Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America B. Ehrenreich “Introduction: Getting Ready” Introduction -- Lunch The setting (ethos) Lewis Lapham (Harper’s) Salmon & field greens The Problem: Clinton’s welfare to work reform Will 4 million women make in on minimum wage? “You.” – the muckraker Introduction – Why Ehrenreich Ehrenreich’s family context Sister, husband, father Middle class duty… Refuses “proletarianizing” 1970s (empathizes with parents) “Sitting at a desk all day was not only a privilege but a duty” (italics mine). Introduction – Why prove what we know to be true? The odds (logos/ethos) National Coalition for the Homeless ($8.89) Economic Policy Institute (97:1) “I began to feel like the elderly man I once knew who used a calculator to balance his checkbook and then went back and checked the results by redoing each sum by hand” (3) Introduction – The Scientist Ethos/Pathos “plunge into the everyday chaos of nature” Questions – getting your hands dirty Hidden economies (30%of workforce makes less that $8/hour) Tricks Unexpected psychological, financial and emotional costs Rules (pg.4) Don’t fall back on skills derived from education or work experience Take highest paying job and do best to keep it Find cheapest accommodations (“hazy . . .”prone to deterioration time” Bending & Breaking Rules (4) Bonjour and Guten Tag Fails to take highest paying job Break down and rant Problems – LIES (5) “Stripped-down version” Divorced homemaker Omit PhD – (over qualified) True alma mater, 3 years Friends as references Boundaries (pg. 5-6) Always have a car No Homelessness End project No hunger Paid for outside of wage experiment Backup ATM Comes home to “real “ life Laptop – 2 hours each night Privileges Always a visitor Race Native English speaker Car Childless Health De facto ways she employs education, etc. Additionally . . . (7-8) No performance of stereotypical poor Usual clothes Usual hair and makeup Talked about real relationships/family Did modify vocabulary . . . No cursing Passing to the “educated” (8) No one called her out as “above” her newfound class Low-wage workers are as heterogeneous as any class Routine Work (not for $) – work for writing Names changed “Coming out” – anticlimactic “does this mean you’re not going to be back on the evening shift next week?” Self-Deception No pretending to wait tables ALL jobs absorbed energy + intellect Tried to make each situation work Her faltering is faltering in BEST case scenario with every advantage Ehrenreich on writing … “[T]he low wage way of life…was close enough… to make me treasure the gloriously autonomous, if not always well-paid, writing life” (2). “I could not…fall back on any skills derived from my education or usual work–not that there were a lot of want ads for essayists anyway” (4). Ehrenreich on writing … “When…an exceptionally chatty interviewer asked about hobbies, I said ‘writing’ and she seemed to find nothing strange about this” (5). “This is not a story of some deathdefying ‘undercover’ adventure …Americans do it every day, and with a lot less fanfare and dithering” (7). Ehrenreich on writing … “[My second husband] proudly told his uncle, who was a valet parker at the time, that I was a writer. The uncle’s response: ‘Who isn’t?’ Everyone literate ‘writes,’ and some of the low-wage workers I have known or met throughout this project write journals and poems—even, in one case, a lengthy science fiction novel” (9).