SENSE AND DISABILTY ENG BC 3998y, sec. 3 Tuesday 11:00-12:50 pm Spring Term 2011 http://senseanddisability.wikispaces.columbia.edu Jennie Kassanoff Office: Barnard 413 Office phone: 854-5649 Mailbox: Barnard 417 http://kassanoff.wikischolars.columbia.edu Office hours: Tuesdays, 2:00-4:00 and by appointment Email: jkassano@barnard.edu TEXTS The following texts are available for purchase at Book Culture: L. Frank Baum Stephen Crane William Faulkner Joseph Gibaldi (ed.) Ernest Hemingway Henry James Helen Keller Booker T. Washington Eudora Welty Edith Wharton The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (Barnes and Noble Classics) Great Short Works of Stephen Crane (Harper Collins) The Sound and the Fury (Knopf) MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, 7th ed. (MLA) The Sun Also Rises (Simon & Schuster) The Spoils of Poynton The Story of My Life (Dover) Up From Slavery (Dover) A Curtain of Green and Other Stories (Harcourt) Ethan Frome (Dover) 978-1-59308-221-5 978-0-06-083032-8 978-0-679-73224-2 978-0-87352-975-4 978-0-7432-9733-2 978-0-14-043288-6 978-0-486-29249-6 978-0-486-28738-6 978-0-156-234924 978-0-486-266909 WIKI This semester, we will use a wiki, a website that we will write and edit as a class community. Several of the assignments will use the wiki, which will not only allow us to communicate between class meetings, but also will help us prepare for our seminar discussions. The wiki is found at http://senseanddisability.wikispaces.columbia.edu/. When you browse to that location, you will be prompted for a username and password. Enter the username X and the password Y. The main page of the wiki gives instructions for setting up your own account and participant page. MODERATING AND PARTICIPATING IN SEMINAR DISCUSSIONS: PREPARATION AND FOLLOW-UP 2 During the semester, you will be responsible for leading two seminar sessions. On those dates, your role as co-moderator will begin in the week leading up to class. You and your comoderator(s) will be responsible for editing the class plan page on the wiki. In its bare form, the class plan page includes the required reading assignment and suggestions for further reading. You will add questions and issues for consideration, passages you’d like your classmates to consider from the assigned texts, and passages from the further reading that you’ve found interesting or provocative. Each class plan must include all three elements, though they may sometimes be woven together, in the form, “Critic A argues X. On the other hand, what about Y? Consider these passages.” The material you post should be pointed and specific. Please don't copy blocks of background material. If you post a quotation from a critical text, please use it to raise a question or issue. And if you post a biographical or historical fact, suggest how consideration of that material might open our discussion outward. In the course of the week, other seminar participants will use the expanding class plan page to guide our reading. Each seminar member will post at least one comment or question on the class plan page or on the discussion page. (A discussion page is reached by clicking on the discussion tab above any page.) As moderators, you may choose to respond to or incorporate these comments into your class plan. When we arrive in class, you and your co-moderator(s) will direct the discussion. Afterwards, you’ll update the class plan page to include issues that emerged in the discussion or interesting responses to your questions. Finally, you’ll send me an e-mail and let me know how you think it all went: what pleased you, what frustrated you, what questions were more interesting than you expected, what questions less so. EXTENDED ESSAY Each seminar participant will research and write an extended essay (known in other seminars as the “senior thesis”). Your extended essay will be prepared in several stages. First, you will submit a one-paragraph topic proposal, due Monday, February 23. Your topic need not focus on one of the texts we are reading in class; it must, however, concern itself with a work of American literature published in the time period we are studying -- roughly 1890 to 1945. Second, you will conduct a preliminary literature search, and will prepare an annotated preliminary bibliography, due on Monday, March 9. Your preliminary bibliography should contain at least five sources other than those we have been reading in class. Third, you will write a thesis prospectus presenting a project plan and a more developed bibliography. You will submit a draft to your Writing Fellow on Monday, March 23, and the final version to me on Monday, April 6. In the interim, you will meet with your Writing Fellow for a conference. You will submit a working draft of your thesis to your Writing Fellow by Monday, April 20, and then meet with her in conference sometime during the following week. Finally, you will write a 20- to 25-page extended essay, due by 12:00 noon on Monday, May 4. Essays must submitted by that time or they will be counted as late. All written assignments must be turned in on time: a half letter grade will be deducted for every day that a late assignment is past due. There are no exceptions, so please plan ahead. All written assignments should be submitted in their best form – creatively written in 12point, double-spaced Times Roman type (including indented quotations), with the pages numbered and stapled, your work thoroughly proofread and carefully documented with parenthetical references and a Works Cited list in accordance with the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers (7th edition). I will be happy to consult with you at any stage during the brainstorming, outlining, writing, editing and/or rewriting process: please feel free to sign up for a time slot during my office hours, or to make a separate appointment. When you submit your essay, please include your Writing Fellow draft and an 8 X 10 self-addressed manila envelope. Please note that essays submitted without a manila envelope will receive a grade, but no comments. 3 HONOR CODE As seniors, you are familiar with the Barnard College Honor Code. As senior thesis writers, you will be participating not only in the Barnard College community, but also in the broader community of literary scholars. This community, like Barnard College, values intellectual integrity very highly. Plagiarism (the use of someone else’s words or ideas without attribution) is a serious violation, and I report all cases of plagiarism to the Dean of Studies without exception. If you are at all confused about appropriate acknowledgment of sources, please see me for clarification. WRITING FELLOWS In order to help you to produce your best work, this seminar will ask you to work with a Barnard Writing Fellow. The Writing Fellow will provide a sensitive but rigorous audience for your work. Your Writing Fellow will read drafts of both your prospectus and your final paper; she will then meet with you to discuss your work. Please note that although Writing Fellows are not specialists in the material we will be studying this semester, they have received rigorous training in the pedagogy and mechanics of expository writing. If you have questions regarding the content of your paper, please consult directly with me. CLASS PARTICIPATION The real action in this senior seminar takes place in the classroom. You are therefore asked to come to seminar prepared and alert with your reading assignments completed and your contributions to the wiki posted in a timely way. Because knowing how to articulate your ideas verbally is a crucial part of the intellectual process, you will be expected, as a member of the class community, to contribute your own unique perspectives to our discussions, so that other students can learn from you as well as you from them. Silence is not an option. Class attendance and punctuality are, of course, mandatory: chronic lateness and/or more than one absence will adversely effect your class participation grade. LAPTOPS IN THE CLASSROOM While laptops can make notetaking easier, they can also pose a barrier (literally and figuratively) to class discussions. My preference is that you not use laptops in class. If you must, however, I ask that, in consideration of others, you sit in the back or along the sides of the classroom. Obviously, surfing the web, checking your Facebook page or im-ing friends are pleasures to pursue outside of class. 4 CONSULTATIONS AND OFFICE HOURS Although you may sign up for an office-hour time slot or schedule an appointment with me at any time during the semester (and for whatever reason), I ask you to choose your extended essay topic in direct consultation with me. To sign up for my office hours, visit http://jkassanoff.pbwiki.com. Feel free to sign up for any one of the eight 15-minute time slots available each week on Thursdays, 2-4, or click on the link to “ENG BC 3998y” where you will find additional appointment slots. To make an appointment with me outside of office hours or conference times, please e-mail me several convenient times during which we could meet, including times before 10:30 a.m. I will email you an appointment time. If you find that you cannot keep a pre-arranged office-hours appointment, please be considerate of others and cancel as soon as possible. COURSE REQUIREMENTS Thoughtful postings to wiki and frequent, lively, informed seminar participation, 10% Topic proposal, 5% Annotated bibliography, 10% Prospectus (4-6 pp.), 10% Writing Fellow drafts and conferences, 5% Moderator activities, 20% Extended essay (20-25 pp.), 40% SCHEDULE OF READINGS: TH 1/22 Introductions Ralph Waldo Emerson, excerpts from “The American Scholar” (1837) MO 1/26 DUE: Create your page on the wiki (http://senseanddisability.wikispaces.columbia.edu/) by making a link from the participant page. Type a short biography on your page. (See my page for a model.) TH 1/29 The Aesthetics of Autism REQUIRED READING Stephen Crane, Maggie; A Girl of the Streets (1893) Georg Simmel, “The Metropolis and Mental Life” (1907) Mark Osteen, “Autism and Representation: A Comprehensive Introduction,” Autism and Representation, ed. Mark Osteen (New York: Routledge, 2008) 1-47. FURTHER READING Michael Fried, “Stephen Crane’s Upturned Faces,” Realism, Writing, Disfiguration: On Thomas Eakins and Stephen Crane (Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987), 91-161. Susan Schweik, “Disability Politics and American Literary History: Some Suggestions,” American Literary History 20 (Spring-Summer 2008): 217-237. Catherine Prendergast, “And Now, a Necessarily Pathetic Response: A Response to Susan Schweik,” American Literary History 20 (SpringSummer 2008): 238-244. Ato Quayson, “J.M. Coetzee: Speech, Silence, Autism, and Dialogism,” Aesthetic Nervousness: Disability and the Crisis of Representation (New York: Columbia UP, 2007). Polly Morrice, “Autism as Metaphor,” New York Times Book Review (July 30, 2005): 23. 5 TH 2/5 Consuming Disability REQUIRED READING L. Frank Baum, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (1900) Rosemarie Garland Thomson, Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature (New York: Columbia UP, 1997), Chapters 1-2. FURTHER READING Robert Bogdan, Freak Show: Presenting Human Oddities for Amusement and Profit (Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1988), chapter 8. Stuart Culver, “What Manikins Want: The Wonderful Wizard of Oz and The Art of Decorating Dry Goods Windows,” Representations 21 (Winter 1988): 97-116. Vivian Wagner, “Unsettling Oz: Technological Anxieties in the Novels of L. Frank Baum,” The Lion and the Unicorn 30.1 (2006): 25-53. TH 2/12 Stigma and Self-Reliance REQUIRED READING Booker T. Washington (1901), Up From Slavery Douglas Baynton, “Slaves, Immigrants, and Suffragists: The Uses of Disability in Citizenship Debates,” PMLA 120 (Mar. 2005): 562-67. FURTHER READING Erving Goffman, selections from Stigma (DSR 131-140) Lerita M. Coleman, “Stigma: An Enigma Demystified” (DSR 141-152) Nancy Bentley, “The Strange Career of Love and Slavery: Chestnutt, Engels, Masoch,” American Literary History 17.3 (2005): 460-485. Kenrick Ian Grandison, “Negotiated Space: The Black College Campus as a Cultural Record of Postbellum America,” American Quarterly 51.3 (1999): 529-579. John Williams-Searle, “Cold Charity: Manhood, Brotherhood, and the Transformation of Disability, 1870-1900,” The New Disability History: American Perspectives, eds. Paul K. Longmore and Laura Umansky (NY: New York UP, 2001) 157-186. (On reserve.) Gregory Michael Dorr, “Defective or Disabled? Race, Medicine, and Eugenics in Progressive Era Virginia and Alabama,” Journal of the Gilded Age & Progressive Era 5.4 (2006): 359-392. TH 2/19 Read Ahead/Read Back Day (no class) Individual conferences in my office (Barnard 413). Please sign up for your spot on http://kassanoff.wikischolars.columbia.edu. MO 2/23 One-paragraph topic proposal due. Post to your wiki page, and tag as “extended essay.” Email a copy to me via attachment by 4 p.m. TH 2/26 Sense and Disabilty REQUIRED READING: Helen Keller, The Story of My Life (1903) William James, “Laura Bridgman,” (1904) Collected Essays and Reviews (New York: Longmans, Green and Co., 1920), 453-458. 6 Walter Benjamin, "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction," Illuminations, ed. and intro Hannah Arendt (New York: Schocken Books, 1969), 217-251. FURTHER READING Susan Crutchfield, “‘Play[ing] her part correctly’: Helen Keller as Vaudevillian Freak,” Disability Studies Quarterly 25 (Summer 2005): n.p. Sam Halliday, “Helen Keller, Henry James, and the Social Relations of Perception,” Criticism 48 (Spring 2006): 175-201. Georgina Klege, “Helen Keller and ‘The Empire of the Normal,’” American Quarterly 52 (June 2000): 322-25. Kim Nielsen, “Helen Keller and the Politics of Civic Fitness,” The New Disability History: American Perspectives, eds. Paul K. Longmore and Laura Umansky (NY: New York UP, 2001) 268-90. (On reserve.) Jim Swan, “Touching Words: Helen Keller, Plagiarism, Authorship,” Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 10 (1992): 321-64. TH 3/5 Paralysis and Pain REQUIRED READING Edith Wharton, Ethan Frome (1911) Elaine Scarry, “Pain and Imagining,” The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World (New York: Oxford UP, 1985), 161-180. FURTHER READING Elizabeth Ammons, “The Myth of Imperiled Whiteness and Ethan Frome,” New England Quarterly 81 (2008): 5-33. (Visit Butler Periodicals Reading Room.) Jennie Kassanoff, “‘A close corporation’: the body and the machine in The Fruit of the Tree,” Edith Wharton and the Politics of Race (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004), 59-82. Shlomith Rimmon-Kenan, “What Can Narrative Theory Learn from Illness Narratives?” Literature and Medicine 25.2 (2006): 241-254. John Fabian Witt, The Accidental Republic: Crippled Workingmen, Destitute Widows, and the Remaking of American Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 2004), Introduction and Chapter 1. (On reserve.) MO 3/9 Annotated bibliography due. Post to your wiki page, tag as “extended essay,” and email a copy via attachment to me by 4 p.m. In addition, add your entries, with annotations, to the Bibliography page of the wiki. At the end of each bibliographic entry and annotation, please include your initials (e.g.: -JAK). TH 3/12 Administering Veterans REQUIRED READING Ernest Hemingway, The Sun Also Rises (1926) Ana Carden-Coyne, “Ungrateful Bodies: Rehabilitation, Resistance and Disabled American Veterans of the First World War,” European History Review 14 (Dec. 2007): 543-565. FURTHER READING Dana Fore, “Life Unworthy of Life?: Masculinity, Disability, and Guilt in The Sun Also Rises,” Hemingway Review 26.2 (2007): 74-88. Scott Gelber, “A ‘Hard-Boiled Order’: The Reeducation of Disabled WWI Veterans in New York City,” Journal of Social History 39 (2005): 161-80. Sander Gilman, The Jew’s Body (NY: Routledge, 1991). 7 K. Walter Hickel, “Medicine, Bureaucracy, and Social Welfare: The Politics of Disability Compensation for American Veterans of World War I,” The New Disability History: American Perspectives, eds. Paul K. Longmore and Laura Umansky (NY: New York UP, 2001) 236-267. (On reserve.) Christine Rosen, Preaching Eugenics: Religious Leaders and the American Eugenics Movement (NY: Oxford UP, 2004). (On reserve.) David Serlin, “The Other Arms Race,” (DSR 49-65) TH 3/19 SPRING BREAK MO 3/23 Draft of prospectus due to Writing Fellow Please place your draft on my office door, and sign up for your Writing Fellow conference by 4 p.m. WE 3/25 – MO 3/30 Writing Fellow conferences TH 3/26 Feeble-mindedness, Sterility and the State REQUIRED READING William Faulkner, The Sound and the Fury (1929) United States Supreme Court, Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927) FURTHER READING Michael Bérubé, “Disability and Narrative,” PMLA 120.2 (2005): 568576. Paul A. Lombardo, Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell. (On reserve.) Merritt Moseley, “Faulkner’s Benjy, Hemingway’s Jake,” College Literature 13 (Fall 1986): 300-304. Maria Truchan-Tataryn, “Textual Abuse: Faulkner’s Benjy,” Journal of Medical Humanities 26 (Fall 2005): 159-172. TH 4/2 Parents and Impairment REQUIRED READING Pearl S. Buck, The Good Earth (1931) Janice Brockley, “Rearing the Child Who Never Grew: Ideologies of Parenting and Intellectual Disability in American History,” Mental Retardation in America: A Historical Reader, eds. Steven Noll and James W. Trent, Jr. (New York: NYU Press, 2004), 130-164. (On reserve.) FURTHER READING Pearl S. Buck, The Child Who Never Grew (1950). (On reserve.) Elizabeth Greene, Histories of 79 Feebleminded Girls Under Supervision in the Community (New York: National Committee for Mental Hygiene, 1923). (Available in the Butler stacks.) Wendy Kline, Building a Better Race: Gender, Sexuality, and Eugenics from the Turn of the Century to the Baby Boom (Berkeley: U of Cal P, 2001), Chapter 4. (On reserve.) Harold Pollack, “Learning to Walk Slow: America’s Partial Policy Success in the Arena of Intellectual Disability,” The Journal of Policy History 19.1 (2007): 95-112. MO 4/6 Prospectus due (4-6 pp.) 8 Post to your wiki page, and tag with “extended essay.” Paper-clip your Writing Fellow draft to your completed assignment, and place the entire package on my office door (Barnard 413) by 4 p.m. TH 4/9 Protectionism and Personhood REQUIRED READING Eudora Welty, “Lily Daw and the Three Ladies,” “Petrified Man,” “The Key,” “Why I Live at the P.O.,” “A Visit of Charity,” “A Worn Path” (1936) Douglas Baynton, “‘A Silent Exile on This Earth’: The Metaphorical Construction of Deafness in the Nineteenth Century” (DSR 33-48) FURTHER READING Laurent Berlant, “Re-writing the Medusa: Welty’s ‘Petrified Man,’” Studies in Short Fiction 26.1 (1989): 59-70. Robert Y. Drake, Jr., “Comments on Two Eudora Welty Stories,” Mississippi Quarterly 13 (Summer 1960): 123-131. Kevin Moberly, “Toward the North Star: Eudora Welty’s ‘A Worn Path’ and the Slave Narrative Tradition,” Mississippi Quarterly 59 (Winter 2005/2006): 107-127. Gail L. Mortimer, “‘The Way to Get There’: Journeys and Destinations in the Stories of Eudora Welty,” Southern Literary Journal 19.2 (1987): 61-69. TH 4/16 Queering Prosthesis REQUIRED READING Willa Cather, Sapphira and the Slave Girl (1940) Robert McRuer, “Compulsory Able-Bodiedness and Queer/Disabled Existence,” (DSR 301-308) FURTHER READING Saidiya V. Hartman, Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and SelfMaking in Nineteenth-Century America (New York: Oxford UP, 1997), chapter 6. (On reserve.) Naomi Morgenstern, “'Love is home-sickness': Nostalgia and Lesbian desire in Sapphira and the Slave Girl,” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 29 (Winter 1996):184-205. Toni Morrison, Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination, Part 1: “Black Matters.” (On reserve.) MO 4/20 Working draft due to Writing Fellow Your draft should be at least 12 pages long and should include an unannotated bibliography. Please place your draft on my office door by 4 p.m., and sign up for your Writing Fellow conference. TH 4/23 Optional conferences available. (No class.) Sign up at http://jkassanoff.pbwiki.com. TH 4/23 – WE 4/29 Writing Fellow conferences 9 MO 5/4 Extended essay due (20-25 pp.) by 12:00 p.m. Post your completed essay to your wiki page, and tag with “extended essay.” Paper-clip your Writing Fellow draft and your self-addressed manila envelope to the hard copy of your extended essay, and place the whole package on my office door (Barnard 413) by 12 p.m. Remember that essays submitted without a self-addressed manila envelope will receive a grade, but no comments.