EASTERN SAMAR STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NURSING Philippine History and Constitution Activity No. 2 “The Philippine Constitution” Submitted by: GEROY, GISELLE C. 08 – 22704 Submitted to: RAY DOMINIC R. LADERA Instructor Date March 05, 2012 Page 2 of 18 Course: Philippine History and Constitution Activity No. 2: The Constitution 1. Discuss the three major steps in changing the constitution. The three major steps in changing the constitution are the following: Congress – it is a constituent assembly or body that is empowered to propose amendments. Remember, Congress is basically a legislative body, not a constituent body. It needs to pass a resolution to turn itself into a constituent assembly. Constitutional Convention – members of a Constitutional Convention are elected by qualified votes. The delegates or members are the direct representatives of the people in framing the fundamental law. Electorate – this refers to the qualified voters through popular initiative. The power of the people to directly propose a change in the constitution is enshrined in the 1987 Constitution Art. XVII, Sec. 2. It cannot be found in the 1935 or 1973 Constitution. Qualified voters herein referred to are citizens who are 18 years old, registered voters, and have none of the disqualifications provided by law (Art. V, Sec. 1). Two Steps for Amendments or Revision 1. Proposal – means that contemplated changes are formulated or expressed in a written statement. Art. XVIII states that; Section 1 – Any amendment to or revision of this constitution may be proposed by: Congress upon a vote of three – fourths of all its members A constitutional Convention 2. Ratification or Approval of People – this upholds the principle that “sovereignty resides in people and all government authority emanates from them”. a.) Why is there a need to change the constitution? Justify your answer. New political developments and circumstances may require that the fundamental law of the land be modified accordingly. Now, if the needed modification cannot be carried out within a reasonable period of time, problems may ensue. If the constitution cannot ride with the genuine wave for change, the good of the nation may not be realized. Public interest will suffer. People will only violate an obsolete rule that does not answer their Philippine History and Constitution – Eastern Samar State University – College of Nursing Page 3 of 18 needs and aspirations for a better life. Worst, a revolution may be thought of as an answer to the necessary change. b.) What are the advantage and the disadvantage of constitutional change? The following are the advantages of constitutional change: Changing of the form of government from presidential to parliamentary. Election of senators by regions to correct the unbalanced representation in the senate. Returning of police control to the local government. The return of a two-party system. The multi-party system has caused confusion in the electoral system and is likely to elect a minority president. Reversion to the safer provision that the government has the prime duty to protect the people and the state. The military as protector of the people is a dangerous provision (Art. II, Sec. 3). Others see it as a chance for the military to excuse themselves and wrest power from duly constituted authorities when a political crisis occurs. To allow foreign investors to own land and operate public utilities such transportation, electricity, and telecommunications. Provision that will specify to whom the President will tender his resignation in case of his resignation. The following are the disadvantages of the constitutional change: The 1987 Constitution is still young. Changing the Constitution often is not good for the country. We have had four major constitutions. The United States Constitution since 1790 has never been replaced. Its first amendment was only after 10 years. To date, the Philippine Constitution has been amended 27 times and the last was in 10992. Majority of the people as shown by surveys are against it (7 out of 10 are against it according to the Social Weather Station ) (Philippine Daily Inquirer, June, 1999) Reforms can be done through ordinary legislation. Amending the constitution, especially the Congress as a constituent assembly will open the floodgates to political amendments that will benefit members of Congress. An example is the lifting of terms of limits. Most of our Congressmen now are on their last term. Philippine History and Constitution – Eastern Samar State University – College of Nursing Page 4 of 18 c.) Differentiate the Ramos, Estrada, and Arroyo Administration in their plan to amend or change the constitution? During the former President Ramos administration his proposal for amendment to the 1987 Constitution through people initiative was criticized for political aspects, and the Ramos Charter Change (CHACHA). Whereas, the Estrada counterpart was on economic reforms. He called his proposal for constitutional change as “Constitutional Corrections and Development” (CONCORD), according to him there are provisions in the constitution that need correction so as to attune the country to the changing needs of the globalized world and finally, attain economic development that will benefit the poor. Estrada also proposed that foreign investors own: 100% of corporations they would likely to put up in the Philippines; lands (Art. XII, Sec. 11); public utilities (Art. XII, Sec 11); mass media (Art. XVI, Sec 11 (1), advertising (Art. XVI, Sec 12 (2); and educational institutions (Art. XIV, Sec. 4 (2); exploration and development of natural resources (Art. XII, Sec. 2). However, President Estrada may, to certain degree, have been correct on his proposed amendments to the constitution for thr practical considerations in view of the country’s inability to provide jobs for the millions who are unemployed. By all indication, PGMA who was catapulted to the presidency in 2001 by People Power II, is also for changing the present constitution. The pronouncements of her political supporters in Congress point to changing the present presidential system to parliamentary system, adoption of a federal government to that of the unitary government and a return to unicameral Congress. 2. Discuss the Philippine Territory a. Compare the 1935, 1973, and 1987 definition of National Territory 1935 Constitution Article 1 National Territory SECTION 1 The Philippines comprises all the territory ceded to the United States by the Treaty of Paris concluded and Spain on the tenth day of December eighteen hundred and ninety – eight, the limits of which are set forth in Article III of said treaty, together with all the islands embraced in the treaty conclude at Washington, between the United States and Spain on the seventh day of November, nineteen hundred, and in the treaty concluded between the United States and Great Britain on the second day of January, nineteen hundred thirty, and all territory over which the present Government of the Philippine Islands exercises jurisdiction. Philippine History and Constitution – Eastern Samar State University – College of Nursing Page 5 of 18 1973 Constitution Article 1 National Territory SECTION 1 The national territory comprises the Philippine archipelago, with all the islands and the waters embraced therein and all the other territories belonging to the Philippines by historic right or legal title, including the territorial sea, the air space, the subsoil, seabed, the insular shelves, and the other submarine areas over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction. The waters around, between and connecting the islands of the archipelago, irrespective of their breadth and dimensions, from part of the internal waters of the Philippines. 1987 Constitution Article 1 National Territory SECTION 1 The national territory comprises the Philippine archipelago, with all the islands and the waters embraced therein, and all the other territories over which islands and waters embraced therein, and all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction, consisting of its terrestrial, fluvial, and aerial domains, including its territorial sea, the seabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and other submarine areas. The waters around, between, and connecting the islands of the archipelago, regardless of their breadth and dimensions, from part of the internal waters of the Philippines. In 1973 Constitution, the phrase was originally worded “and all other territories belonging to the Philippines by historic right and legal title”. It was changed to the present phrase in the 1987 Constitution refers to Sabah and includes the Spratlys Islands. b. Define National Territory and its components The national territory comprises the Philippine archipelago, with all the islands and waters embraced therein, and all other territories, over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction, consisting of its terrestial, fluvial, and aerial domains, including its territorial sea, the seabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and other submarine areas. The waters around, between, and connecting the islands of the archipelago, regardless of their breadth and dimensions, from part of the internal waters of the Philippines. Philippine History and Constitution – Eastern Samar State University – College of Nursing Page 6 of 18 Article I, Section I provides what comprises our national territory, these are: A. The Philippine Archipelago with all the Islands and Waters Embraced Therein The term archipelago is derived from the Greek word pelagos which means sea. Archipelago is that part of the sea studded with islands. The sea and the islands are considered as a single geographical unit. The archipelago that is referred to in Article I, Sec. 1 includes; 1. Those ceded by Spain to the US according to the Treaty of Paris on December 10, 1898; 2. Those that were included according to the Treaty of Washington on November 7, 1900 between US and Spain, which were not included in the Treaty of Paris. These are the islands of Cagayan, Sulu, and Sibuto; 3. Those which were identified in the Treaty with Great Britain on January 2, 1930 between US and Great Britain, such as the Turtle Islands and the Mangsee Islands; and 4. The islands of Batanes, which were included under the Treaty of Paris and consequently, covered under the 1935 constitution. B. All other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction These refer to territories already acquired or will be acquired in the future according to international law. These include Batanes Islands, which was left out under the Treaty of Paris. It pertains also to Sabah, Spratly Islands in the China Sea, and Marianas Islands that includes Guam in the Pacific. In the 1973 Constitution, the phrase was originally worded “and all other territories belonging to the Philippines by historic right and legal title”. It was changed to the present phrase to avoid direct referral to our claim to Sabah, which Malaysia detests. This change was aimed to improve Philippine relations with Malaysia. It does not mean, however, that we drop our claim to Sabah. This phrase does not actually claim nor disclaim Sabah but there is no obstacle to pursue our claim on it under Public International Law (Nolledo, 1994). C. The terrestrial, fluvial, and aerial domains The fluvial domains, aside from its external waters, are: 1. The territorial sea, which extends 12 nautical miles (19 kms) from the shore. It is also called “marginal sea” or “marine belt”. It is the belt of waters, which are adjacent or parallel to the coastline of the state, outside of the internal waters. Philippine History and Constitution – Eastern Samar State University – College of Nursing Page 7 of 18 2. The seabed or the seafloor. It is the land holding the sea extending from the shore. It is simply the bottom of the territorial sea. 3. The subsoil, which is the soil layer beneath the surface soil of the territorial sea or seabed. 4. The insular shelves or the continental shelves. It is that submerged portion of the continent or offshore, extending to a point of steep descent to the ocean floor. It consists of the seabed and subsoil of the submarine areas adjacent to the shore but outside of the territorial sea, to a depth of 200 meters and beyond. 5. Other submarine areas, which refer to those areas under the territorial sea called as refers, basins, shoal, and the like. D. The Islands Waters There are three kinds of waters of these. These are: 1. Internal or inland waters (referred to as national waters); 2. Territorial sea; and 3. High seas The internal or inland waters are the waters around, between, and connecting the islands of the archipelago. They are in same category as inland rivers or lakes which are subject to the exclusive use and exploitation of the state. The internal waters are referred to comprise as national waters. The inland waters and the territorial sea comprise what is known as the territorial waters of the state in which state exercises sovereignty and exclusive domain just like its land territory. However, through the principle of right of innocent passage foreign ships can pass through the territorial sea of a state subject to regulations imposed by the state. But the open seas or high seas that lie seaward of the territorial sea or are beyond the territorial sea are international waters and therefore, every state has the equal right of use and not subject to sovereignty of any state. c. Define Archipelago Doctrine The Philippine is one of the largest archipelagos in the world lies southeast of the Southeast Asian region, directly below Taiwan. It is bounded by the South China Sea on the West, the Pacific Ocean on the east, the Sulu Sea and the Celebes Sea on the south, and the Bashi Tunnel on the north. The Philippines is composed of about 7,200 small and large islands scattered over some 1,295,000 square kilometers of oceanic waters. Its total land area is 300,000 square kilometers. Only 2,700 islands are named, and the eleven largest islands account for almost 95% of the land and Philippine History and Constitution – Eastern Samar State University – College of Nursing Page 8 of 18 population. The waters surrounding them, or in between them, may separate one or more islands from the Philippine territory, if these waters which are around, between, and connecting the islands (Sec. I) are not recognized by the international community as part of the national territory. That is why, the Philippines’ position was made clear in the International Convention on the law of the Sea held in Geneva, Switzerland in 1958 which established the three-mile rule. The three-mile established the delineation of territorial waters of a state which is three miles away from its baseline. If this rule will apply, the Philippine waters, which may not covered, will become international waters or open seas. It will also cause the separation of the Visayas by the Sibuyan Sea or Sulu and Palawan by the Mindanao Strait. The three-mile rule therefore, is not applicable to the Philippines considering also the security problems it will cause. d. Justify the Philippine claim to the Kalayaan Group of Islands and Sabah The Philippine Claim on Spratlys (Kalayaan Group of Island) The Spratlys is a chain of more than 100 islands, cays, reefs, and shoals in the South China Sea. There are five countries, aside from the Philippines, who are actively contesting sovereignty and ownership of these islands. These are China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Brunei, and Malaysia claim all the islands in the Spratlys. The Philippines claims only a group of 50 to 60 islands, islets, shoal, cays, and reefs on the westerns section of the Spratlys which it calls Kalayaan Group of Islands (KGI). All of these claimant countries have soldiers stationed on their occupied islands except Brunei, making the Srpatlys is important to all claimant countries because it is believed to be rich in oil and natural gas reserves aside from the fishery resources. It is also a vital shipping route for commerce and transport from the Persian Gulf to China Sea and to the Pacific (Lim,1996). The Philippine claim on the Spratlys started when Tomas Cloma, a fishing magnete and founder of a nautical school (Philippine Maritime Academy), sent a note to then Vice President and Foreign Affairs Secretary Carlos P. Garcia on May 15 and again on May 26, 1956, claiming that he had discovered in 1947, and had occupied what has called Freedomland Archipelago(Batungbacal, 1999). He claimed it by virtue of “discovery and effective occupation” in his private capacity and not in behalf of the government of the Philippines. Taiwan and Vietnam, upon learning of Cloma’s claim, asserted their claim on the Spratlys Islands. Vietnam drove Cloma out of the island on the same year and stationed a naval force in Itu aba, the largest island on the Spratlys. Vietnam sent a destroyer to patrol the area and announced its annexation of the islands to one of its provinces (Ibid, 1999). This proded Cloma to try to convince Philippine History and Constitution – Eastern Samar State University – College of Nursing Page 9 of 18 the Philippine government to espouse his claim to the United Nations but to no avail. Thereafter, on July 6, 1956, he published in the newspaper his declaration of a separate government for the “Free Territory of Freedom land ” with himself as head of the Supreme Council of State. But the formal claim of the Philippines on KGI started when it occupied some of the islands in 1970. The biggest of these is the Pagasa Island in which an airship was built and Filipino soldiers were stationed. Claimant countries scrambled to occupy the islands after the Philippines placed troops and declared that it was making an official claim on the KGI. President Marcos issued P. D. 1956 on June 11, 1978 declaring the KGI as part of Philippine territory and created it as a municipality of Palawan. On the same date, P.D. 1599 was also issued establishing the delimitation of the EEZ, which covers the KGI. The Philippine claim on Sabah The Philippine claim on Sabah has a long historical basis compared to its claim on the Spratlys. In 1704, North Borneo, which is now called Sabah, was given as a gift to the Sultan of Sulu by the Sultan of Brunei when the former was able to help the latter in quelling a rebellion. Hence, the Sultan of Sulu acquired soveignty on North Borneo. In 1978, at the height of the Spanish attack on Sulu, the heir to the Sultanate of Sulu, Sultan Jamadul Alam, leased North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company owned by an Austrian national, Gustavos von Overbeck and his British business partner, Alfred Dent. The company administered the territory up to 1946 and paid the Sultan of Sulu an annual rent of $5,000 Malaysian dollars which was increased to $5,300 in 1903 (Currents 1997). During that time, Malaysia was already under British control but the British did not claim sovereignty over Sabah. However, in 1946, the British government annexed and took over Sabah despite its earlier pronouncements that it had no right to claim sovereignty over Sabah (Rasul, 1989). e. Search on the Treaty of Paris, What does it contain? The treaty of peace between the United States and Spain was signed at Paris by the respective commissioners on the 10th day of December, 1898, and ratified by their' governments a few months later. Spain agreed to cede to the United States the Philippine Archipelago in consideration of receiving $20,000,000. Article 8 of the Treaty declares that "the abandonment and cession stipulated shall in no way affect the property and rights accorded by custom or law to the peaceful holders of goods of any sort in the provinces, cities, public or private establishments, civil or ecclesiastical corporations, or any other collectively which has any legal right to acquire goods, or Philippine History and Constitution – Eastern Samar State University – College of Nursing Page 10 of 18 rights in the ceded or abandoned territories, and the same applies to the rights and properties of individuals of every nationality whatsoever." Article 9 recites that "Spanish subjects born in the Peninsula and resident in the territories, the sovereignty of which Spain abandons, or cedes, may remain in, or go away from, those territories and still hold, in their case, their property rights as well as the right to sell, or dispose of, the real estate, or its produce. They shall also have the right to follow their trades, or professions, subject to the laws affecting all other foreigners." It is easy to comprehend the grief and anger with which the Filipinos learned the terms of the Treaty of Paris. Apparently the friars were as firmly entrenched as ever. The Americans had given them a title to the lands which the natives protested had been stolen from their rightful owners. Their archenemy with whom they had struggled for many years appeared to have the support of the powerful Government of the United States, for no intimation of the ultimate action of the American authorities in the disposition of the friars' lands had as yet been given. The insurgent leaders were thoroughly disgusted with the turn of events, and it must be confessed that they had no little ground for their discontent. The money which they had received from the Spanish Government ($400,000) as a condition of surrender in 1897, had been carefully husbanded for the future struggle that they anticipated and had been expended in their operations supporting the American invasion. There is no doubt that someone, who they had reason to suppose was authorized to speak for the American Government, had assured the Junta Patriotica in Hong Kong that they might look for the independence of the Philippines to follow American success in wresting the islands from Spain. The expectations of the Filipinos were strengthened by Admiral Dewey's action in bringing Aguinaldo and his lieutenants to Manila in an American war vessel; in supplying them with arms; and in employing them in the ensuing cramping. The services rendered by the insurgents during the three months that the American fleet lay in Manila Bay, quite unable for lack of troops to take advantage of the naval victory, should not be lightly estimated. Even after the arrival of reinforcements from America, the revolutionary forces afforded valuable assistance in the reduction of the city and afterwards in holding the island and maintaining order. To have granted independence to the Philippines at that time would have been to visit the people with a greater misfortune than a continuance of the rule of the friars, and it is weIl that the American Government did not entertain either idea. But it can hardly be questioned that both policy and justice demanded prompt and substantial recognition of the services of the leaders in the Filipino rebellion. Had this been done it is probable that Aguinaldo and his companions could have been induced to lay down their arms and to submit to the authority of the American Government. That they continued the contest for Philippine History and Constitution – Eastern Samar State University – College of Nursing Page 11 of 18 the possession of their country - a contest in which they had already sacrificed fifty thousand lives - is not to their discredit. Senator Hoar, addressing Congress on the subject, said: "Mr. President, there is one mode by which the people of the Philippine Islands could establish the truth of the charges as to their degradation and incapacity for self-government which have been made by the advocates of Imperalism in this debate, and that mode is by submitting tamely and without resistance to the United States." There had been serious friction, bordering at times upon open rupture, between the American and insurgent troops from the time of the arrival of the former, but it was not until February, 1899, that the ill-advised and hopeless armed opposition of the Filipinos to the United States Government began. It is impossible to determine the responsibility for the immediate outbreak. Each side accused the other of undue precipitancy and aggravation, hut the question is of little consequence. The subjugation of the insurrectos was accomplished under extreme difficulties. The native troops are maintained a guerilla war for years, retreating to the mountains, or the jungle, when pressed, and only attacking in overwhelming numbers. The capture of Aguinaldo broke the back of the resistance, and although a few armed bodies remained at large in different parts of the Archipelago, the Philippine Commission was able to certify on September the 11th, 1902, that ,"The recently existing insurrection of the Philippine Islands has ceased and a condition of general and complete peace has been established therein." At this point it may be well to sketch in outline the system of administration under the Spaniards. We shall thereby gain some idea of the task which was presented to the American Government upon taking over the islands, the extent of its achievement up to the present, and the difficulties yet to be overcome. 3. Discuss the State a. Discuss the definition of State Section 4 of the 1987 Constitution, which states that; The prime duty of the Government is not the defense of the state but to serve and protect the people. The government may call upon the people to defend that state and, in the fulfillment thereof, all citizens may be required, under conditions provided by law, to render personal, military, or civil service. b. The Separation of Church and State Both the 1973 and 1987 constitutions express the separation of church and state. They also declare its inviolability. Article III, Sec. 5, of the 1987 Constitution reiterates the separation of church and the state which prohibits any law to be made respecting the establishment of religion and curtailing its free exercise. By this, it is meant that the Philippine History and Constitution – Eastern Samar State University – College of Nursing Page 12 of 18 state cannot declare an official religion for its citizens nor prohibit the formation of any religion for its citizens nor prohibit the formation of any religion as long as such religion does not violate the laws of the state. It is also means that the state cannot aid one religion and disregard another. The principle of separation of church and state is seen by others as the application of the biblical admonition, render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s and unto God the things that are God’s. This principle prohibits both the church and the state to interfere in each other’s affairs. c. Define Local Government, its composition, organization, and function Local government refers to a municipal corporation. A municipal corporation is a public corporation created by the government for political purposes with subordinate and local powers of legislation (Martin, 1970). Simply put, local government refers to the political subdivision of the state commonly referred to as barangay, municipalities, cities, and provinces (Art.X, Sec. 1 and De Guzman and Reforma, 1988). R.A. 7160 provides autonomy or limited self-rule to local government units through decentralization to promote government efficiency at the local level. Decentralization here means the transfer or the sharing of the powers of the national government with the local government. Senator Paterno proposed three areas for the government’s decentralization which was incorporated in R.A. 7160, these areas are decentralization in functions; authorities and budget (Paterno, 1989). Two types of Decentralization: 1. Political Decentralization or Decentralization of Power. It involves the transfer of powers to the local government. Also known as devolution, political decentralization refers to the act by which the national government confers power and authority upon the various local government units to perform specific fuctions and responsibilities (Sec. 17-e R.A. 7160). Among the government functions and services transferred are those concerning health, social welfare and development, agriculture, public works, tourism, public buildings and other facilities, population development, and environment and natural resources. Personnel are also devolved. 2. Administrative Decentralization or Decentralization of Administration It involves the delegation of administrative power by broadening the bas of government power and in the process, making the local government more responsive and accountable. The delegation of administrative power relieves the national Philippine History and Constitution – Eastern Samar State University – College of Nursing Page 13 of 18 government from the burden of managing the local affairs relieves the national government from the burden of managing the local affairs and concentrate on national concerns. Sections 5 and 6 Article X deal with the taxing power s of local government units and the automatic release of share of national taxes. Section 5. Each local government unit shall have the power to create its own resources for the revenue and to levy taxes, fees, and charges subject to such guidelines and limitations as the Congress may provide, consistent with the basic policy of local autonomy. Such taxes, fees, and charges shall accure exclusively to the governments. Section 6. Local government units shall have a just share, as determined by law, in the national taxes which shall be automatically released to them. The 1987 Constitution has numerous provisions that acknowledge and encourage people’s participation in the government affairs (Art.II, sec. 23; Art. X, Sec. 14; art. XIII, Sec. 15 and Sec. 16). The Local Government Code also provides for a stronger participation of people’s organization(POs) and nongovernment organizations (NGOs).In local governance to make them active partners in pursuit of local autonomy. It defines people’s organizations as “bona fide associations of citizens with demonstrated capacity to promote the public interest and with identifiable leadership, membership and structure”. (Art. 13, Sec. 15). The difference between POs and NGOs is that, POs are membership – based organizations while NGOs are non- membership, small organizations possessing specialist knowledge. According to the Local Government Code of 1991, the participation of POs, NGOs and private sectors in the local governance include the following: 1. Membership in local development councils or local special boards, which shall not be less than ¼ of the total membership of the fully organized councils (Rule XIII, ar. 62 – 63). The POs or NGOs operating in the province, municipality, or barangay must be accredited by the local government unit concerned and shall choose from among themselves their representatives in the following Local Special Bodies (LSBs) which are formed in barangays, municipalities, or cities, and provinces: Philippine History and Constitution – Eastern Samar State University – College of Nursing Page 14 of 18 a. Local Development Council which is tasked to formulate, coordinate, monitor and evaluate socioeconomic development programs and projects; b. Local Prequalification Bids and awards committee which is responsible for the conduct of prequalification’s of contractors, bidding, evaluation of bids, and the recommendation of awards concerning local infrastructure projects; c. Local School Board which determines the annual supplemental budgetary needs for the operations and maintenance of public schools and serve as an advisory committee on educational matters; d. Local Health Boards which propose annual supplemental budgetary needs for the operations and maintenance of public schools and serve as an advisory committee on educational matters; e. Local Peace and Order Councils which formulate programs and acts as an advisory committee on local peace and order concerns; f. People’s Law Enforcement Board which shall have jurisdiction to hear and decide on citizen’s complaints or cases filed before it against erring officers and members of the Philippines national Police (PNP); 2. Sectoral representation in local legislative councils (women and labor sectors); 3. Preferential treatment by the LGUs for local cooperatives; and 4. Mandatory consultations by the national agencies with the appropriate POs and NGOs before the implementation of a project (Rule XI, Art. 54) especially those that may cause population or depletion of nonrenewable resources. A civil society is composed of nongovernment organizations, people’s organizations, labor organizations, women’s groups and youth, religious and environmental groups. It includes the academe, social and civic clubs, media, and other kinds of group or associations with similar or different political persuasions. Members of the civil society use different means to push their goals. They lobby in government offices, conduct press conferences, write letters to their representatives in government or take to the streets to press their interests. They become a political force to reckon with and challenge the traditional politics in which power emanates only from above. Philippine History and Constitution – Eastern Samar State University – College of Nursing Page 15 of 18 The three sectors – government, business sector and civil society, create triad linkages in governance to attain and sustain human development an advance the people’s welfare. Business sector – composed of different institutions established to earn profit through the production and distribution of goods and services (e.g., commercial houses, banking, industries, retail trade, service sector and others) Government – embodied by people and agencies that implement the law and administer the activities of the state Civil society – causes the mobilization of the people for participation in economic in economic, political, or social undertakings. d. What is the role of women in gender equality? Article II, Sec. 14 is recognition of the vital role of women in our society. It states: “The state recognizes the role of women in nation building and shall ensure the fundamental equality before the law of women and men.” e. The Bill of Rights There will be three (3) cases that will be posted at wikispaces under PhilHistConsti page. Select only one (1) of these cases, and justify your answer based on the following questions. Case1 Aling Loring, a 43 year old mother of three and lives in Pasay is a sidewalk vendor for almost two decades now. He was informed by a friend that particular street on Sampaloc, Manila was a good spot to sell various items like clothes, accessories, and candies etc. Wanting to earn more, Aling Loring went to a street in Sampaloc. Only few hours after setting her goodies in a sidewalk, two policemen grabbed her by the shoulders and took all her items into a large bag and brought her to the police precinct and informed her that because it was illegal to sell items on that particular area. As for her violations, according to the police, all her items were confiscated and were divided among policemen within the precinct. She was not also allowed to talk to anyone while in custody. She was informed to wait for available lawyer to settle her case but no such lawyer was provided. She was detained in the precinct cell for three weeks. She begged the policemen to give back her items and goodies but she was just threatened and told that she would have more violations if ever she speaks Philippine History and Constitution – Eastern Samar State University – College of Nursing to anyone about it. Page 16 of 18 One police officer even brought her to one room and asked her take off her clothes and dance for him which she out rightly refused. The officer threatened her more and verbally abused her. She wore the same clothes for the entire three weeks, with only bread and coffee as meals. Her floor of her cell served as her bed and comfort room at the same time. She pleaded to talk to her children in exchange of her silence about everything that had happened to her. She was still not released. 1. a. What is the in the bill of rights that was violated? Completely site the provisions and justify the answer. Bill of Rights Violated: Section 2. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures of whatever nature and for any purpose shall be inviolable, and no search warrant or warrant of arrest shall issue except upon probable cause to be determined personally by the judge after examination under oath or affirmation of the complainant and the witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized. Aling Loring, a sidewalk vendor for almost two decades in particular street on Sampaloc, Manila sells various items like clothes, accessories, and candies etc. Only few hours after setting her goodies in a sidewalk, two policemen grabbed her by the shoulders and took all her items into a large bag and brought her to the police precinct and informed her that because it was illegal to sell items on that particular area. As for her violations, according to the police, all her items were confiscated and were divided among policemen within the precinct. Section 4. No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances. She begged the policemen to give back her items and goodies but she was just threatened and told that she would have more violations if ever she speaks to anyone about it. Section 12. (1) Any person under investigation for the commission of an offense shall have the right to be informed of his right to remain silent and to have competent and independent counsel preferably of his own choice. If the person cannot afford the services of counsel, he must be provided with one. These rights cannot be waived except in writing and in the presence of counsel. Philippine History and Constitution – Eastern Samar State University – College of Nursing Page 17 of 18 She was informed by the policemen to wait for available lawyer to settle her case but no such lawyer was provided. She was detained in the precinct cell for three weeks. (2) No torture, force, violence, threat, intimidation, or any other means which vitiate the free will shall be used against him. Secret detention places, solitary, incommunicado, or other similar forms of detention are prohibited. One police officer even brought her to one room and asked her take off her clothes and dance for him which she out rightly refused. The officer threatened her more and verbally abused her. She wore the same clothes for the entire three weeks, with only bread and coffee as meals. Her floor of her cell served as her bed and comfort room at the same time. She pleaded to talk to her children in exchange of her silence about everything that had happened to her. She was still not released. b. How can the accused invoke his constitutional rights? The accused, Aling Loring has the right to defend herself and has a need to have a great lawyer in order to invoke her constitutional rights. She just want to earn a living and was able to have an opportunity to stay in place start of her business. She was threatened verbally by the policeman. The vendor may be occupying the streets illegally, but this does not justify the violation of her rightful ownership of the unsold goods. It is basic in law that any property to be seized must be properly identified, inventoried, documented and signed by the confiscating officer for evidentiary purposes. Otherwise, the authorities can just appropriate the confiscated merchandise for their own use. Even valuable books being sold on Recto Avenue were confiscated by the authorities without the necessary inventory receipt. Philippine History and Constitution – Eastern Samar State University – College of Nursing Page 18 of 18 References: Naguit, Reynaldo Discourse on the 1987 Philippine Constitution c.2005 Trinitas Pub.http://www.univie.ac.at/ksa/apsis/aufi/forbes/forbes55.htm http://philippines.ahrchk.net/news/mainfile.php/leg_sel/15/ http://opinion.inquirer.net/inquireropinion/letterstotheeditor/view/20080714-148266/Streetvendors-rights-violated Philippine History and Constitution – Eastern Samar State University – College of Nursing