The Road Ahead in Texas Challenges & Opportunities in the P/C Insurance Industry for 2011 & Beyond 48th Annual Joe Vincent Management Seminar Austin, TX January 31, 2011 Download at www.iii.org/presentations Robert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, President & Economist Insurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038 Tel: 212.346.5520 Cell: 917.453.1885 bobh@iii.org www.iii.org Presentation Outline Insurance Industry Financial Overview & Outlook Profitability Premium Growth Capital & Capacity Underwriting Performance: Commercial & Personal Lines Financial/Investment Review & Outlook Financial Strength Overview Texas Overview: Growth and Profitability Analysis Tort System Review: Overview and Causes for Concern Exposure Analysis: Where Will Growth Come from in the Aftermath of the Great Recession?” Crisis-Driven Exposure Issues: Personal & Commercial Lines Growth in the Post-Crisis World Catastrophe Loss Review 2 P/C Insurance Industry Financial Overview Profit Recovery Continues Early Stage Growth Begins 3 $65,777 $26,700 $3,043 $28,311 $44,155 $38,501 $30,029 $20,559 $20,598 $10,870 $3,046 $10,000 $19,316 $20,000 $5,840 $30,000 $14,178 $40,000 $24,404 $50,000 $21,865 $60,000 2005 ROE*= 9.6% 2006 ROE = 12.7% 2007 ROE = 10.9% 2008 ROE = 0.3% 2009 ROAS1 = 5.8% 2010:Q3 ROAS = 6.7% $30,773 $70,000 P-C Industry 2010:Q3 profits were$26.7B vs.$16.4B in 2009:Q3, due mainly to $4.4B in realized capital gains vs. -$9.6B in previous realized capital losses $36,819 $80,000 $62,496 P/C Net Income After Taxes 1991–2010:Q3 ($ Millions) $0 -$10,000 -$6,970 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 * ROE figures are GAAP; 1Return on avg. surplus. Excluding Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers yields a 7.7% ROAS for 2010:Q3 and 4.6% for 2009. 2009:Q3 net income was $29.8 billion excluding M&FG. Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute 09 10:Q3 ROE: Property/Casualty Insurance, 1987–2010E* (Percent) P/C Profitability Is Both by Cyclicality and Ordinary Volatile 20% Katrina, Rita, Wilma 15% 10% Sept. 11 Hugo 5% Andrew 0% 4 Hurricanes Lowest CAT Losses in 15 Years Northridge Financial Crisis* -5% 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 * Excludes Mortgage & Financial Guarantee in 2008 - 2010. Sources: ISO, Fortune; Insurance Information Institute figure for 2010 is actual through 2010:Q3. 04 05 06 07 08 09 10E 5 A 100 Combined Ratio Isn’t What It Once Was: Investment Impact on ROEs A combined ratio of about 100 generated ~7.5% ROE in 2009/10, 10% in 2005 and 16% in 1979 Combined Ratio / ROE 110 105 15.9% 14.3% 100.6 100 100.1 97.5 100.7 12.7% 15% 101.0 99.5 99.7 7.3% 7.7% 9.6% 95 18% 92.6 12% 9% 8.9% 6% 90 4.4% 85 3% 0% 80 1978 1979 2003 2005 Combined Ratio 2006 2008* 2009* 2010:Q3* ROE* Combined Ratios Must Be Lower in Today’s Depressed Investment Environment to Generate Risk Appropriate ROEs * 2009 and 2010:Q3 figures are return on average statutory surplus. 2008, 2009 and 2010:H1figures exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurers Source: Insurance Information Institute from A.M. Best and ISO data. P/C Premium Growth Cycles Cyclicality is Driven Primarily by the Industry’s Underwriting Cycle, Not the Economy 8 Soft Market Persisted in 2010 but May Be Easing: Relief in 2011? (Percent) 25% 1975-78 1984-87 2000-03 Net Written Premiums Fell 0.7% in 2007 (First Decline Since 1943) by 2.0% in 2008, and 4.2% in 2009, the First 3-Year Decline Since 1930-33. 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10F -5% NWP was up 0.8% through 10:Q3 vs. -4.5% through 09:Q3 Shaded areas denote “hard market” periods Sources: A.M. Best (historical and forecast), ISO, Insurance Information Institute. 9 5% 0% -5% -10% Sources: ISO, Insurance Information Institute. 2010:Q3 2010:Q2 2010:Q1 2009:Q4 2009:Q3 2009:Q2 2009:Q1 2008:Q4 2008:Q3 2008:Q2 2008:Q1 2007:Q4 2007:Q3 2007:Q2 2007:Q1 2006:Q4 2006:Q3 2006:Q2 2006:Q1 2005:Q1 -1.8% -0.7% -4.4% -3.7% -5.3% -5.2% -1.4% -1.3% -1.9% -1.6% -4.6% 2005:Q2 -4.1% 2005:Q3 -5.8% 2005:Q4 -1.6% 2004:Q4 2004:Q3 2004:Q2 2004:Q1 2003:Q4 2003:Q3 2003:Q2 2003:Q1 2002:Q4 2002:Q3 1.3% 2.3% 0.5% 2.1% 0.0% 10.3% 10.2% 13.4% 6.6% 15.1% 16.8% 16.7% 12.5% 10.1% 9.7% 7.8% 7.2% 5.6% 2.9% 5.5% 10% 2002:Q2 15% 10.2% 20% 2002:Q1 P/C Net Premiums Written: % Change, Quarter vs. Year-Prior Quarter The longawaited uptick: mainly personal lines Finally! Back-to-back quarters of net written premium growth (vs. the same quarter, prior year) 10 Monthly Change* in Auto Insurance Prices, 1991–2010* 10% 8% Cyclical peaks in PP Auto tend to occur approximately every 10 years (early 1990s, early 2000s and likely the early 2010s) 6% A pricing peak may be occurring 4% 2% 0% “Hard” markets tend to occur during recessionary periods Dec. 2010 change fell to 4.4% from 5.4% in Nov. -2% '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 *Percentage change from same month in prior year; through December 2010; seasonally adjusted Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns. Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institutes. 11 Average Premium for Home Insurance Policies** Consumer efforts to economize (increased deductibles, more shopping, etc.) and adverse exposure trends are depressing the average homeowners insurance premium $950 $900 $850 $804 $800 $822 $791 $799 $807 08 09* 10* $764 $729 $750 $700 $668 $650 $593 $600 $550 $536 $508 $500 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 * Insurance Information Institute Estimates/Forecasts **Excludes state-run insurers. Source: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute estimates 2009-2010 based on CPI and other data. 12 Average Commercial Rate Change, All Lines, (1Q:2004–3Q:2010) 3Q10 -5.2% 1Q10 -5.3% 2Q10 4Q09 -5.6% -6.4% 3Q09 -5.8% 2Q09 -4.9% 1Q09 -5.1% -6.4% -11.0% -12.9% -13.5% -12.0% -13.3% -11.8% -11.3% Source: Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers; Insurance Information Institute 4Q08 3Q08 2Q08 1Q08 4Q07 3Q07 2Q07 1Q07 4Q06 3Q06 -5.3% -3.0% -2.7% -4.6% KRW Effect -16% 2Q06 1Q06 4Q05 3Q05 2Q05 1Q05 4Q04 3Q04 2Q04 -14% Magnitude of Price Declines Shrank During Crisis, Reflecting Shrinking Capital, Reduced Investment Gains, Deteriorating Underwriting Performance, Higher Cat Losses and Costlier Reinsurance -9.6% -12% -8.2% -10% -9.7% -8% -9.4% -6% -7.0% -4% -5.9% -2% -3.2% 0% -0.1% 1Q04 (Percent) Market Remains Soft as Capital Restored and Underwriting Losses Remain Modest 13 Change in Commercial Rate Renewals, by Account Size: 1999:Q4 to 2010:Q3 Percentage Change (%) Peak = 2001:Q4 +28.5% Pricing Turned Negative in Early 2004 and Has Been Negative Ever Since Market has Been Soft for 6+ years and Remains Soft as Capital is Restored and Underwriting Losses Remain Modest KRW Effect Trough = 2007:Q3 -13.6% Source: Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers; Insurance Information Institute. 14 Net Written Premium Growth by Segment: 2008-2011F Personal lines growth resumed in 2010 and will continue in 2011, while commercial lines contracted again in 2010 and but will stabilize in 2011 4% 2.8% 2.5% 2% 0.3% 0% -2% -0.1% -0.1% -4% -2.0% -3.1% -6% -8% -10% -9.4% -12% Personal Lines 2008 Commercial Lines 2009E 2010P 2011F Rate and exposure are more favorable in personal lines, whereas a prolonged soft market and sluggish recovery from the recession weigh on commercial lines. Sources: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute. 17 Capital/Policyholder Surplus (US) Total Surplus Exhibits Little Cyclicality, While Surplus Leverage Ratios Influence Cycle 18 Policyholder Surplus, 2006:Q4–2010:Q3 ($ Billions) 2007:Q3 Previous Surplus Peak Surplus set a new record in 2010:Q3* $560 $544.8 $540.7 $540 $530.5 $512.8 $520 $460 $440 $515.6 $511.5 $505.0 $500 $487.1 $480 $521.8 $517.9 $496.6 $490.8 $478.5 The Industry now has $1 of surplus for every $0.77 of NPW—the strongest claimspaying status in its history. $463.0 $455.6 $437.1 $420 06:Q4 07:Q1 07:Q2 07:Q3 07:Q4 08:Q1 08:Q2 08:Q3 08:Q4 09:Q1 09:Q2 09:Q3 09:Q4 10:Q1 10:Q2 10:Q3 Quarterly Surplus Changes Since 2007:Q3 Peak *Includes $22.5B of paid-in capital from a holding company parent for one insurer’s investment in a non-insurance business in early 2010. Sources: ISO, A.M .Best. 09:Q1: -$84.7B (-16.2%) 09:Q2: -$58.8B (-11.2%) 09:Q3: -$31.0B (-5.9%) 09:Q4: -$10.3B (-2.0%) 10:Q1: +$18.9B (+3.6%) 10:Q2: +$8.7B (+1.7%) 10:Q3: +$23.0B (+4.4%) 20 Investment Performance Investments Cycles Also Influence P/C Insurer Profitability 27 Property/Casualty Insurance Industry Investment Gain: 1994–2010:Q31 2009:Q3 gain was $29.3B ($ Billions) $70 $64.0 $58.0 $60 $52.3 $40 $55.7 $51.9 $48.9 $47.2 $50 $59.4 $56.9 $45.3 $44.4 $42.8 $39.0 $39.5 $36.0 $35.4 $31.7 $30 Investment gains in 2010 are on track to be their best since 2007 $20 $10 $0 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05* 06 07 08 09 10:Q3 In 2008, Investment Gains Fell by 50% Due to Lower Yields and Nearly $20B of Realized Capital Losses 2009 Saw Smaller Realized Capital Losses But Declining Investment Income Investment Gains Recovered Significantly in 2010 1 Investment gains consist primarily of interest, stock dividends and realized capital gains and losses. * 2005 figure includes special one-time dividend of $3.2B. Sources: ISO; Insurance Information Institute. $4.43 $8.92 $3.52 $9.70 $9.13 -$19.81 -$7.98 -$1.21 $6.61 Capital losses have turned to capital gains, aiding earnings $6.63 $16.21 $13.02 $10.81 $9.24 $6.00 $1.66 $9.82 $9.89 $4.81 $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 -$5 -$10 -$15 -$20 -$25 $2.88 ($ Billions) $18.02 P/C Insurer Net Realized Capital Gains, 1990-2010:Q3 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10:Q3 Realized Capital Losses Were the Primary Cause of 2008/2009’s Large Drop in Profits and ROE and Were a Major Driver of Its Recovery in 2010 Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute. 29 Treasury Yield Curves: Pre-Crisis (July 2007) vs. December 2010 6% 5% 4.82% 4.96% 5.04% 4.96% 4.82% 4.82% 4.88% 5.00% 4.93% 5.00% 4.17% 4% 3% Treasury yield curve is near its most depressed level in at least 45 years, though longer yields rose in late 2010 as economy improves. Investment income is falling as a result. 5.19% 4.42% 3.29% 2.66% 1.93% 2% QE2 Target 0.99% 1% 0.62% 0.09% 0.14% 0.19% 0.29% 1M 3M 6M 1Y October 2010 Yield Curve* Pre-Crisis (July 2007) 0% 2Y 3Y 5Y 7Y 10Y 20Y 30Y The Fed’s Announced Intention to Pursue Additional Quantitative Easing Could Further Depress Rates in the 7 to 10-Year Maturity Range Sources: Board of Governors of the United States Federal Reserve Bank; Insurance Information Institute. 30 Reduction in Combined Ratio Necessary to Offset 1% Decline in Investment Yield to Maintain Constant ROE, by Line* s ne i L -5.7% -5.2% -4.3% -3.7% -3.3% -3.3% -3.1% -2.1% -1.9% -3.6% -2.0% -1.8% 0% -1% -2% -3% -4% -5% -6% -7% -8% -1.8% s ty l e e o p t r a s n i a ro p l Li y rc Su Au s o t P C a / al r e l s s n y n t a t P u M m m m m li P di so s pl rra d e m m m m r r r t e C a e d o o r o o Pe Pv Pe C C C C C Fi W Su M W to u A R a ur s n ei ** e nc -7.3% Lower Investment Earnings Place a Greater Burden on Underwriting and Pricing Discipline *Based on 2008 Invested Assets and Earned Premiums **US domestic reinsurance only Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute. 31 Distribution of P/C Insurance Industry’s Investment Portfolio Portfolio Facts as of 12/31/2009 As of December 31, 2009 Invested assets totaled $1.26 trillion 68.8% Bonds Generally, insurers invest conservatively, with over 2/3 of invested assets in bonds Only 18% of invested assets were in common or preferred stock *Net admitted assets. Common & Other 7.0% Preferred 6.2% Cash & Stock 18.0% Short-term Investments Sources: NAIC; Insurance Information Institute research. 32 2011 Financial Overview About Half of the P/C Insurance Industry’s Bond Investments Are in Municipal Bonds Bond Investment Facts as of 12/31/09 As of December 31, 2009 Investments in “Political Subdivision [of states]” bonds were $102.5 billion Investments in “States, Territories, & Possessions” bonds were $58.9 billion Investments in “Special Revenue” bonds were $288.2 billion All state, local, and special revenue bonds totaled 48.2% of bonds, about 35.7% of total invested assets 31.0% Special Revenue Political Subdivisions 11.0% 33.3% Industrial U.S. Government 0.9% 15.5% 6.3% 2.0% States, Terr., Foreign Govt etc. Sources: NAIC, via SNL Financial; Insurance Information Institute research. 33 2011 Financial Overview When P/C Insurers Invest in Higher Risk Bonds, It’s Corporates, Not Munis Subdivisions of States 0.1% 97.4% 2.5% 0.1% States 92.5% 7.4% Industrial 72.8% 0% 20% 40% 20.4% 60% 80% Class 1 Class 2 Classes 3-6 6.8% 100% The NAIC’s Securities Valuation Office puts bonds into one of 6 classes: class 1 has the lowest expected impairments; successively higher numbered classes imply increasing impairment likelihood. Data are as of year-end 2009. Sources: SNL Financial; Insurance Information Institute. Financial Strength & Underwriting Cyclical Pattern is P-C Impairment History is Directly Tied to Underwriting, Reserving & Pricing 35 P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–2009 5 of the 11 are Florida companies (1 of these 5 is a title insurer) 18 19 16 18 14 15 35 31 29 12 16 14 13 5 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0 7 6 9 13 12 9 11 9 7 8 10 15 12 20 19 30 31 34 34 40 36 41 50 49 50 47 49 50 48 55 60 60 58 70 The Number of Impairments Varies Significantly Over the P/C Insurance Cycle, With Peaks Occurring Well into Hard Markets Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute. Reasons for US P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–2008 Deficient Loss Reserves and Inadequate Pricing Are the Leading Cause of Insurer Impairments, Underscoring the Importance of Discipline. Investment Catastrophe Losses Play a Much Smaller Role Reinsurance Failure Sig. Change in Business 3.7% 4.2% Misc. 9.1% Investment Problems Affiliate Impairment 7.0% 38.1% Deficient Loss Reserves/ Inadequate Pricing 7.9% 7.6% Catastrophe Losses 8.1% Alleged Fraud 14.3% Rapid Growth Source: A.M. Best: 1969-2008 Impairment Review, Special Report, Apr. 6, 2009 38 Underwriting Trends – Financial Crisis Does Not Directly Impact Underwriting Performance 39 P/C Insurance Industry Combined Ratio, 2001–2010:Q3* As Recently as 2001, Insurers Paid Out Nearly $1.16 for Every $1 in Earned Premiums Heavy Use of Reinsurance Lowered Net Losses Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases Cyclical Deterioration 120 115.8 110 Lower CAT Losses, More Reserve Releases Best Combined Ratio Since 1949 (87.6) 107.5 100.1 100 101.0 100.8 98.4 99.3 99.7 2009 2010:Q3 95.7 92.6 90 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 * Excludes Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers in 2008, 2009 and 2010. Including M&FG, 2008=105.1, 2009=100.7, 2010:Q3=101.2 Sources: A.M. Best, ISO. 40 Calendar Year Combined Ratios by Segment: 2008-2011F Personal lines combined ratio is expected to remain stable in 2010 while commercial lines and reinsurance deteriorate 110 108 106 104 102 100 98 96 94 92 90 108 106 104.5 103.8 102.4 100 99.5 98.9 Personal Lines Commercial Lines 2008 2009 2010P 2011F Overall deterioration in 2011 underwriting performance is due to expected return to normal catastrophe activity along with deteriorating underwriting performance related to the prolonged commercial soft market Sources: A.M. Best . Insurance Information Institute. 43 Profitability and Growth in Texas P/C Insurance Markets Analysis by Line and Nearby State Comparisons 44 RNW All Lines: TX vs. U.S., 2000-2009 (Percent) 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% P/C Insurer profitability in TX is highly variable and below that of the US overall over the past decade US: 7.0% TX: 3.7% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% 00 01 02 US All Lines Sources: NAIC. 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 TX All Lines 45 RNW PP Auto: TX vs. U.S., 2000-2009 25% 20% Pvt. Passenger Auto profitability in TX is has been somewhat below the US in recent years 15% 10% 5% Average 2000-2009 0% US: 7.2% TX: 6.1% -5% -10% 00 01 02 US PP Auto Sources: NAIC. 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 TX PP Auto 46 RNW Comm. Auto: TX vs. U.S., 2000-2009 (Percent) 20% 15% Commercial Auto profitability in TX is generally below the US average 10% 5% Average 2000-2009 0% US: 8.5% TX: 5.6% -5% -10% 00 01 02 US Comm Auto Sources: NAIC. 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 TX Comm Auto 47 RNW Comm. Multi-Peril: TX vs. U.S., 2000-2009 (Percent) Hurricane Ike put a big dent in CMP profitability in 2008 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% Average 2000-2009 -30% US: 8.0% TX: 0.4% -40% -50% 00 01 02 US Comm M-P Sources: NAIC. 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 TX Comm M-P 48 RNW Homeowners: TX vs. U.S., 2000-2009 (Percent) Homeowners Profitability: Mold, Hurricanes, Hail & Tornadoes (Need I Say More?) 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% Average 2000-2009 -30% US: 4.7% -40% TX: -2.3% -50% -60% 00 01 02 US HO Sources: NAIC. 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 TX HO 49 RNW Workers Comp: TX vs. U.S., 2000-2009 (Percent) Workers comp profitability in TX has generally outperformed the US 20% 15% 10% 5% Average 2000-2009 US: 6.4% 0% TX: 9.2% -5% 00 01 02 US WComp Sources: NAIC. 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 TX WComp 50 All Lines: 10-Year Average RNW TX & Nearby States 2000-2009 New Mexico 10.5% Texas All Lines profitability is below the US and regional average 7.0% U.S. 6.9% Arkansas 6.0% Oklahoma 3.7% Texas -9.3% Mississippi -13.0% Louisiana -15% -10% -5% 0% Source: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute 5% 10% 15% PP Auto: 10-Year Average RNW TX & Nearby States 2000-2009 11.1% 7.2% U.S. 6.8% Arkansas 7.6% 6.1% 4.7% 0.8% New Mexico Oklahoma Texas PP Auto profitability is below the US and regional average Texas Mississippi Louisiana 0% 2% 4% 6% Source: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute 8% 10% 12% Top Ten Most Expensive And Least Expensive States For Automobile Insurance, 2008 (1) Rank Most expensive states Average expenditure Rank Least expensive states Average expenditure 1 D.C. $1,126 1 North Dakota $503 2 Louisiana 1,105 2 Iowa 519 3 New Jersey 1,081 3 South Dakota 520 4 Florida 1,055 4 Nebraska 547 5 New York 1,044 5 Idaho 562 6 Delaware 1,007 6 Kansas 576 7 Rhode Island 986 7 Wisconsin 581 8 Nevada 970 8 North Carolina 595 9 Connecticut 950 9 Maine 600 10 Maryland 922 10 Indiana 612 Texas ranked 15th in 2008, with an average expenditure for auto insurance of $854. (1) Based on average automobile insurance expenditures. Source: © 2010 National Association of Insurance Commissioners. 53 Comm. Auto: 10-Year Average RNW TX & Nearby States 2000-2009 11.1% New Mexico 8.5% U.S. 6.1% Arkansas 7.2% Oklahoma 5.6% 3.1% -3.8% Texas Commercial Auto profitability is below the US and regional average Texas Mississippi Louisiana -5% 0% 5% Source: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute 10% 15% Comm. M-P: 10-Year Average RNW TX & Nearby States 2000-2009 13.3% Texas Commercial Multi-Peril profitability is below the US and regional average 8.0% New Mexico U.S. 6.4% Arkansas 11.0% Oklahoma 0.4% Texas -10.0% Mississippi -20.2% Louisiana -30% -20% -10% 0% Source: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute 10% 20% Homeowners: 10-Year Average RNW TX & Nearby States 2000-2009 12.0% 4.7% New Mexico U.S. -6.9% Arkansas -1.6% Oklahoma Texas Homeowners profitability is below the US and regional average -2.3% -29.0% -32.4% Texas Mississippi Louisiana -40% -30% -20% -10% Source: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute 0% 10% 20% Top Ten Most Expensive And Least Expensive States For Homeowners Insurance, 2008 (1) Texas ranked as the most expensive state for homeowners insurance in 2008, with an average expenditure of $1,460. Rank Most expensive states Average expenditure Rank Least expensive states Average expenditure 1 Texas (3) $1,460 1 Idaho $387 2 Florida (4) 1,390 2 Utah 432 3 Louisiana 1,155 3 Oregon 439 4 Oklahoma 1,048 4 Washington 471 5 Massachusetts 1,026 5 Wisconsin 503 6 New York 983 6 Delaware 535 7 Connecticut 980 7 Ohio 565 8 Mississippi 980 8 Maine 572 9 D.C. 926 9 Pennsylvania 586 10 Kansas 916 10 Kentucky 601 (1) States with the same premium receive the same rank. (2) Based on the HO-3 homeowner package policy for owner-occupied dwellings, 1 to 4 family units. Provides “all risks” coverage (except those specifically excluded in the policy) on buildings and broad named-peril coverage on personal property, and is the most common package written. (3) The Texas Department of Insurance developed home insurance policy forms that are similar but not identical to the standard forms. (4) Florida data excludes policies written by Citizen's Property Insurance Corporation, the state's insurer of last resort, and therefore are not directly comparable to other states. Note: Average premium=Premiums/exposure per house years. A house year is equal to 365 days of insured coverage for a single dwelling. The NAIC does not rank State Average Expenditures and does not endorse any conclusions drawn from this data. Source: © 2010 National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). Reprinted with permission. Further reprint or distribution strictly prohibited without written permission of NAIC. 57 Workers Comp: 10-Year Average RNW TX & Nearby States 2000-2010 New Mexico 8.7% 6.4% U.S. 13.2% 3.7% Texas Workers Comp profitability is above the US 9.2% average but similar to the regional 9.5% average Arkansas Oklahoma Texas Mississippi 9.9% Louisiana 0% 5% Source: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute 10% 15% All Lines DWP Growth: TX vs. U.S., 2000-2009 (Percent) -3.3% 2.7% 0.5% 3.7% 3.4% 6.2% 2.2% 1.4% 0.3% 7.4% 4.6% 5.2% 10% 9.8% 7.9% 15% 14.3% 12.0% 15.7% 20% 5% Texas DWP growth is generally higher than for the US overall. Average: 2000-2009 US: 4.9% TX: 6.2% 20.5% 25% 00 Source: SNL Financial. 01 02 US DWP: All Lines 03 04 05 06 TX DWP: All Lines 07 08 -1.6% -5% -2.1% 0% 09 59 Comm. Lines DWP Growth: TX vs. U.S., 2000-2009 (Percent) 0.0% 5.4% 10.4% -1.2% 0% 0.2% 4.1% 5% 3.3% 2.3% 6.3% 7.6% 15% 11.4% 9.2% 20% 4.5% 0.1% 27.2% 25% 19.0% 15.3% 19.2% 30% 10% Texas Commercial Lines DWP growth is generally higher than for the US overall. Average: 2000-2009 US: 5.5% TX: 7.3% -9.3% -7.4% -5% -10% -15% 00 01 02 03 US DWP: Comm. Lines Source: SNL Financial. 04 05 06 07 TX DWP: Comm. Lines 08 09 60 Personal Lines DWP Growth: TX vs. U.S., 2000-2009 (Percent) 0% 00 01 02 03 US DWP: Personal Lines Source: SNL Financial. 04 05 06 07 TX DWP: Personal Lines 08 1.1% 2% 4.3% 5.5% 0.8% 4% 2.8% 3.1% 6% 0.0% 8% 1.2% 2.9% 10% 2.3% 2.4% 8.2% 12% 9.2% 7.2% 11.3% 14% 11.1% 16% 2.2% 0.7% 18% 5.3% 16.8% Texas Commercial Lines DWP growth is generally higher than for the US overall. Average: 2000-2009 US: 4.3% TX: 5.5% 09 61 Shifting Legal Liability & Tort Environment Is the Tort Pendulum Swinging Against Insurers? 62 Cost of US Tort System ($ Billions) $180 $169 $167 $156 $156 $159 $144 $141 $130 $150 $129 $200 $148 $270 $259 $270 $248 $255 $252 $247 $261 $246 $233 $250 $205 $300 $260 Tort costs consumed 1.74% of GDP in 2009, down from 2.21% in 2003 $100 Per capita “tort tax” was $808 in 2009, up from $793 in 2000* $50 * Restated in 2009 dollars, based on CPI. Source: Towers Watson, 2010 Update on US Tort Cost Trends. 12E 10E 08 06 04 02 00 98 96 94 92 90 $0 Over the Last Three Decades, Total Tort Costs as a % of GDP Appear Somewhat Cyclical ($ Billions) $300 Tort Sytem Costs 2.50% Tort Costs as % of GDP $250 Tort System Costs $200 $150 2.00% $100 1.75% Tort Costs Have Remained High but Relatively Stable Since the mid-2000s. As a Share of GDP they Should Fall as the Economy Expands $50 $0 Tort Costs as % of GDP 2.25% 1.50% 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 Sources: Towers Watson, 2010 Update on US Tort Cost Trends, Appendix 1A 08 10E 12E 67 Business Leaders Ranking of Liability Systems in 2010 Worst States 41. New Mexico 42. Florida Nebraska 43. Montana 4. Indiana 44. Arkansas 5. Iowa 45. Illinois 6. Virginia 46. California Texas 47. Alabama South Carolina Hawaii 48. Mississippi 49. Louisiana Best States 1. Delaware 2. North Dakota 3. 7. Utah 8. Colorado 9. Massachusetts 10. South Dakota New in 2010 North Dakota Massachusetts South Dakota Drop-offs Maine Vermont Kansas Midwest/West has mix of good and bad states. 50. West Virginia Source: US Chamber of Commerce 2010 State Liability Systems Ranking Study; Insurance Info. Institute. Newly Notorious New Mexico Montana Arkansas Rising Above The Nation’s Judicial Hellholes: 2010 Watch List Illinois Madison County, IL Atlantic County, NJ St. Landry Parish, LA District of Columbia NYC & Albany, NY St. Clair County, IL Cook County West Virginia Philadelphia California Los Angeles and Humboldt Counties Dishonorable Mention MI Supreme Court City of St. Louis CO Supreme Court Nevada Clark County South Florida Source: American Tort Reform Association; Insurance Information Institute 69 Average Jury Awards 1999 - 2008 $1,200 $1,077 $1,100 $1,018 $1,022 $1,000 $1,046 $950 $900 $800 $725 $747 $756 2000 2001 $800 $799 2002 2003 $700 $600 $500 1999 Source: Jury Verdict Research; Insurance Information Institute. 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Sum of Top 10 Jury Awards, 2004-2010 $6,000 The sum of the largest jury awards was up slightly in 2010 $5,159 $5,000 $4,000 $2,954 $3,000 $2,000 $1,344 $815 $1,000 $1,511 $1,568 2009 2010 $616 $0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Source: Insurance Information Institute from Lawyers USA, January 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010. 2010 Top Ten Jury Verdicts Value Issue State $505.1 Million Products Liability Nevada $208.8 Million Personal Injury (Asbestos/Mesothelioma case) California $152 Million Massachusetts Wrongful Death (Tobacco verdict) $132.5 Million Personal Injury (Ford rollover retrial) Mississippi $124.5 Million Personal Injury (Passenger van rollover case) Texas $103 Million Legal Malpractice/Breach of Fiduciary Duty Mississippi $90.8 Million Products Liability, Wrongful Death (Tobacco verdict) Florida $89 Million Personal Injury, Products Liability Pennsylvania $82.5 Million Wrongful Death Texas $80 Million Wrongful Death (Tobacco verdict) Florida Source: Lawyers USA, January 18, 2011. 2009 Top Ten Jury Verdicts Value Issue State $370 Million Defamation California $330 Million Personal Injury (Drunk driving case) Florida $300 Million Personal Injury (Tobacco verdict) Florida $89 Million Personal Injury (Drunk driving case) Missouri $78.75 Million Personal Injury (Prempro) New Jersey $77.4 Million Medical Malpractice New York $71 Million Conversion and Breach of Fiduciary Duty Texas $70 Million Workers Comp Case Texas $65 Million Personal Injury Florida $60 Million Medical Malpractice New York Source: Lawyers USA, January 15, 2010. 2008 Top Ten Jury Verdicts Value Issue State $388 Million Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Nevada $316 Million Breach of Contract Georgia $188 Million Defamation New York $85 Million Premises Liability Pennsylvania $84 Million Negligence, Personal Injury Texas $66 Million Breach of Fiduciary Duty Oklahoma $60 Million Insurance Bad Faith Nevada $55 Million Negligence California $54 Million Wrongful Death Georgia $48 Million Negligence Indiana Source: Lawyers USA, January 13, 2009. Where Will the Exposure Growth Come From? Personal Lines Commercial Lines 85 2% 0.6% 4% 1.1% 1.8% 2.5% 3.6% 3.1% 2.7% 0.9% 3.2% 2.3% 2.9% 4.1% 6% 1.6% The Q4:2008 decline was the steepest since the Q1:1982 drop of 6.8% Real GDP Growth (%) 5.0% 3.7% 1.7% 2.6% 3.2% 3.2% 3.3% 3.3% 3.5% 3.1% 3.2% 3.2% 3.3% US Real GDP Growth* -0.7% 12:4Q 12:3Q 12:2Q 12:1Q 11:4Q 11:3Q 11:2Q 11:1Q 10:4Q 10:3Q 10:1Q 09:4Q 09:3Q 09:2Q 10:2Q Economic growth projections for 2011 have been revised upward. This is a major positive for insurance demand and exposure growth. -4.9% 09:1Q 08:4Q-6.8% -4.0% 08:3Q 08:2Q 08:1Q 07:4Q 07:3Q 07:2Q 07:1Q 2006 2005 2004 2000 -8% 2003 -6% 2002 -4% Recession began in Dec. 2007. Economic toll of credit crunch, housing slump, labor market contraction has been severe but modest recovery is underway 2001 -2% -0.7% 0% Demand for Insurance Continues To Be Impacted by Sluggish Economic Conditions, but the Benefits of Even Slow Growth Will Compound and Gradually Benefit the Economy Broadly * Estimates/Forecasts from Blue Chip Economic Indicators. Source: US Department of Commerce, Blue Economic Indicators 1/11; Insurance Information Institute. 86 Real GDP Growth: US vs. TX, 1998-2009 7% 6.3% Texas US 6% 5% 4.4% 4.8% 4.4% 5.5% 4.8% 4.2% 4% 4.6% 3.4% 3% 2.6% 2% 1.3% 2.4% 1.7% 1% 2.8% 2.7% 2.1% 2.1% 0.2% 0.5% 0.1% 0.3% 0% -1.5% Real economic growth in Texas outpaced the US from 1998-2009. The average rate of real economic growth was 2.9% in Texas and 2.3% in the US -1% -2% -3% 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 -2.1% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Pursue Additional Quantitative Easing Could Further Depress Rates in the 7 to 10-Year Maturity Range Sources: Board of Governors of the United States Federal Reserve Bank; Insurance Information Institute. 87 2011 Financial Overview State Economic Growth Varied in 2009 Mountain, Plains states still growing the fastest Some Southeast states growing well, but others among the weakest 89 Direct Premiums Written: All Lines Percent Change by State, 2004-2009 Top 25 States 42.9 45 North Dakota is the growth juggernaut of the P/C insurance industry—too bad nobody lives there… 12.2 11.5 10.7 KS NC ID 4.6 12.3 NE HI 12.8 TX 5.0 12.9 DC AR 13.0 SC 5.1 13.0 WV GA 13.5 MS 5.5 14.0 NM WA 14.1 IA 5.8 14.2 DE 10 FL 14.8 OK 7.9 15.4 15 Texas was the 15th fastest growing state for P/C insurers from 2004-2009 and one of the few large states to see any growth UT 20 17.2 25 18.8 30 22.0 35 23.8 Pecent change (%) 40 AL MT WY SD LA 0 ND 5 Sources: SNL Financial LC.; Insurance Information Institute. 90 -15.2 CA -8.2 NH OH -14.8 -3.7 ME MI -3.5 IL -9.2 -3.1 NJ MA -2.8 RI CO -5.2 -2.4 CT -1.8 -1.6 VT MN PA IN NY NV WI OR AZ MD KY TN VA -15 MO States with the poorest performing economies also produced the most negative net change in premiums of the past 5 years -10 -20 -1.2 -0.5 -0.1 -5 AK Pecent change (%) 0 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 2.0 2.4 2.5 Bottom 25 States 2.6 4.2 5 4.5 Direct Premiums Written: All Lines Percent Change by State, 2004-2009 Over the 5 years from 2004-2009, 15 states saw premiums shrink, one had no growth, and 4 others grew premiums by less than 1% Sources: SNL Financial LC; Insurance Information Institute. 91 Annual Inflation Rates, (CPI-U, %), 1990–2014F Annual Inflation Rates (%) Inflation peaked at 5.6% in August 2008 on high energy and commodity crisis. The recession and the collapse of the commodity bubble have reduced nearterm inflationary pressures 6.0 5.0 4.9 5.1 3.8 4.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.3 3.4 3.2 2.9 2.8 2.4 3.0 2.6 2.5 3.8 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.9 1.6 1.7 1.3 2.2 2.2 1.0 0.0 -0.4 -1.0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10F 11F 12F 13F 14F The slack in the U.S. economy suggests that inflation should not heat up before 2012, but other forces (commodity prices, inflation in countries from which we import, etc.), plus U.S. debt burden, remain longer-run concerns Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators, 10/10 and 1/11 (forecasts). 92 0.7 0.5 I.I.I. estimates that each incremental 100,000 decline in housing starts costs home insurers $87.5 million in new exposure (gross premium). The net exposure loss in 2009 vs. 2005 is estimated at about $1.3 billion 0.89 0.9 0.56 0.59 0.68 1.1 0.90 1.3 1.20 1.29 1.5 1.19 1.01 1.7 New home starts plunged 72% from 2005-2009; A net annual decline of 1.49 million units, lowest since records began in 1959 1.20 1.33 1.43 1.50 1.9 1.46 1.35 1.48 1.47 1.62 1.64 1.57 1.60 1.71 2.1 1.36 (Millions of Units) 1.85 1.96 2.07 1.80 New Private Housing Starts, 1990-2016F Job growth, improved credit market conditions and demographics will eventually boost home construction 0.3 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10F11F12F13F14F15F16F Little Exposure Growth Likely for Homeowners Insurers Until 2012. Also Affects Commercial Insurers with Construction Risk Exposure, Surety Source: U.S. Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (1/11); Insurance Information Institute. 94 2011 Financial Overview Average Square Footage of Completed New Homes in U.S., 1973-2010* 2,500 2,300 2,100 1,900 1,700 The trend toward building larger homes reversed in 2009 and 2010, affecting exposure growth beyond the decline in number of units built 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 1,500 The average size of completed new homes often falls in recessions (yellow bars), but historically bounces back in expansions 1,660 1,695 1,645 1,700 1,720 1,755 1,760 1,740 1,720 1,710 1,725 1,780 1,785 1,825 1,905 1,995 2,035 2,080 2,075 2,095 2,095 2,100 2,095 2,120 2,150 2,190 2,223 2,266 2,324 2,320 2,330 2,349 2,434 2,469 2,521 2,519 2,438 2,374 Square Ft 2,700 The average size of completed new homes fell by 145 square feet (5.75%) from 2008-2010, the largest recession-based drop in nearly four decades *2010 figure is weighted average square feet of completed homes in first three quarters of 2010 Source: U.S. Census Bureau: http://www.census.gov/const/www/quarterly_starts_completions.pdf; Insurance Information Institute. 95 2011 Financial Overview Wage and Salary Disbursements (Payroll Base) vs. Workers Comp Net Written Premiums Wage and Salary Disbursement (Private Employment) vs. WC NWP ($ Billions) 7/90-3/91 3/01-11/01 12/07-6/09 $7,000 $60 $6,000 $50 $5,000 $40 $4,000 $30 $3,000 $2,000 Wage & Salary Disbursements $1,000 WC NPW WC net premiums written were down $13.7B or 28.7% to $34.1B in 2009 after peaking at $47.8B in 2005 $0 $20 $10 $0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10* Weakening payrolls have eroded $2B+ in workers comp premiums; nearly 29% of NPW has been eroded away by the soft market and weak economy * Average Wage and Salary data as of 7/1/2010. Shaded areas indicate recessions. **Estimated “official” end of recession June 2009. Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis; Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis at http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/WASCUR ; I.I.I. Fact Books 97 Recovery in Capacity Utilization is a Positive Sign for Commercial Exposures “Full Capacity” Percent of Industrial Capacity The US operated at 75.2% of industrial capacity in November 2010, above the June 2009 low of 68.3% 82% Hurricane Katrina 80% 78% 76% The closer the economy is to operating at “full capacity,” the greater the inflationary pressure 74% 72% 70% March 2001November 2001 recession 68% Source: Federal Reserve Board statistical releases at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm. 98 Sep 10 Jun 10 Mar 10 Dec 09 Sep 09 Jun 09 Mar 09 Dec 08 Sep 08 Jun 08 Mar 08 Dec 07 Sep 07 Jun 07 Mar 07 Dec 06 Jun 06 Sep 06 Mar 06 Dec 05 Sep 05 Jun 05 Mar 05 Dec 04 Jun 04 Sep 04 Mar 04 Dec 03 Sep 03 Jun 03 Mar 03 Dec 02 Sep 02 Jun 02 Mar 02 Dec 01 Sep 01 Jun 01 Mar 01 66% December 2007June 2009 Recession Business Bankruptcy Filings, 1980-2010:Q3 90,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 1980-82 1980-87 1990-91 2000-01 2006-09 58.6% 88.7% 10.3% 13.0% 208.9%* There were 60,837 business bankruptcies in 2009, up 40% from 2008 and the most since 1993. 2010:Q3 bankruptcies totaled 29,059, down 5.5% from 2009:Q3 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10:3Q 70,000 43,694 48,125 80,000 69,300 62,436 64,004 71,277 81,235 82,446 63,853 63,235 64,853 71,549 70,643 62,304 52,374 51,959 53,549 54,027 44,367 37,884 35,472 40,099 38,540 35,037 34,317 39,201 19,695 28,322 43,546 60,837 43,016 % Change Surrounding Recessions Significant Exposure Implications for All Commercial Lines Sources: American Bankruptcy Institute at http://www.abiworld.org/AM/AMTemplate.cfm?Section=Home&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=61633 ; Insurance Information Institute 99 Private Sector Business Starts, 1993:Q2 – 2010:Q1* 192 188 187 189 186 190 194 191 199 204 202 195 196 196 206 206 201 192 198 206 206 203 211 205 212 200 205 204 204 197 203 209 201 203 192 192 193 201 204 202 210 212 209 216 220 223 220 220 210 221 212 204 218 209 207 199 191 193 230 220 210 170 160 184 171 180,000 businesses started in 2009:Q4, the best quarter in 2009. 2009 was the slowest year for new business starts since 1993. 169 177 180 186 174 175 180 186 200 190 Business Starts 2006: 872,000 2007: 843,000 2008: 790,000 2009: 697,000 172 (Thousands) 150 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 Business Starts Were Down Nearly 20% in the Recession, Holding Back Most Types of Commercial Insurance Exposure * Latest available as of December 29, 2010, seasonally adjusted Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cewbd.t07.htm. 100 Financial Strength & Ratings Industry Has Weathered the Storms Well 102 P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–2009 5 of the 11 are Florida companies (1 of these 5 is a title insurer) 18 19 16 18 14 15 35 31 29 12 16 14 13 5 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0 7 6 9 13 12 9 11 9 7 8 10 15 12 20 19 30 31 34 34 40 36 41 50 49 50 47 49 50 48 55 60 60 58 70 The Number of Impairments Varies Significantly Over the P/C Insurance Cycle, With Peaks Occurring Well into Hard Markets Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute. Reasons for US P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–2008 Deficient Loss Reserves and Inadequate Pricing Are the Leading Cause of Insurer Impairments, Underscoring the Importance of Discipline. Investment Catastrophe Losses Play a Much Smaller Role Reinsurance Failure Sig. Change in Business 3.7% 4.2% Misc. 9.1% Investment Problems Affiliate Impairment 7.0% 38.1% Deficient Loss Reserves/ In-adequate Pricing 7.9% 7.6% Catastrophe Losses 8.1% Alleged Fraud 14.3% Rapid Growth Source: A.M. Best: 1969-2008 Impairment Review, Special Report, Apr. 6, 2009 106 Labor Market Trends Massive Job Losses Sapped the Economy and Commercial/Personal Lines Exposure, But Trend is Improving 121 2011 Financial Overview Unemployment and Underemployment Rates: Rocketed Up in 2008-09; Stabilized in 2010 January 2000 through December 2010, Seasonally Adjusted (%) 18 U-6 went from 8.0% in March 2007 to 17.5% in October 2009; Stood at 16.7% in December 2010 Traditional Unemployment Rate U-3 Unemployment + Underemployment Rate U-6 16 Recession ended in November 2001 14 12 Unemployment kept rising for 19 more months Recession began in December 2007 Unemployment rate fell to 9.4% in December 10 Unemployment peaked at 10.1% in October 2009, highest monthly rate since 1983. 8 6 4 Dec. 10 2 Jan 00 Jan 01 Jan 02 Jan 03 Jan 04 Jan 05 Jan 06 Jan 07 Jan 08 Jan 09 Peak rate in the last 30 years: 10.8% in November December 1982 Jan 10 Stubbornly high unemployment and underemployment will constrain payroll growth, which directly affects WC exposure Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute. 122 Monthly Change in Private Employment (1,000) 158 241 16 62 75 -83 -334 -452 -297 -215 -186 -262 -109 Monthly Losses in Dec. 08–Mar. 09 Were the Largest in the Post-WW II Period -734 -667 -806 -707 -744 -649 (800) -12 -85 -58 -161 -253 -230 -257 -347 -456 -547 (600) 113,000 private sector jobs were created in December Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 Apr-07 May-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07 Sep-07 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 May-08 Jun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 (400) -14 0 (200) Private employers added jobs in every month in 2010 for a total of 1.346 million for the year 65 97 23 65 127 42 15 186 79 200 213 400 51 61 117 143 112 193 79 113 January 2008 through December 2010* (Thousands) Private Employers Added 1.346 million Jobs in 2010 After Having Shed 4.66 Million Jobs in 2009 and 3.81 Million in 2008 Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute 4.9% 08:Q1 4.6% 07:Q3 4.8% 4.5% 07:Q2 07:Q4 4.5% 07:Q1 6.0% 5.4% 7.0% 8.4% 8.6% 8.7% 8.9% 9.1% 9.3% 9.5% 9.6% 9.6% 9.6% 9.6% 9.7% 10.0% 8.1% 6.9% 8.0% 6.1% Unemployment likely peaked at 10% in late 2009. 9.0% 5.0% 9.3% 2007:Q1 to 2012:Q4F* Rising unemployment 11.0% eroded payrolls and workers comp’s 10.0% exposure base. 9.6% US Unemployment Rate Unemployment forecasts remain stubbornly high through 2011, but still imply millions of new jobs will created. * = actual; = forecasts Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (1/11); Insurance Information Institute 12:Q4 12:Q3 12:Q2 12:Q1 11:Q4 11:Q3 11:Q2 11:Q1 10:Q4 10:Q3 10:Q2 10:Q1 09:Q4 09:Q3 09:Q2 09:Q1 08:Q4 08:Q3 08:Q2 4.0% 125 Unemployment Rates by State, December 2010: Highest 25 States* 8.8 8.8 9.0 9.1 9.1 9.3 9.3 9.4 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.6 9.6 9.7 10.2 10.3 10.6 10.7 12.5 11.5 10.1 9.8 10 11.7 12 12.0 Unemployment Rate (%) 14 14.5 16 In December, 31 states and DC reported unemployment rate decreases from a year earlier, 16 states had increases and 3 had no change. 8 6 4 2 16 states + DC had unemployment rates above the US average in Dec. 2010, 34 states were below. 0 NV CA FL MI RI SC OR KY GA MS NC DC WV OH MO IN ID US TN AZ WA IL NJ AL CT CO *Provisional figures for December 2010, seasonally adjusted. Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute. 127 Unemployment Rates By State, December 2010: Lowest 25 States* 2 3.8 4 4.4 4.6 5.5 6.3 6.4 6.4 5.8 6 6.7 6.8 6.8 7.0 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.5 7.9 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.5 8.1 8 8.0 Unemployment Rate (%) 8.5 8.5 10 7.2 In December, state and regional unemployment rates were little changed. Some 31 states and DC reported unemployment rate decreases from a year earlier, 16 states had increases and 3 had no change. Unemployment in Texas has been well below that of the US during and after the recession— contributing its relatively strong p/c exposure performance 0 PA NM DE TX NY MA AK LA AR WI UT MD ME MT MN OK KS VA WY HI IA VT NH SD NE ND *Provisional figures for December 2010, seasonally adjusted. Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute. 128 Catastrophic Loss – Catastrophe Losses Trends Are Trending Adversely 143 US Insured Catastrophe Losses $9.2 $27.1 $27.5 $12.9 $5.9 $26.5 $4.6 $8.3 $10.1 $2.6 $7.4 $8.3 $16.9 $4.7 $2.7 $20 $7.5 $40 $5.5 $22.9 $60 $13.6 $80 First Half 2010 CAT Losses Were Down 19% or $1.4B from first half 2009 $61.9 2000s: A Decade of Disaster 2000s: $193B (up 117%) 1990s: $89B $10.6 $100 $6.7 $120 $100.0 $100 Billion CAT Year is Coming Eventually ($ Billions) $0 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10*20?? 2010 CAT Losses Were Close to “Average” Figures Do Not Include an Estimate of Deepwater Horizon Loss *Estimate from Munich Re. Note: 2001 figure includes $20.3B for 9/11 losses reported through 12/31/01. Includes only business and personal property claims, business interruption and auto claims. Non-prop/BI losses = $12.2B. Sources: Property Claims Service/ISO; Munich Re; Insurance Information Institute. 144 Combined Ratio Points Associated with Catastrophe Losses: 1960 – 2010E Combined Ratio Points 8.1 8.8 2.6 3.3 2010E 1.6 2.7 2008 2002 2006 1.6 2004 1.6 2000 3.3 3.3 3.6 2.9 1.0 1998 1996 1994 5.0 5.4 5.9 3.3 2.8 2.3 2.1 1990 1992 1.2 1988 1986 1984 1982 1980 1978 1976 1974 1972 1970 1.2 0.4 0.8 1.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.5 1.0 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.8 1.1 0.6 1.4 2.0 1.3 2.0 0.5 0.5 0.7 1968 0.4 1966 1962 1964 3.0 3.6 1960s: 1.04 1970s: 0.85 1980s: 1.31 1990s: 3.39 2000s: 3.52 0.8 1.1 1.1 0.1 0.9 1960 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Avg. CAT Loss Component of the Combined Ratio by Decade The Catastrophe Loss Component of Private Insurer Losses Has Increased Sharply in Recent Decades Notes: Private carrier losses only. Excludes loss adjustment expenses and reinsurance reinstatement premiums. Figures are adjusted for losses ultimately paid by foreign insurers and reinsurers. Source: ISO; Insurance Information Institute estimate for 2010. 145 Natural Disasters in the United States, 1980 – 2010 Number of Events (Annual Totals 1980 – 2010) Number There were a record 247 natural disaster events in the US in 2010 Geophysical (earthquake, tsunami, volcanic activity) Source: MR NatCatSERVICE Meteorological (storm) Hydrological (flood, mass movement) Climatological (temperature extremes, drought, wildfire) 146 Insured Losses Due to Weather Perils in the U.S.: 1980 – 2010 (Tropical Cyclone, Thunderstorm, and Winter Storm only) For the second year in a row, insured losses due to weather perils in the U.S. in 2010 were the highest on record for a year without a hurricane landfall. Sources: MR NatCatSERVICE, Property Claims Services © 2011 Munich Re 147 U.S. Thunderstorm Loss Trends, 1980 – 2010 (Annual Totals) Thunderstorm losses in 2010 totaled $9.5 billion, the 3rd highest ever Average thunderstorm losses have now quintupled since the early 1980s Hurricanes get all the headlines, but thunderstorms are consistent producers of large scale loss Source: Property Claims Service, MR NatCatSERVICE 155 Top 12 Most Costly Disasters in US History (Insured Losses, 2009, $ Billions) $50 $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 Hurricane Katrina Remains, By Far, the Most Expensive Insurance Event in US and World History $45.1 $22.2 $22.7 $11.3 $12.6 Wilma (2005) Ike Northridge Andrew (2008) (1994) (1992) 9/11 Attacks (2001) $17.2 $4.2 $5.2 Jeanne Frances (2004) (2004) $6.2 $6.6 $8.1 $8.5 Rita (2005) Hugo (1989) Ivan (2004) Charley (2004) Katrina (2005) 8 of the 12 Most Expensive Disasters in US History Have Occurred Since 2004; 8 of the Top 12 Disasters Affected FL Sources: PCS; Insurance Information Institute inflation adjustments. 158 Total Value of Insured Coastal Exposure (2007, $ Billions) Florida $2,458.6 New York $2,378.9 $895.1 Texas Massachusetts $772.8 $895B Insured New Jersey $635.5 Coastal Connecticut $479.9 Louisiana $224.4 Exposure in S. Carolina $191.9 Texas in 2007 Virginia $158.8 Maine $146.9 In 2007, Florida Still Ranked as the #1 Most North Carolina $132.8 Exposed State to Hurricane Loss, with $92.5 Alabama $2.459 Trillion Exposure, but Texas is very exposed Georgia $85.6 too, and ranked #3 with $895B Delaware $60.6 in insured coastal exposure New Hampshire $55.7 Mississippi $51.8 The Insured Value of All Coastal Property Was $8.9 Rhode Island $54.1 Trillion in 2007, Up 24% from $7.2 Trillion in 2004 Maryland $14.9 $0 Source: AIR Worldwide $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 160 Insurance Information Institute Online: www.iii.org Thank you for your time and your attention! Twitter: twitter.com/bob_hartwig Download: www.iii.org/presentations