Un-rules for Good Writing 1 2 3 4 . Don’t use no double negatives. . Make each pronoun agree with their antecedent. . Join clauses good like a conjunction should. . About them sentence fragments. Slide 5.1 5. When dangling, watch your participles. 6. Verbs has to agree with their subject. 7. Just between you and I, case is important too. 8. Don’t write run-on sentences they are hard to read. Slide 5.2 9. Don’t use commas, that aren’t necessary. 10. Try to not ever split infinitives. 11. Its’ important to use your apostrophes correctly. 12. Proofread your writing to see if you any words out. Slide 5.3 13. Correct spelling is esential. 14. A preposition is a poor word to end a sentence with. Slide 5.4 Pseudo-Statements Not tested by degree of correspondence with actual events Slide 5.5A Pseudo-Statements Not tested by degree of correspondence with actual events 1. Definitions: statements that assert that one term may be substituted for another Slide5.5B Pseudo-Statements Not tested by degree of correspondence with actual events 1. Definitions: (evaluated for usefulness) Slide5.5 statements that assert that one term may be substituted for another Pseudo Statements 2. Tautologies: statements that must be true by their very construction People are lazy because they are unmotivated. Charismatic leaders are hopeful because they are optimistic. Sensationalism in the news uses exaggerations. Slide 5.6 Pseudo Statements 3. Contradictions: statements that must be false due to their very construction A noisy quiet original copy “fresh frozen” Bosnian government jumbo shrimp Slide5.7 Categorical Syllogism Major Premise: All men are mortal Minor premise: Socrates is a man Conclusion: (Therefore,) Socrates is mortal Slide 5.8 Euler’s Circles Things that are Mortal Men Slide 5.9A Euler’s Circles Things that are Mortal Men Socrates Slide 5.9B Euler’s Circles Things that are Mortal Men Socrates Slide 5.9C Major Term Euler’s Circles Things that are Mortal Major Term Men Minor Term Socrates Slide 5.9D Euler’s Circles Things that are Mortal Major Term Men Middle Term Minor Term Socrates Slide 5.9 Conditional Syllogism Forms Major Premise: If p, then q Minor Premise: p Conclusion: Slide 5.10 q or not q not p Logic of the Conditional Syllogism Major Premise: If a newscaster is credible, then the news broadcast will be respected by the public Minor Premise: A newscaster is credible Conclusion: the news broadcast will be respected by the public Slide 5.11 Logic of Using Hypotheses Major Premise: If a newscaster is credible, then the news broadcast will be respected by the public Minor Premise: the news broadcast is not respected by the public Conclusion: A newscaster is not credible Slide 5.12 Denying the Antecedent in Research Major Premise: If a newscaster is credible, then the news broadcast will be respected by the public Minor Premise: A newscaster is not credible Conclusion: the news broadcast still may be respected because it has a strong public affairs division Slide 5.13 Affirming the Consequent Research Major Premise: If the RCQ is a valid measure, then much valuable research will have been spawned Minor Premise: much valuable research has been spawned Conclusion: the RCQ is a valid measure Slide 5.14 Errors in Research Arguments Fallacies of Overgeneralization Hasty Generalizations Extrapolation Fallacies of Distraction Personal Attacks Appeals to Authority Appeals to Ignorance Begging the Question Slide 5.15