Apology

advertisement

• Athenian philosopher

• “Student” of Socrates

• Aristotle’s teacher

• Founded the Academy (Closed 525 AD;

Justinian)

• Composed many (preserved) dialogues on

morality, metaphysics and epistemology

1

The Apology

Ostensibly, the story of Socrates’ trial

Also represents Socrates’ conception of human nature as essentially rational

Background to the trial

Athenian democracy

Socrates the gadfly

Mocked in Aristophanes’ The Clouds

Socrates’ (divinely inspired) “inner voice” advises him

Apollo’s Oracle/Priestess at Delphi

 “No one is wiser than Socrates”

 Socrates says that he has no wisdom, small or great

 Certainly not prominent Athenians

 Neither politicians nor writers

 Writers as “clairvoyants”!

2

From early rumor

Socrates paraphrases Aristophanes’ The Clouds:

"Socrates is an evil-doer, and a curious person, who searches into things under the earth and in heaven, and he makes the worse appear the better cause; and he teaches the aforesaid doctrines to others."

Current formal charge (Meletus, Anytus,

Lycon)

 impiety

 practices new (unsanctioned) religion does not recognize the State’s gods corruption of youth

3

Result of trial

Socrates’ sentenced to execution

 expectation of exile

Plato’s rejection of democracy in the Republic

Socrates’ defense

Against the rumor (Aristophanes)

Socrates denies any special wisdom expect that he knows his own ignorance

Admits he’s embarrassed the pompous

4

Against impiety

Socrates recognizes some gods (e.g. Apollo) even if other philosophers (Anaxagoras) don’t

 Socrates recognizes the Oracle of Delphi (Apollo’s representative) who says that no one is wiser than Socrates

Accusation of practice of new religion implies Socrates recognizes some gods, which contradicts accusation of atheism

5

Against corruption of youth

This is the critical accusation

Socratic Paradox as defense

 All normal humans are rational

 Rational creatures are designed to seek only value, only what is good, only what is right

 Hence, rational creatures can’t be bad intentionally

 Hence, rational creatures are robots of reason & not driven by emotion

6

“Paradox” means “beyond belief.” A paradox expresses something that is simultaneously credible and incredible.

Thus, Socratic Paradox regarding rationality:

To corrupt the youth is to make them evil

Evil youths would harm Socrates

No rational person would intentionally harm him/herself

Since Socrates is rational, he either

 did not corrupt the youth or

 did so only unintentionally

If he did not corrupt, he should not be punished

If he unintentionally corrupted the youths, he should be educated but not punished

Hence, in either case, Socrates should not be punished

7

A rational person will always and necessarily:

Try to do what he/she judges to be best

Never knowingly do what is wrong

Any behavior that appears wrong or immoral must result from

Ignorance of the immorality

Psychological impairment, malfunction or insanity

8

Rational persons act deliberately

Deliberation = the use of reason to select what is judged to be the best alternative action

So, rational persons always try to do what seems best

Hence, they never intentionally do what they think is wrong

Therefore, rational agents should never be punished for wrongdoing. At worst, they should be taught what is right or best. For once they know this, they will inevitably try to do what is right or best

Failure to try to do what is believed best = mental illness

9

Our inclination towards fallacy

Cognitive Biases ( Daniel Kahneman (Princeton Professor of

Cognitive Psychology and Behavorial Economics; Nobel Laureate in Economics) & Amos Tversky (Deceased Stanford Professor of

Cognitive Psychology)

 gambler’s fallacy

 selecting a car ordering effects on preferences

Impact Bias in predicting happiness

 Daniel Gilbert: Harvard Professor of Social Psychology

 His research indicates that humans chronically err in estimating how happy their activities and property will make them.

Failures in deployment of knowledge

Where are my glasses?

Calculation errors on math test

 Tip of the tongue phenomenon

Rational wrong doing

Augustine: weakness of will

Hume: reason as slave of desire

10

The unexamined life is not worth living

The examined life is the life of a rational person who undertakes to know what is generally good and valuable in life

Only such a person may come to know what is best to do or how to live so as to optimize what is valuable in life.

11

The unexamined life is one in which a person does not attempt to know what is generally good and valuable in life

Such a person cannot rely on deliberation to guide life

Rationality is wasted in such a person. Such a person cannot hope to have a good or rewarding life

So, the unexamined life, is not worth living

12

Is deliberation driven by value rather than desire?

Is evil action the result of ignorance or insanity?

Are people really saints?

Is education the only appropriate response to

(unintentional) evil?

Are rational agents slaves to deliberation or are we free to do what is wrong?

13

Assume that as a rational person you

Inevitably seek what is most valuable in order to be happy

Rational deliberation optimizes your chance of securing what is most valuable and thereby being happy

Successful deliberation depends upon knowledge

Hence, your happiness depends on your actions being controlled by whomever is most knowledgeable, even if that is someone other than yourself

Hence you should surrender personal autonomy to whomever is more knowledgeable than you and committed to deliberating on your behalf to achieve what is most valuable for you

But wait! Is it better to be autonomous or ruled always and completely by whomever is wiser?

14

Download