NTR 503: Behavior Change
Group Project Self and Peer Appraisal Form
Name:
Group Topic /
Name:
ASSESSMENT AND RATING OF PERFORMANCE: On the following four charts, please rate yourself and all of your
fellow group members on the following contributions to the group project. These ratings will not determine grades, alone, but will
contribute information for determining your final project grades so please be thoughtful and fair in your assessments.
SELFAPPRAISAL
(Rating
Yourself)
Unsatisfactory:
Does not achieve
results that meet
expectations.
Needs
Improvement:
Does not
regularly meet
expectations in all
areas of
responsibilities
despite feedback
Satisfactory/Making
Progress: Is a
satisfactory performer in
most areas of the job; is
making progress and
continues to learn key
aspects of the job.
Fully
Competent:
Consistently
satisfactory in
key aspects of
the job.
Exceeds
Expectations: Is
a consistently
strong performer
fulfilling all
aspects of the job;
often exceeds
expectations in
key areas of job.
Exceptional:
Achieves results
far exceeding
those expected in
all major areas of
responsibility;
demonstrates
outstanding
initiative and
creativity.
Quality of Contributions
to the Project: Contributes
high levels of proficiency
in applying principles
covered in the course to the
project.
Quantity of Work:
Contributions were made in
expected amounts, volume,
frequency, timeliness,
efficiency, and
productivity.
Team Player: Builds good
working relationships with
other group members,
adapts to group
expectations and needs, and
keeps commitments.
Communication: Oral and
written communication are
clear and effective. Active
listening assures
understanding. Ideas are
exchanged in a collegial
and professional way.
Initiative/Problem
Solving: Takes
responsibility for mastering
knowledge and skills
required for effective
performance, and organizes
work appropriately for best
use of knowledge and
skills.
Overall Performance
Rating (does not have to
be an average of above
ratings)
Overall Letter Grade - Could you please provide a letter grade (e.g., A to F) that would be fair for yourself?
Additional Comments:
1
PEER
APPRAISAL #1
NAME:
Unsatisfactory:
Does not achieve
results that meet
expectations.
Needs
Improvement:
Does not
regularly meet
expectations in all
areas of
responsibilities
despite feedback
Satisfactory/Making
Progress: Is a
satisfactory performer in
most areas of the job; is
making progress and
continues to learn key
aspects of the job.
Fully
Competent:
Consistently
satisfactory in
key aspects of
the job.
Exceeds
Expectations: Is
a consistently
strong performer
fulfilling all
aspects of the job;
often exceeds
expectations in
key areas of job.
Exceptional:
Achieves results
far exceeding
those expected in
all major areas of
responsibility;
demonstrates
outstanding
initiative and
creativity.
1. Quality of
Contributions to the
Project—Contributes high
levels of proficiency in
applying principles covered
in the course to the project.
2. Quantity of Work—
Contributions were made in
expected amounts, volume,
frequency, timeliness,
efficiency, and
productivity.
3. Team Player—Builds
good working relationships
with other group members,
adapts to group
expectations and needs, and
keeps commitments.
4. Communication—Oral
and written communication
are clear and effective.
Active listening assures
understanding. Ideas are
exchanged in a collegial
and professional way.
5. Initiative/Problem
Solving—Takes
responsibility for mastering
knowledge and skills
required for effective
performance, and organizes
work appropriately for best
use of knowledge and
skills.
Overall Performance
Rating (does not have to
be an average of above
ratings)
Overall Letter Grade - Could you please provide a letter grade (e.g., A to F) that would be fair for this person?
Additional Comments (please include specifics on their contribution to the work; How did they contribute to the presentation?
How did they contribute to each of the major parts of the work (e.g., lit review, ethnography, prototyping)? :
2
PEER
APPRAISAL #2
NAME:
Unsatisfactory:
Does not achieve
results that meet
expectations.
Needs
Improvement:
Does not
regularly meet
expectations in all
areas of
responsibilities
despite feedback
Satisfactory/Making
Progress: Is a
satisfactory performer in
most areas of the job; is
making progress and
continues to learn key
aspects of the job.
Fully
Competent:
Consistently
satisfactory in
key aspects of
the job.
Exceeds
Expectations: Is
a consistently
strong performer
fulfilling all
aspects of the job;
often exceeds
expectations in
key areas of job.
Exceptional:
Achieves results
far exceeding
those expected in
all major areas of
responsibility;
demonstrates
outstanding
initiative and
creativity.
1. Quality of
Contributions to the
Project—Contributes high
levels of proficiency in
applying principles covered
in the course to the project.
2. Quantity of Work—
Contributions were made in
expected amounts, volume,
frequency, timeliness,
efficiency, and
productivity.
3. Team Player—Builds
good working relationships
with other group members,
adapts to group
expectations and needs, and
keeps commitments.
4. Communication—Oral
and written communication
are clear and effective.
Active listening assures
understanding. Ideas are
exchanged in a collegial
and professional way.
5. Initiative/Problem
Solving—Takes
responsibility for mastering
knowledge and skills
required for effective
performance, and organizes
work appropriately for best
use of knowledge and
skills.
Overall Performance
Rating (does not have to
be an average of above
ratings)
Overall Letter Grade - Could you please provide a letter grade (e.g., A to F) that would be fair for this person?
Additional Comments (please include specifics on their contribution to the work; How did they contribute to the presentation?
How did they contribute to each of the major parts of the work (e.g., lit review, ethnography, prototyping)? :
3
PEER
APPRAISAL #3
NAME:
Unsatisfactory:
Does not achieve
results that meet
expectations.
Needs
Improvement:
Does not
regularly meet
expectations in all
areas of
responsibilities
despite feedback
Satisfactory/Making
Progress: Is a
satisfactory performer in
most areas of the job; is
making progress and
continues to learn key
aspects of the job.
Fully
Competent:
Consistently
satisfactory in
key aspects of
the job.
Exceeds
Expectations: Is
a consistently
strong performer
fulfilling all
aspects of the job;
often exceeds
expectations in
key areas of job.
Exceptional:
Achieves results
far exceeding
those expected in
all major areas of
responsibility;
demonstrates
outstanding
initiative and
creativity.
1. Quality of
Contributions to the
Project—Contributes high
levels of proficiency in
applying principles covered
in the course to the project.
2. Quantity of Work—
Contributions were made in
expected amounts, volume,
frequency, timeliness,
efficiency, and
productivity.
3. Team Player—Builds
good working relationships
with other group members,
adapts to group
expectations and needs, and
keeps commitments.
4. Communication—Oral
and written communication
are clear and effective.
Active listening assures
understanding. Ideas are
exchanged in a collegial
and professional way.
5. Initiative/Problem
Solving—Takes
responsibility for mastering
knowledge and skills
required for effective
performance, and organizes
work appropriately for best
use of knowledge and
skills.
Overall Performance
Rating (does not have to
be an average of above
ratings)
Overall Letter Grade - Could you please provide a letter grade (e.g., A to F) that would be fair for this person?
Additional Comments (please include specifics on their contribution to the work; How did they contribute to the presentation?
How did they contribute to each of the major parts of the work (e.g., lit review, ethnography, prototyping)?:
4