Authority, Power & Politics Dr. Len Elovitz Chapters 6 &12 in Hoy & Miskel POWER The ability to influence thought and behavior The ability for A to get B to do what B would normally not do Authority Often used interchangeably with power. I believe authority needs to be granted by a third party In this context think of the most powerful individual you know in an organization. What was the source of his/her power? What assumptions did he/she have about subordinates? What strategies did/he or she employ? What were the consequences of his/her actions? Sources of Power – French & Raven Reward Power – controlling rewards will induce others to comply Coercive Power – potential of punishment Expert Power – Having knowledge that others want for themselves compels them to comply Legitimate Power – Holding a position of authority in the organization Referent Power – Personal Charisma Sources of Authority - Sergiovanni Bureaucratic Personal Technical-rational Professional Moral Bureaucratic - Source Hierarchy Rules And Regulations Mandates Role Expectation Teachers Are Expected To Comply Or Face The Consequences Bureaucratic - Assumptions Teachers Are Subordinates Teachers Can’t Be Trusted Supervisors Are Trustworthy Supervisors’ And Teachers’ Goals Differ Supervisors Must Be Watchful Supervisors Know More Than Teachers External Accountability Works Best Bureaucratic - Strategies Expect and Inspect Hold teachers to predetermined standards Directly supervise and closely monitor Determine teacher needs and In-service them Find out how to motivate teacher and get them to change Bureaucratic - Consequences With proper monitoring, teachers respond as technicians in executing predetermined scripts Teachers’ performance is narrowed Personal - Source Motivation technology Interpersonal skills Human relations leadership Teachers will want to comply because of the congenial climate provided and to reap rewards offered in exchange. Personal - Assumptions Supervisors’ And Teachers’ Goals Differ but can be bartered so each gets what they want Meet teachers’ needs & the work gets done Congenial climate makes teachers content, easier to work with & more apt to cooperate Supervisors must be expert at handling people to increase compliance & performance Personal - Strategies Develop a congenial school climate Expect and reward What gets rewarded gets done Personal - Consequences Teachers respond as required when rewards are available but not otherwise. Performance is narrowed Technical Rationality - Source Evidence by logic and scientific research Teachers comply in light of what is considered to be the truth Technical Rationality - Assumptions Supervision & teaching are applied sciences Knowledge & research is privileged Scientific knowledge supercedes practice Teachers are skilled technicians Values, preferences & beliefs don’t count - facts & objective evidence do Technical Rationality - Strategies Use research to identify the best practice Standardize the work of teachers In-service teachers in the best practice Monitor to insure compliance Technical Rationality - Consequences With proper monitoring, teachers respond as technicians in executing predetermined scripts. Performance is narrowed Professional - Source Informed knowledge of craft Personal expertise Teacher responds on the basis of professional values, accepted tenets of practice, and internalized expertness Professional - Assumptions No one best way exists Scientific knowledge is to inform not to prescribe practice Acceptance of authority comes from within the teacher Supervisor is respected for knowledge, training & experience Professional - Strategies Promote a dialogue among teachers to determine accepted practices Provide teachers with as much discretion as they want or need Require teachers to hold each other accountable Make available assistance, support & professional development opportunities Professional - Consequences Teachers respond to professional norms and thus little monitoring is required. Performance is expansive. Moral - Source Full obligation and duties derived from widely shared community values, ideas and ideals Teachers respond to shared commitments and felt interdependence Moral - Assumptions Schools are professional learning communities Schools are defined by their shared values, beliefs & commitments What is right and good is as important as what works & is effective Collegiality is a professional virtue Moral - Strategies Promote collegiality Rely on teachers to respond to their own sense of duties and obligations Rely on teachers informal norm system to enforce professional and community values Moral - Consequences Teachers respond to community values for moral reasons Performance is expansive and sustained. Sergiovanni Supervision I Bureaucratic Personal Technical-rational Supervision II Professional Moral Politics Individuals form coalitions in order to influence decision making and procedures Examples Gender Age Department Ethnic group Internal interests External interests External Coalitions Try to bring their own interests and power to bear in the activities and decision making practices Related Union PTA Band Parents Unrelated Taxpayers groups Professional Organizations Political (capital P) Mitzberg (1983) Dominated External Coalition Powerful coalition that dominates not only internal coalitions but the school and district leadership as well Divided External Coalition One or more groups with conflicting opinions such as conservative v progressive. Can politicize the BOE Passive External Coalition The number of outside groups increase to the point where their power becomes defuse and limited Apathy takes over Power Game Hirshman (1970) - Participants have 3 options Leave- find another place – exit Stay and play : try to change the system – voice Stay and contribute as expected- loyalty Those who leave cease to be influencers, loyals do not participate as active influencers, those who speak out become players in the power game Is this an oversimplification? Are there other roles that you can think of in the power game? The destroyer – disloyal The instigator – signifier The nut – who knows Mitzberg again “internal politics is typically clandestine and illegitimate because it is designed to benefit the individual or group, usually at the expense of the organization; therefore, the most common consequences of politics are divisiveness and conflict.” Do you agree? Political Tactics Ingratiating – Gain favors by doing favors Networking – Gain influence by courting individuals Information Management – Manipulate information to one’s advantage Impression Management – Create a positive image by appearence Coalition Building – Band together with others to achieve mutual goals Scapegoating – Shift the blame to others for bad outcomes (circle of blame) Increasing Indispensability – Make oneself indispensable to the organization LEADERSHIP Leadership Defined “Leadership is a process of social influence in which one person is able to enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task.” Martin Chemers Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 38 Power and Leadership Leadership is a group function: it occurs only when 2 or more people interact. Leaders intentionally seek to influence the behavior of others. Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 39 Are leadership and administration synonymous? Administrators are concerned with efficiency and stability. Leaders are concerned with change and gaining consensus on what needs to be done Leadership and Management Are these terms are mutually exclusive? One manages things, not people, and one leads people, not things. We manage finances, inventories and programs, but we lead people. Warren Bennis and Burt Nanus have said that “managers are people who do things right and leaders are people who do the right thing.” ELCC Standard 2 vs. 3 Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 41 Leadership and Management (continued) Nevertheless, school leaders must be both managers and leaders. Bureaucracies, using the factory model, were and still are typically managed, not led. Many schools were and still are managed, not led. US schools are generally in need of better leadership. Leaders empower followers and do not play Theory X soft games. Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 42 Adaptive Leadership Leaders need to deal with two types of circumstances: Technical problems—clear cut. The busses are late Teacher quits Adaptive problems—complex issues. Curriculum change Restructuring of grade levels Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 43 Leadership as a Relationship With Followers Leaders (not authority figures) relate to followers in ways that: Motivate them to unite in a shared vision. Arouse their personal commitment to the vision. Organize the working environment to make the envisioned goals central in the organization. Facilitate the work of followers to transform the vision into reality. Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 44 Leadership as a Relationship With Followers (continued) How leaders do these things is defined in terms of the character and quality of the relationship between leaders and followers. Leaders who accept Theory X assumptions about followers are traditional “bosses”. e.g. Machiavelli’s The Prince. e.g. Max Weber’s “bureaucracy”. Leaders who accept Theory Y assumptions about followers see leadership as collaborating with others to reach organizational goals, thus creating a growth enhancing environment. Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 45 Transforming Leadership James MacGregor Burns published Leadership in 1978. This work has influenced most scholars of leadership ever since. Burns distinguished: Transactional leadership results in quid pro quo transactions between leaders and followers. Transformational leadership seeks to satisfy higher order needs of followers and engages them fully, elevating them into leaders. Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 46 Moral Leadership The concept of moral leadership contains three related ideas: There is a genuine sharing of mutual needs, aspirations, and values. Followers have the latitude in responding to the initiatives of leaders, and that they have the ability to make informed choices. They voluntarily grant power to the leaders. Leaders take responsibility for delivering on commitments and representations made to followers. Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 47 A Progression A progression inherent in transforming leadership: At the lowest level, is the exercise of power by leaders, which is not leadership at all. Transactional leadership is entry-level leadership where leader bargain with followers. In transforming (or transformational) leadership followers engage in a common cause with leaders. At the highest level, moral leadership involves shared vision, a sense of mutual purpose, and shared values woven into daily life to inspire new and higher levels of commitment and involvement. Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 48 A Process of Growth and Development Transformational and moral leadership increasingly draw on higher levels of motivation of followers, which leads to not only compliance, but also of personal commitment to the goals of the organization. In Dan Lortie’s famous Schoolteacher research, he concludes that teachers are motivated by feeling successful and effective in their teaching. Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 49 Implications for leaders Foster a culture that facilitates teaching and enhances the likelihood that one will be successful at it. Energize and applaud the efforts of teachers Reward and support success in teaching Celebrate teaching as the central value of the school Leadership and Vision One of the pivotal tasks of leadership is to engage constantly in a dynamic process of stating a vision of things to come, revising in light of new ideas and restating the vision of “where we are and where we are going”. Examples: Winston Churchill, Martin Luther King, Abraham Lincoln. Reflective practice in visioning is rethinking assumptions, beliefs, and values and either reaffirming or revising them. As opposed to Reflexive – Do it as we always do it Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 51 Whose Vision Is It, Anyway? Leaders have something important to say about the vision and should have a clearly thought-out vision of the future. Yet, leaders should avoid imposing their own prepared statements for ratification. Leaders must demonstrate convincingly their interest in collegiality and shared leadership to shift the norms of the school’s culture from traditional to collaborative. Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 52 Manipulation and Empowerment Critical theory is a form of social criticism that holds that institutionalized oppression of groups of people in society is often supported by those oppressed as they are led to believe that the system operates in their best interest. (Stockholm syndrome?) Critical theorists have applied their theories to schools, principals, and teachers. Some schools mandate compliance to school goals or that teachers embrace the organizational culture. Where empowerment occurs however: Teachers participate actively in processes of leadership. They acquire greater personal ownership and commitment to values that shape the vision. They are stimulated to increase their awareness of the larger mission of the school and the connection of their own daily work to the vision and mission. Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 53 Sustainable Leadership Michael Fullan: Sustainable leadership is “the capacity of a system to engage in the complexities of continuous improvement consistent with deep values of human purpose.” Hargreaves and Fink: “Sustainable educational leadership and improvement preserves and develops deep learning for all that spreads and lasts, in ways that do no harm to and indeed create positive benefit for others around us, now and in the future.” Are Leaders Born? Aristotle thought so – What do you think? What are the traits of successful leaders? Early Trait Research – 1948 Stogdill reviewed 124 trait studies of the following factors associated with leadership Capacity- intelligence, alertness, verbal facility originality, judgment Achievement- scholarship, knowledge, Responsibility – dependability, initiative, persistence, aggressiveness, self-confidence, desire to excel Participation – activity, sociability, cooperation, adaptability, humor Status – socioeconomic position, popularity Findings The following traits consistently differentiated leaders from non-leaders: Above average intelligence Dependability Participation Status The rest was confusing and uneven leading him to conclude that there is not a set combination of traits that result in an individual becoming a leader More recent research Focus switched to what traits were associated with a successful leader. Personality traits: self-confidence, stress tolerance, emotional maturity, integrity, extroversion Motivation: interpersonal needs, achievement orientation, power needs, expectations, self-efficacy Skills: technical, interpersonal, conceptual Situational leadership Strong reaction against the concept of born leaders lead researchers to study the characteristics of the leadership setting. Theory - Leaders are made by the situation Factors studied – subordinates, organization characteristics, internal environment, external environment Peter Principle Current thinking To restrict thinking to one of the following: Leaders are Born Leaders are Made Leadership is Determined by the situation is counterproductive Servant Leadership – Robert Greenleaf Servant-leaders achieve results for their organizations by giving priority attention to the needs of their colleagues and those they serve. Servant-leaders are often seen as humble stewards of their organization's resources (human, financial and physical). Wikipedia Aspects of being a servant leader In order to be a servant leader, one needs the following qualities: listening, empathy, healing, awareness, persuasion, conceptualization, foresight, stewardship, growth and building community. Acquiring these qualities tend to give a person authority versus power. From Greenleaf’s Essay - 1970 “The servant-leader is servant first… It begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve, to serve first. Then conscious choice brings one to aspire to lead. That person is sharply different from one who is leader first, perhaps because of the need to assuage an unusual power drive or to acquire material possessions…The leader-first and the servant-first are two extreme types. Between them there are shadings and blends that are part of the infinite variety of human nature. The difference manifests itself in the care taken by the servant-first to make sure that other people’s highest priority needs are being served. The best test, and difficult to administer, is: Do those served grow as persons? Do they, while being served, become healthier, wiser, freer, more autonomous, more likely themselves to become servants? And, what is the effect on the least privileged in society? Will they benefit or at least not be further deprived?”