What is ECRI?
Council of Europe’s independent anti-racism monitoring body, established 1993
47 countries/experts + secretariat in
Strasbourg
Broad, evolving mandate : “combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, antisemitism and intolerance in greater
Europe from the perspective of the protection of human rights ”
ECRI’s Working Methods: Country Reports
Gathering information on:
International and national legal framework
Work of equality bodies
Discrimination in various realms (labour market, housing, access to goods/services, education, health, justice, etc.)
Racist expression and violence
Work of police and law enforcement
Climate of opinion and political discourse
Situation of vulnerable groups
ECRI’S Working Methods:
Contact Visits and Dialogue
Contact visits of 3 days to 1 week every 5 years
Dialogue with authorities during drafting of reports
Formulating recommendations and identifying issues of priority concern
Transmitting reports to authorities and publication
Interim follow-up 2 years after
Occasionally – statements about urgent situations
ECRI’S Working Methods:
Work on General Themes
Collecting best practices
General Policy Recommendations (13 so far, latest on “anti-Gypsism”)
Commissioned research (e.g., political discourse, ethnic data, impact of crisis)
Conferences (e.g., freedom of expression)
Regular seminars with “equality bodies”
ECRI’s Working Methods:
Cooperation with Civil Society
Organization of national roundtables
Promoting dialogue between authorities and other stakeholders
Raising awareness of challenges to address
Regular exchange of information with NGOs
Active work with media
(Re-)Current Challenges
Most common target groups:
Roma
Muslims
Immigrants, asylum-seekers, refugees
Blacks and other visually distinct groups
Jews
Emerging Challenges (I)
Impact of the crisis:
Direct: budget cuts affecting programmes for vulnerable groups, equality bodies
Indirect: toughening of migration debate, fertile ground for racist groups
Shift in immigrant integration debate:
From “right” or “need” to “duty” or “obligation”
Key: non-discrimination, non-stigmatization
Right-wing populist parties = fixtures
How best to cope? Suppress public funding, prosecute hate speech, self-regulation, political strategies (exclude, defuse, engage, adopt, etc.)
New media and racism
How best to cope? Legal measures, complaints mechanisms, self-regulation, international cooperation
We agree! Cities = main focus of mixing, try to visit cities beyond capital
ECRI’s recommendations addressed to govts., but action often required locally
ECCAR’s 10 point plan: similar to ECRI’s focus
(e.g., discrimination, civil society involvement)
ECRI urges ratifying Convention on
Participation in Public Life at Local Level
ECRI & Cities: Overlap with ECCAR
Monitoring and data collection
Employment: equal opportunities, dialogue between social partners, work on GPR
Housing: research on exclusion, development of affordable social housing
Education: challenging exclusion (esp. Roma, newcomers), teacher training (GPR 10)
Hate crime: legislation, penalty enhancement, training
Intercultural Dialogue and Cooperation?
Key to overcoming social distance, which breeds prejudice and discrimination
ECCAR Action Plan #9: “Promoting cultural diversity ”: audiovisual material, cultural projects, public space, “memory politics” – excellent!
ECRI’s work complements ECCAR
Two Council of Europe resources on intercultural dialogue with ECRI input:
White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue
“Living Together as Equals in Dignity”
(2008)
Report of the Group of Eminent Persons
“Living Together: Combining Diversity and Freedom in 21st-Century Europe ”
(2011)
White Paper: Some Key Points
Need to combat barriers to intercultural dialogue: ignorance of language, discrimination, poverty, exclusion, racism, intolerance
Learning/teaching intercultural competences: democratic citizenship, language, history
Creating spaces for intercultural dialogue: town planning, cultural activities, museums/heritage sites, media, sport, workplace, etc.
Report “Living Together”: Some Key Points
Extending citizenship and voting rights
Key role of authorities, celebrities and those with access to media
Need for realistic picture of situation of migrants, Europe’s current/future needs
Specific needs of Roma
Fair treatment and burden-sharing on asylumseekers
ECRI’s approach to Intercultural Dialogue
Discrimination as barrier to dialogue
Combat segregation in education, elsewhere due to other reasons (e.g., settlement patterns)
Change the climate of opinion
Penalise racist expression & ban racist organizations
Suppress public financing for racist parties and restrict their access to public broadcasters
Training and awareness-raising
Self-regulation in politics and media
Addressing barriers to dialogue through empowerment
Language training for migrants and minorities
Assistance in pass citizenship, integration tests
Promoting minority involvement, participation and representation
ECRI encourages integration: a two-way process of mutual recognition between majority population and minority groups
Integration ≠ assimilation
Key elements: freedom from racism, nondiscrimination, equal opportunities for all, freedom of religious beliefs and cultural practices, diversity, respect for others
Intercultural dialogue in some ECRI GPRs:
GPR 10 on education : policies to avoid separation, minority staff recruitment, interpretation and/or language courses for parents, mediators, diversity in textbooks, teacher training;
GPR 12 on sports : policies to promote minority access/representation, sports outreach activities to bring people together, mechanisms for reporting/ dealing with racist behaviour, avoiding stereotyping in advertising
Cooperation between ECRI and ECCAR?
Please send us information/research on racism and measures to combat it in cities!
Please receive our delegations on contact visits!
Please participate in our roundtables!
Possible cooperation on thematic work?
Secretariat of ECRI
Council of Europe
E-mail: combat.racism@coe.int
Visit our website: www.coe.int/ecri