Can’t we all just get along? In 1950-1960s = strain Policy = provide opportunity to those who lack means for achieving legitimate success. Turmoil of 1960s criminologists become more skeptical Politicians and other interests groups lack will to make real changes Cloward and Ohlin story Many groups actively oppose providing opportunities Law reflect shared belief about what is wrong Law resolves conflicts and maintains order The state is “neutral” Bias is temporary and unintentional Consensus Law is an end process in a conflict over values Bias is built into the law (winners punish losers) The state (CJS) responds to the needs of those in power (not neutral) Conflict Central Themes Emphasis on “inequality” and “power” Crime as “political” concept CJS serves interests of powerful Solution to crime is more equitable society EXPLANATION than crime OF LAW and CJ SYSTEM rather Conflict Theory Marxist/Radical Theory Left Realism/Peacemaking Feminist Criminology/Gender and Crime George Multiple groups in society with varying levels of power ▪ Political interest groups ▪ Social movements ▪ Broad segments of society ▪ Vold Group Conflict Political parties Those who win conflict get control over the law and coercive power of the state The Interest groups’ influence on law-making Research on consensus over laws The formulation of law operation of the CJS Research on “extra-legal” variables “Legal” = prior record, offense seriousness “extra” = RACE, CLASS, GENDER Demeanor? After controlling for legal factors, race-CJS studies are all over the board Especially if one controls for demeanor (Reiss, 1966 observed police) Research issues The meaning of prior record and demeanor How to isolate and study bias Different stages of the legal system Racial profiling ▪ ▪ ▪ Difficult to determine Minorities more likely to live in high-crime areas Alfred Blumstein ▪ Racial disparity in incarceration due largely to disparities in arrest rates ▪ Blacks at a disadvantage in the criminal justice system, especially for less serious crimes Race Victim x Race interactions Race and Drug Prosecutions Long history of connecting drugs to “dangerous” populations and Capital Punishment Chinese Opium Mexicans Marijuana African Americans Crack Cocaine e “Crack Multiplier” Enforcement patterns for drug offenses Thorston Cultural conflict theory Gist: violate laws of the majority simply by following the norms of one’s own reference group George Sellin (1938) Vold (1958) Group conflict theory (crime that results from conflict) Labor strife, protest-related crime Communist Manifesto Means of production determine the structure of society Capitalism: • • Owners of the means of production (capitalists) Workers = proletariat, lumpen proletariat The laboring class produces goods that exceed the value of their wages (profit) The owners invest the profit to reduce the workforce (technology) The workers will no longer be able to afford the goods produced by the owners ▪ Early attempt to tie Marx and Crime Together ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Altruism as a defining characteristic of society and human nature Egoism characterizes capitalist society Capitalism builds social irresponsibility and creates a climate of crime Solution: socialism (which allows altruism to flourish) Instrumental Hard line position Crime and the creation and enforcement of law the direct result of capitalism Structural Marxist Position Marxist Position Softer Position Governments are somewhat autonomous Over time, the direction of the law (creation and enforcement) will lean towards the capitalists Richard Quinney (1980) All Conflict is organized around capitalist versus the poor Either you are an oppressed lackey or a capitalist Anyone who does not realize this (or identifies with capitalism) has false class consciousness The real power and authority is exclusive to the ruling class Primary goal of capitalists? Maintain Power! To do this, must trample rights of others But, also must portray an egalitarian society Accomplished by controlling media, academics Capitalists control the definition of crime Laws protect the capitalists (property, $) Laws ignore crimes of the capitalists (profiteering) CJS is the tool of the capitalists; used to oppress (not protect) the working population Crimes of the rich treated with kid gloves Property crimes strictly enforced “Street crimes” are enforced only in poor neighborhoods Incarceration to control surplus labor Crimes Economic Domination Crimes of the Government Crimes of Control Social Injuries (should be crimes) Crimes of the Capitalists (must control) of the Lower Class “Rebellion” Crimes of “Accommodation” The policy implication of Marxist Criminology is clear. Dismantle the capitalist structure in favor of a socialist structure. An “underdog theory” with little basis in fact Are “socialist societies” any different? Other capitalist countries have low crime rates Most crime is poor against poor—Marxists ignore the plight of the poor. ▪The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison ▪ Key point = harmful acts of the rich are often ignored (unneccesary surgery, environmental harm, etc.) White collar crime less serious and less likely to be enforced ▪ ▪ Pollution, Hazardous work conditions, Unsafe products, Insider trading, Embezzlement, Fraud Even wealthy people who engage in street crime are less likely to be formally charged and better able to avoid sanctioning Only some forms of capitalism encourage crime ▪ ▪ Market economy (compassionate capitalism) ▪ ▪ Japan (Top down) Scandinavian (Bottom up) Market society (high levels of inequality and poverty) Solution: softer, gentler capitalist society Mechanisms that link market societies to high rates of violence ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Destroys livelihoods Tendency toward extremes of inequality Weakens public support Erodes informal social support Promotes a culture of competition and consumption Deregulates the technology of violence Weakens alternative political values and institutions Feminist Criminology Relationships between gender, crime, and the criminal justice system Gender Ratio and Generalizability ▪ Emphasizes equal opportunity and importance of sex-role socializations Focus on “patriarchy”—male dominance exerted over females through financial and physical power ▪ Types ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Liberal feminism Socialist feminism Radical feminism Good example of conflict theory in action Feminists responsible for shaping the law and law enforcement Marital Rape Intimate Partner Violence Feminists also largely responsible for the recent focus on gender/crime issues ▪ Gender ratio (Gender Gap) ▪ Males account for the vast majority of delinquent and criminal offending ▪ ▪ UCR, NCVS, self-report Gender gap shrinking? Liberation hypothesis (Not supported by research) WHY is gender ratio so large? Can traditional theories explain? (Social bond, delinquent peers, etc.) Masculinity & sex roles Generaliziblity Can “Male” theories explain female offending? issue Many theories blatantly sexist (See, Cohen) Many theories simply ignore females Mainstream theories do explain male and female offending similarly Could we do better explaining female criminality? Salience of sexual/physical abuse among delinquent girls ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Street women Harmed-and-harming women Battered women Drug-connected women Other women ▪ Research findings ▪ When gender effects are found, females are treated more leniently Chivalry Hypothesis Paternalism Hypothesis Seriousness of offense differs in ways that most research doesn’t count Sort-of-legal-factors (“familied”)