Superconducted info, sticky knowledge When does « open » help developing economies Yves Bourgeois, PhD Director, UNB Urban and community studies institute Bailiwick 2012 Conference: Focus on open access UNBSJ, Saint John 24 October 2012 we are gathered here today because knowledge is not free 1 Juxtapositions 1. Gov facilitating and implementing… 4G, 1gbps networks, e-services uptown revital, convention centres, airport upgrades 2. We recently observed… 1 billionth facebook friend request, spike in skype Can air traffic 85M (2001) to 113M (2011) Conflicting observations if you subscribe to a Deathof-distance view (ICT-mediated K cannibalizing physical proximity mediated K) but rational if you consider them mutually enhancing 2 K filtering 1. 2. You don’t watch a youtube video to learn how to ride a bike (Polanyi 1966), well… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjUopYKMVhA Data Info K wisdom (Ackoff 1989) TK vs CK When we speak of open innovation, we are speaking of Information and arguably codified K Knowledge and wisdom = spatially-mediated 3 Packing & unpacking knowledge is costly Costs to acquiring knowledge can be high & many Direct costs IPR (Apple-v-Samsung), subscriptions Venue is money K infrastructure, conferences Digital pony express data encrypt, netw security Indirect costs Time = money sift, act, learn (e-journals) Devel absorptive capacity (training, R&D) 4 Unpacking knowledge is spatial Distance, K decay, “broken telephone” F2F buzz – (Storper & Venables 2004) water coolers trust, networks, gossip unrecord Temporary vs permanent knowledge clusters (Bathelt 2011) Introductions, collaborations, closing deals, fixing misunderstandings …F2F-dependent 5 Knowledge can be sticky When knowledge can be packed and unpacked into bits and bytes, transmission costs can be virtually nil, but … not all K can be packed learning-by-doing, learning-by-interacting etc often requires physical space mediation chefs learn in kitchens, physicists in labs unpacking knowledge is costly absorptive capacity (skills, R&D), learning, trust Inability to pack some K and cost of unpacking impel physical proximity 6 Implications for developing economies ICT mediated knowledge can substitute or enhance K acquisition strategies Oreilly.com, customer feedback integration Need much more sophisticated appreciation of how open and “closed” knowledge strategies are used by businesses according to environment/locales (access to infra) stages of product development (K forms) stages of business development (start up, export) industrial sector Firms develop sophisticated knowledge strategies – or wing it – recombining physical and relational proximities to identify, adopt, adapt, produce, share and sell knowledge. 7 Use of web-based technologies % of establishments Email 95.3% Company website 82.8% Intelligence on markets and competitors 78.5% Intelligence on technologies 71.9% Purchasing products 68.1% Financial services 67.8% Marketing to existing clients 64.5% Downloading software 61.0% Establishing presence and reputation 59.6% Client prospecting 53.4% Updates on our products 48.5% Online training 45.9% Hiring workers 35.9% Employee collaborations 34.8% Selling products 31.4% Client feedback 29.3% Entertainment 26.0% Product demos 15.1% Managing resources Other 12.5% Rural firms (vs urban and metro) systematically underutilize productivity yet equally accessible ICT technologies 3.3% 8 Source: Bourgeois (2011) The knowledge economy in Atlantic Canada Reflections on open access Open access potential of flattening or leveling playing field in scientific production Open access journals will need to establish credibility not simply turnaround speed Some elephants in the corner… scientific production infrastructure (nanotech labs, particle accelerators) are spatially anchored absorptive capacity skill levels needed to pack and unpack knowledge peer-reviewed content often subjected to earlier peer-reviews at F2F conferences 9