7-26-05-Pay_for_perf.. - University of Washington

advertisement

A Short History of Healthcare in the 21st Century

The Regulatory Environment, Public

Reporting and Pay-for-Performance

(P4P)

Gene Peterson

Preston Simmons

Center for Clinical Excellence

University of Washington Medical Center

SIP #5

July 19, 2005

Goals for Today

 History of the regulatory environment

 History of the quality movement

 What are we as a hospital reporting now?

 Where is this going in the future?

 Will there be individual physician profiling on the same measures?

 One role of the Health Care Leader is to manage the

Environment of Care

 Complex Undertaking

“Regulatory Environment”, Spiegel and Kavaler, Risk management in Health

Care Institutions ,

 A flavor for regulations. Who regulates the industry ( just a few examples)

Federal, State and Local

WAC

RCW

CMS

Specific regulations on how health care organizations are built

NFPA

National Environmental Policy Act

OSHA

WISHA

EPA

Shoreline Act

Department of Health

L&I

DSHS- Licensing Division

JCAHO

ADA

Department of Construction and Land Use

Etc. …………………………..

The good news is that we have proven structures to comply

B

OARD

Safety Hotline

E-Mail

Orientation

Training

E NVIRONMENT OF C ARE

S TRUCTURE AND C OMMUNICATIONS

E NVIRONMENT OF C ARE

P

ATIENTS

, V

ISITORS

S

TAFF

, P

ROPERTY AND

E

QUIPMENT

L

EADERSHIP

Safety Fairs

Meetings

ICES

Newsletters

Safety Audits

K

EY

P

ROCESS

S

UBCOMMITTEES

Medical Equipment

Emergency Preparedness

Hazardous Materials and Waste

Security/ Public Safety

Fire Prevention

Safety

Utility Management

Education and Communication

Work Place Violence

F:/PUBLIC/SAFETY/SAFETYHEALTH/SMC-STRUCTURE&COMMUNCIATIONS

K EY S UPPORT E LEMENTS

Environmental Health and

Safety (EH&S)

Risk Management

Employee Health

Employee Safety Committee

Infection Control

Quality Improvement

Management

Safety Officer

Key Departments

1997- National Patient Safety

Foundation

1999- To Err is Human

The First Institute of Medicine Report Alerted the Public and Congress of 45,000-98,000

Deaths due to “errors” in healthcare- first real public attention to medical failures

2001- Crossing the Quality Chasm

The Second IOM Report

Safe

Effective

Patient Centered

Timely

Efficient

Equitable

2002-JCAHO Six National Patient

Safety Goals

 Patient identification

 Communication among caregivers

 High-alert medications

 Eliminate wrong-site, wrong-patient, wrong-procedure surgery

 Infusion pumps

 Clinical alarm systems

2002-Leapfrog Three Leaps

 Computerized Physician Order Entry

 ICU Care Standards

 Volume Measures

CABG

PCI

AAA

Pancreatectomy

Esophagectomy

Neonatal Care

2003- National Voluntary Hospital

Reporting Initiative-CMS

 Hospitals are given the chance to voluntarily report outcome data

 No take always but a reporting bonus

 Process measures

Acute Myocardial Infarction

Heart Failure

Community Acquired Pneumonia

The Medicare Prescription Drug,

Improvement, and Modernization Act of

2003

Instructs the Center for Medicare Services to contract with the Institute of Medicine of the

National Academy of Sciences to:

 catalogue, review, and evaluate the validity of leading health care performance measures;

 catalogue and evaluate the success and utility of alternative performance incentive programs in public or private sector settings; and

The Medicare Prescription Drug,

Improvement, and Modernization Act of

2003

Identify and prioritize options to implement policies that align performance with payment under the Medicare program that indicate — the performance measurement set to be used the payment policy that will reward performance the key implementation issues (such as data and information technology requirements) that must be addressed

Who is supporting this idea…

An open letter in Health Affairs Co-authored by Berwick,

Eddy,…support this idea. They argue that the government needs to become involved in pay-for-performance efforts:

 The human and financial costs of medical care and substandard care have been exhaustively documented.

 A robust inventory of measures and standards for quality improvement has been developed and continues to grow.

 The strategic concept of paying for performance-a bedrock principle in most industries- has begun to emerge in health care in a variety of experiments in both private and public sectors.

Health Affairs, Vol 22(6) November/December 2003, pages 7-9.

2004- Leapfrog partners with the

National Quality Forum - Thirty

Leaps

Awareness

Accountability

Ability

Action

2004- Leapfrog adds process and outcomes measures

 Society for Thoracic Surgery (STS) for CABG

 American College of Cardiologist National

Cardiac Data Registry (ACC-NCDR)

(Washington Data COAP)

 Vermont Oxford Data Base for Neonates

 Beta Blockade for AAA

2004- Institute for Healthcare Improvement

•Deploy Rapid Response Teams

•Deliver Reliable, Evidence-Based Care for

Acute Myocardial Infarction

•Prevent Adverse Drug Events

•Prevent Central Line Infections

•Prevent Surgical Site Infections

•Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

2004- CMS Displays Quality Data from National

Hospital Voluntary Reporting Initiative www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov

Patients with pneumonia receiving antibiotics within 4 hours

AVERAGE FOR

ALL REPORTING

HOSPITALS IN

THE UNITED

STATES

AVERAGE FOR

ALL REPORTING

HOSPITALS IN

THE STATE OF

WASHINGTON

UNIVERSITY OF

WASHINGTON

MEDICAL CTR

39%

72%

72%

* Top Hospitals represents the top 10% of hospitals nationwide. Top hospitals achieved a 89% rate or better.

HEALTH

GRADES

2005 Surgical Care Improvement

Project (SCIP)

Preventing Surgical Complications in four broad areas where the incidence and cost of complications are high:

 Surgical site infections

 Adverse cardiac events

 Venous thromboembolism

 Postoperative pneumonia

SCIP Steering Committee

Organizations

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

American College of Surgeons

American Hospital Association

American Society of Anesthesiologists

Association of periOperative Registered Nurses

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Department of Veterans Affairs

Institute for Healthcare Improvement

Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare

Organizations

2006-Leapfrog-Hospital

Rewards Program

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI)

Community acquired pneumonia (CAP)

Deliveries/newborns

These represent

33% of the admissions and 20

% of the spending by commercial payers

Hospital Rewards Program Quality

Measures: CABG

Measure Source

CABG mortality

CABG volume

Prophylactic antibiotic received within one hour prior to surgical incisision

Prophylactic antibiotic selection for surgical patients - CABG

Prophylactic antibiotics discontinued within 24 hours after surgery end time - CABG

Process of Care -- 80%+ adherence to at least two:

•CABG using internal mammary artery

•Aspirin at discharge

•Beta-blocker within 24 hours after surgery

•Beta-blockers prescribed at discharge

•Lipid-lowering therapy prescribed at discharge

•Extubation within 24 hours after surgery

Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system

ICU physician staffing (IPS)

Leapfrog Quality Index (NQF Safe Practices)

LFG Survey

LFG Survey

JCAHO Core Measure

JCAHO Core Measure

JCAHO Core Measure

LFG Survey

LFG Survey

LFG Survey

LFG Survey

Weight

34.00%

12.00%

3.50%

3.50%

3.50%

18.50%

8.33%

8.33%

8.33%

REWARDING SUPERIOR QUALITY CARE: THE PREMIER HOSPITAL QUALITY INCENTIVE DEMONSTRATION

CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES

FACT SHEET

March 2005

Overview

CMS is pursuing a vision to improve the quality of health care by expanding the information available about quality of care and through direct incentives to reward the delivery of superior quality care. Through the Premier Hospital Quality

Incentive Demonstration, CMS aims to see a significant improvement in the quality of inpatient care by awarding bonus payments to hospitals for high quality in several clinical areas, and by reporting extensive quality data on the CMS web site.

Quality of Care

Under the demonstration, top performing hospitals will receive bonuses based on their performance on evidence-based quality measures for inpatients with: heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, coronary artery bypass graft, and hip and knee replacements.

Financial Awards

CMS will identify hospitals in the demonstration with the highest clinical quality performance for each of the five clinical areas. Hospitals in the top 20% of quality for those clinical areas will be given a financial payment as a reward for the quality of their care. Hospitals in the top decile of hospitals for a given diagnosis will be provided a 2% bonus of their Medicare payments for the measured condition, while hospitals in the second decile will be paid a 1% bonus. The cost of the bonuses to Medicare will be about $7 million a year, or $21 million over three years.

Improvement Over Baseline

In year three, hospitals that do not achieve performance improvements above demonstration baseline will have adjusted payments. The demonstration baseline will be clinical thresholds set at the year one cut-off scores for the lower 9th and

10th decile hospitals. Hospitals will receive 1% lower DRG payment for clinical conditions that score below the 9th decile baseline level and 2% less if they score below the 10th decile baseline level.

2005-Other Reports

 Washington Clinical Outcomes

Assessment Project (COAP)

 SCOAP

 American College of Surgeons National

Surgical Quality Improvement Project

UWMC Operating Plan

 2001- Through CQI produce measurable improvements in clinical care service and operating performance. CORM

 2002-Lay the foundations for improving patient safety. CORM

 2003- Make measurable progress toward becoming the #1 AMC resource on patient safety by building the culture of a high reliability organization…(Increase reporting by 50% and decrease harm events in 3 areas)

UWMC Operating Plan

 2004- Achieve measurable improvements in patient safety and quality. (Six JCAHO National

Safety Patient Goals, Identify and adopt an integrated quality model, Identify a balanced set of key organizational and clinical quality metrics.)

 2005-Provide the safest clinical care available.

Presented in a PASCO format (Increase reporting by 30%, decreased falls by 50%, reduce DVT by 50%)

2006 UWMC Operating Plan 13 of

25 Elements are Quality and safety

Elements

Critical Test Results

Medication Reconciliation

Hand Hygiene

Falls With Injury

AMI

Heart Failure

Community Acquired Pneumonia

Central Line Infections

Surgical Site Infections

Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Venous Thromboembolism

Rapid Response Teams

These are organizational performance measures. What about physician performance measures?

 When will P4P role down to physicians on the surgical side?

New York Times Friday April 15, 2005

Sample Outpatient Health

Outcomes/Safety Data

 Women’s Health- Breast and Cervical

Cancer Screening

 Diabetes Care- Eye exams, HbA1c, cholesterol screening, ACE inhibitors

 Use of Optimal Medications- Asthma,

Otitis Media, Acute Bronchitis

 Pharmacy Measures- Formulary

Compliance, Generic use

 Service Measures

P4P Options

 Financial

 Non Financial

Financial Strategies

 Quality Bonuses

 Compensation at Risk

 Performance Fee Schedules

 Quality grants

 Reimbursement for Care Planning

 Variable Cost Sharing for Patients

Non Financial Strategies

 Performance Profiling

 Publicizing Performance

 Technical Assistance for Quality

Improvement

 Practice Sanctions

 Reducing Administrative Requirements

Discussion

Download