The Development of Self-Regulation: Do Parents make a difference?

advertisement

The Development of Self-

Regulation: Do Parents make a difference?

Rachelle Tomac

Research Development Portfolio Presentation

CEP 900 Fall 2005

Dr. David Wong

Research Question:

Do Children learn to be self-regulated learners thorough interactions with parents?

Why is this important to me as a School

Psychologist?

– Self-regulated learner : a student who is motivated to perform well, set realistic goals, use effective strategies, self-monitor, and able to adjust strategy use as necessary

– A self-regulated learner is a good student, and if the child in not a good student we strive to teach him/her these skills

Major Views of Self-

Regulation:

Social-Cognitive View

Self-Determination Theory:

Support verses Control

Social-Cognitive Model of the development of selfregulation (Zimmerman)

The child

– observes a model performing a behavior of interest

– Emulates the model’s performance

– Uses self-control as he/she independently attempts the model’s learning techniques

– Self-regulates the use of the technique across new situations based on how well it worked

Research says that “adults/parents can initiate children’s development of selfregulative behaviors”

Social-Cognitive View in use:

Zimmerman developed the “Self-

Regulation Empowerment Program”

3 Steps:

– Empowerment

– Study/Learning Strategies

– Cyclical Feedback Loop

Forethought, performance control, and self reflection

Self-Determination Theory

Deci, Ryan, Eccles, Grolnick

Individuals have innate needs for:

– Autonomy

– Competence

– Relatedness

Motivation to meet these needs is on a continuum from extrinsic to intrinsic

External Regulation : behaves in a way to obtain a reward or avoid punishment

Integrated Regulation : becomes involved in an activity because of the sheer pleasure experienced from the task itself (improving the quality of the action and sense of well-being)

How do these theories help me to develop my research?

My Research:

– Dr. Evelyn Oka collected the data

– Parent-Child Interactions video-recorded

– Use theory and literature to develop a way to analyze the data

Goal: to correlate qualities of the parent-child interaction to the child’s level of selfregulation

Coding the Parent-Child

Interactions

What is important:

– Directiveness (V or NV)

– Non-directiveness (V or NV)

– Affect

– Engagement (motivational behaviors)

– Autonomy/self-esteem (motivational beliefs)

– Synchrony

Coded interviews:

What I expect to see

Interactions of highly self-regulated children and parent will display:

– More positive affect

– Higher degree of synchrony

(appropriateness and responsiveness)

– More consistent use of non-directive instructional styles

Why is this important, what do I have to add to the literature?

Synchrony over time is more important and accurate than the dual categories of ‘control’ vs ‘support’.

Better understanding of qualities that lead to self-regulation

– In a diverse population

– Serve as the basis for developing both school and family based intervention/prevention programs in self-regulation

Future Directions for my

Research:

Longitudinal Study

– Participants would be 23-26 yrs old

– Motivational Scales / Levels of Self-

Regulation and Autonomy

– Autonomy=Satisfaction?

Is this a vital skill to satisfaction not only throughout school, but in life?

Questions?

Thank You

Download