Fear and Anxiety:
The Effects of Global
Climate Change
Perceptions
SUNY Oswego- Global Labs
UNIBE
Courtney Bledsoe, Augustus
McGiver
• This research centers around climate change and our physiological and psychological responses to it.
• We used 4 types of physiological measures:
Pulse, Galvanic skin response (GSR),
Electromyogram (EMG) and Respiration.
•
There are several human behavioral contributions to climate change.
•
It is often discussed that, to keep the climate from changing drastically, humans must change certain behaviors.
•
There are many psychological barriers that limit behavioral changes.
•
There has been a multitude of research done to show that climate change can lead to a psychological response of anxiety or fear.
•
This study topic has been chosen to help further analyze these psychological barriers.
• This study took place in San Jose, Costa
Rica.
• UNIBE- Universidad de Iberoamerica.
•
•
The objectives of this experiment are as follows:
To observe whether or not there are changes in physiological responses when stimulated with video of a natural disaster.
To view first hand, the factors that might influence the responses.
•
•
Participants were chosen from students that attend UNIBE and also from the U.S.A
•
They were given a consent form to sign; then the participants were asked several pre-stimuli questions to answer.
•
Following that, they were asked to sit down and the equipment was hooked up to them.
•
A two minute baseline, to test the equipment, was taken and then they were shown a fifteen minute video clip of a natural disaster.
•
After the video, the participants were asked to answer a few post-stimuli questions.
- Pulse Monitor
Measures heart rate
- Galvanic Skin Response (GSR)
Measures electrical conductance of sweat glands
- Respiratory Band
Measures breathing rate
- Electromyogram (EMG)
Measures electrical activity produced by muscles
Gender
Female
Male
Total
Frequency
35
13
48
Percentage
72.9
27.1
100
Location
Costa Rica
United States
Total
Frequency
38
10
48
Percentage
79.2
20.8
100
Respiration
(baseline vs. experimental)
Paired Samples t-test t df
Sig. (2tailed)
RES1-1:30
RES 3:30-4 3.097
25 .005
RES 1-1:30
RES 4:30-5 2.103
25 .046
RES 1-1:30
RES 5-5:30 2.743
25 .011
• Our data supported the notion that respiration rate was significantly decreased during multiple sections of the video when compared to the baseline.
•
Upon further analysis we hope to look at EMG and
GSR data. We also would like to compare the differences between independent variables such as gender, major, location, etc.
•
In future experiments we'd like to compare data with a larger sample size across multiple cultures.
Contact Information
Courtney: bledsoe@oswego.edu
Augustus: mcgiver@oswego.edu