• Athenian philosopher
• “Student” of Socrates
• Aristotle’s teacher
• Founded the Academy (Closed 525 AD;
Justinian)
• Composed many (preserved) dialogues on
1
The Apology
Ostensibly, the story of Socrates’ trial
Also represents Socrates’ conception of human nature as essentially rational
Background to the trial
Athenian democracy
Socrates the gadfly
Mocked in Aristophanes’ The Clouds
Socrates’ (divinely inspired) “inner voice” advises him
Apollo’s Oracle/Priestess at Delphi
“No one is wiser than Socrates”
Socrates says that he has no wisdom, small or great
Certainly not prominent Athenians
Neither politicians nor writers
Writers as “clairvoyants”!
2
From early rumor
Socrates paraphrases Aristophanes’ The Clouds:
"Socrates is an evil-doer, and a curious person, who searches into things under the earth and in heaven, and he makes the worse appear the better cause; and he teaches the aforesaid doctrines to others."
Current formal charge (Meletus, Anytus,
Lycon)
impiety
practices new (unsanctioned) religion does not recognize the State’s gods corruption of youth
3
Result of trial
Socrates’ sentenced to execution
expectation of exile
Plato’s rejection of democracy in the Republic
Socrates’ defense
Against the rumor (Aristophanes)
Socrates denies any special wisdom expect that he knows his own ignorance
Admits he’s embarrassed the pompous
4
Against impiety
Socrates recognizes some gods (e.g. Apollo) even if other philosophers (Anaxagoras) don’t
Socrates recognizes the Oracle of Delphi (Apollo’s representative) who says that no one is wiser than Socrates
Accusation of practice of new religion implies Socrates recognizes some gods, which contradicts accusation of atheism
5
Against corruption of youth
This is the critical accusation
Socratic Paradox as defense
All normal humans are rational
Rational creatures are designed to seek only value, only what is good, only what is right
Hence, rational creatures can’t be bad intentionally
Hence, rational creatures are robots of reason & not driven by emotion
6
“Paradox” means “beyond belief.” A paradox expresses something that is simultaneously credible and incredible.
Thus, Socratic Paradox regarding rationality:
To corrupt the youth is to make them evil
Evil youths would harm Socrates
No rational person would intentionally harm him/herself
Since Socrates is rational, he either
did not corrupt the youth or
did so only unintentionally
If he did not corrupt, he should not be punished
If he unintentionally corrupted the youths, he should be educated but not punished
Hence, in either case, Socrates should not be punished
7
A rational person will always and necessarily:
Try to do what he/she judges to be best
Never knowingly do what is wrong
Any behavior that appears wrong or immoral must result from
Ignorance of the immorality
Psychological impairment, malfunction or insanity
8
Rational persons act deliberately
Deliberation = the use of reason to select what is judged to be the best alternative action
So, rational persons always try to do what seems best
Hence, they never intentionally do what they think is wrong
Therefore, rational agents should never be punished for wrongdoing. At worst, they should be taught what is right or best. For once they know this, they will inevitably try to do what is right or best
Failure to try to do what is believed best = mental illness
9
Our inclination towards fallacy
Cognitive Biases ( Daniel Kahneman (Princeton Professor of
Cognitive Psychology and Behavorial Economics; Nobel Laureate in Economics) & Amos Tversky (Deceased Stanford Professor of
Cognitive Psychology)
gambler’s fallacy
selecting a car ordering effects on preferences
Impact Bias in predicting happiness
Daniel Gilbert: Harvard Professor of Social Psychology
His research indicates that humans chronically err in estimating how happy their activities and property will make them.
Failures in deployment of knowledge
Where are my glasses?
Calculation errors on math test
Tip of the tongue phenomenon
Rational wrong doing
Augustine: weakness of will
Hume: reason as slave of desire
10
The examined life is the life of a rational person who undertakes to know what is generally good and valuable in life
Only such a person may come to know what is best to do or how to live so as to optimize what is valuable in life.
11
The unexamined life is one in which a person does not attempt to know what is generally good and valuable in life
Such a person cannot rely on deliberation to guide life
Rationality is wasted in such a person. Such a person cannot hope to have a good or rewarding life
So, the unexamined life, is not worth living
12
Is deliberation driven by value rather than desire?
Is evil action the result of ignorance or insanity?
Are people really saints?
Is education the only appropriate response to
(unintentional) evil?
Are rational agents slaves to deliberation or are we free to do what is wrong?
13
Assume that as a rational person you
Inevitably seek what is most valuable in order to be happy
Rational deliberation optimizes your chance of securing what is most valuable and thereby being happy
Successful deliberation depends upon knowledge
Hence, your happiness depends on your actions being controlled by whomever is most knowledgeable, even if that is someone other than yourself
Hence you should surrender personal autonomy to whomever is more knowledgeable than you and committed to deliberating on your behalf to achieve what is most valuable for you
But wait! Is it better to be autonomous or ruled always and completely by whomever is wiser?
14