Use of Prior Statements, Depositions and
Corollary Proceedings:
Searing Impeachment and Effective Rehabilitation
Henry J. Renk, Esq.
Partner
FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY www.fitzpatrickcella.com

Impeachment of a Witness
“To call into question the veracity of a witness, by means of evidence adduced for such purpose, or the adducing of proof that a witness is unworthy of belief.”
Black’s Law Dictionary
(6th ed. 1990) www.fitzpatrickcella.com
2

Rehabilitation of a Witness
“After cross examination, a witness whose credibility has suffered may be examined again (redirect examination) to improve his standing with the trier of fact in matters covered on cross examination.”
Black’s Law Dictionary
(6th ed. 1990) www.fitzpatrickcella.com
3

IMPEACHMENT www.fitzpatrickcella.com
4

Any Witness Can Be Impeached (Rule
607)
• Your Own Live Witness
• Adverse Live Witness
• Out-of-Court Declarant www.fitzpatrickcella.com
5

Timing Of Impeachment
•Your Own Witness: At Any Time
•Adverse Witnesses: Usually on Cross-Examination
•Out-of-Court Declarant: Whenever Credibility Attacked www.fitzpatrickcella.com
6

Impeachment Techniques
1) Attacking witnesses’s character
• e.g., through prior bad acts or prior convictions
2) Demonstrating Bias
• e.g., what motivation does the witness have?
3) Demonstrating Sensory Deficiencies
• e.g., could they really see what happened?
4) Use of Prior Inconsistent Statements
• e.g., previous statements that now contradict their trial testimony www.fitzpatrickcella.com
7

Types of Prior Statements for Use in
Impeachment
•Testimony: – Deposition or Trial
– U.S. or Foreign Litigation
– P.T.O. Testimony
•Statements Under Oath: – Affidavits or Declarations
– P.T.O. Sworn Papers
•Statements Not Under Oath: – Internal Company Records
– Publications by Witnesses
– P.T.O. Papers
•Litigation Documents: – Discovery Responses, Expert
Reports, Etc. . .
www.fitzpatrickcella.com
8

Rules of Evidence - Impeaching
With Prior Inconsistent Statements
•Rule 613: Prior Statements of Witnesses
• Relaxes common-law foundation requirements
• Show statement to opposing counsel upon request
• When proving prior statement through extrinsic evidence:
– Witness must be given chance to explain/deny
– N/A to admission by party opponent [Rule 613(b)] www.fitzpatrickcella.com
9

Rules of Evidence - Impeaching
With Prior Inconsistent Statements (cont.)
•FRE 806: Attacking and Supporting Credibility of Declarant
• Allows for impeachment (or rehabilitation) using out-ofcourt statement against declarant www.fitzpatrickcella.com
10

Impeachment Technique Using Prior
Inconsistent Statement
•Step 1: Recommit Witness to His/Her Direct Testimony
•Step 2: Validate the Prior Statement
• e.g., Establish when/how prior statement was made
• Authenticate prior statement
• If prior statement is more valuable demonstrate that it is the more accurate of the two statements.
•Step 3:Confront the Witness with the Prior Statement
• Leave no room for evasion or argument by witness re: statement inconsistencies www.fitzpatrickcella.com
11

Impeaching Experts
•Rules 702 – 705
•To question soundness of opinions
•Opportunity to contrast multiple experts www.fitzpatrickcella.com
12

Impeaching Out-of-Court Declarant
•Only When Statement Offered for Its Truth
•Can Use Inconsistent Statement Made At Any Time (vs.
Requirement of Prior Inconsistency for Live Witness)
•Inconsistency Must be Independently Admissible www.fitzpatrickcella.com
13

Practical Considerations Regarding
Impeachment
Practice Tip 1:
Don’t overuse the weapon of impeachment
– Use sparingly
– Save for key fact(s) www.fitzpatrickcella.com
14

Practical Considerations Regarding
Impeachment (cont.)
Practice Tip 2:
Make sure the trier of fact understands the impeachment www.fitzpatrickcella.com
15

Practical Considerations Regarding
Impeachment (cont.)
Practice Tip 3:
Make sure the impeachment is consistent with theory of your case www.fitzpatrickcella.com
16

Practical Considerations Regarding
Impeachment (cont.)
Practice Tip 4:
Impeach only when success is probable
- i.e., only where inconsistency clear www.fitzpatrickcella.com
17

Practical Considerations Regarding
Impeachment (cont.)
Practice Tip 5:
Do not impeach on information favorable to your case www.fitzpatrickcella.com
18

Practical Considerations Regarding
Impeachment (cont.)
Practice Tip 6:
Consider the witness your are impeaching www.fitzpatrickcella.com
19

REHABILITATION www.fitzpatrickcella.com
20

Rules of Evidence Relating to Rehabilitation
Using Prior Statements
• FRE 801(d)(1)(B):
• Prior consistent statement admissible, but only:
1) After credibility of witness has been attacked
2) To rebut express or implied charge of recent fabrication, improper influence, or bad motive.
3) Prior statement must have been made before corrupting influence or event was present (See,
Tome v. United States, 513 U.S. 150 (1995)) www.fitzpatrickcella.com
21

Rules of Evidence Relating to Rehabilitation
Using Prior Statements (cont.)
• FRE 806: Attacking and Supporting Credibility of Declarant
• Declarant’s statement admitted in evidence
• Declarant’s credibility attacked www.fitzpatrickcella.com
22

Practical Considerations Relating to
Rehabilitation
Practice Tip 1:
Hit your own witness’s inconsistent statements head on during direct www.fitzpatrickcella.com
23

Practical Considerations Relating to
Rehabilitation (cont.)
Practice Tip 2:
Rehabilitate only where absolutely necessary www.fitzpatrickcella.com
24

Practical Considerations Relating to
Rehabilitation (cont.)
Practice Tip 3:
On redirect refer to adversary’s raising of inconsistent statement www.fitzpatrickcella.com
25

Practical Considerations Relating to
Rehabilitation (cont.)
Practice Tip 4:
Prepare your witness to adequately handle the bad points www.fitzpatrickcella.com
26

Thank You www.fitzpatrickcella.com