Techniques & Research in Music Education Class 1 Introduction Types of Research Project Overview Ethics in Research Introductions • Introductions – – – – Call me Phil Millikin, NU, UofI Calvin 11 yrs. School Bands 14 yrs. • Who are You? • Syllabus – please read – Changes as needed – Laptops? – www.pmhmusic.weebly. com Research - Course Intro • Personal experience w/ research – No one went into music ed. b/c they love research! – As a young teacher, I was not interested – Your prior experience? • Best way to learn it is to read it and do it! – No readings on statistics or methodology – We use stats to study music education – At this point research is my focus (historical and quantitative) – Course moves fast! PLEASE ask questions, esp. when something is unclear. [May be something I don’t know. I will find out]. Research: What it is… • Systematic mode of inquiry based on the scientific method: – – – – – – Define the question Gather information and resources (observe – Lit rev.) Form hypothesis (theory about what will happen) Perform experiment/study and collect data Analyze data Interpret data and draw conclusions. Accept or reject hypothesis & perhaps form new hypotheses – Publish results (dissemination) – Retest (frequently done by other scientists-replication) • BEST PRACTICE Definition (Phelps, et. al, 2005) • The identification and isolation of a problem into a workable plan; the implementation of that plan to collect the data needed; and the synthesis, interpretation, and presentation of the collected information into some format which readily can be made available to others. Collective Research (Consensus) • A gradual accumulation and synthesis of knowledge that leads to the discovery of truth • Nothing is really proven • Research is ongoing • Many studies seem irrelevant until connected w/ other research. Examples: [next slide] Examples of “Abstract” Topics? • Burnsed, V. (2001). Differences in preference for subtle dynamic nuance between conductors, middle school students, and elementary school students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 49-56. • Darrow, A., Haack, P., & Kuribayashi, F. (1987). Descriptors and preferences for Eastern and Western musics by Japanese and American nonmusic majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 237-48. • Furman, C. E., & Duke, R. A. (1988). Effect of majority consensus on preferences for recorded orchestral and popular music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 220-31. • LeBlanc, A., & Sherrill, C. (1986). Effect of vocal vibrato and performers sex on children's music preference. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 222-37. • Morrison, S. J. (1998). A comparison of preference responses of white and African-American students to musical versus musical/visual stimuli. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 208-22. Deductive Mode (top-down) – Deductive mode (general to specific/broad theory to a specific hypothesis) • General Theory: Elementary students’ perception of dynamic contrast increases as they get older • Hypothesis: Students in 4th grade will be able to hear volume differences in music to a greater extent than 1st graders. • Observe & Collect data (how?) • Draw Conclusions Inductive Mode (bottom-up) – Inductive mode (specific to general/specific observations lead to patterns and general conclusions) • Observation – Many males in my 9th gr. choir do not sing confidently • Look for Patterns – In individual auditions, I notice that many do not match pitch • Tentative Hypothesis – MS Choir directors in our district are not familiar w/ strategies for adolescent voice • Theory – [we have MS choir directors from many institutions] Undergraduate institutions are not preparing teachers to teach male changing voice – Inductive-Deductive (specific to general to specific…/research involves combinations of both modes) Types of Research • Descriptive - determine characteristics of a group or phenomenon (surveys, content analyses, observation) • Correlational - determine relationships among two or more variables (explores cause and effect but doesn’t determine cause & effect) • Experimental - intervening to determine cause and effect (treatment vs. control grs./manipulation of variables) • Causal-comparative - determining differences among groups, after the fact - exploring cause and effect – post hoc research [e.g., smoking and singing range] Types of research (cont.) • Content-Analyses – examining content of periodicals, conferences, concert/contest programs, textbooks, curricula, etc. to determine trends & gaps. • Qualitative/Ethnographic - naturalistic portrayal of people or groups in their environment, sociology or anthropology (also descriptive) • Historical - studying the past through primary sources (also descriptive) • Philosophical - the act of doing philosophy (based on philosophical thought & literature) • Action - inquiring for the sake of a specific situation, active participation/stakeholders (perhaps your project) • Meta-Analyses - combining results from many studies to draw a more powerful conclusion Models of Action Research Quantitative vs. Qualitative Positivism is the philosophy of science that information derived from logical and mathematical treatments and reports of sensory experience is the exclusive source of all authoritative knowledge, and that there is valid knowledge (truth) only in this derived knowledge. • • • • • • • • Quantitative Positivist/modernism Designed setting Experiment/Test Statistics & numbers Instrument-non human Conclusions = based on data Generalize to pop. Value free[?] • • • • • • • • Qualitative Post Positivist/postmod. Natural Setting Observation Narrative Human data collector Conclusions = interp. of observations Situational gnrlizability. Value bound Standards for Research • Research based vs. nonresearch based – Opinion vs. conclusions based on data – personal experience vs. designed study • Peer review vs. non-peer review – All research journals are PR – Some non-research periodicals are PR • vs. • and Research in Music ED • Research journal list in syllabus • Open access journals – Available to all for free online • In print journals – Subscription – Usually also online to subscribers and through college databases • Most if not all are accessible online through DePaul library, NAfME membership, or other sources Introduction to Proposal Project Step One – Define a Topic • What do you wonder about music teaching & learning? • What interests you? • Testable? • Important? – How will your study contribute to or change your practice and that of others? • Feasible? – Time? – Money? – Other resources? Step 2 – Design Study • How will you research your topic? • What genre is appropriate? – Descriptive • Survey • Content analysis – Experimental • Compare experimental group(s) w/ control group • Master’s theses at DePaul are ordinarily descriptive or experimental • APA style – see style guide at http://pmhmusic.weebly.com/depaul---med-492-501.html Part I - Introduction • Introductory Paragraphs – In 3-5 paragraphs, provide background for the report. Citing or quoting others who have written of the importance of the issue is especially appropriate. This section should lead up to your purpose statement. • Purpose of Study – In ONE SENTENCE, tell us exactly what your project is (i.e. “The purpose of this project is to compare middle school band student achievement in sight reading after a two week program of daily practice in sight reading with achievement before it.”). • Research Questions/Hypothesis • Need for Study – Usually, this is a continuation of your introduction. Who will benefit from this study? What implications might your findings have on current and future practice in music education? • Definition of Terms – Define any unusual terms or terms that will have a specific and unusual meaning in your document (if there are any). • Limitations (not obvious) Dorfman & Lipscomb (2005) Research Questions 1. What do graduate students know about research in music education when they enter research methods classes? 2. How do graduate students entering research methods classes feel about research as an area of study during their initial graduate school experiences? 3. How do the attitudes of these graduate students change after completing an introductory course in research methods? 4. To what extent does knowledge about research methods change how graduate students teach music? Part 2 – Review of Research • Why a lit review? – Science = Gradual accumulation of knowledge towards truth – To build an ‘evidence’ based argument for your study rationale • To identify promising and not-so-promising trends from previous studies – – – – To delimit the boundaries of the research problem To avoid repeating mistakes of others To strengthen your methodology Do avoid unnecessary duplication of research • Use models (such as lit. review from today) • Synthesize results. Use transitional statements. • See syllabus on abstracts HINT!! - “Treeing Back” • Find a study that is related to your topic area • Retrieve study and examine the reference list • Note other studies that may be also be relevant • Retrieve the other studies • Repeat… …until you start to see that same ‘pool’ of studies recurring over and over – This is a good method for evaluating whether you have come close to exhausting the extant research in a given area – This is also a good method for determining which studies have had the greatest impact in your topic area (e.g., through number of times cited) Part 3 - Methodology • Description of procedures • Instruments, tests, & surveys • How data will be analyzed • How study will be organized Ethics in Research Basic Question… • Will any psychological or physical harm come to anyone as a result of my research? – The protection of participants from harm – Ensuring confidentiality of research data – Deception of subjects only when integral to the study, yet must still be consistent with the statements above Protecting from Harm • Physical – “Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male” (19321972) • Treatment withheld for syphilis patients, even after 1947 when penicillin had become standard effective treatment • Psychological – How similar are the conditions of the research to ‘normal operating procedures?’ – Sensitive information • Full disclosure of possible risks • Option to not participate or withdraw • Informed Consent/assent (minors) Ensuring Confidentiality • Names removed from forms • Coding – who has access, where is it stored • Anonymity • Destroying data • No identifying information in print (write in generalities and in aggregate terms when possible) [Exceptions-locations or institutional names] Institutional Review Board (IRB) • Neutral committee that weighs risk • Determine if informed consent is in place (parents of children) • Ensure plans for debriefing subjects • Review Types: – Exempt – no review needed – Expedited – quick review possible – Full – thorough review/discussion of procedures Broader Ethical Issues… • • • • • • Falsification of data Corruption of the review process (non-blind-journals) Multiple submission Duplicate submission Piece-meal publication Authorship – Principal vs. Secondary – Profs. and students – Cowriter vs. research assistant • Plagiarism - paraphrasing vs. lifting • Presentations and audiences (state to national, not other way around) • Money - conflict of interest Resources/Review • Research books • • • • • American Psychological Association (2010). Publication manual of the American psychological association (6th ed.). Washington DC: Author. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., Borg, W. R. (2006). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Allyn & Bacon Phelps, R. P., Sadoff, R. H., Warburton, E. C., & Ferrara, L. (2005). A guide to research in music Education (5th ed.). Lanham MD: Scarecrow Press. Phillips, K. H. (2008). Exploring research in music education & music therapy. New York: Oxford University Press. Salkind, N. J. (Ed.). (2007). Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics (Vols. 1-3). Thousand Oaks, CA: Gale Reference. • Terms from Syllabus Terms/Concepts from Today • Research Definition • Research Based vs. Non-Research Based • Peer-Review vs. Non Peer-Review • Experimental Research • Descriptive Research • Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research • Historical Research • Philosophical Research • Correlation Research • APA Style • • • • • Consensus Deductive Inductive IRB Research Proposal Framework For Tomorrow • Read, then write two abstracts for articles (not lit reviews) related to your study. – Taken from list for today. • Read entire article • write summary • compare w/ abstract if there is one • Email to me as soon as you finish • Read: – One article from reading list – All current abstracts from the JRME and Update. Writing an Abstract • Include an APA citation • Accurate & dense w/ information • Nonevaluative (not a review) • Coherent, concise, readable. Use active voice – Highlight most important aspects • 150-200 words. (Use word count tool) 1. Purpose of the study 2. Participants (subjects) & their important characteristics 3. Methodology (what the researcher[s] did) 4. Basic findings 5. Conclusions & Implications Sample 1 (159 words) • This study examined performance anxiety (PA) among middle school vocal soloists. /Participants included male (n = 63) and female (n = 221) middle school students (N = 284) participating in an all-district solo and ensemble festival. /Students completed the Smith Performance Anxiety Inventory (SPAI) immediately following their performance. This survey consisted of 15-closed response questions measuring various physical and emotional phenomena on a seven-step Likert scale. /Total SPAI scores indicate that 72% (n = 204) of participants reported moderate to high levels of anxiety and that these students experienced trembling, sweaty palms, and difficulty concentrating at significantly higher levels (p < .01) than other responses measured by the SPAI. Data also indicated that among students that experienced moderate to high levels of PA (n = 204), 86% (n = 175) were female. /Recommendations for managing PA include 1) openly discussing PA among students, 2) videotaping performance for selfassessment, and 2) simulating the performance environment many times before the event. Hash, P. M. (2011). Effect of pullout lessons on the academic achievement of eighth grade band students (2011). Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 30(1), 16-22. (166 words) • The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of pullout instrumental lessons on the academic achievement of eighth-grade band students. /Participants (N = 353) included 292 nonband students and 61 band students pulled once per week for music lessons in a single suburban K–8 school district in Midwestern United States. /Data indicated that eighth-grade band students achieved significantly higher mean scores on the ACT Explore test than students who dropped band prior to eighth grade (n = 58) or never enrolled in the program (n = 234). In addition, no significant differences existed between all band students and the highest achieving nonband students, or between students who discontinued band after at least 1 year and those who never enrolled. /Although band students in this study tended to be more academically successful than nonband students at the outset, these results support the assertion that pullout lessons had no negative effect on academic achievement, regardless of the number of years students participated in the program.