Unit II Module 2 Measuring Public Opinion

advertisement
+
Unit II Module 2
Measuring Public Opinion
AP Gov
Miller
+
Objectives

By the end of this module, SWBAT

Identify the relationship between public opinion and political
ideology

Describe the different general types of political issues

Compare and contrast the different polling instruments used in
America today

Explain the difference between internal and external validity
errors when polling
+
Ideology & Opinion

Public opinion is a “snapshot” of the current ideological lean
of the American voting population

Dynamic, constantly shifting depending on


Domestic events

Foreign events

Salient political issues of the day
Elected officials need info regarding opinion to inform future
decisions and receive feedback for past decisions
+
Political Polls

Polls are research instruments designed to measure certain
aspects of public opinion

Some are broad in their scope but most are geared toward
gathering data regarding certain political issues

Many different types of organizations conduct polls for
different reasons
+
Issue Types

Salient issues – issues that are timely, current and “trending”
now

Stable issues – issues that politicians feel comfortable
discussing in detail

Congruent issues – elected officials feel similarly to their
constituents and act accordingly
+
Issue Types

Examples

Salient issues –

Passé issues –
-
Stable issues –
-
Unstable issues –
-
Congruent issues –
-
Incongruent issues –
+
The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

“Good” polls have the following characteristics

Scientific in nature featuring a randomly selected sample

Proper, unbiased phrasing in questions

Repeatability, consistency

Non-biased interpretation of data
+
Tracking Polls

Tracking polls are best examples of “good” polls

Fit all the good poll categories

Large randomly selected sample

Consistent data collected over a long period of time

Non-biased in language and data interpretation
+
Tracking Polls

Tracking polls are great … but very expensive

Their high cost prohibits their frequent usage

More likely to be done by


Consulting firms (Gallup)

Media firms (prominent periodicals)

Universities
Almost never used by candidates or political parties
+
The Good, The Bad and the Ugly

“Bad” polls abound throughout the political landscape

Can be taken before an election or vote  straw poll

Or Can be taken after an election or vote  exit poll

These are used quite often by candidates, parties, and
special interest groups due to lower cost and/or amount of
time/effort needed compared to tracking poll
+
Straw Polls

What’s wrong with them?

Sample size often too small and/or sample population not
randomly selected

Language could be biased due to lack of proper editing

Interpretation could be biased due to a partisan influence (i.e.
straw poll taken by Democrats or Republicans vs. tracking poll
taken by a university)
+
Exit Polls

What’s wrong with them?

Rely on volunteers to self-report (non scientific due to lack of
random sampling)

Not conducted by professionals, usually done by campaign
volunteers or interns (errors or bias present)

Responses subject to Hawthorne Effect – people changing
behavior when they know they are being observed (example:
African American intern conducting an exit poll in Orange
County)
+
Why Conduct Straw, Exit Polls?


Compared to tracking polls they are

Cheaper

Quicker to conduct

Easier to analyze
Need to conduct more of them and “average” the results to
minimize the margin of error and approximate the accuracy
of a tracking poll
+
The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly

The “ugly” poll would be the notorious push poll

Poll only in name, really a cheap campaign stunt

Straw, exit polls are flawed by circumstance whereas push
polls are malicious and flawed by design
+
Push Polls

Push polls are cleverly designed to infect voters’ minds with
biases against one candidate or position on an issue in favor
of another

Verbiage, presentation sounds and feels like a poll but it’s
really misinformation

This phenomenon happens often in US History

Pro-life (assumes opposition is “pro-death”)

Anti-federalists (don’t have a position of their own, simply
opposing Federalist ideology)

No Child Left Behind (opposition to this bill is all about harming
children)
+
Push Polls

Too dirty a tactic more national or gubernatorial candidates
to use publicly

Could get away with them in smaller state and local
elections, however, with less media scrutiny

Tactic works best with

Unstable political issues

Very close to the date of the election
+
Technology Issues

The media by which the poll is taken can greatly effect
results

FDR vs. Alf Landon

Straw polls conducted via telephone provided data that indicated
that Landon would win in a landslide

Of course FDR crushed him

What went wrong?
+
Technology Issues

In the 1930s only the elite and middle class has regular
access to home phones

Therefore, the sample was not representative of the
American electorate

Results were heavily skewed

This is an example of an internal validity error – a serious
flaw with the polling instrument itself that can ruin the data it
collects
+
Check Yourself

Researchers must always protect the sanctity of the data –
don’t mess with it and accept it for what it is

1950s – Eisenhower vs. Stevenson

First presidential election to be predicted by computer

Repeated computer analysis indicates that Stevenson is going to
get hammered by Eisenhower

Researchers still predict that Stevenson was going to win
+
Check Yourself

Researchers were biased, Stevenson was “one of their own” a
preeminent intellectual

Felt bias in his favor, concluded that computer must be
wrong, even though it was remarkably accurate

This type of problem is an external validity error –
researcher allows her/his bias to skew interpretation of the
data
+
Summary

Politicians use polls to

Determine what issues to address and which issues to avoid

Glean information during Election Day

Attempt to confuse and infuriate voters for their benefit

Align themselves with popular trending political concepts
+
Summary

In an ideal world, every poll would be a tracking poll but

They are too costly and difficult to conduct by non-professionals

Many politicians see no need for them since public opinion is so
fickle anyway

Many politicians more concerned with steering public opinion
than determining it
+
Download