public hearing? Has it published a notice of proposed rulemaking? Has it been sued or held an adjudicatory proceeding before an ALJ?); AND Answer a 20-point question on the final exam that asks you to discuss a generic administrative law issue in the context of your agency. You may choose to track any federal agency or sub-agency, but not a state/local/foreign agency. Agencies that students have successfully followed in the past include: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Department of Agriculture (USDA) Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Federal Election Commission (FEC) Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) That said, you may choose a different agency if you’d like. You need not acquire intimate knowledge of all the technical workings of your chosen agency or sub-agency. Rather, I hope the exercise will help you get a sense of the reallife application of some of the esoteric doctrines we’ll be discussing. EXAMPLE: As you begin your tracking exercise in the second week of class, you should look up the organic statute(s) that created your agency, and the enabling statute(s) that gave it particular powers and authorities. Then, when we turn to notices of -3- Administrative Law Fall 2013 Professor Amanda C. Leiter Leiter@wcl.american.edu OHs Wed. 3:15-5, Room 470 proposed rulemaking, you should check to see whether your agency has published any such notices in the past 6 months. And so on through the semester. After you know some basics about your agency, you may wish to cultivate a contact within the agency who will be willing to talk to you on the phone every couple of weeks to give you a continuing update on how the agency is confronting the various issues being covered in class. (In addition to giving you insights about this class, your contact may also prove useful in your later job search. Moreover, cultivating a contact at an agency is itself a useful skill for future practice.) The “deliverables” for this assignment are as follows: By Wednesday, Sept. 11 – Please email my assistant, Kevin Schellhase, kschell@wcl.american.edu, and let him know which agency or sub-agency you have chosen to follow. You need not check your choice with me, though I’m happy to discuss it with you if you have questions. o In choosing your agency, note that you either need to attend one hearing over the course of the semester or write a short research paper on an issue pending before the agency. It is therefore worth your time to navigate through your chosen agency’s website and find out (a) whether the agency has some public proceedings scheduled between September and early November, and/or (b) whether any interesting issues are currently pending before the agency. o Over the course of the semester, you may choose to narrow your choice (for example, you may start out by signing up for the Securities and Exchange Commission and decide later to focus on the SEC’s Division of Enforcement). By Wednesday, Nov. 27 – Complete the written assignment. This means you must EITHER o Attend and write up a 1-page summary of an administrative proceeding at your chosen agency. Your write-up should include: The name of the agency; The name, date, time, and location of the proceeding; The character of the proceeding (e.g. formal rulemaking, informal adjudication, etc.); A brief synopsis of the issues covered in the proceeding; A brief discussion of how (if at all) “the public interest” figured into the proceeding; and A brief observation of any arrangement the agency made for public participation in the proceeding (for example: Was the proceeding publicly announced? Were members of the public invited to attend? Did any members of the public choose to attend? If so, how many? -4- Administrative Law Fall 2013 Professor Amanda C. Leiter Leiter@wcl.american.edu OHs Wed. 3:15-5, Room 470 Were audience members able to ask questions or offer insights? etc.). o OR, ALTERNATIVELY, you may research and write up a 4-page discussion of an issue currently pending before your agency. If you choose this option, your write-up should include: The name of the agency; A discussion of the issue you chose to research (this should include identification of the statute(s) under which your agency claims authority to do whatever it’s thinking about doing); Identification of the outside parties that are interested in the outcome; A brief synopsis of the different “sides” of the debate, and where the identified outside parties stand; and A discussion of how (if at all) the agency is factoring in “the public interest” as it makes its decision. o These will not be graded, but careful completion of one or the other written assignment is required to ensure that you get full credit for classparticipation. Failure to complete the assignment will result in your course grade being lowered by a full third-of-a-grade (e.g. from an A- to a B+). Several times over the semester, we will spend some time at the end of class discussing your field observations on the topic at hand (e.g. how your respective agencies handle notices of proposed rulemaking, etc.). We will first break into groups of 4-6, so you can share your observations with your fellow students; then, when we come back together, I’ll ask a few of the groups to share your discussion with the rest of the class. Finally, the exam will include one 20-point question (out of 100-points) that asks you: o To identify the agency you followed over the semester; o To give a few concrete examples of rulemakings or adjudications in which your agency is presently engaged; and o To analyze a generic administrative law topic (for example: congressional oversight of agency action, or judicial review of agency action, or public participation in agency action) in the context of your chosen agency. -5- Administrative Law Fall 2013 Professor Amanda C. Leiter Leiter@wcl.american.edu OHs Wed. 3:15-5, Room 470 SYLLABUS Topic 1 2 3 I. Introduction A. What is administrative law? B. A walk through the APA C. Intro to agency choice of form II. Legislative Control of Administrative Agencies A. Authorization: The Problem of Delegation B. Revision: The Legislative Veto 4 C. Appropriations: The Line Item Veto D. Oversight: Hearings and Legislation Reading Reading A (posted on MyWCL) Reading B (posted on MyWCL) APA §§ 551, 553558, 701-706 (CDBF 982-83, 988-94, 995-97) CDBF 15-33 CDBF 34-62 SKIM APA ch. 8 (CDBF 997-1002) III. Executive Control of Administrative Agencies 5 A. Appointment CDBF 62-97 B. Removal C. Independent Agencies 6 7 IV. Judicial Control of Administrative Agencies A. Standards of Review under the APA 1. A&C Review of Questions of Fact or Policy Reread APA ch. 7 (CDBF 995-97) CDBF 111-127 CDBF 127-155 2. Judicial Review of Questions of Law 8 a) Pre-Chevron CDBF 155-181 b) Chevron 9 10 [Chevron continued] c) The Mead Mess 3. Arbitration and the Substantial Evidence Standard B. Judicial Remedies for Unlawful Agency Action -6- CDBF 181-198 CDBF 199-229 Administrative Law Fall 2013 Topic Professor Amanda C. Leiter Leiter@wcl.american.edu OHs Wed. 3:15-5, Room 470 SYLLABUS Reading C. Barriers to Judicial Review 1. Jurisdiction 11 2. Reviewability CDBF 231-261 a) Agency Action b) Statutory Preclusion 12 13 14 c) Committed to Agency Discretion 3. Standing CDBF 261-284 CDBF 297-345 4. Ripeness CDBF 345-369 5. Exhaustion V. The Agency Toolbox A. Choice of Form 15 1. Due Process & Statutory Constraints on Choice of Form Reread APA ch. 5 (CDBF 982-94) CDBF 379-397 2. Agency Authority to Issue Rules 16 3. Agency Authority to Make Policy by Order after Adjudication CDBF 397-414 17 4. Agency Authority to Make Policy by Manuals and Guidance Documents CDBF 414-424 18 19 Reread APA § 553 (CDBF 988-89) B. Rulemaking 1. Procedures: Notice & Comment 2. Political Influence on Rulemaking 3. Impartiality of the Rulemaker CDBF 424-447 CDBF 448-474 20 4. Hybrid Procedures CDBF 474-490 21 5. Exemptions from 553 CDBF 490-513 22 6. Alternatives to 553 CDBF 513-528 -7- Administrative Law Fall 2013 Topic Professor Amanda C. Leiter Leiter@wcl.american.edu OHs Wed. 3:15-5, Room 470 SYLLABUS Reading 7. Analytical Tools to Formulate Policy 23 a) Presidential Oversight CDBF 528-554 b) Cost-Benefit Analysis 24 25 c) Impact Statements C. Adjudication 1. Agency Authority to Adjudicate CDBF 554-568 CDBF 569-580 26 2. Due Process: Application CDBF 580-616 27 3. Due Process: Hearing Rights CDBF 616-631 28 4. Due Process: Hearing Rights, cont’d CDBF 631-677 -8-