Powerpoint

advertisement

Sociolinguistics

I . Inter-relationships between linguistic form and social function

II. Why should linguistics study?

III. The difficulty of defining what language is

IV. Social functions of speech

V. Telephone conversation

VI. Compliments

Yun-Pi Yuan 1

I . Inter-relationships between linguistic form and social function (1)

1.

2.

3.

4.

Lang. cannot be studied separately from its social/speech context.

9 Sentences:

Should I make some tea?

Would you like some tea?

Can I make you a cup of tea?

Let’s have a cup of tea.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

How about a nice cup of tea?

I could make you a cup of tea.

Do you drink tea?

Have some tea.

There’s tea in the pot.

What are these sentences doing?

When, and with whom, would each one be appropriate?

From these examples, would you say that linguistic form and social function are unrelated? Should we study them separately?

Interaction between Pycholinguistics and Sociolinguistics

Yun-Pi Yuan 2

I . Inter-relationships between linguistic form and social function (2)

 Mandarin examples:

 您, 你,敝人

 府上,舍下

 令郎,小犬

 Geographical origin

 Phonological variant

Northern Taiwanese vs. southern Taiwanese

Examples of Taiwanese spoken in I-lan

Yun-Pi Yuan 3

II. What should linguistics study?

Grammar only: (the structure/form of language) to discover the rules of language x and thus universal rules

Problems:

Speech is social behavior and has many social functions

What is language X?

what’s the language x?

 people who language spoken

Speak language x by people x who are people x?

What is a native speaker?

Social functions/factors:

 Speech is a form of social behavior; language must be related to and interact with society.

Yun-Pi Yuan 4

III. The difficulty of defining what “one language” is (1)

Mutual intelligibility ≠ the same language.

Scandinavia

76%

Norwegian Swedish

87% Number= %of informants who

18% claimed to understand their

72% 42% neighbors’ language fairly

23% easily on 1st encounter

Danish

Dutch and German

Romance languages (Spanish, Portuguese, French, Italian, etc.)

Potato joke

Spanish vs. Italian

4. Hindi and Urdu

Yun-Pi Yuan 5

III. The difficulty of defining what “one language” is (2)

 Same language ≠ mutual intelligibility

(ex1)one language (ex2) one original language dialect dialect dialect different languages

 ex1: one language (mutual intelligibility? same nation? same language?)

Chinese (Taiwanese, Cantonese, Shanghai, Shandung,

Mandarin, etc.)

 ex2:

 the Romance situation (sharing a common writing system, culture, history; next to each other geographically)

Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, etc.

6

III. The difficulty of defining what “one language” is (3)

 How to define native speakers?

Northwest Amazon:

20 different tribes, each with a different languages

All are exogamous, so a man’s wife must speak a different language

 Marriage is patrilocal, and a wife must speak the husband’s language to their children

 Most people here are multilingual

* Conclusion; to define a language, we have many factors (social, cultural, political, linguistic, etc.)

Yun-Pi Yuan 7

IV. Social functions of speech

 Communication: Communicative pressures can influence the forms/rules of language.

Quick & easy  contractions

Rhetorically expressive

 more complex forms

 Identification:

of other people

of ourselves

Yun-Pi Yuan 8

Identification of Other People

geographic/natural/ethnic social class people education professional group: occupation role (at any time)

Role -teacher Role (students)

(myself) –professor -student

-wife -big sister

-daughter -younger person

-little sister: to older sister -responsible adult

-elder sister -girlfriend

-sister-in-law -tutor

-friend

* Each of these roles may have “sub roles,” too.

Yun-Pi Yuan 9

Identification of Self

groups you belong to education

Self occupation geographic role at any one time

Yun-Pi Yuan 10

V. Telephone conversation (1)

 Telephone openings

 basic structure of conversation: ab, ab, ab

 Problem 1: how can we get the conversation going? How do we get into the structure?

(Schegloff’s study)

 Basic structure of telephone openings: summons- answer sequences

Summons Answer

Question Answer

(raise topic) A structure of

Yun-Pi Yuan obligations and rights

11 between two people

V. Telephone conversation (2)

 Adjacency Pair (coordinated pair):

 Definition: Many acts require replies of specific kinds and put the hearer under a conversational obligation to provide them.

 Examples: summons-answer; Q-A; greetinggreeting; offer-acceptance/refusal; thanksacknowledgement; apology-acceptance (refusal)

 Why does the answerer always speak first instead of the caller (since he doesn’t know to whom he’s speaking and he’s not the one who wants to initiate a conversation)?

Yun-Pi Yuan 12

V. Telephone conversation (3)

 Viewing the ring as a nonlinguistic realization of a caller’s summoning act solves the problem.

 Phone ring = summons of caller  answer of answerer

 A case of an utterance realizing more than one act.

 Another general rule: “those who initiate conversations have the right to raise the topic, and answerer has the obligation to listen.”

 A conversational social relationship

Yun-Pi Yuan 13

V. Telephone conversation (4)

 Identification on telephone

 Problem 2: how to achieve mutual recognition?

“Preferred method of identification involves the minimum use of recognitional resources.”

“oversuppose and undertell”

 Two identification problems (on telephone):

Caller identifies Answerer

Answerer identifies Caller

TA T1 T2 T3 ring Hello? Tom? Yeah, Bill

*summons *answer+ voice *ID of other+

(question) voice clue to self

Yun-Pi Yuan 14

V. Telephone conversation (5)

e.g.1 Ring summons answerer T1: Hello? answer/question

(ID resource + oblige caller to ID) caller T2: Hi greeting (claim of ID; an answer to the Q) answer T3: Hi greeting (claim of ID + complete greeting) e.g.2 Ring summons answerer: 1Hello? answer/question

(provide ID resource caller: 2 Hello, Jenny. greeting/ claim of ID/oblige--resource

(pause) failure by A to recognize C

This is Paul. provide more resource answerer: 3 Oh, hello, Paul. greeting/claim of ID

Yun-Pi Yuan 15

V. Telephone conversation (6)

e.g.3 Answerer: T1 Hello?

Caller: T2 Connie?

Answerer: T3 Yeah, John.

e.g.4 Variation

A: T1 Hello?

C: T2 Connie?

A: T3 Oh, hi. How are you?

Yun-Pi Yuan 16

Language vs. Society

 There is a social structure to language.

 What is said and how it is said is determined socially.

 An utterance is a complex of actions.

Yun-Pi Yuan 17

VI. Compliments—giving compliments (I)

 Giving compliments:

 Status and age

 Sex (gender)

Women to women most frequent

Women to men

(descending frequency)

Men to women least frequent

Men to men

Yun-Pi Yuan 18

VI. Compliments—giving compliments (II)

 Syntactic patterns

Three major patterns

NP be/look (intensifier) ADJ “You look really nice.”

 ADJ includes: nice, good, beautiful, pretty, great, wonderful, lovely

I (intensifier) like/ love NP “I really like that skirt.”

 VERB includes: like, love. enjoy, admire, be impressed by

PRO be (intensifier) (a) ADJ NP “That’s really a nice coat.”

Formulaic Language: a very limited subset of English sentence structure and vocabulary is used to give compliments.

Yun-Pi Yuan 19

VI. Compliments—giving compliments (III)

 Topics

Appearance

 clothes, hair

Ability (skill)/performance

 a well-done job, a skillfully played game, a good meal

Personality/friendship

“That was kind.”

Possessions

“I live your new bike.”

Yun-Pi Yuan 20

VI. Compliments—responding (I)

 Responding to compliments

 What compliments do?

 Two types of action

Supportive action: an offer, congratulations, a gift

“That’s a good idea.” to be taken as TURE.

Assessment: saying something which is supposed

“That’s really a nice coat.”

 Three social norms (rules)

Accept supportive action

Accept truth of assessment

Avoid self-praise

Yun-Pi Yuan 21

VI. Compliments—responding (II)

 Some conventional, formulaic responses

 Thank you, 哪裡,哪裡

 Other types of solutions:

 accept by agreeing A: Your dress is very nice.

B: Yeah, this is my favorite dress .

 reject by disagreeing (indirect/implicit rejection)

A: You did a great job cleaning the house.

B: Well, I guess you haven’t seen the kid’s room.

other “in-between” responses

Scale down

(agree with reservations)

Transfer

Return to the speaker

Yun-Pi Yuan 22

Examples of Other in-between Responses

Scale Down:

A: She’s a real fox.

B: Yeah, she’s a pretty woman.

A: You brought

—like a ton of things.

B: Just a few little things.

A: This is a really good paper.

B: Yeah, there are still a few parts that need work, though.

Transfer:

A: That’s a nice sweater.

B: Do you like it? My mother brought it for me.

Return to the Speaker:

A: That’s a nice sweater.

B: Yours is new, too, isn’t it? That color really suits you.

Yun-Pi Yuan 23

Reasons for giving compliments

 If compliments are so hard to respond to why give them?

 Solidarity (another norm: Speaker should express solidarity with hearer, and raise the hearer’s status when possible.)

Encouragement

Expression of gratitude

 Compliment preceding and thus softening a criticism

Yun-Pi Yuan 24

Language and Gender

Different norms for the conversational styles of women and men:

Women: focus on “connection” (solidarity), so

“intimacy” is the key

Men: focus on “status” ( so “independence,” the key)

 Conclusion:

Women: “Rapport talk” (“trouble talk”)—recount their trouble, and expect sympathy, understanding affirmation, but not a solution.

Men: “Report talk” (“solution talk”)—exhibiting knowledge and skill, holding center stage thus storytelling, joking, or imparting information.

Cause asymmetrical situation, result in some arguments.

(You Just Don’t Understand by D. Tannen, 1986.)

Yun-Pi Yuan 25

Download