Pardon our Noise It’s only the sound of freedom Taun Stewart English 2010 Report Taun Stewart English 2010 Report Pardon Our Noise Its only the sound of freedom When Ronnie Barrett sent his letter to Chief Correa of the Honolulu Police Department, he didn’t just seal it in an envelope, but posted it on his website for everyone to behold. Barrett, CEO of Barrett Arms, wrote the letter not only in defense of his company and business, but in defense of the basic rights guaranteed to the citizens of this country by the constitution, after Correa’s constant pushing of his anti-gun agenda in Hawaii. The issue on the surface is Correas efforts to ban the .50 caliber rifle from civilian ownership in Hawaii. Barrett writes the letter with great credentials, as CEO of an arms company, and with experience in Law enforcement, he is able to expose much of Correas’ claims and information as false. But this one letter, opens up a very interesting disagreement for those on both sides of the wide spectrum of second amendment issues. Ironically, Honolulu Police Department uses weapons produced by Barrett Arms, including the .50 caliber rifle. And Barrett states in his letter than any infringement by the Hawaii State Government on its citizen’s constitutional rights would sever all further sales and service of Barrett arms to law enforcement agencies across the entire state. Barrett not only questions the moral issue of Correas efforts, but also the practical issue. He asks Correa how many .50 caliber rifles his departments have found at crime scenes, how many have been used in robberies, how many have even as much as raised in issue anywhere in the state. The answer of course is none. Of the 125 Barrett .50 caliber rifles registered to law abiding responsible citizens in the State of Hawaii, none have ever raised a concern. Though Barrett does an enormous amount of business with law enforcement agencies and militaries across the world, still a significant amount of business exists in the civilian market. If Barrett and other arms companies were to lose their civilian market, the results would be drastic. Their ability to supply our military and law enforcement agencies would be drastically reduced, or even eliminated as Barrett states. But as right wing pro gun people proudly cheer on their hero Ronny Barrett, they are also running into very strong opposition from the opposite side. Many argue that they do support practical weapons for civilians; Weapons that could be used in hunting, or practical defense bp0.blogger.com of their home and properties. But that the .50 caliber rifle is just an overpowered danger to society in untrained civilian hands, with no real use. Those opposed to civilian ownership of the .50 caliber refer to it as a “nightmare” weapon. The letter also refers to the enormous, government owned small arms factories that were in production during World War II. These factories lacked the innovation, and adaption that is so plentiful in the many private small arms companies such as Browning, Armalite, Colt, and Barrett Arms. Barrett’s rifle has been named by the collective branches of the military, as one of the top ten innovations that helps them to effectively accomplish their jobs. And as with virtually any industry, when small arms companies are overrun by government, innovation grinds nearly to a halt, leaving law enforcement and military with less than the best equipment possible, unacceptable in careers where heroic men and women trust their lives to their rifles. To close the letter, and hopefully the issue, Barrett ends http://savvysurvivor.com/supplementary/barrett82mod.jpg with an invitation to other small arms companies to join Barrett Arms in their position. And they will. They will join Barrett in their position not to support a state or local government who is “obviously in violation of the United States Constitution, thereby jeopardizing the safety and security of its citizens.” To some, Ronnie Barrett’s letter draws a clear picture of the man he truly is, a great American. It is well written, respectful, and courteous, yet unnaccepting of any infringement on American Citizens rights, or disregard for the constitution. But to others, his defense of this devastating weapon brings a feeling of danger to those who fear what a weapon of this magnitude could do in the wrong hands. Some will make the argument that anti-gun people pushing their agendas will take any opportunity to dig their fingernails into issues like this, and use them to pry as far as possible into the world of firearms, to eliminate as many as possible from civilians. And others will argue that those defending this issue will continue to take it further and further. If the .50 caliber is allowed, what’s next? Rocket launchers, grenades, missiles? To what extent does the second amendment really allow civilians to obtain deadly weapons? These are all issues that will come out with this issue, and many following it. The bottom line is, both sides have very good points. It is a matter of public safety versus a matter of constitutional rights. It something that both sides will always have very strong and emotional opinions about. This opens up another issue all itself, how do we deal with situations like this? Does the constitution always take priority? Even over public safety? Perhaps these are things we must also discuss. media.pegasusnews.com Barrett’s two page, to the point letter, is just another defense of our basic rights as citizens of this country, in the constant attempt of others to destroy not only the second amendment, but many of our rights. Time will tell how Chief Correa receives the letter, but at least Chief Correa now knows how we all have received his attacks on our basic rights and freedoms. Works Cited: Barrett, Ronnie. "Fifty caliber ban in Hawaii". Barrett Arms. <Barrett.net>. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x16560 9 Hodgkins, Michael. "Banning 50 Caliber in Hawaii". NRA. <http://www.nraila.org/issues/50caliberhawaii>. Photos http://savvysurvivor.com/supplementary/barrett82mod.jpg (This image shows a Barrett M107 in its standard configuration) http://bp0.blogger.com/_kNyU41yfTpo/R8DI7Xk12dI/AAAAAAAAArw/xMvg4MDuga0/s160 0-h/50+caliber+rifles.jpg (This image shows HPD officer Ron Taira, displaying the .50 caliber next to other standard caliber weapons. http://media.pegasusnews.com/pegasus/img/photos/2008/11/04/Bullets_t520.jpg This image shows standard caliber rounds compared to the massive .50 caliber BMG